Steven Tomlinson

Being familiar with the issue, I once read that a tooth has the capacity to regenerate itself, although I don't recall the information source, it was not the New England Journal of Medicine, having said that, and also due to the fact that I don't have any experience in the field of dentistry, I am just as perplexed about the matter as anyone else. I don't have much to offer, other than to mention that, either teeth do regenerate or, John Armstrong might have an excellent point in this regard. BTW, the whole Armstrong pro or con issue does ostensibly have a middle ground where a modus vivendi can be reached in the sense that while obviously, the two Oswald's aspect is very controverial, even those who poo-poo the idea, would seemingly have to concede that there sure were a hell of a lot of Oswald sighting's at places where Lee Oswald was supposedly somewhere else. The question of Oswald sightings leading up to the assassination should be held separate to the photograph and apparent evidence of his youth. Although both issues create doubt, there's no necessity for them to be about the same individual. The youth aspect only provides a 'beginning' (with useful bits) to the alleged assassin's life. The sightings provide supposed evidence of 'intentions' and 'leanings'. My spider senses are telling me the suggestion of three separate Oswald issues; 1 dead Oswald, 1 teenage Oswald photo and 1+ Oswalds via sightings will bring to the opportunist mind the desired freedom to operate ridicule. It may be wrong, but the idea or possibility is not ridiculous. ST

Thank you, Mr. Hogan. Mr. VOEBEL. Yes; I think he even lost a tooth from that. I think he was cut on the lip, and a tooth was knocked out. Mr. Voebel does not sound too certain in his recollections, and who could blame him after so many years. I can't tell a thing about Lee Oswald's teeth from this photo. Unless someone can produce a plausible scientific opinion, with supporting data, then I submit that my guess that there is no broken tooth deserves to be considered as good as anyone else's. When you write, "I can't tell a thing about Lee Oswald's teeth from this photo", what you actually mean, and intend to mean is, "I can't tell a thing 'for certain' about Lee Oswald's teeth from this photo." Imagine the prize was £1,000,000 and the question was, "Does the person in this photo appear to be missing a tooth?" You, I and most people with a modicum of common sense would answer "Yes!" It doesn't mean he 'was' missing a tooth, but it does appear (view) as such. It would seem fair to say it 'appears' that he was missing a tooth or 'possibly' (it doesn't appear, but could if people came forward to say so) that he was larking around with something dark over his front tooth and that is also the reason for his exaggerated comedic posture to the camera. ST

Do you know if these two photographs are generally accepted as authentic or just to Mr Armstrong plus a relative few? ST

1. LHO stamped name and address on some of the Fair Play For Cuba leaflets. The address, to an investigator, would show a connection to Banister's building. 2. Somebody (probably LHO) sent some brown packaging to a non-existent Dallas address. If I'm not mistaken, it was addressed to LHO. It would only become relevant if his name became important. 3. LHO left his wallet at home on the morning of 22/11/63. If another showed up it would seem very strange to a normal person and would suggest a duality. Either another person or another secret life. 4. LHO went to the same store as the other Oswald on the morning of the assassination. An excellent idea if he knew the other Oswald would use the store that morning. The counter person apparently remembered an Oswald with a military ID and another who looked like him. I believe there were at least a couple more instances that could be viewed as ass-covering but I can't remember them right now. Can anybody think of other possible examples.

1. LIFE magazine showed a picture of LHO as a teenager, with a broken tooth. 2. The body exhumed, supposedly of the same LHO, did not show a broken tooth. Is it possible for these to have been the same person?...How?

I'm a Mensan living in/at Lytham St Annes near Blackpool, England. I recently returned here to New America after spending 15 of my 43 years in the original America. I've worked for the Police, been an art dealer, security/fire engineer, a professional pool player 'on the road' in America and about 20 other life wasting occupations. I've spent my entire life studying my own self and the other animals and do not like what I've learned. Enter the JFK story. Tangled up within this murderous act lay all the weaknesses of humankind rolled into and practiced by the few. I'd like to join the forum to make use of my analytical and intuitional skills for a purpose before I drop dead instead of just being an extreme annoyance to those who talk rubbish.