Jake Hammond

I'll get on it tomorrow chaps, don't think I'm ignoring anyone ! Weekends are normally a bit hectic Essentially I was making the point that if you look at all the conspiracy stuff that lets face it doesn't really fit together then you can point a lot of fingers. Also, unfortunately ( I mean that genuinely) Ruth Paine and Marina both have to be bare faced XXXXX and completely compromised in order for Oswald to not have being up to something that day and have taken a gun to work. There is very much a wider conspiracy to cover up after the fact, there was also at least an element of fore knowledge of something by the alphabet agencies. Oswalds behaviour and ( apparent) state of mind suggest he was part of it in some way. I'll try and find the show I was thinking of. The deleted word rhymed with tyres.

The filming of both deaths.... If there was a nefarious plot to kill both these men (and I believe that at least Oswalds execution was entirely organised). Then we have the lone gunman, the member of the public, publicly killing the victim. This sounds rather basic but what it does is prevent any discussion of Kennedy being bumped off behind the scenes in a coup, assassinated by Putin or Oswald being silenced by ' them' for what he knows. Obviously the Z film was released later but the execution was conducted in public and actually the Z film could have always stayed in the bank as a back up, albeit edited, to be released in a time of need by the conspirators. Oswald had to be killed on TV because he was never going to be in public again and so his mysterious death soon after the crime in private would have been incredibly suspicious, even to the general public ( who in those days could still largely think for themselves) . The transfer was the only time it could be reliably done, other than the media press conference, which of course Ruby attended, gun in pocket. it really was a show, performed and scripted.

I'll read your blog and his statements fully tomorrow, I've seen them previously but not for over a year... its late here though and I'm done for the day.

Ok so the 62 chevy wagon is a non starter as that photo isn't even on the right day ? I'll amend tomorrow. I'll check up on what Craig said again, maybe I was too quick there to blame the WC . Happy to be pulled up on issues as always.

Doesn't he match descriptions of a man seen on the 6th floor with a rifle ? sport jacket, hat, darker skin ? Also the Rambler was driven by a darer skinned possibly cuban looking man apparently. He also looks quite cool and relaxed relative to the situation. Just seems incongruous.

I'm happy to change things, stay objective and keep this updated and expand it out to other possible Ramblers and even other vehicles if you have better info.

Thank you, I'll research what Tosh and Jay said more closely. The car pictured isn't the one at 1240 but it may well be that there is a middle ground and there may even be another Rambler involved somewhere in the plot anyway. That the next thing I need to do to fill out this topic. if you have any good links please do share.

ok Thank you, I'll read up his story re the Rambler and see what could still work.

I bet, is that on a topic that's still active ?

Very possibly, great analysis again Dennis. I tidied up the Rambler topic I opened too BTW, and added some images back in for clarity.

Yes the sign in the full image says 12.40, I'm not aware of the lanes being closed I think that traffic just piled up in the right lane due to rubber necking and Ramblers innocently picking people up.....

Yes, it was also a '62 chevy Bel air wagon. Not entirely dissimilar to be fair.

Obtuse question ..... Do we tend to believe the accuracy and voracity of what he has said over the years because he is clearly a good guy and a just a nice old man . I know I do.

Thanks Michael, I have read some into Tosh Plumlee previously and the Rambler story although I need to read again. However, the image at 1240 shows the Rambler parked exactly like witnesses said and at the exact time. In addition the car behind it could well be the Cadillac narrowly avoiding it. I think for once we've caught a break here and this image captures exactly what good witnesses have stated. The object of this topic was to nail down if the 1240 image shows 'the rambler' and if so what the model of 'Rambler' is. Its an AMC '61/2 Rambler 'classic' station wagon, most likely in Echo green. The images of the Mexico/Tosh car show a 1959 rambler. The '59 had twin headlights spaced almost touching each other, almost in pods above the Bonnet line. In addition it has two distinctive vertical bumper over riders on the bumper going up and above the horizontal. The car at 1240 has the small vertical pieces BELOW the bumper, as per a' 61/2 'classic'. It would be a huge coincidence to me that another light-coloured Rambler station wagon would pull up at the curb at 1240 and narrowly avoid being hit by a large luxury car following it. Two in one minute of the same make, model, colour tone, same parking position and followed by very likely the car witnesses stated. Thats just a step too far into coincidence theory for me. Therefore I can't see any way for the Plumlee story to be accurate and the 59 Rambler Mexico car to be the one on Elm at 1240 picking someone up who looked like Oswalds double. Below is a 62 sedan with original wheels.

Wow, thank you. Things really did move on, well done, fantastic. I'm sure its her. Leica M3, Dr. of engineering, funded by naval intelligence, lived near a Naval base..... > checks out. Was DR. Elinor Sandborne another Stuart Reed ?