Craig Lamson Posted August 2, 2008 Share Posted August 2, 2008 This and several other photos show WTC to have been a light gray beforeit became covered with soot. I should not have called it "white". Jack Amazing! Not only are the very basics of photography beyond you, now we you have proven you can't see. Properly exposed photos which do not exhibit excess contrast show a full sunlit section of the building 6 exterior to be very dark gray or black. Your admission of error will be accepted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted August 2, 2008 Share Posted August 2, 2008 Contrast added to show soot in Biggert photo. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 2, 2008 Share Posted August 2, 2008 (edited) Contrast added to show soot in Biggert photo.Jack All your little ps work has shown is that the only "soot" that exists is between a certain persons ears.... BTW how do you explain that the "soot" moves in the space of just a few seconds between the different Biggert frames? Oh yes, its because its not "soot" after all. Edited August 2, 2008 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted August 2, 2008 Share Posted August 2, 2008 I have just found a ten-part video which SOLVES most everything. I do not know who produced it, but it has some fantastic stuff. It is in ten parts...1-9 and an epilogue. I have already watched two segments and am going to watch all ten. Lots of new stuff already...INCLUDING A MISSILE THAT LOOKS LIKE AN AIRLINER... ...A SEQUENCE SHOWING HOW THE "ROADRUNNER" CUTOUTS WERE MADE...and A SEQUENCE PROVING THAT THE FOX "HELICOPTER SHOT" IS FAKED AND SHOWING HOW IT WAS DONE...and much more. As far as I know, this is VERY NEW. Part 1 at... http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/108.html Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 2, 2008 Share Posted August 2, 2008 I have just found a ten-part video which SOLVES most everything.I do not know who produced it, but it has some fantastic stuff. It is in ten parts...1-9 and an epilogue. I have already watched two segments and am going to watch all ten. Lots of new stuff already...INCLUDING A MISSILE THAT LOOKS LIKE AN AIRLINER... ...A SEQUENCE SHOWING HOW THE "ROADRUNNER" CUTOUTS WERE MADE...and A SEQUENCE PROVING THAT THE FOX "HELICOPTER SHOT" IS FAKED AND SHOWING HOW IT WAS DONE...and much more. As far as I know, this is VERY NEW. Part 1 at... http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/108.html Jack What is the old saying...A fool and his money... or....Wanna buy a bridge.... Either fits here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 (edited) Someone went to lotsa trouble to make a composite of video frames to show "Building 6". Actually that is BUILDING 5. Jack Edited August 3, 2008 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 I have just found a ten-part video which SOLVES most everything.I do not know who produced it, but it has some fantastic stuff. It is in ten parts...1-9 and an epilogue. I have already watched two segments and am going to watch all ten. Lots of new stuff already...INCLUDING A MISSILE THAT LOOKS LIKE AN AIRLINER... ...A SEQUENCE SHOWING HOW THE "ROADRUNNER" CUTOUTS WERE MADE...and A SEQUENCE PROVING THAT THE FOX "HELICOPTER SHOT" IS FAKED AND SHOWING HOW IT WAS DONE...and much more. As far as I know, this is VERY NEW. Part 1 at... http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/108.html Jack What is the old saying...A fool and his money... or....Wanna buy a bridge.... Either fits here. The ten part video (September Clues) is FREE. And it does feature a movable bridge. Lamson obviously has not viewed it. Takes about an hour. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 Specially for those dudes that said WTC6 WAS A BLACK BUILDING. This photo show that the true color IN SUNLIGHT was light gray, almost white. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 I have just found a ten-part video which SOLVES most everything.I do not know who produced it, but it has some fantastic stuff. It is in ten parts...1-9 and an epilogue. I have already watched two segments and am going to watch all ten. Lots of new stuff already...INCLUDING A MISSILE THAT LOOKS LIKE AN AIRLINER... ...A SEQUENCE SHOWING HOW THE "ROADRUNNER" CUTOUTS WERE MADE...and A SEQUENCE PROVING THAT THE FOX "HELICOPTER SHOT" IS FAKED AND SHOWING HOW IT WAS DONE...and much more. As far as I know, this is VERY NEW. Part 1 at... http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/108.html Jack What is the old saying...A fool and his money... or....Wanna buy a bridge.... Either fits here. The ten part video (September Clues) is FREE. And it does feature a movable bridge. Lamson obviously has not viewed it. Takes about an hour. Jack Mr. Lamson is an authority of vantage points and the images therefrom. We solicit his expert opinion on these two images...ONE FROM A VERY HIGH VANTAGE POINT, SHOWING ALL THE WAY TO THE NEW JERSEY HORIZON, and the other FROM A VERY LOW VANTAGE POINT, showing ONLY SKY....yet the two videos are perfectly synchronized and matched, apparently shot from the same location. How is this possible, Mr. Light? Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 (edited) Jack, Are you satisfied that Keith is incorrect regarding his assertion that a 767 would break apart at speeds greater than 220 mph at low altitudes, and that the engines would stall? Edited August 3, 2008 by Evan Burton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 Now here is an odd pair of photos...a fireman who took them saw a man in an upper floor of Building 6 and took his picture. The building has already exploded and burned. Who was the man and why was he there? Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 Jack,Are you satisfied that Keith is incorrect regarding his assertion that a 767 would break apart at speeds greater than 220 mph at low altitudes, and that the engines would stall? I believe Mr. Keith, who was an ENGINEER for Boeing. I do not believe UNTRUTHERS. I am not an engineer. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 So you do not believe the pilots who fly the aircraft? You do not believe Qantas documentation specifying limits? What evidence will convince you that Keith is wrong? Jack,Are you satisfied that Keith is incorrect regarding his assertion that a 767 would break apart at speeds greater than 220 mph at low altitudes, and that the engines would stall? I believe Mr. Keith, who was an ENGINEER for Boeing. I do not believe UNTRUTHERS. I am not an engineer. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 How about this, from: http://www.757.org.uk/limits/lim1.html From Sea Level to 8,000ft restrict airspeed to 313 kts for Bird Impact Protection. Above 8,000ft, observe Vmo / Mmo pointer and overspeed warning. 313 knots = 360 mph This is for the 757, but the speeds are not dissimilar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 I have just found a ten-part video which SOLVES most everything.I do not know who produced it, but it has some fantastic stuff. It is in ten parts...1-9 and an epilogue. I have already watched two segments and am going to watch all ten. Lots of new stuff already...INCLUDING A MISSILE THAT LOOKS LIKE AN AIRLINER... ...A SEQUENCE SHOWING HOW THE "ROADRUNNER" CUTOUTS WERE MADE...and A SEQUENCE PROVING THAT THE FOX "HELICOPTER SHOT" IS FAKED AND SHOWING HOW IT WAS DONE...and much more. As far as I know, this is VERY NEW. Part 1 at... http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/108.html Jack What is the old saying...A fool and his money... or....Wanna buy a bridge.... Either fits here. The ten part video (September Clues) is FREE. And it does feature a movable bridge. Lamson obviously has not viewed it. Takes about an hour. Jack Obvioulsy jack can't understand, along with all things photographic, sarcasm.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now