Brendan Slattery

Your a hate monger.

That's because your boss is an excellent teacher.

P.S. You are = you're

John I KNEW you'd uncover this! Way over here in the US of Amerika....just what we needed, an Irish lad to come to DC and get this sort of thing out. McKinney rocks. She just had better be careful and make sure her personal security is on high alert. People like her are exactly who these bastards kill. Let's not ever forget that.

We need every one in the government to know NOW that if McKinny should suffer a heart attack, a fatal gunshot, a drowning, a one car crash, extremely fast acting cancer, a plane crash, MANY of us will be most suspious. Remember JFK, MLK, RFK, (Ted who he lived ), JFK jr and all the victims of 9-11, Iraq and the other wars begun by this fraudlunt administration. We need articles of impeachment immediately. Before these evil lunatics begin WW 3- (already underway).

Isreal has no right to this land. They are in disobediance to God. We need to ceace supporting these evil murderous empires: Isreal and the US- it is total fascism now folks.

(Has been as long as I remember!!)

Dawn

What a surprise. Dawn adds naked anti-Semitism to her ugly resume. Do Iran, Syria, Hamas and Hezbollah even exist in her bizarre world? Nah. It's all about the evil Joooooos. So much simpler that way. But why bother arguing with a crazy person?

We need every one in the government to know NOW that if McKinny should suffer a heart attack, a fatal gunshot, a drowning, a one car crash, extremely fast acting cancer, a plane crash, MANY of us will be most suspious.

Some of us will be relieved.

Good news! John's race-hustling, conspiratorial-minded, Jew-hating disgrace of a boss is losing in the polls! We're almost rid of her! Adios, bi-yotch.

John theorized that the six wireless devices "could" be positioned to transmit conversations in the plaza to the nearby federal offices.

LOL!

Lordy, the conceit and self-importance expressed in this forum is beyond belief. God help the Fed whose job it is to "eavesdrop" on Jack and friends. But you're too smart for them Jack! You've seen through their diabolical, eeeevvvil scheme! Good for you.

P.S. Black socks in public? Are you a retiree in Miami Beach? You might want to rethink that.

...so much crap in that from Hofstadter...I suggest he and you read 'The Emperor's New Clothes'. Of course some people are clinically paranoid, but most put in that 'catagory' see behind the curtain of Oz or the fact the Empire has no clothes, but this upsets the drugged and delusional zombie, yes-men and women, and frightened followers, etc. I'd posit that those falsly labeled 'paranoids' are those who have changed societies for the better most of the time by first seeing the problems and then acting upon them. Better to name them independant thinkers who only seem 'paranoid' by those who refuse to question orthodoxy fed to them by the ruling elites.

I've always admired him for admitting that he destroyed (non-critical) evidence. He knew the buffs would have a field day, but he fessed up anyway.

a felony being a felony, you would!

Dense David strikes again. I said I admired the confession, not the act. Moron.

I've always admired him for admitting that he destroyed (non-critical) evidence. He knew the buffs would have a field day, but he fessed up anyway.

Great guy. His wife was Reed Irvine's secretary at AIM.

'Brendan Slattery' dronned on:

Boy, ain't that the truth. These guys really need to get their story straight. The JFK forum isn't about solving a murder. It's about making a political statement. Have you noticed that 99% of the mouth-breathers here are diehard leftists? Coincidence? If there's a conservative CT'er here, I've yet to bump into him or her. Trolls like Chuck are simply full of hate, and he's rationalized that hate by adopting a conspiracy theory that sees the people he hates as the sponsors of Kennedy's demise. All one has to do is ask “how could Lee Harvey Oswald have shot the President with that lousy rifle?” and the McChimpBushHitlerHalliburton crowd is hooked. Only a minuscule number of people know anything about a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle, which was quite a serviceable weapon. Hatred for the US is their template. They just can't deal with the fact that a pathetic little leftist (i.e. one of their own) committed the crime of the century, so they twist the facts to achieve a certain desirable outcome. As for the innocent people trampled and defamed in the process? Well, they're just plum out of luck.

***************

Slattery still seeing a "commie" under every mattress, spider hole?

Brandon, you'd do better trying to explain why Ronnie Raygun left Beirut after the Marine massacre? Was it CasperW or Ronnie running the country...?

Hold onto to Von Pein he needs every military retiree he can find, how is Texas these day's, Ted?

(sorry BillK)

The only thing under your mattress is a copy of Playgirl. Please don't drink and post.

"I cannot forget the moment when the reporter tells him on camera he has been charged with the murder of JFK. He is genuinely shocked. This is not acting. For some reason he was convinced that he was not going to be charged with this crime. Why?"

That moment is indelibly printed into my memory. He is taken aback. He has to pause. It was a genuine and honest human reaction to being completely "startled"- even to the point of it being a somewhat physical reaction to the sudden shock and surprise.

Gee. You're easily impressed. He was surprised that he'd been charged? Big deal.

"But his reaction was entirely consistent with that of an innocent person!"

Horsexxxx. He was a cocky little xxxx. "A policeman hit me." Um, why was that, Lee? Could it be that you pulled a gun and tried to kill him? I guess he innocently left that qualifier out.

Yes, Virginia, the bubble-top had been used on sunny days before. The sound of a bullet shattering plastic probably would have prompted Greer and his buddies to act sooner than they did. But we'll never know.

"Jack White's analysis is breath-taking in its simplicity"

You got that right!

I can only imagine that your Mr. Crawley doesn't get out much.

I apologize for the poor quality of this image but, as any photo expert might suggest, I'm no photo expert.

But I do believe it's interesting to check out the facial expressions that LHO exhibited while in custody.

He ranges from being pissed off to slightly amused to seemingly full of hidden knowledge.

He does NOT look like a guy who believes he's in big trouble. He's defiant.

He also does NOT look like someone who has ZERO knowledge of the shooting. He definitely knows something and he's not afraid to let the world see this in his expression.

I cannot forget the moment when the reporter tells him on camera he has been charged with the murder of JFK. He is genuinely shocked. This is not acting. For some reason he was convinced that he was not going to be charged with this crime. Why?

Yes, let's forget about the mountain of forensic, ballistic, eyewitness, and circumstantial evidence and instead concentrate on a few momentary glimpses in front of a camera. Do you remember the TV interview he gave in New Orleans, where he explained the differences between Marxism and Communism? Pretty cool customer, wouldn't you say? He also participated in a radio debate down there. In short, your boy Lee had prior TV exposure and was media savvy. Yet you're suprised that he kept his composure in Dallas?

And since I've brought it up, on that bottom photo, does that look like freshly laid plywood to anybody? Looks a lot like ancient beat-up dirty floor planking to me. And speaking of which, just how long could it have taken five of Truly's men to lay down plywood, anyway?

Ashton

Because everything's suspicious in Buff Land.

And if I ever feel a need for somebody to tell me how to spend my time, I'll ask somebody who doesn't feel the need to put everything they write in boldface. Thanks for the application, though.

Ashton

I didn't tell you how to post ... I said it is a shame that you don't spend your time on more important things concerning JFK's murder.

Bill Miller

Hey, Bill, I for one have never had a problem with your use of boldface type. I think you have probably guessed by now that Ashton Gray has no real knowledge of, or interest in, JFK's assassination.

He seems to be more interested in being Slattery-lite with his withering comments.

Thank you for noting that he's a pale imitation of me. Much appreciated.

Lenny, you took eight days to reply to a post I left on July 18th.

Boo Hooo poor Brendan, how dare he ignore you for eight whole days. You should tell your Mammy.

That was the least of his sins. He blew off my queries, then had the audacity to ask why I didn't address his pet concerns. Hypocrisy, thy name is Len.

BTW, where's your pic, Ray. You're bucking for a suspension.

I noticed you didn’t address Cheney’s comments that the US military wouldn’t face much resistance and be welcome to Iraq as liberators. Nor have you explained how the invasion has made the world as a whole and the US particular safer.

Lenny, you took eight days to reply to a post I left on July 18th. You think I'm under any obligation to answer you at all, esp in a timely manner? Get real. You also ducked a thread where I asked you to name the wars you served in that you supported. So there you sit in Brazil, all safe and sound, taking potshots at US foreign policy. What a hero.

Hi-larious. Once upon a time, the Left hated this four-eyed wimp like poison (except when he was ratting out his boss). Now he's a media darling. Since when did Dean become an authority on the conservative movement? Come to think of it, what has this man done with his life since leaving the White House in disgrace more than 30 years ago? Perhaps his long-lost brother is Howard Dean, another authority on civil discourse. Sorry, but Dean's moment in the spotlight, not unlike disco, is dead.

Brendan Slattery says:

"...when you shamelessly accuse your own govt of the crime of the 20th century (JFK) and the 21st century (9-11), you are on shaky moral ground."

THEN COUNT ME ON SHAKY MORAL GROUND.

I'M TREMBLING.

BK

No kidding! If Brendan thinks that our government hasn't done some pretty dirty things, then he hasn't studied our history.

When did I ever make that claim, Bill? I readily recognize historical black eyes like Japanese internment, Jim Crow, and Watergate. What does that have to do with JFK or the WTC? Just because someone or some institution has the potential to do something nefarious doesn't mean they did. Please don't tell me you think the Bush Admin killed 3,000 Americans in cold blood. If you're smart enough to see Clint Hill's shoe, you should be smart enough to see through Jack's un-American bullsh*t.

Somebody tell him that we have even sanctioned the assassination of other leaders.

Including the guy who came back from Dallas in a box.

To think that we have lines we won't cross is like believing a thief who says that he has morals because he only steals from strangers.

Oh, lines are crossed all the time, and they should be (i.e. Chile).

"Sure, we'll be dead, but at least we'll have our honor."

No thanks. I'd rather be alive.

Brendan Slattery says:

"...when you shamelessly accuse your own govt of the crime of the 20th century (JFK) and the 21st century (9-11), you are on shaky moral ground."

THEN COUNT ME ON SHAKY MORAL GROUND.

I'M TREMBLING.

BK

Have you been fitted for your tinfoil hat, Bill?

Jack has no way of finding out if the things he accuses you of are true.

EXACTLY. So HOW in good conscience could he MAKE such accusations?

You, on the other hand, could have checked with any number of people, including Gary Mack, to find out if Jack's story about being attacked was true.

I don't converse with Mack or any of White's cronies. The point is that Jack is a well-known flake who doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt. I don't trust him any more than I'd trust a Holocaust denier. And yes, when you shamelessly accuse your own govt of the crime of the 20th century (JFK) and the 21st century (9-11), you are on shaky moral ground.

Your decision to mock an 80-year old man for being savagely attacked, and your justifying it by claiming he's said things you don't approve of about your country, is cowardly.

His age doesn't immunize him from criticism. Lord knows he can dish it out.

What's next, Brendan? Gonna go over to Jane Fonda's house and ask if she killed her mother? Gonna go over to Ron Kovic's house and challenge him to a footrace? OUR country can get along just fine without YOUR kind of protection, thank you very much.

I thought I'd shove Joe "Yellowcake" Wilson down a flight of stairs. Why do you ask?

'Brendan Slattery' wrote:

Sure. Just as soon as he apologizes to me for being a "paid provacateur" or maintaining two forum identities. Just as soon as he apologizes to the US govt for supposedly tampering with the Zap film, faking the moon landings, or killing 3,000 fellow Americans on 9-11. Just as soon as he apologizes to the family of Nicole Brown Simpson for working on the Butcher of Brentwood's defense team.

And the beat goes on ...

You aren't a "paid provacateur"? Surely you jest! It was Robert Groden that was involved in the OJ case!

YOU do PR? roflmfao!!! Keep at it though, we need someone to dust of Tom DeLay's image, after all, he is running for re-election, tsk-tsk

By his own admission, he worked with Groden during the OJ civil case. Go crawl back under your rock.

Wow, Brendan, you sound reasonable for a second. Now please apologize to Jack, whose run in with an attacker is well-known in the research community...

Sure. Just as soon as he apologizes to me for being a "paid provacateur" or maintaining two forum identities. Just as soon as he apologizes to the US govt for supposedly tampering with the Zap film, faking the moon landings, or killing 3,000 fellow Americans on 9-11. Just as soon as he apologizes to the family of Nicole Brown Simpson for working on the Butcher of Brentwood's defense team.

And the beat goes on ...

Jean and Mary are blurred in Z311 and Z312, so I have used Z310 to make my point.

And I concede your point. I was relying on a still frame a second earlier, but after watching the film in real time, she does indeed turn her head to the left at the last second. And unlike Jack, I will not suggest film tampering to cover my mistake.

As for her multiple versions of events since 1963, that remains intact.

YOU are a totally sick individual! Making jokes about someone almost being murdered....!

Jack was almost murdered?? You have proof? Bear in mind this is a man who lies through his teeth about any number of subjects. We're just supposed to genuflect and swallow his story whole?

BTW, Jack accuses me and Von Pein of being one in the same. That's a very serious accusation ... worthy of mockery and ridicule. If you treat people with contempt, don't be surprised when you get it in return.

You have no heart, mind nor soul and I mean that as precisely and strongly as I can. Nice words can't describe your ethical depravity...and I will refrain from a list of those that do! You are a total degenerate, morally, a foul person more akin to old bodily eliminations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Is Walmart running a sale on exclamation points?

You have no respect for persons, nations, history, truth, decentcy, life....your a total negation of what a decent human should be in my opinion.

Don't you have anything better to do, like writing yet another hysterical essay on US "fascism" or "imperiled" civil liberties?

John, I really think you are wrong if you think the entity known here as BS is not a professional disruption agent.

Translation: don't contradict any of the crazy things we write!