If JFK had gone two terms...

[Sid Walker]

It’s a little bit simplistic to tar me with the guilt by association charge. Piper has in fact spent his entire career working for and had all his books published by Wills A. Carto the fuhrer of the Holocaust denial/neo-Nazi movements and for many of those years happily worked alongside racist bigot Bollyn. If someone spends there entire career working for publications run by Communists it’s reasonably safe to assume they are are Communist or at least Socialist same goes for someone who works for neo-Nazi’s.

Considering his long association with Bollyn and Carto and the former’s openly stated views on interracial dating/marriage/breeding and the latter’s openly stated views on Jews and Blacks he was supremely hypocritical when ranted on this forum

Andy Walker endorses the work of Deborah Lipstadt, a squalid racist who says that Jews should not marry non-Jews.

I call upon all of the good anti-racists on this forum to denounce Deborah Lipstadt for her foul racist position that Jews should not marry non-Jews.

Then when Deborah Lipstadt finally rejects this hate-filled supremacist point of view (something spawned from the old lie that God places one group of people above another, that "Chosen People" nonsense), maybe we can start believing EVERYTHING she says about "the Holocaust Deniers."

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.ph...ost&p=55441

Piper did opt to write a book glorifying his boss’s Holocaust denial (which is fine by you of course) and bragged on this forum to writing an essay that he thought was a “crock” in order to win a prize some money (so much for his claims of intellectual integrity).

Most people would define Piper’s views towards Jews as you define them as bigoted.

So your hero is an intellectually dishonest bigot who works for and with declared racists. Does that invalidate his book? Not in and of itself but they aren’t good signs especially when he has a pretty obvious ax to grind. I was rather unimpressed by the chapters he made available one basically consisted of ‘Guy Bannister (or someone else suspected of involvement in the assassination) knew “x”, “x” worked for “y” a Jew’’. Many of his claims were unsourced.

Is he “reflexively anti-Zionist or anti-Jewish”? From your previous description of his views and his statements on this forum the answer is a rather obvious yes on both counts. BTW you avoided answering my question if you share Piper’s views towards Jews.

Why doesn’t Conway want to debate Piper? I can imagine several possible reasons 1) she doesn’t want to grant him credibility 2) she has low tolerance for sleaze 3) he set unreasonable conditions 4) lack of time

As for Lane though he did good work on the assassination 40+ years ago he seems to long gone down the crackpot’s path serving as the in house attorney for the likes of Carto and Jim Jones.

Funny that you and Piper and the rest of Carto’s crew* only turned on Bollyn when he started criticizing Carto’s friends.

* Not meant to imply you are in any way associated with Carto

Len

I don't share anyone's views - in entirety.

On the other hand, with almost everyone, I share some views.

I've even, on very rare occasions, agreed with you.

When it comes to the highly complex topic of "views towards Jews", I'm more influenced by authors of a philosophical bent. Israel Shamir and Gilad Atzmon are my strongest contemporary influences.

Who are yours?

Edited June 19, 2007 by Sid Walker