Eric Carlson Posted June 7, 2007 Share Posted June 7, 2007 In all my reading on George DeMohrenschildt, I have not been able to validate this information on him: ----QUOTE ON----- [DeMohrenschildt] claimed that he was involved in a pro-Nazi plot to kill Joseph Stalin. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKdemohrenschildt.htm ----QUOTE OFF---- Can anyone give me the source on this one? I e-mailed John at spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk and he had this to say: ------------------------------ Hi Eric, I wrote the page several years ago and cannot remember where I got the information from. However, if you post the question on the forum, I am sure someone will know. John ---------------------- Can anyone help? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sid Walker Posted June 8, 2007 Share Posted June 8, 2007 In all my reading on George DeMohrenschildt, I have not been able to validate this information on him:----QUOTE ON----- [DeMohrenschildt] claimed that he was involved in a pro-Nazi plot to kill Joseph Stalin. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKdemohrenschildt.htm ----QUOTE OFF---- Can anyone give me the source on this one? I e-mailed John at spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk and he had this to say: ------------------------------ Hi Eric, I wrote the page several years ago and cannot remember where I got the information from. However, if you post the question on the forum, I am sure someone will know. John ---------------------- Can anyone help? Thanks! It sounds like disinformation to me... although as always, I'd keep an open mind and look out for actual evidence. This is an extract from David Irving's Hitler's War, FWIW. The sheer complexity of that (Hitler's) character is evident from a comparison ofhis brutality in some respects with his almost maudlin sentimentality and stubborn adherence to military conventions that others had long abandoned. We find him cold-bloodedly ordering a hundred hostages executed for every German occupation soldier killed; dictating the massacre of Italian officers who had turned their weapons against German troops in 1943; ordering the liquidation of Red Army commissars, Allied commando troops, and captured Allied aircrews; in 1942 he announced that the male populations of Stalingrad and Leningrad were to be exterminated. He justified all these orders by the expediencies of war. Yet the same Hitler indignantly exclaimed, in the last week of his life, that Soviet tanks were flying the Nazi swastika as a ruse during street fighting in Berlin, and he flatly forbade his Wehrmacht to violate flag rules. He had opposed every suggestion for the use of poison gases, as that would violate the Geneva Protocol; at that time Germany alone had manufactured the potentially war-winning lethal nerve gases Sarin and Tabun. In an age in which the governments of the democracies attempted, engineered, or condoned the assassinations, successfully or otherwise, of the inconvenient* – from General Sikorski, Admiral Darlan, Field Marshal Rommel, and King Boris of Bulgaria to Fidel Castro, Patrice Lumumba, and Salvador Allende – we learn that Hitler, the world’s most unscrupulous dictator, not only never resorted to the assassination of foreign opponents but flatly forbade his Abwehr to attempt it. In particular he rejected Admiral Canaris’s plans to assassinate the Red Army General Staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Carlson Posted June 8, 2007 Author Share Posted June 8, 2007 Thanks Sid! That quote you sent is probably accurate, but it does not rule out the possibility DeM claimed he was in a pro-Nazi plot against Stalin. Wherever that story came from, I really want to see what the original says. Whatever he claimed could give a glimse into DeM's mind. Perhaps he aspired to be an accomplice in political assassination. Any one else have the source? You will be my hero. Thanks!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted June 8, 2007 Share Posted June 8, 2007 Nice to see you hear Eric. I'd take anything Irving said with a shaker full of salt he is an infamous Hitler apologist and isn't taken very seriously by historians. He has been known to be rather careless with the facts That said the story reeks of BS to me and I suspect that either DeM never said it or if he did he made it up. Len Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sid Walker Posted June 8, 2007 Share Posted June 8, 2007 Nice to see you hear Eric. I'd take anything Irving said with a shaker full of salt he is an infamous Hitler apologist and isn't taken very seriously by historians. He has been known to be rather careless with the facts That said the story reeks of BS to me and I suspect that either DeM never said it or if he did he made it up. Len Nice to hear you sea, Len. Nice also to confirm that we have agreement on some topics, if not all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hogan Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 (edited) Any one else have the source? You will be my hero. Thanks!! Hi Eric, Bruce Campbell Adamson will probably be able to answer your question. The link to his email address is at the very bottom left of his website. Good luck. http://www.ciajfk.com/demohrenschildt.html Edited June 9, 2007 by Michael Hogan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Miller Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 Wasn't DeMohrenschildt involved in the Vlasov group or the ABN ant-communist group at one point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 I'd take anything Irving said with a shaker full of salt he is an infamous Hitler apologist and isn't taken very seriously by historians. He has been known to be rather careless with the factsLen Nice... to confirm that we have agreement on some topics, if not all. Agreed!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Carlson Posted June 12, 2007 Author Share Posted June 12, 2007 Hey Len! Yeah, I finally thought to just write to John and he let me on the board personally. Thanks for the warning on Irving, I'd never heard of him before. I want to get to the bottom of this, even if DeM was lying. It would show that DeM at least thought about political assassinations enough to fabricate stories in which he was a conspirator. Also, I doubt John would just make this up. It had to come from somewhere. I just wrote to Bruce Adamson. If anyone knows, he will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Carlson Posted June 14, 2007 Author Share Posted June 14, 2007 Bruce Campbell Adamson, one of the foremost researchers on De Mohrenschildt has never heard of this claim by De Mohrenschildt. That really makes it dubious in my mind. Here is Bruce's response to me: --------------------------- DeM's nephew was a Communist; Stalin's daughter corresponded with Dimitri Von Mohrenschildt... Never heard of it; should I check it out ? Bruce --------------------------- Eric wrote: Here are exerpts from the Adamson Report: (Nothing earth shattering here) Stalin’s daughter [wrote] to Dimitri Von Mohrenschildt in the very year she defected to the United States in 1967. In the Spring of the following year Dimitri Von Mohrenschildt, Bertram D. Wolfe and Allen Dulles’ sister Eleanor Lansing Dulles signed a protest against the Communists annual meeting. Svetlana refused to stand up against the Communists. On March 25, 1968 Svetlana Alliluyeva wrote Dimitri thanking him for material sent. Dimitri Von Mohrenschildt, the brother of Lee Harvey Oswald’s closest friend had known Svetlana well enough to ask her if she would also sign the protest. -------------------------- Recently this author uncovered evidence that Dimitri Von Mohrenschildt had a son in Soviet Russia who, unlike Dimitri, seems to have believed in the Communist way of life. In researching the life of Dimitri this author uncovered a letter dated October 10, 1991 from Dimitri’s son who called himself “Sharma.” Sharma called Dimitri “Dad.” Sharma [possible nick name] wrote his father: “There is a lot to talk about the happenings in Soviet Union. I am sure that aspect you are keeping well up to date with but one small item in the papers which has drawn my attention is regarding socialistic pattern of society in the light of Sri Aurobindo. I remember having discussed the matter with Mr. MP Pandit and he also of the opinion that Communism per se is not bad provided personal liberties and spiritual aspirations of the people are not curbed and he even went to the extent of saying that if the Bolsheviks had allowed the practice of religion the Soviet pattern of Communism perhaps could have been a best model for peace and prosperity on the earth. May be the concept of “village of cosmic Communism... I can almost imagine you chuckling with that quizzical look in your eyes.” 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now