David Yarnell Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 Why did nobody react to the recently unearthed microfilm of New York Journal American columnist Jack O'Brian ? He said on November 22, 1965, the first day he took over the late Kilgallen's "Voice of Broadway," that Florence Pritchett Smith had known she was dying and planned her own funeral. She even had chosen pallbearers. What part of this is offensive ? Unless you think the Hearst Corporation was part of the conspiracy, then you have no reason to doubt what O'Brian said. Would somebody prefer that I scan the Xerox to a Microsoft Word attachment and E-mail it to you ? That costs money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Simkin Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 Why did nobody react to the recently unearthed microfilm of New York Journal American columnist Jack O'Brian ? He said on November 22, 1965, the first day he took over the late Kilgallen's "Voice of Broadway," that Florence Pritchett Smith had known she was dying and planned her own funeral. She even had chosen pallbearers. What part of this is offensive ? Unless you think the Hearst Corporation was part of the conspiracy, then you have no reason to doubt what O'Brian said. Would somebody prefer that I scan the Xerox to a Microsoft Word attachment and E-mail it to you ? That costs money. I am sorry I was unable to reply to this posting yesterday as I was working to tight deadlines. I have done so now and have replied to the original question here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=2358 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now