Lynne Foster

This is the document he is talking about -quite fascinating:

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

1:39 p.m. November 29, 1963

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. TOLSON

MR. BELMONT

MR. MOHR

MR. CONRAD

MR. DE LOACH

MR. EVANS

MR. ROSEN

MR. SULLIVAN

The President called and asked if I am familiar with the proposed

group they are trying to get to study my report - two from the House,

two from the Senate, two from the courts, and a couple of outsiders. I

replied that I had not heard of that but had seen reports from the

Senate Investigating Committee.

The President stated he wanted to get by just with my file and my

report. I told him I thought it would be very bad to have a rash of

investigations. He then indicated the only way to stop it is to

appoint a high-level committee to evaluate my report and tell the House

and Senate not to go ahead with the investigation. I stated that would

be a three-ring circus.

The President then asked what I think about Allen Dulles, and I

replied that he is a good man. He then asked about John McCloy, and I

stated I am not as enthusiastic about McCloy, that he is a good man but

I am not so certain as to the matter of publicity he might want. The

President then mentioned General (Lauris) Norstad, and I said he is a

good man. He said in the House he might try (Hale) Boggs and (Gerald

R.) Ford and in the Senate (Richard B.) Russell and (John Sherman)

Cooper. I asked him about Cooper and he indicated Cooper of Kentucky

whom he described as a judicial man, stating he would not want (Jacob

K.) Javits. I agreed on this point. He then reiterated Ford of

Michigan, and I indicated I know of him but do not know him and had

never seen him except on television the other day and that he handled

himself well on television. I indicated that I do know Boggs.

Johnson, President Lyndon B.

Assassination of President John F. Kennedy

Presidential Commission on Assassination

of President John F. Kennedy

Security - Presidential

Presidential Conferences

Presidential Travel Security

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Memorandum for Messrs. Tolson, Belmont, Mohr, November 29, 1963

Conrad, DeLoach, Evans, Rosen, Sullivan

The President then mentioned that (Walter) Jenkins had told him that

I have designated Mr. DeLoach to work with them as he had on the Hill.

He indicated they appreciated that and just wanted to tell me they

consider Mr. DeLoach as high class as I do, and that they salute me for

knowing how to pick good men.

I advised the President that we hope to have the investigation

wrapped up today but probably won't have it before the first of the week

as an angle in Mexico is giving trouble - the matter of Oswald's getting

$6500 from the Cuban Embassy and coming back to this country with it;

that we are not able to prove that fact; that we have information he

was there on September 18 and we are able to prove he was in New Orleans

on that date; that a story came in changing the date to September 28

and he was in Mexico on the 28th. I related that the police have again

arrested Duran, a member of the Cuban Embassy; that they will hold her

two or three days; will confront her with the original informant; and

will also try a lie detector test on her.

The President then inquired if I pay any attention to the lie

detector test. I answered that I would not pay 100% attention to them;

that it was only a psychological asset in investigation; that I would

not want to be a part of sending a man to the chair on a lie detector

test. I explained that we have used them in bank investigations and a

person will confess before the lie detector test is finished, more or

less fearful it will show him guilty. I said the lie detector test has

this psychological advantage. I further stated that it is a misnomer to

call it a lie detector since the evaluation of the chart made by the

machine is made by a human being and any human being is apt to make the

wrong interpretation.

I stated, if Oswald had lived and had take a lie detector test, this

with the evidence we have would have added that much strength to the

case; that these is no question he is the man.

I also told him that Rubenstein down there has offered to take a lie

detector test but his lawyer must be consulted first; that I doubt the

lawyer will allow him to do so; that he has a West Coast lawyer

somewhat like the Edward Bennett Williams type and almost as much of a

shyster.

The President asked if we have any relationship between the two

(Oswald and Rubenstein) as yet. I replied that at the present time we have

- 2 -

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Memorandum for Messrs. Tolson, Belmont, Mohr, November 29, 1963

Conrad, DeLoach, Evans, Rosen, Sullivan

not; that there was a story that the fellow had been in Rubenstein's

nightclub but it has not been confirmed. I told the President that

Rubenstein is a very seedy character, had a bad record - street brawls,

fights, etc.; that in Dallas, if a fellow came into his nightclub and

could not pay his bill completely, Rubenstein would beat him up and

throw him out; that he did not drink or smoke; that he was an

egomaniac; that he likes to be in the limelight; knew all of the

police officers in the white light district; let them come in and get

food and liquor, etc.; and that is how I think he got into police

headquarters. I said if they ever made any move, the pictures did not

show it even when they saw him approach and he got right up to Oswald

and pressed the pistol against Oswald's stomach; that neither officer

on either side made any effort to grab Rubenstein - not until after the

pistol was fired. I said, secondly, the chief of police admits he moved

Oswald in the morning as a convenience and at the request of motion

picture people who wanted daylight. I said insofar as tying Rubenstein

and Oswald together, we have not yet done so; that there are a number

of stories which tied Oswald to the Civil Liberties Union in New York in

which he applied for membership and to the Fair Play for Cuba Committee

which is pro-Castro, directed by communists, and financed to some extent

by the Castro Government.

The President asked how many shots were fired, and I told him three.

He then asked if any were fired at him. I said no, that three shots

were fired at the President and we have them. I stated that our

ballistic experts were able to prove the shots were fired by this gun;

that the President was hit by the first and third bullets and the second

hit the Governor; that there were three shots; that one complete

bullet rolled out of the President's head; that it tore a large part of

the President's head off; that in trying to massage his heart on the

way into the hospital they loosened the bullet which fell on the

stretcher and we have that.

He then asked were they aimed at the President. I replied they were

aimed at the President, no question about that.

I further advised him that we have also tested the fact you could

fire those three shots in three seconds. I explained that there is a

story out that there must have been more than one man to fire several

shots but we have proven it could be done by one man.

The President then asked how it happened that Connally was hit. I

explained that Connally turned to the President when the first shot was

fired and in that turning he got hit. The President then asked, if

Connally had not been in his seat, would the President have been hit by

the second shot. I said yes.

- 3 -

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Memorandum for Messrs. Tolson, Belmont, Mohr, November 29, 1963

Conrad, DeLoach, Evans, Rosen, Sullivan

I related that on the fifth floor of the building where we found the

gun and the wrapping paper we found three empty shells that had been

fired and one that had not been fired. that he had four but didn't fire

the fourth; then threw the gun aside; went down the steps; was seen

by a police officer; the manager told the officer that Oswald was all

right, worked there; they let him go; he got on a bus; went to his

home and got a jacket; then came back downtown, walking; the police

officer who was killed stopped him, not knowing who he was; and he

fired and killed the police officer.

The President asked if we can prove that and I answered yes.

I further related that Oswald then walked another two blocks; went

to the theater; the woman selling tickets was so suspicious - said he

was carrying a gun when he went into the theater - that she notified the

police; the police and our man went in and located Oswald. I told him

they had quite a struggle with Oswald but that he was subdued and shown

out and taken to police headquarters.

I advised the President that apparently Oswald had come down the

steps from the fifth floor; that apparently the elevator was not used.

The President then indicated our conclusions are: (1) he is the one

who did it; (2) after the President was hit, Governor Connally was hit;

(3) the President would have been hit three times except for the fact

that Governor Connally turned after the first shot and was hit by the

second; (4) whether he was connected with the Cuban operation with

money we are trying to nail down. I told him that is what we are trying

to nail down; that we have copies of the correspondence; that none of

the letters dealt with any indication of violence or assassination;

that they were dealing with a visa to go back to Russia.

I advised the President that his wife had been very hostile, would

not cooperate and speaks only Russian; that yesterday she said , if we

could give assurance she would be allowed to remain in the country, she

would cooperate; and that I told our agents to give that assurance and

sent a Russian-speaking agent to Dallas last night to interview her. I

said I do not know whether or not she has any information but we would

learn what we could.

The President asked how Oswald had access to the fifth floor of the

building. I replied that he had access to all floors. The President

asked where was his office and I stated he did not have any particular

place; that he

- 4 -

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Memorandum for Messrs. Tolson, Belmont, Mohr, November 29, 1963

Conrad, DeLoach, Evans, Rosen, Sullivan

was not situated in any particular place; that he was just a general

packer of requisitions that came in for books from Dallas schools; that

he would have had proper access to the fifth and sixth floors whereas

usually the employees were down on lower floors. The President then

inquired if anybody saw him on the fifth floor, and I stated he was seen

by one of the workmen before the assassination.

The President then asked if we got a picture taken of him shooting

the gun and I said no. He asked what was the picture sold for $25,000,

and I advised him this was a picture of the parade showing Mrs. Kennedy

crawling out of the back seat; that there was no Secret Service Agent

on the back of the car; that in the past they have added steps on the

back of the car and usually had an agent on either side standing on the

bumper; that I did not know why this was not done - that the President

may have requested it; that the bubble top was not up but I understand

the bubble top was not worth anything because it was made entirely of

plastic; that I had learned much to my surprise that the Secret Service

does not have any armored cars.

The President asked if I have a bulletproof car and I told him I

most certainly have. I told him we use it here for my own use and,

whenever we have any raids, we make use of the bulletproof car on them.

I explained that it is a limousine which has been armorplated and that

it looks exactly like any other car. I stated I think the President

ought to have a bulletproof car; that from all I understand the Secret

Service has had two cars with metal plates underneath the car to take

care of hand grenades or bombs thrown out on the street. I said this is

European; that there have been several such attempts on DeGaulle's

life; but they do not do that in this country; that all assassinations

have been with guns; and for that reason I think very definitely the

President ought to always ride in a bulletproof car; that it certainly

would prevent anything like this ever happening again; but that I do

not mean a sniper could not snipe him from a window if he were exposed.

The President asked if I meant on his ranch he should be in a

bulletproof car. I said I would think so; that the little car we rode

around in when I was at the ranch should be bulletproofed; that it

ought to be done very quietly. I told him we have four bulletproof cars

in the Bureau: one on the West Coast, one in New York and two here. I

said this could be done quietly without publicity and without pictures

taken of it if handled properly and I think he should have one on his

ranch.

- 5 -

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Memorandum for Messrs. Tolson, Belmont, Mohr, November 29, 1963

Conrad, DeLoach, Evans, Rosen, Sullivan

The President then asked if I think all the entrances should be

guarded. I replied by all means, that he had almost to be in the

capacity of a so-called prisoner because without that security anything

could be done. I told him lots of phone calls had been received over

the last four or five days about threats on his life; that I talked to

the Attorney General about the funeral procession from the White House

to the Cathedral; that I was opposed to it. The President remarked

that the Secret Service told them not to but the family wanted to do it.

I stated that was what the Attorney General told me but I was very much

opposed to it. I further related that I saw the procession from the

Capitol to the White House on Pennsylvania and, while they had police

standing on the curbs, when the parade came, the police turned around

and looked at the parade.

The President then stated he is going to take every precaution he

can; that he wants to talk to me; and asked if I would put down my

thoughts. He stated I was more than head of the FBI - I was his brother

and personal friend; that he knew I did not want anything to happen to

his family; that he has more confidence in me than anybody in town;

that he would not embroil me in a jurisdictional dispute; but that he

did want to have my thoughts on the matter to advocate as his own

opinion.

I stated I would be glad to do this for him and that I would do

anything I can. The President expressed his appreciation.

Very truly yours,

[signed J. E. H.]

John Edgar Hoover

Director

Notice how legitimate researchers acknowledge that Johnson and Hoover knew that Oswald was just a patsy.

The following memorandum, written by Hoover immediately after his meeting with President Johnson, just seven days after the assassination of President Kennedy, is a remarkable document to say the least. There is much information imparted in the memo regarding just how fluid and unstable the cover story about who killed JFK still was shaping up to be at that time. By analyzing the discrepancies between the story Hoover briefed Johnson about on November 29th, and what the final cover story handed down by the Warren Commission would claim almost a year later, we can better appreciate the degree to which the final "official report" was sculpted to fit the constraints the Commission was forced to adhere to, regardless of the actual facts of the assassination.

Source of above quotation:

In a telephone conversation on 28th November, 1963, LBJ asked Hoover if Oswald "was connected to the Cuban operation". Hoover definitely knew what LBJ was talking about and replied "that is what we are trying to nail down now". What was the Cuban operation that LBJ and Hoover were talking about?

John,

Hoover and Johnson were close friends, they both knew that Oswald was just a patsy, and my best guess is they were talking about Hunts efforts to build a relationship with Oswald and Johnson was wondering about the progression of the relationship, as it related to operations in Cuba.

I have posted somewhat of an elaboration of this speculation

here:

According to John,

"In a telephone conversation on 28th November, 1963, LBJ asked Hoover if Oswald "was connected to the Cuban operation". Hoover definitely knew what LBJ was talking about and replied "that is what we are trying to nail down now". What was the Cuban operation that LBJ and Hoover were talking about?"

A speculation: Could he have been talking about Cuban operations that Howard Hunt was involved in? I believe Johnson was talking about a rogue, Watergate-like effort to assassinate Castro, and Hunt had probably discussed such operations with Oswald, for the purpose of trying to determine the best way to manipulate the "patsy".

FORMER THEORY DELETED:

Yeah, aint the Hoover thread GREAT. It also answers the philisophical question, "What is the sound of one hand clapping."

You certainly picked an appropriate thread to respond to.

J. Edgar Hoover's rise to power:

Were it not for the untimely death of his adversaries, Hoover's political career may have very well ended in 1933, when Senator Thomas Walsh was evidently preparing for the ouster of the corrupt demagogue. Walsh condemned the abuse of power and the illegal actions that Hoover condoned through his failure to respect due process, and Hoover's only retort was to wage secret battle to compensate for the fact that the rule of law was against him. The war between Hoover and Walsh became critical in 1933 when Roosevelt announced his decision to make Walsh his Attorney General. On February 28, Attorney General-designate Thomas Walsh announced his decision to reorganize the Justice Department and that his plans included "an almost completely new Personnel".49 On March 3, 1933, a day before Roosevelt's Inauguration, Thomas Walsh, who had recently married and was on a brief wedding trip to North Carolina, died of a massive myocardial infarction. And in his typical cover-your-tracks fashion, J. Edgar Hoover made sure that "a thoroughly documented medical examination was made."50 Was Senator Thomas Walsh Hoover's first known victim or was his death a convenient coincidence?

Are you all familiar with this history?

Well then, I guess ignorance about J. Edgar Hoover explains the reluctance to discuss this very significant document, the smoking gun memo.

James Jesus Angleton was in no sense "right," "correct" or ever vindicated.

His paranoid and counter productive decimation of US intelligence is well documented. The failure of Angleton to ever find any high level SOviet moles in US intelligence is a well worn fact in US diplomatic history.

Angleton's hysterical witch hunts reeked of McCarthyism and the worst kind of Cold War character assassination.

To be very clear, James Jesus Angleton was himself responsible for the grave defects in US intelligence morale during his reign as Counter Intelligence Chief at the Central Intelligence Agency. The witchhunt ruined many carrers, while shrowded in secrecy, and his victims were unable to pursue legal recourse to regain their tarnished reputations and ruined careers.

AJ Weberman's opinions on this matter of no real interest, as this is the YIPPIE most famous for digging through Bob Dylan's garbage, and his opinion about ALdrich Ames and Angleton bears no weight in serious discussions of Angleton's malfeasance and hysterical, reckless behaviour.

No Mr. Angleton was not right, and his decimation of the agency was a travesty of justice unparalleled in US diplomatic history......

J. Edgar Hoover was the very definition of paranoia and not even Angleton can rival his travesties.

sorry, I misquoted.

Speaking about Jim Garrison, Katzenbach said, "I had the impression both before and after the assassination that Jim Garrison was an absolute nut".

Katzenbach is an intelligent, decent man and I agree 1000%.

Now Dawn and her many alter egos, like all those shrinks and high school students who agree with everything she says, claim that Garrison is a hero.

Are they really just trying to revive Hoover's reputation through Garrison? Why do they give a tyrant like Hoover a free pass?

I have been given the distinct impression that these hateful people who have called me every name in the book are as ignorant and as dangerous as this disgusting tyrant.

Now that's just my opinion, and like Katzenbach, "I had the impression both before and after I started posting here, that the people who dominate this message board are J. Edgar Hoover Loyalists" and that's rather disgusting, isn't it?

I guess J. Edgar Hoover was most disturbed about what Dorothy was writing, is that not correct?

J. Edgar Hoover's rise to power:

Were it not for the untimely death of his adversaries, Hoover's political career may have very well ended in 1933, when Senator Thomas Walsh was evidently preparing for the ouster of the corrupt demagogue. Walsh condemned the abuse of power and the illegal actions that Hoover condoned through his failure to respect due process, and Hoover's only retort was to wage secret battle to compensate for the fact that the rule of law was against him. The war between Hoover and Walsh became critical in 1933 when Roosevelt announced his decision to make Walsh his Attorney General. On February 28, Attorney General-designate Thomas Walsh announced his decision to reorganize the Justice Department and that his plans included "an almost completely new Personnel".49 On March 3, 1933, a day before Roosevelt's Inauguration, Thomas Walsh, who had recently married and was on a brief wedding trip to North Carolina, died of a massive myocardial infarction. And in his typical cover-your-tracks fashion, J. Edgar Hoover made sure that "a thoroughly documented medical examination was made."50 Was Senator Thomas Walsh Hoover's first known victim or was his death a convenient coincidence?

Are you all familiar with this history?

Just curious. let's imagine the people's commission had reviewed all the research, and was about to produce it's final report.

Can anybody here tell me, what would the people's commission say about J. Edgar Hoover?

Some of you have indicated that Jim Garrison is a hero and I think that Garrison is Hoover's lackey. Would the people's commission call J. Edgar Hoover a hero, or what.....?

Here's some evidence about Nixon's tendency to murder his enemies:

Watergate burglar Gordon Liddy, who joined the FBI in 1957, is certainly a living embodiment of the fact that Hoover's FBI was essentially "America's Gestapo." Indeed, the evidence is so clear and beyond dispute that one does not even need to make any inferences or assumptions. All one has to do, is to quote Gordon Liddy himself. Liddy's FBI training led him to develop the belief that he belonged to an elite corps of agents whose duty it was to save America from all form of subversion -real or imagined and J. Edgar Hoover was the supreme dictator who spearheaded the national security-motivated war. In the words of Gordon Liddy: "As Adolph Hitler was referred to throughout the Third Reich as simply der Fuhrer, so J. Edgar Hoover was referred to throughout the FBI as the Director." Hoover storm trooper, Gordon Liddy was prepared to do whatever was deemed to be necessary, to satisfy der Fuhrer. Indeed, discussion about the liquidation of political enemies was entertained as casually as most people talk about the weather. The following Liddy narrative reflects the sinister murder plots that tyrannical intelligence spooks like J. Edgar Hoover were prone to embrace:

I urged as the logical and just solution that the target [Jack Anderson] be killed. Quickly. My suggestion was received with immediate acceptance, almost relief, as if they were just waiting for someone else to say for them what was really on their minds. There followed a lengthy discussion of the ways and means to accomplish the task best. Hunt [former CIA agent who has been linked as a co-conspirator in the Kennedy assassination] still enamoured of the LSD approach asked Dr. Gunn [a physician retired from the CIA known for his "unorthodox application of medical and chemical knowledge"] whether a massive dose might not cause such disruption of motor function that the driver of the car would lose control of it and crash. [like Kennedy's car at Chappaquiddick, the event that, according to Nixon, "would undermine Kennedy's role as a leader of the opposition to the administration's policies.]4 Dr. Gunn repeated his earlier negative advice on the use of LSD. Besides, though LSD can be absorbed through the skin, our hypothetical target might be wearing gloves against the winter cold, or be chauffeur-driven. The use of LSD was, finally dismissed. Hunt's suggestion called to Dr. Gunn's mind a technique used successfully abroad. It involved catching the target's moving automobile in a sharp turn or sharp curve and hitting it with another car on the outside rear quarter. According to Dr. Gunn, if the angle of the blow and the relative speeds of the two vehicles were correct, the target vehicle would flip over, crash, and usually burn.5

Liddy goes on and on talking about all kinds of different ways to murder people and about illegal FBI operations which were always staged in a manner that made it appear as though the FBI was absolutely blameless. Indeed J. Edgar Hoover routinely authorized criminal activity like illegal surveillance, mail openings, unauthorized bugging, illegal wiretaps, break-ins and murder -and it was all successfully covered up through the overriding obsession to avoid discovery. Gordon Liddy embodies the fact that murder was the ultimate consequence of Hoover's obsession to control a particular target, and like all illegal FBI activity, it was done in a manner that "proved" that it was not the fault of the FBI even though it was. Ernest Hemingway was precocious enough to characterize the murderous capacity of Hoover's FBI, but he was ignored and at least four decades ahead of his time -we are still just beginning to appreciate the significance of Hoover-directed tyranny. Would-be assassins like Gordon Liddy should certainly erase every single shred of doubt about the fact that J. Edgar Hoover cultivated and worked with murderers. To be sure, Gordon Liddy has never been prosecuted for murder, but like Al Capone who was also accomplished in the art of covering up criminal operations, allegations of murder follow him as closely as is evidently warranted. According to Washington attorney Bernard Fensterwald: "G. Gordon Liddy has been reliably linked to two separate alleged murder plans during his work for Nixon's top aides, and one other actual completed murder, during his previous FBI service."6 When Liddy became Nixon's crony and the cozy relationship between Hoover and the Nixon White House soured, Liddy and his faithful Cuban partners in crime were responsible for break-ins at Hoover's apartment and "a poison of the thyon-phosphate genre was placed on Hoover's personal toilet articles."7 The poison induces fatal heart attacks. Howard Hunt had indicated that he had been ordered to kill Anderson with an untraceable poison and while the scheme was dropped, the simple fact that zealots with a proclivity to commit politically motivated murder had access to such diabolical resources, is in itself revolting.

Very interesting, huh?

That was my response.

John, I had suggested something similr to this quite a while ago. I'll try to find it.

We need a people's, Hoover Commission.

Someone once said that the Kennedy assassination is a 1000 piece puzzle with 10,000 pieces.

How can you possibly solve the mystery without talking about J. Edgar Hoover?

By defintion, I believe, a felon is someone who has been convicted of a felony.

You can argue that Hoover committed felonies but from a strict semantic point, he was not a felon.

Semantics aside, I suppose you can cite by thread and post # any post where I have defended Hoover. I do not recall (could be wrong).

You just did, I guess semantical defenses do not register, in your mind.

That is probably why you were disbarred.

Well at least the disinformation agents were not feeding him disinformation!

Then they must have been serving him that information.

But seriously, can you go to the 3 tramps thread and help me out there --last question.

I mean the question on this thread.

Isn't that Harrelson, followed by Sturgis and Hunt?

Lynne wrote:

Dawn, you sound like a conservative, mouthpiece lawyer who is pretending to be a liberal.

Now we know, per Lynne's world view:

1. Ron is a Nixon apologist.

2. Dawn is a secret conservative. Her liberal postings are just a pretense to hide her true colors.

None of us would have known this but for Lynne.

Lynne, thank you for this information.

And you defend felons like J. Edgar Hoover.

You are very welcome.

Obviously every one will know that I concur with Mr. Wallace and I appreciate his articulateness and logic.

Angleton was right, as Trento knows.

When Epstein became famous, disinformation agents fed him information, his early work is much more relevant to the Kennedy assassination.

Nobody wants to say anything about the felons who are responsible for the murder of John F. Kennedy: how strange.

This is well documented:

In the words of Gordon Liddy: "As Adolph Hitler was referred to throughout the Third Reich as simply der Fuhrer, so J. Edgar Hoover was referred to throughout the FBI as the Director." Hoover storm trooper, Gordon Liddy was prepared to do whatever was deemed to be necessary, to satisfy der Fuhrer. Indeed, discussion about the liquidation of political enemies was entertained as casually as most people talk about the weather. The following Liddy narrative reflects the sinister murder plots that tyrannical intelligence spooks like J. Edgar Hoover were prone to embrace:

I urged as the logical and just solution that the target [Jack Anderson] be killed. Quickly. My suggestion was received with immediate acceptance, almost relief, as if they were just waiting for someone else to say for them what was really on their minds. There followed a lengthy discussion of the ways and means to accomplish the task best. Hunt [former CIA agent who has been linked as a co-conspirator in the Kennedy assassination] still enamoured of the LSD approach asked Dr. Gunn [a physician retired from the CIA known for his "unorthodox application of medical and chemical knowledge"] whether a massive dose might not cause such disruption of motor function that the driver of the car would lose control of it and crash. [like Kennedy's car at Chappaquiddick, the event that, according to Nixon, "would undermine Kennedy's role as a leader of the opposition to the administration's policies.]4 Dr. Gunn repeated his earlier negative advice on the use of LSD. Besides, though LSD can be absorbed through the skin, our hypothetical target might be wearing gloves against the winter cold, or be chauffeur-driven. The use of LSD was, finally dismissed. Hunt's suggestion called to Dr. Gunn's mind a technique used successfully abroad. It involved catching the target's moving automobile in a sharp turn or sharp curve and hitting it with another car on the outside rear quarter. According to Dr. Gunn, if the angle of the blow and the relative speeds of the two vehicles were correct, the target vehicle would flip over, crash, and usually burn.5

Liddy goes on and on talking about all kinds of different ways to murder people and about illegal FBI operations which were always staged in a manner that made it appear as though the FBI was absolutely blameless. Indeed J. Edgar Hoover routinely authorized criminal activity like illegal surveillance, mail openings, unauthorized bugging, illegal wiretaps, break-ins and murder -and it was all successfully covered up through the overriding obsession to avoid discovery. Gordon Liddy embodies the fact that murder was the ultimate consequence of Hoover's obsession to control a particular target, and like all illegal FBI activity, it was done in a manner that "proved" that it was not the fault of the FBI even though it was. Ernest Hemingway was precocious enough to characterize the murderous capacity of Hoover's FBI, but he was ignored and at least four decades ahead of his time -we are still just beginning to appreciate the significance of Hoover-directed tyranny. Would-be assassins like Gordon Liddy should certainly erase every single shred of doubt about the fact that J. Edgar Hoover cultivated and worked with murderers. To be sure, Gordon Liddy has never been prosecuted for murder, but like Al Capone who was also accomplished in the art of covering up criminal operations, allegations of murder follow him as closely as is evidently warranted. According to Washington attorney Bernard Fensterwald: "G. Gordon Liddy has been reliably linked to two separate alleged murder plans during his work for Nixon's top aides, and one other actual completed murder, during his previous FBI service."6 When Liddy became Nixon's crony and the cozy relationship between Hoover and the Nixon White House soured, Liddy and his faithful Cuban partners in crime were responsible for break-ins at Hoover's apartment and "a poison of the thyon-phosphate genre was placed on Hoover's personal toilet articles."7 The poison induces fatal heart attacks. Howard Hunt had indicated that he had been ordered to kill Anderson with an untraceable poison and while the scheme was dropped, the simple fact that zealots with a proclivity to commit politically motivated murder had access to such diabolical resources, is in itself revolting.

The numbers refer to the footnotes you will find here:

Is this a trick question?

Here's some evidence about Nixon's tendency to murder his enemies:

Watergate burglar Gordon Liddy, who joined the FBI in 1957, is certainly a living embodiment of the fact that Hoover's FBI was essentially "America's Gestapo." Indeed, the evidence is so clear and beyond dispute that one does not even need to make any inferences or assumptions. All one has to do, is to quote Gordon Liddy himself. Liddy's FBI training led him to develop the belief that he belonged to an elite corps of agents whose duty it was to save America from all form of subversion -real or imagined and J. Edgar Hoover was the supreme dictator who spearheaded the national security-motivated war. In the words of Gordon Liddy: "As Adolph Hitler was referred to throughout the Third Reich as simply der Fuhrer, so J. Edgar Hoover was referred to throughout the FBI as the Director." Hoover storm trooper, Gordon Liddy was prepared to do whatever was deemed to be necessary, to satisfy der Fuhrer. Indeed, discussion about the liquidation of political enemies was entertained as casually as most people talk about the weather. The following Liddy narrative reflects the sinister murder plots that tyrannical intelligence spooks like J. Edgar Hoover were prone to embrace:

I urged as the logical and just solution that the target [Jack Anderson] be killed. Quickly. My suggestion was received with immediate acceptance, almost relief, as if they were just waiting for someone else to say for them what was really on their minds. There followed a lengthy discussion of the ways and means to accomplish the task best. Hunt [former CIA agent who has been linked as a co-conspirator in the Kennedy assassination] still enamoured of the LSD approach asked Dr. Gunn [a physician retired from the CIA known for his "unorthodox application of medical and chemical knowledge"] whether a massive dose might not cause such disruption of motor function that the driver of the car would lose control of it and crash. [like Kennedy's car at Chappaquiddick, the event that, according to Nixon, "would undermine Kennedy's role as a leader of the opposition to the administration's policies.]4 Dr. Gunn repeated his earlier negative advice on the use of LSD. Besides, though LSD can be absorbed through the skin, our hypothetical target might be wearing gloves against the winter cold, or be chauffeur-driven. The use of LSD was, finally dismissed. Hunt's suggestion called to Dr. Gunn's mind a technique used successfully abroad. It involved catching the target's moving automobile in a sharp turn or sharp curve and hitting it with another car on the outside rear quarter. According to Dr. Gunn, if the angle of the blow and the relative speeds of the two vehicles were correct, the target vehicle would flip over, crash, and usually burn.5

Liddy goes on and on talking about all kinds of different ways to murder people and about illegal FBI operations which were always staged in a manner that made it appear as though the FBI was absolutely blameless. Indeed J. Edgar Hoover routinely authorized criminal activity like illegal surveillance, mail openings, unauthorized bugging, illegal wiretaps, break-ins and murder -and it was all successfully covered up through the overriding obsession to avoid discovery. Gordon Liddy embodies the fact that murder was the ultimate consequence of Hoover's obsession to control a particular target, and like all illegal FBI activity, it was done in a manner that "proved" that it was not the fault of the FBI even though it was. Ernest Hemingway was precocious enough to characterize the murderous capacity of Hoover's FBI, but he was ignored and at least four decades ahead of his time -we are still just beginning to appreciate the significance of Hoover-directed tyranny. Would-be assassins like Gordon Liddy should certainly erase every single shred of doubt about the fact that J. Edgar Hoover cultivated and worked with murderers. To be sure, Gordon Liddy has never been prosecuted for murder, but like Al Capone who was also accomplished in the art of covering up criminal operations, allegations of murder follow him as closely as is evidently warranted. According to Washington attorney Bernard Fensterwald: "G. Gordon Liddy has been reliably linked to two separate alleged murder plans during his work for Nixon's top aides, and one other actual completed murder, during his previous FBI service."6 When Liddy became Nixon's crony and the cozy relationship between Hoover and the Nixon White House soured, Liddy and his faithful Cuban partners in crime were responsible for break-ins at Hoover's apartment and "a poison of the thyon-phosphate genre was placed on Hoover's personal toilet articles."7 The poison induces fatal heart attacks. Howard Hunt had indicated that he had been ordered to kill Anderson with an untraceable poison and while the scheme was dropped, the simple fact that zealots with a proclivity to commit politically motivated murder had access to such diabolical resources, is in itself revolting.

Very interesting, huh?

Was J. Edgar Hoover a hero like Jim Garrison?

How quaint, the bastard who was trying to deport John Lennon gets a free pass on the day that John Lennon was murdered.