Charles Blackmon

7 minutes ago, Joseph McBride said:

What is a "debbie downer"?

Someone who spreads negativity.

Enjoying your book BTW

24 minutes ago, Michael Griffith said:

W I don't recommend Collateral Damage on my website, but I do recommend The Reporter Who Knew Too Much.  

Mike

Please provide your website link. I would like to take a look at it sometime.

6 hours ago, Chris Bristow said:

I was always baffled by the claim that the WTC fell at a free fall rate. When you can see the debris falling off the sides and falling faster than the WTC it makes you wonder how they could make that claim.

The other claim about the exhaust from explosions blasting out windows and blowing smoke out didn't make a lot of sense either. if an entire floor collapses in about one second all the air inside it has to go somewhere very quickly.

Two papers showed that the upper section was falling at "approximately 64% of free fall" and remarkably, no signs of deceleration as it impacted the supposedly intact lower sections.

9 hours ago, Ron Bulman said:

I imagine the next question would be.  "Huh, what is thermite?"

Microsoft Word - Jones_TOCPJ (benthamopen.com)

In this exhaustive study the conclusion is that "the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material. " Pretty compelling!

When someone can prove to me there was no thermite detected in the smoldering tower remains I will maybe stop having doubts about the 9/11 story.

30 minutes ago, Jonathan Cohen said:

I also wonder what compelled Gil to edit out the homophobic and transphobic statements from his post on June 22, only a portion of which is preserved in my quote reply in that thread.

What does that subject have to do with the subject of this thread? 

I knew that the stop/start of the Zapruder film was suspicious but I did not know there was a stop/start on all these other films. Thanks for pointing this out!

3 hours ago, David Von Pein said:

 

But evidence like this never fazes a staunch Anybody-But-Oswald CTer.

 

I am one of many here who believe there was a conspiracy, which may have involved LHO in some as yet undetermined way. I guess that makes me a CT-er, but there are too many unanswered questions about LHO to know exactly what his involvement was (patsy or conspirator). I am hoping by following the best threads and researchers at this site to one day get better answers than what we have so far.

So obviously this would make the BY photos fakes that were put together after the assassination, correct?

 “Well, you know if we do find out that this is a conspiracy, you know that we have orders from Chief Justice Warren to cover this thing up.” Wow now that is a very interesting quote!

15 hours ago, Allen Lowe said:

nope. That's not the way it was back then. It would have all faded into oblivion. 

 

 

Maybe you are referring to stonewalling by the MSM and the federal government but no, I do not agree that such a thing would be overlooked. Its your opinion and thats fine. 

21 hours ago, Allen Lowe said:

The thing to remember about this nonsense about election fraud is that it makes no sense, because if the Dems cooked the results in the presidential, why did they not do the same to make sure they had an impenetrable majority in the Senate? This is starting to sound like claims of Zapruder fakery, which ignore the basic logic that if they wanted to suppress the images they would have destroyed the film, not let it come out in ways which convinced the rest of the world that there was a conspiracy.

If the conspirators had destroyed the film, the whole nation would know that there had been a conspiracy and not just those of us who question the so-called evidence implicating LHO alone. 

4 hours ago, Bill Brown said:

Then go substantiate it.  I've already given you the information.

 

Aren't you the guy who, a couple pages back, asked what the going rate was on guarantees, while being totally unaware of the evidence you were commenting on?  I have no desire to help you along. 

In other words, you are into spreading misinformation.

40 minutes ago, Bill Brown said:

Before he was shot in the head, Reynolds told the FBI that he was of the opinion that the man he saw running with a gun in his hands was Lee Oswald.

This would need to be substantiated. Every source I have read about what Warren Reynolds said is he would not identify the man he saw fleeing as Oswald, until after he was shot in the head and his family received death threats then he suddenly fingered Oswald. No real surprise considering the threats.

The other thing about LHO behavior at the theater is why would he sit next to multiple strangers if he was so concerned about being identified and possibly apprehended? The only way sitting next to multiple strangers makes sense to me is if he was attempting to make contact with someone he did not know personally i.e. a handler (recall he had half of a dollar bill in his pocket. What was that for?)

Maybe its me but in trying to understand why LHO went into the theater IF he was this double cold-blooded killer that is alleged, why would he not think it better to get the heck out of Dodge while the getting is good? The longer he waits the more likely somebody on the streets (police or citizenry) would recognize him from his image splashed on everybody's T.V.

The guy that I tend to believe really killed Tippit (Larry Craford) did exactly that- he beat it out of town and went somewhere up north.

Its kind of funny that Lone Nut adherents think they are experts at explaining what Oswald was thinking in all sorts of situations that day. Yet none can explain his thinking concerning why he went into the Texas Theater.

How much is the going rate for "guarantees" nowadays? 

OK thanks I watched a YouTube video about the Greer theory once. Pretty silly!

This video is unavailable to view on my device (not sure why). If anyone could summarize what the "dumb theory" is I would be much obliged.  

1 hour ago, Denny Zartman said:

I so it's not like anyone is scoring points for the Lone Nut theory by "proving" LHO did it.

Two killings with no known motive for either one. Fits like a glove with the narrative of the "lone nut".

It is my understanding of this complex case, that if the Single Bullet Theory is NOT Single Bullet "FACT" then there had to be more than one person shooting at the limousine. I know, thats just repeating what most here already believe...of course this opens the door for someone to state otherwise (and maybe offer some good reasons why the SBT is not necessary for LHO to be the lone shooter).

2 hours ago, David Von Pein said:

 

Were all of those doctors complete idiots, James?

 

On the contrary there is nothing idiotic about trying to save your career and your hard-earned military pension by doing what your superiors order you to do.

7 hours ago, Jonathan Cohen said:

So what? She believes Oswald assassinated President Kennedy, and she has every right to tell her version of the story if she's asked to do so.

You just said she was trying to escape attention and she was being bothered. So which is it?

That is very nice of Mr. Gordon to give a warning before possibly banning someone. Not every administrator out there affords such a courtesy.