Tim Gratz Posted May 20, 2005 Share Posted May 20, 2005 As we all know, Sen. Gary Hart served with Sen. Richard Schweiker on a subcommittee of the Church Committee investigating the Kennedy assassination, and he retained an interest in it. My question is: Was Hart's presidential campaign sabotaged by the conspirators? Do you know the theory? And for extra credit, what actor from "Miami Vice" played a role (unwitting, I am sure) in the gambit (if in fact it was one). And the answer is NOT the G-Man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted May 20, 2005 Share Posted May 20, 2005 As we all know, Sen. Gary Hart served with Sen. Richard Schweiker on a subcommittee of the Church Committee investigating the Kennedy assassination, and he retained an interest in it.My question is: Was Hart's presidential campaign sabotaged by the conspirators? Do you know the theory? And for extra credit, what actor from "Miami Vice" played a role (unwitting, I am sure) in the gambit (if in fact it was one). And the answer is NOT the G-Man! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Tim as I remember, it was the Miami Herald that claimed he was having an affair with Donna Rice, based on a few photo's of the couple together. wether this had anything to do with JFK or not must be pure conjecture.( Unless you know differently) I pity anyone who seeks Democratic nomination in the U S, my God dont the knives come out..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Gratz Posted May 20, 2005 Author Share Posted May 20, 2005 Stephen, I shall try to find the article. The theory, and I suspect there may be no evidence to support it (but what difference does THAT make) is that Donna Rice was "planted" on Hart. Course he took the "bait" but then again if she was a plant the planters knew his weakness! The theory is that it was done to prevent him from reopening the assassination inquiry as president. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted May 20, 2005 Share Posted May 20, 2005 Tim .. Is it usually sexual scandals that "DO" for the Democrats, strange, in the U K its usually the Tories that get caught with their pants down, & Labour with their hand in the till. Look foward to further revelations on this topic... Steve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Gratz Posted May 20, 2005 Author Share Posted May 20, 2005 Funny role reversals there!! I could ask which would more tempt you but . . . Didn't Lyndon do both? But he did NOT shoot Jack! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted May 20, 2005 Share Posted May 20, 2005 I could ask which would more tempt you but . . . Tim.. As a life long socialist, and 25 years Married, I am of course above reproach,on either subject.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Gratz Posted May 21, 2005 Author Share Posted May 21, 2005 Cheat on your wife . . . get caught . . . Go to divorce court . . . heavy legal fees followed by great loss of property. Take graft . . . get caught . . . Hire criminal lawyer (even more expensive than divorce lawyers!) Go to jail (then she'll also divorce you) Even greater loss of property! Either way, you lose, the attorneys win big-time! So, even morality and legality aside--go straight, Stephen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now