Bugliosi's Purpose

[J. Raymond Carroll]

True, Reclaiming History is nothing more than a prosecutor's brief like Case Closed.

Reclaiming History, at its best, is a labor of love born out of an admirable, even relentless, ardor for the truth about the assassination. There is no other way to describe the patience and stamina required to get to the bottom of so many stories, encrusted as they are by decades of falsehoods, misrepresentations and outright hoaxes. Mr. Bugliosi’s verve for setting the record straight is unequaled and will probably never be surpassed,

Thus Spakes Max Holland: http://www.washingtondecoded.com/site/books/index.html

[William Kelly]

True, Reclaiming History is nothing more than a prosecutor's brief like Case Closed.

Reclaiming History, at its best, is a labor of love born out of an admirable, even relentless, ardor for the truth about the assassination. There is no other way to describe the patience and stamina required to get to the bottom of so many stories, encrusted as they are by decades of falsehoods, misrepresentations and outright hoaxes. Mr. Bugliosi's verve for setting the record straight is unequaled and will probably never be surpassed,

Thus Spakes Max Holland: http://www.washingtondecoded.com/site/books/index.html

Thus mis-spakes Mad Max, whose own works on the subject carries the same burdon as Bugliosi, though at least Vinnie the Boo - as Dr. Mantik more correclty calls him - is entitled, as a lawyer, to represent his clients - those who pay him to maintain his positions.

If he was a cop - he'd be a Bad cop on the take - and as a journalist, Max Holland is a whore, whose date, or is it is pimp? is the J. Anthony Lucas/Columbia/CIA/Miller Center nexus of American institutional policy.

And if Holland would have read Bugliosi's book, he would have learned that it wasn't a labor or love, that he did do it for the money, just like Holland, and that he hated "writing" the chapter on Oswald, the most significant part of his book since he makes the pawn and patsy out to the major and only Kingpin.

Nor in fact, did Bugliosi actually write the book, as he employs, as he paid so well,

ghost writers, some of whom he actually credits, and the part he did "write," he didn't write, but dictated from his ghost writters sentences and notes and then had transcribed. He not only is an obnoxious dictator in person, but as a "writer."

Why can't John get Bugliosi and Holland to join the forum and answer qustions about their work? I promise to be more polite.

BK