Robert Prudhomme
-
Posts
4,105 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Robert Prudhomme
-
-
On 11/11/2016 at 0:17 PM, Pamela Brown said:
IMO we had no good choice. Our choice was between a tyrant and a crook. One way or another we will be lucky if we do not end up in a civil war. I have never felt more strongly that our nation has come under judgment. This election is evidence of that...
I'm sorry, I'm from Canada and I'm just not up on all of the details. When you call Hillary a "crook", does that mean there is a list of indictable offences against her? Or that she has been convicted of an indictable offence?
-
22 hours ago, Ron Ecker said:
Now Trump says he may not repeal Obamacare after all. Everyone can start resting easier. He may not do anything else he said he would do. I'll bet he doesn't even build a wall. ("Mexico refuses to pay for it.") President Trump may be entirely different from campaigner Trump. Trump trumps Trump. At least we can hope so.
Yeah, he'll be okay. "Peace in our time", right?
-
21 hours ago, Douglas Caddy said:
Posted by me on my Facebook page today:
Trump is fighting back against the rising mass demonstrations against his being inaugurated as president in January. The national police union endorsed his candidacy. The FBI helped rig his election. Now these pro-trump law enforcement entities are infiltrating the mass protest demontrations using paid skilled persons who purposely cause violence. This leads to arrests of innocents and ultimately to an attempt to ban all demonstrations. The process is called COINTELPRO and America has seen it before. The difference this time is that we are now entering stage one of a national police state under a Trump Adminstration.
COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of covert, and at times illegal,[1][2] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations.[3]en.wikipedia.org -
-
21 hours ago, Ron Ecker said:
Larry, any speculation as to what Trump might do militarily has to take into account that America is 20 trillion dollars in debt. How could we afford to fight another war, no matter the cause?
The only politician I recall pointing out that we can't afford another war anywhere was Ron Paul back in the 2012 Republican debates, and he was ignored like a pariah. As I recall, some of the other candidates just quietly chortled. I'm no economist, but there are those preaching a financial doomsday even without any war.
Take Iran. Apparently Trump wants to tear up the Iran deal. So what's the alternative? Invade Iran? On whose dime?
"Deficits don't matter." ~~ Dick Cheney ~~
-
First Lady Michelle Obama meets with Melania Trump for tea in the Yellow Oval Room of the White House, Nov. 10. Chuck Kennedy / The White House
"Plagiarism, biotch. I'll spell it for you. P-l-a-g-i-a-r-i-s-m. Google it if you don't know what it means."
-
21 hours ago, Roger DeLaria said:
Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse......
What a circus that will be.
-
22 hours ago, Michael Cross said:
Fascinating to watch this debate. Robert is trying to find empirical evidence about height while others say opinion and appearance are enough.
What's wrong with fact based data? It can only add to the investigation IMO.
The problem with facts, Michael, is they don't always give you the answer you are seeking.
-
23 hours ago, Paul Trejo said:
Robert,
It's been a few weeks since you've ordered your Stereoscopic viewer. May we ask -- what was your conclusion with regard to Tom Hume's original proposal that Oswald's BYP were made with a combination of the Stereo-Realist camera and the Imperial Reflex -- that is, that LHO attempted to made a 3D effect with these?
Regards,
--Paul TrejoHi Paul
I just received my stereo viewer in the mail. By unfolding it, I thought I could view the BYP's directly from the screen. I was able to see LHO's body and head standing out in 3D but the background was out of focus. Also, with the viewer unfolded, the divider bar between the two images is not in place.
The only solution, I believe, is to print out the stereo images Tom posted, and view them directly in the viewer.
-
On 09/11/2016 at 2:15 AM, Thomas Graves said:
Prudhomme,
I wonder how the Moderators feel about the "appropriateness" of your statement in the context of the Rules of the Forum?
-- Tommy
Why don't you go cry to them like a little girl and find out for us, Thomas?
-
A real Presidential debate between a pair of perfect gentlemen, just in case we've forgotten what a real debate sounds like.
-
On 09/11/2016 at 1:38 AM, David Von Pein said:
It's absolutely incredible. I, too, am stunned. Maybe it's all a dream. Somebody pinch me. It's a new low for America. I'm thinking about packing up and moving to Canada.
Now, the question is, will Donald Trump's swelled head even fit through the Oval Office door? I'm doubting it will.
So much for Trump's constant refrain about the election being "rigged", eh?
To make people feel a little better, you can always listen to a real President anytime you want to, right here:
http://JFK-Press-Conferences.blogspot.com
I guess I could always fix up my woodworking shop and put a couple of bunks out there, too.
-
21 hours ago, Larry Hancock said:
It is stunning...but nothing compared to the oncoming recession...no more need to worry about superpower excess though...
It warms my heart to see those words, Larry. You need a place to stay, I have an extra bedroom here.
-
I'm sitting here in stunned silence watching Trump about to win the election. Really, America? We can forgive you for electing GW the second time around but this is ridiculous.
-
On 08/11/2016 at 7:12 PM, Thomas Graves said:
(Sounds like you're afraid of losing, Bob.)
Who is taller in the Malcolm Couch clip, "Shelley" or "Lovelady"?
The vote so far:
"Shelley" is taller. -- Tommy
"Lovelady" is taller. -- Cowboy Bob
Who else would like to vote on this? (Don't be shy.)
-- Tommy
It's people Like you, Thomas, who are running this forum into the earth.
-
On 08/11/2016 at 0:55 PM, Michael Walton said:
OK Bob I'll take you up on this offer and will put it together and post it. And then we'll see what happens and see if there's any discussion in debating it here.
That's the spirit, Michael.
-
How typically an American way of determining the truth.
What is next, a poll to determine which is larger, 5 or 15?
-
It's quite simple, Thomas, even for you. Why would the FBI lie about Bill Lovelady's height when they stated it as being 5' 8"? Were they able to look ahead way into the future, and see that we would be debating whether or not Shelley and Lovelady are seen walking in the Couch film, and that wee Shelley could not possibly be taller than the 5' 8" Lovelady? That would be quite a conspiracy theory, Thomas.
Wouldn't it have been easier for them to destroy the Couch film?
-
On 07/11/2016 at 10:42 PM, Thomas Graves said:
Howdy Bob!
Maybe. Maybe not.
........... Naw. Probably not.
I think we've all heard that Lovelady was pretty short. IMHO, that's why he looks kinda "dwarfish" sitting in that chair in Homicide and Robbery. It's possible that Shelley was pretty short, too, but just a little taller than Lovelady.
To me, "Shelley" (with his distinctive hairstyle) looks a little taller than "Lovelady" in Couch.
But really, it's Lovelady's bold plaid shirt and bald spot and receding hairline in Couch that "does it" for me.
Sorry, Bob, but why don't you go ahead and knock yourself out, anyway.
Unless you find out that Shelley was only or 5' 3" or 5' 4" (or so), I'm sticking with Shelley's and Lovelady's being "captured" in Couch.
-- Tommy
If Lovelady was so "dwarfish", it seems strange the FBI would state he was 5'8".
But, who am I to throw common sense at your fantasy?
-
On 07/11/2016 at 6:35 PM, Michael Walton said:
There's really not all that much to contribute to this case any more. I come to learn new stuff and the one that did help me was the possibility that Oswald is in the doorway (PM). I also learned that the guy leaning over is *not* Oswald but Lovelady.
The run-up to the murder was also a big thing for me, having learned about who Kennedy was.
I was thinking about posting something that would have completely destroyed the BS laden jet effect. I found a gunshot wound clip that looks amazingly like JFK's and the really amazing thing is the gun barrel had to have been no more than 5 feet from this poor guy's head. He's shot in the back of the head and there is absolutely NO so-called jet effect or nerve twitching theory like they said was the reason for Kennedy's back and to the left movement.
I asked two people who are members of this forum if they thought it'd be interesting to EF to post. One said probably not and the other I've not heard back from so I'm taking that as a "no" as well.
But unless there's a major reveal in the future (like for example if the news station ever releases the PM footage and it shows it was LHO) there's really not much more to contribute.
Meanwhile, if people continue to post crazy and outlandish theories about the case, it's important that there be rebuttals to them. There's no "smear tactics" here.
Tom, fair enough that I didn't pick up on your humor. I think I have a pretty good sense of humor (anybody who has the balls to joke about their own deafness like I do has to have one) but I had no idea you were pulling legs in your posts.
By all means, Michael, if you have something interesting on the so called "jet effect", post away! I love discussing the ballistic and wound aspects of this case and have found we often get entirely new perspectives from "new" guys, such as yourself.
-
Whatever you want to see, Thomas. I'm still working on gathering facts (remember what those are?), such as Bill Shelley's height in 1963.
If it is established that Bill Shelley was considerably shorter than the 5'8" Bill Lovelady, will you concede it is very likely not Shelley and Lovelady seen walking together down the Elm St. extension in the Couch film, shortly after the assassination?
-
"Enhanced"
Is that what they are calling it nowadays? Almost everything in that "enhanced" photo is plaid.
-
On 07/11/2016 at 0:27 PM, Sandy Larsen said:
Michael,
Rather than using smear tactics, why not do some contributing or analysis employing research and reasoning.
And surprise us....
-
On 06/11/2016 at 2:33 PM, Thomas Graves said:
Barto,
Do you think Dwarf Man Sitting in a Chair looks like Lovelady, or not?
IIRC, Highly-influential Sandy Larsen and Robert Prudhomme think Dwarf Man's someone else altogether (who just happened to be wearing a shirt like Lovelady's that day), or that that clip was created months after the assassination, or something.
-- Tommy (with smiling "sun" face, wearing sunglasses)
I think you are slightly delusional, Thomas. Would you mind quoting the post in which I stated the man in the plaid shirt sitting in the DPD office was not Lovelady?
If you can't keep your threads, posts and posters straight, perhaps you should be looking for a new hobby. Might I suggest basket weaving?
Trump?
in JFK Deep Politics
Posted · Edited by Robert Prudhomme
deleted...double post