Jump to content
The Education Forum

Bill Simpich

Members
  • Posts

    424
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bill Simpich

  1. Jim,

    My position is the same as always - I don't know if Oswald was in Mexico City or not.  The evidence is wobbly on that point, to put it mildly.

    Whether or not Oswald was there - the piggy-backing theory remains the same.  

    I believe the evidence shows that Duran, Kostikov and company spoke to someone calling himself on Oswald on September 27-28, up till the late morning of the 28th, when the man calling himself Oswald left the Soviet embassy.  At that point, I believe that person had given up or competed his task.

    The phone calls after that are what I call the piggy-backing.  I believe that those phone calls are faked, by someone piggy-backing on the story being told by the man visiting the Soviet and Cuban consulates and introducing himself as Oswald and showing what he claimed to be Oswald's passport.

  2. Steve,  the Mexican-Americans like Joe Molina in the GI Forum did not know that Bill Lowery was with the Communist Party.  Bill would attend their meetings with other Communists without revealing their party membership.

    As to Larry's questions about how LHO would actually spy on Molina - Greg Parker's whole idea is new to me, but I must admit I find it appealing.  Molina handled the TSBD's finances, so I think LHO would have never met him on the job in any case - the American GI Forum would have been ideal for LHO, especially if he could avoid the meetings but write letters to Joe Molina!

    I am convinced that the shoe store salesman/Communist Party member Bill Lowery is a "spare part" in the assassination that was never used. 

    I find the whole shoe store story of Johnny Brewer wild, especially when he runs out the door after listening to the Texas police chase over the radio of his "IBM pals" that liked to hang out at the shoe store with him and apparently egged him into chasing Oswald - they even had a key and locked the store up for him!

  3. Late during the night of the assassination, Gannaway and his buddies came to Joe Molina's house and asked him questions about Oswald and the assassination.  They asked Molina to come to the station the next day, where he is asked a lot of follow-up questions.  Molina was fired a few days later, although he was never arrested.  Greg Parker offered some informed speculation on Lowery back in 2015:

    "Oswald was a long-time cia asset who became the property of the fbi on return from Russia. What got him into "intelligence" was a program that will be revealed in the upcoming volume. This program both took him to the soviet union, and was the one used to get him into the TSBD.

    "He was told he would be taking over from William Lowery in watching and informing on Joe Molina. Lowery had "outed" himself (and thus making him useless as an informant) in September."

  4. Steve and Bart,

    It looks to me that the "FBI agent" the provided the tape was "the shoe salesman" that was a "government agent" and with the "Texas Communist Party"

    That would be  William Lowery, cited in my Key Point #7 above - Joe Molina's colleague who had been an FBI informant inside the Communist Party from 1945 right up to September 1963.

    If you are interested in Nestor Castellanos, I have a fair amount on him.  

    Bart, do you have the other Butler deposition a month earllier - on or about April, 1978?

  5. It's useful to keep in mind that many people are witting or unwitting "assets", and others are "sources" - neither description is the same as an informant, who is paid for their work.  

    The "T-1" type of cryptonyms only give you information about that specific case - when you see a crypt with a city prefix and a C or an S suffix, you have a more substantial "symboled informant" at hand.

  6. Still looking for leads on solved FBI cryptonyms - see the previous posts above.

    This post is to discuss Bill Lowery, FBI informant DL-2-S - and the fake story about Oswald being S-172 and/or S-179.

    He was paid $200 a month by Hosty.    For the proof, see...

     
    At page 5:  William Lowery, the CPUSA officer in Dallas who came out as an FBI informant in Sept 1963, is the guy who actually received $200 a month as an informant from Jim Hosty.
     
    - and believe it or not, FBI cover-up artist Wally Heitman volunteered to work for free as Lowery's lawyer before the HSCA!  When Lowery admitted he got paid $2500 a year - which boils down, again, to $200 a month, the next question was "how was he paid" -Heitman instructed Lowery not to answer.  He did not want the answer that Hosty paid him $200 a month!  (p. 15)  When they pinned him down, he said $50 a week (p. 19)   

    If Oswald played any role with the FBI - or any other agency - it needed to be covered up.  What better way to do it than with a disinformation campaign, aided by members of the news media.  Consider this...

    Joan Mellen reports that Joseph Goulden was the executor to the will of David Phillips (Farewell to Justice, p. 454).  

    Goulden reported on December 8, 1963 that Oswald was an informant of the FBI.  This then was brought into the scheme of Bill Alexander and Hugh Aynesworth to spread a deliberately made-up story about LHO being Agent S-172 or S-179.
     
    Lonnie Hudkins printed the story in the Houston Post on Jan. 1, 1964
     
    Hudkins was interviewed on 2/8/64 and said that the 179 number came from a Dallas government official, not a federal official -  undoubtedly Alexander - but he refused to reveal the exact name.  He said that Goulden gave him a number different from 179 that he couldn't recall.
     
    In Esquire, Feb. 1976, Aynesworth admitted he and Alexander made it up to draw out the FBI on the issue. (James Hosty repeated this story in Assignment:  Oswald).  
     
    Hudkins claimed that he invented the two phony informant numbers for Oswald "and leaked the information during a phone conversation in order to determine if the FBI had tapped his telephone."   Hudkins even claimed that an FBI dropped by his office a half an hour later and after beating around the bush asked if he had heard  anything about Oswald's phony payroll number.  Hudkins claim about both of these stories does not mean it is true.  Even FBI chief Clarence Kelley referred to Hudkins and his frequent tips as a "usually unreliable source of information".
     
     
    Goulden denied it, claiming he got it from a "Dallas law enforcement officer".  The FBI considered Goulden's story scurrilous.  Goulden said he would try to get permission, and called back and said he couldn't reach him.   He told the FBI later that the officer assured him it was being "handled through proper channels".
     
    Goulden also wrote that a Dallas law enforcement officer provided him information that Ruby gained access to the basement by posing as the helper of a cameraman.  He claimed he couldn't reach this officer again, and then used the same story about it being "handled through proper channels".
     
    Years later, the man at FBI HQ believed that DA Bill Alexander had made up the story.   Alexander told Gerald Posner, "I never much liked the federals...I figured it was as good a way as any to keep them out of my way by having to run down that phony story."  (Posner, Case Closed, p. 348).
     
    To top it off, reporter Hugh Aynesworth told Larry Sneed that "I made it up" - and that he gave the phony number S-172 to Hudkins.  (Sneed, No More Silence, p. 32).
     
    Were Goulden or Hudkins prosecuted for lying to the FBI and this campaign of disinformation?  Or Alexander, who was a seasoned district attorney and knew that FBI informant numbers were identified as DL 2-S, not S-172?  Nope.   These men didn't have to say anything - but once they did, that's obstruction of justice under 18 USC 1001 then and now.
     
    Assistant WC counsel Leon Hubert told his boss that if they wanted to make a proper record, the FBI could not simply get an affidavit from the FBI HQ Security Division, they needed to search the informant files for the field offices in Dallas and New Orleans.  According to Breach of Trust author Gerald McKnight, this was never done.  (p. 145). 
     
    I think it's at least possible that all this was done to hide the very real relationship Oswald had with Customs and New Orleans FBI agent Warren de Brueys - who worked the Cuba beat -  as reported for more than fifty years by FBI informant Orestes Pena.
     
    Cuban exile Orestes Pena testified that he saw Oswald chatting on a regular basis with FBI Cuban specialist Warren de Brueys, David Smith at Customs, and Wendell Roache at INS.   Pena told the Church Committee that Oswald was employed by Customs.   Informant Joseph Oster went farther, saying that Oswald's handler was David Smith at Customs.   Church Committee staff members knew that David Smith "was involved in CIA operations".  Orestes Pena's handler Warren de Brueys admitted he knew David Smith. Oswald was also frequently seen with Juan Valdes, who described himself as a "customs house broker".  
     
    Note:  Pena told the Church Committee that Oswald was employed by Customs:   Church Committee Boxed Files / NARA Record Number: 157-10014-10120.   See http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=1421&relPageId=31 (de Brueys); http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?mode=searchResult&absPageId=182451    (Pena)(also see 180-10075-10167, 2000 release of Pena's depo, at National Archives; and Joan Mellen's Farewell to Justice, pp. 46-48) http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?mode=searchResult&absPageId=488541 (Juan Valdes' still-unreleased file, part of the CIA's broken-up "Fair Play for Cuba file" 100-300-011) 
  7. Key point #10:  Dissemination of the Oswald backyard photo

    November 22:  Curry issues order - photos only to be disseminated upon orders of the Chief's office

    November 23-24:   Lumpkin makes "24 or more" copies of the backyard Oswald photo

                                      Lumpkin places them on a table for law enforcement officers - where anyone could take them  

     

     

  8. Key point #9:  The False CPUSA Report to Army 

    Stringfellow:  Notified 112th that LHO said he went to Cuba AND was a card-carrying CPUSA member

                            Memo winds us at US Strike Command - the base poised to retaliate on Cuba

    Stringfellow:  Like others, part of the Army Intelligence Reserve

    Ed Coyle of 112th:  Testifies that all DPD intelligence officers are Army Intelligence

     

  9. Key point #4:  Hill joins Westbrook in Personnel - 10/63

       Had access to all personnel files and internal affairs records

       Westbrook:  Chief of hiring, firing, discipline, internal affairs

       Official reports stated that Homicide found the hulls on 6th Floor, but claims made           that Luke Hill joins Westbrook in Personnel - 10/63 or Jerry Hill found the hulls

       Official reports stated that Lumpkin - or Revill - or Homicide - controlled crime scene

×
×
  • Create New...