Bernice Moore Posted June 18, 2007 Share Posted June 18, 2007 Gaeton Fonzi, author of "The Last Investigation", & update on the Bug Book If anyone wants to read a I,696-page crock, we recommend Reclaiming History by the noted lawyer, Vincent Bugliosi. It says Lee Harvey Oswald alone killed President Kennedy. In making his case, he questions - and distorts - the work of Gaeton Fonzi, my former editorial partner and the author of The Last Investigation, the increasingly influential book which makes the strongest case in print that Oswald did not kill Kennedy. When Bugliosi challenges Fonzi's book, he challenges this magazine, for Fonzi's work originally appeared here and in The Washingtonian in 1980. That was l4 years before it became a book which is a must reading for students of the assassination. Bugliosi's book is just being released, but Fonzi read parts referring to his work. Fonzi particularly was annoyed by being labeled "a conspiracy theorist." Writes Fonzi: "Bugliosi is wrong. I was never a 'conspiracy theorist.' I went from an agnostic to a conspiracy believer." Fonzi goes on to describe how he became a believer. It stemmed from interviewing Arlen Specter (the same U.S. senator we see on TV all the time) back in 1967. Specter had returned from working for the Waren Commission and coming up with "the single bullet theory." Fonzi had just met with a lawyer named Vincent Salandria, and surprised Specter by knowing in detail the contradictions to that theory. Fonzi was amazed that when confronted with inconsistencies Specter could not explain them. Normally articulate, he stumbled and fumbled. Fonzi's article in Philadelphia Magazine caused a local sensation. It resulted, some years later, in Pennsylvania Sen. Richard Schweiker hiring him as a field investigator, here in Florida, when Congress reopened the investigation into JFK's death. In three years on the government payroll, Fonzi developed links between Oswald and the CIA. He discovered the agency had lied to the Warren Commission, and 15 years later was still stonewalling him and others trying to solve the crime of the century. He wrote all this in these pages. And not long ago he followed up with a story detailing how recently declassified CIA files have reinforced the impression that if intelligence figures did not kill a president. they surely did their best to frustrate the doc attempting to find out who did. June2 007 By BernardM cCormick As for Bugliosi's assertion that Fonzi came to his investigative work with a bias,I rise to support Fonzi. I was there that day in Wildwood, N.J., when the two of us, while working on a light piece (the title was "The Working Man's Riviera") were diverted to meet a Philadelphiala lawyer who was insisting the Warren Commission was a cover up. Vincent Salandria was unusual at that time in that he had actually studied the 26 volumes of evidence. Neither Fonzi nor I had even read the official report, a summary which had been praised by the New York Times. But no one at the Times had read the 26 volumes of evidence, because they had not yet been released. Such endorsements made the commission's work accepted by the public, including Fonzi and me. We did not know enough to have any bias. THE ANSWER Salandria wanted to meet Fonzi because of his reputation as an investigative reporter. Fonzi invited me along for the fun. Both of us expected to meet a nut case. And initially I thought we had. My first impression was of a man unnervingly intense and obsessive. But when he began running us through the evidence, we were startled at the blatant contradictions.Keep in mind, this was just the initial physical stuff - the position of the holes in JFK's shirt, the wounds, the pristine "single bullet" that had to wound both Kennedy and Gov. John Connolly to limit the deed to a single shooter. This was before it became known that dozens of witnesses thought shots came from the grassy knoll, and it was a decade before investigators, including Fonzi. discovered that the CIA had concealed its huge involvement in anti-Castro activities in South Florida from the Warren Commission. It was even longer before it was learned that the CIA set up President Kennedy for failure at the Bay of Pigs, figuring he would have to use our military to save the operation,and his butt. It was before the truth of the Cuban Missile Crisis came out. When Kennedy, after a secret agreement with the Russians tried to shut down CIA efforts to kill Castro and stage attacks in Cuba. That resulted in CIA agents and their Cuban-American operatives hating Kennedy, considering him a traitor. And it was nearly 40 years before we would learn that in faking cooperation with Fonzi's investigation. the CIA assigned as liaison a retired agent who was, had been deeply involved in coordinating anti-Castro activities in Miami. Of course, he didn't bother to mention that. And when asked to identify the specitic CIA man who headed the anti- Castrcl work in South Florida, he could not find him. It turns out the man government investigators wanted so badly to question was /rillsef. It is thought most of those involved in the murder of JFK are dead. Certainly the most suspicious CIA types are. And ) ct those books supporting a long dis- credited idea that Oswald acted alone .()ntinLrc to be published. It is strange. \n.i indt-'c'd.. it is stranger that Fonzi, who started out as an agnostic and became a believer criticized or finding and revealing tirc t i ' L r t l r . IIERE} g u lfst reo m m e d i ag ro u p.co m PUBLISHER'S LETTER that the opposite end of this book, we rise once again to defend a work which appeared in these pages 27 years ago, and which has grown into something of a landmark in the history of the Kennedy assassination. If you have a day to devote, Google the name Gaeton Fonzi and see the multiple references to his book The Last Investigation which first appeared here as two long magazine articles in 1980. In retrospect, the book had the wrong name, but only because it has had such an impact that many researchers have been inspired to investigate the crime of the century, uncovering additional information to corroborate crucial details that Fonzi developed during five years as a government investigator. Fonzi's initial assignment for Pennsylvania Sen. Richard Schweiker was to look into CIA connections with anti-Castro Cubans in South Florida. Fonzi, in his own phrase, "stumbled" across a connection between Lee Harvey Oswald and a high ranking CIA officer. Fonzi never accused the CIA man of particpating in JFK's murder, but he did open a door that subsequently cast light on the elaborate efforts of the intelligence community to sabotage the quest for truth. And the truth continues to come out, almost 45 years after the tragic day in Dallas. Even Fonzi's CIA man, David Atlee Phillips, when near death, said he thought the intelligence community was involved in the killing. He did not admit a role, but that may have been one last bit of spycraft, a disinformation specialist's final wink at history - kill a president and get away with it. And a dying E. Howard Hunt, the famous Watergate burglar and longtime CIA figure, named the intelligence community figures he said were involved, including David Atlee Phillips. Hunt modestly described himself as "a bench warmer" in the actual event. Another deathbed confession of sorts has been the gradual declassification of documents which show the extent to which the CIA stonewalled the congressional committee for which Fonzi worked. For more on that, go to the last page. This magazine is not known as hard hitting, but it is an immense satisfaction to know that a former editorial partner in this publication has made history, and that we had a part in helping him. >F >F >F Some years back we interviewed the late ]im Moran and he revealed Jim Moran's 10 rules of business.1 . Be there 2 Be there.3. Be there 4. Be there 5. Be there. 6. Be there 7. Be there 8. Be there 9. Be there 10. Be there. First at Courtesy Ford in Chicago and later when he built fM Family Enterprises into a giant network of dealerships and distributorships in the south, Jim Moran was there - for his customers and for the communities he served. - BERNARD McCORMICK 1 2 June 2007 gulfstreammediagroup Beow is how it originally came through, I tried to make it more readable........but for correct procedure...as sent from the author....here it is below... f anyone wants to read a I,696-page crock, we recommend Reclaiming History by the noted lawyer, Vincent Bugliosi. It says Lee Harvey Oswald alone killed President Kennedy. In making his case, he questions - and distorts - the work of Gaeton Fonzi, my former editorial partner and the author of The Last Investigation, the increasingly influential book rvhichm akest he strongesct asei n print that Osrvald did not kill Kennedy. When Bugliosi challengesF onzi'sb ook, he challenges this magazine, for Fonzi's work originally appeared here and in The Washingtonian in 1980. That rvas l4 years before it became a book which is must readinsf or studentso f the assassination. Bugliosi's book is just being released, but Fonzi read parts referring to his work. Fonzi particularly was annoyed by being labeled "a conspiracy theorist." Writes Fonzi: "Bugliosi is wrong. I was never a 'conspiracy theorist.' I went from an agnostic to a conspiracy believer." Fonzi goes on to describe how he became a believer. It stemmed from interviewing Arlen Specter (the same U.S. senator we see on TV all the time) back in 1967. Specter had returned from working for the Wanen Commission and coming up with "the single bullet theory." Fonzi had just met with a lawyer named Vincent Salandria, and surprised Specter by knowing in detail the contradictions to that theory. Fonzi was amazed that when confronted rvith inconsistenciesS, pecterc ould not explain them. Normally articulate,h e stumbleda nd fumbled. Fonzi's article rn Philadelphia Magazinec auseda local sensationI.t resulted, some years later, in PennsylvaniaS en. Richard Schweiker hiring him as a field investigator, h ere in Florida, when Congress reopenedth e investigationin to JFK's death. In three years on the government payroll, Fonzi developedl inks betweenO srvalda nd the CIA. He discoveredt he agencyh ad lied to the Warren Commission, and 15 years later was still stonewalling him and others trying to solve the crime of the century. He wrote all this in these pages. And not long ago he followed up rvith a stor)' detailing how recently declassified CIA files have reinforced the impression that if intelligencefi guresd id not kill a president. they surely did their best to frustratct-h osc attempting to find out who did. June2 007 By BernardM cCormick As for Bugliosi's assertion that Fonzi camet o his investigativew ork with a bias,I rise to support Fonzi. I was there that day in Wildwood, N.J., when the tlvo of us, while r,vorking on a light piece (the title was "The Working Man's Riviera") were diverted to meet a Philadelphiala wyer who was insisting the Warren Commission was a cover up. Vincent Salandria was unusual at that time in that he had actually studied the 26 volumes of evidence. Neither Fonzi nor I had even read the official report, a summary which had been praised by the New York Times. But no one at the Times had read the 26 volumes of evidence, because they had not yet been released. Such endorsements made the commission's work accepted by the public, including Fonzi and me. We did not know enough to have any bias. I' THE RlISWER alandria wanted to meet Fonzr becauseo f his reputationa s an investigative reporter. Fonzi inr ited me along for the fun. Both of us expectedt o meet a nut case.A nd initiallr I thought we had. My first impression w'as of a man unnervinglyi ntense.g aunt,o bsessive. But when he began running us through the evidence. we were starlled at the blatant contradictionsK. eep in mind, this rvasj ust the initial physical stuff - the position of the holes in JFK's shirt, the wounds, the pristine "single bullet" that had to wound both Kennedy and Gov. John Connolly to limit the deed to a single shooter. This was before it became known that dozens of witnesses thought shots came from the grassy knoll, and it was a decade before investigators, including Fonzi. discovered that the CIA had concealed its huge involvement in anti-Castro activities in South Florida from the Warren Commission. It was even longer before it rvas learned that the CIA set up President Kennedy for failure at the Bay of Pigs, figuring he would have to use our military to save the operation,a ndh is butt. It was beforet he truth of the Cuban Missile Crisis came out. when Kennedy, after a secret agreement with the Russians.t ried to shut down CIA efforts to kill Castro and stage attacks in Cuba. That resulted in CIA agents and their Cuban-American operatives hating Kennedy, considering him a traitor. And it was nearly 40 years before we would learn that in faking cooperation with Fonzi's investigation. t he CIA assigneda s liaisona retired agent who was had been deeply involved in coordinating anti-Castro activities in Miami. Of course, he didn't bother to mention that. And when asked to identify the specitic CIA man who headed the anti- Castrcl rvork in South Florida, he could not lind him. It turns out the man government inrestigatorsw anted so badly to question u as /rillsef. It is thought most of those involved in the murder of JFK are dead. Certainly thc rnost suspiciousC IA types are. And ) ct thcse books supporling a long dis- .rc!litcd idea that Oswald acted alone .()ntinLrc to be published. It is strange. \n.i indt-'c'dit is strangert hat Fonzi, who .t.rrtcrl r)ut as an agnostic and became a be- Irer er . r. criticizedf or findinga ndr evealing tirc t i ' L r t l r . IIERE} g u lfst reo m m e d i ag ro u p.co m PUBLISHER'SL ETTER t the opposite end of this book, we rise once again to defend a work which appeared in these pages 27 years ago, and which has grown into something of a landmark in the history of the Kennedy assassinationI.f you have a day to devote, Google the name Gaeton Fonzi and see the multiple references to his book The Last Investigation which first appeared here as two long magazine articles in 1980. In retrospect, the book had the wrong name, but only because it has had such an impact that many researchers have been inspired to investigate the crime of the century, uncovering additional information to corroborate crucial details that Fonzi developed during five years as a government investigator. Fonzi's initial assignment for Pennsylvania Sen. Richard Schweiker was to look into CIA connections with anti-Castro Cubans in South Florida. Fonzi, in his own phrase, "stumbled" across a connection between Lee Harvey Oswald and a high ranking CIA officer. Fonzi never accused the CIA man of particpating in |FK's murder, but he did open a door that subsequently cast light on the elaborate efforts of the intelligence community to sabotaget he quest for truth. And the truth continues to come out, almost 45 years after the tragic day in Dallas. Even Fonzi's CIA man, David Atlee Phillips, when near death, said he thought the intelligence community was involved in the killing. He did not admit a role, but that may have been one last bit of spycraft, a disinformation specialist'sfi nal wink at history - kill a president and get away with it. And a dying E. Howard Hunt, the famous Watergate burglar and longtime CIA figure, named the intelligence community figures he said were involved, including David Atlee Phillips. Hunt modestly described himself as "a bench warmer" in the actual event. Another deathbed confession of sorts has been the gradual declassification of documents which show the extent to which the CIA stonewalled the congressional committee for which Fonzi worked. For more on that, go to the last page. This magazine is not known as hard hitting, but it is an immense satisfaction to know that a former editorial partner in this publication has made history, and that we had a part in helping him. >F >F >F Some years back we interviewed the late ]im Moran and he revealed Iim Moran's 10 rules of business.1 . Be there 2 Be there.3. Be there 4. Be there 5. Be there. 6. Be there 7. Be there 8. Be there 9. Be there 10. Be there. First at Courtesy Ford in Chicago and later when he built fM Family Enterprises into a giant network of dealershipsa nd distributorships in the south, |im Moran was there - for his customers and for the communities he served. - BERNARD McCORMICK 1 2 June 2007 gulfstreammediagroup Thanks Frog..... B... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Black Posted June 18, 2007 Share Posted June 18, 2007 Hello Bernice From my first readings of some of his early work to the present time, Fonzi has been very near the top of my list of asassination investigators. One of my greatest regrets regarding Fonzi's work and the investigation in general, is that The Baron's murder/suicide, prevented Fonzi's interview. Charles Black Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Black Posted June 18, 2007 Share Posted June 18, 2007 Hello again Bernice I have two questions that I hope that you can input, as I feel that they are potentially important but never discussed. First: The Baron's daughter (Alexandra?)...to what extent was she interviewed and by whom? Also her ex husband, whom tho I can't document, seems to have had a less high opinion of Georges, if I recall. Are either or both still alive ? Second: Jeanne de Morenschildt-----although I know that she considered his later years as being "insane"----this woman would have had a WEALTH of knowledge regarding their relationship with the Oswalds. Jeanne was not just a "flunky"! I feel that she had very intimate knowledge of all that he did and was a "co-worker" in nearly all of his "projects". Although some very absurd reports have been recorded, such as the studies of LHO's pubic hair, how deeply have the De Morenschildts, whom I have always felt were one of the most important factors, barring virtually none, regarding ALL of the later actions of the Oswalds, been deeply and seriously studied. His involvement with the Oswalds could not have been one of "social choice" and by chance! I feel this is an extremely important area in which I KNOW nearly nothing of "deeper significance" ! I hope that I am not taking this thread off course, but every time that Fonzi enters my mind...it is immediately followed by thoughts of The Baron's "very timely" death! Charles Black Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now