Jim, thank you for the above article link. Because of various "place-holder" (non-active) links on John's Web site, I was beginning to wonder whether he is still among the living. I did send a July 16th e-mail message to the "Jim Hargrove" address listed as the contact point for the John Armstrong Web site, but did not receive a reply. Am I correct in assuming that you are one and the same Jim Hargrove? If so, I have some suggestions and dead-link issues that I would like to discuss with you off-line.
Meanwhile, Michael Clark wrote: "Start a new thread, IMO."
Since by now we are nearly 55 years beyond the subject event, this "John Armstrong" message thread is new enough that I will stick with it for the moment. Regarding your above "opinion versus evidence" statement, I well understand what you are saying, but I am here in this forum to learn your and other members' reasoned *opinions* - as formed on the basis of the available *evidence*. There *are* a few established historical *facts* regarding the JFK assassination, but way too much evidence is still missing - and a considerable amount of it has been deliberately destroyed by various culpable parties.
So, please continue to offer you reasoned opinions, based on the available evidence - with the assumption being that if and when the evidence changes, our opinions should be changed along with it. Thanks again, ML