Ron Ecker Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 Fred A. Bieberdorf, the first aid attendant at the city jail, was with Oswald after he was shot. He rode in the ambulance with Leavelle and two detectives. Here’s the link to his testimony. His deposition or a report on his interview is in the WC volumes (referred to in his testimony as Exhibit 5123) but I can’t find it. http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/bieberdo.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Gratz Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 The alleged absence of LHO blood proves the shooting was not "faked". You, ladies and gentlemen, are smart enough to figure out why I say that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kathleen Collins Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Some time ago I shared my experience of Beverly Oliver's (hereinafter B.O.) claim that Ruby had contacted her, through an intermediary, from his oversees sanctuary.B.O. let this cat out of the bag at the JFK Lancer conference at which Judge Tunheim was a featured speaker. Her method of doing so is most interesting. She initially told a very small group of attendees the following: In the recent past she received what purported to be a message from the alive-and-well Ruby. In it he acknowledged that she likely would dismiss his overture as some sort of provocation. So he challenged her to come up with a dozen or so questions that only B.O. and Ruby could answer: real personal sorts of things. B.O. complied, and reported that Ruby correctly answered all but one question. And even the wrong answer, she claimed, could be understood in terms of simple semantic differences (what she called a "runway," he called a "ramp," or vice-versa). Well, you know what they say about secrets. Within hours of B.O.'s original spinning of the yarn, the entire conference was abuzz with news that Ruby lives! B.O. was claiming to be angry and scared, but somehow managed to keep herself squarely in the spotlight -- almost as if the leak was exactly what she had planned for. Perhaps Jack White and/or Larry Hancock know more about this little drama. Charles For more "evidence" that Jack Ruby is alive: http://coverthistory.blogspot.com/2005/08/...rst-became.html http://coverthistory.blogspot.com/2005/09/...the-secret.html I remember reading this in the Globe. There's a joke scandal sheet, Weekly World News, where they had a story that Oswald had only recently died. As a centerfold they have Oswald after his autopsy, sewn up, but with hair missing and white hair remaining -- he's obviously aged. But the most amazing thing was Oswald still had the black eye the cops gave him back in 1963. Kathy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Gratz Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Wanted to repeat this: The alleged absence of LHO blood proves the shooting was not "faked". You, ladies and gentlemen, are smart enough to figure out why I say that. No one apparently has the answer yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted September 6, 2007 Author Share Posted September 6, 2007 Of course the shooting was NOT faked. But my real question was either the Jackson or Beers photo faked? There seem to be anomalies which cannot be explained. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Gratz Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Jack: 1. Why, pray tell, would anyone fake those photos? You certainly do not believe Ruby was just a "patsy" do you? 2. Well, what are the "anomalies"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted September 7, 2007 Author Share Posted September 7, 2007 (edited) Jack...B.. Evidently Gratz missed my comparison of the photos. Certain anomalies seem apparent. Take a look. Ruby a patsy? In the same way as LHO, he was "used" by the plotters. Jack (THE GRAPHIC DID NOT ATTACH, EVEN THOUGH I USED THE QUOTE FEATURE. WHY NOT? SOMETIMES IT DOES, SOMETIMES NOT. GO TO POSTING ON PAGE 1) Edited September 7, 2007 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted September 7, 2007 Author Share Posted September 7, 2007 Some time ago I shared my experience of Beverly Oliver's (hereinafter B.O.) claim that Ruby had contacted her, through an intermediary, from his oversees sanctuary.B.O. let this cat out of the bag at the JFK Lancer conference at which Judge Tunheim was a featured speaker. Her method of doing so is most interesting. She initially told a very small group of attendees the following: In the recent past she received what purported to be a message from the alive-and-well Ruby. In it he acknowledged that she likely would dismiss his overture as some sort of provocation. So he challenged her to come up with a dozen or so questions that only B.O. and Ruby could answer: real personal sorts of things. B.O. complied, and reported that Ruby correctly answered all but one question. And even the wrong answer, she claimed, could be understood in terms of simple semantic differences (what she called a "runway," he called a "ramp," or vice-versa). Well, you know what they say about secrets. Within hours of B.O.'s original spinning of the yarn, the entire conference was abuzz with news that Ruby lives! B.O. was claiming to be angry and scared, but somehow managed to keep herself squarely in the spotlight -- almost as if the leak was exactly what she had planned for. Perhaps Jack White and/or Larry Hancock know more about this little drama. Charles Charles, I know nothing about this...but your anecdote seems to be a misinterpretation by those who heard what she said rather than her attempting to mislead anyone. I believe Beverly's 11-22 story is basically true. However, she is NOT a researcher and remains naive enough to be misled by people attempting to exploit or debunk her. As an example, a European documentary maker "convinced" her that he had discovered frames from her movie. He furnished her 11x14 color prints of several frames showing an enlargement of the grassy knoll area. Excitedly, she sent them to me for study. When they arrived, I could see she had been duped...they were enlargements from Nix frames, cropped-in to make it appear they were closeups. She was not convinced till I showed her the Nix frames they were cropped from. I believe this was an attempt to discredit her...but we were able to divert it. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Drago Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Jack, I have no opinion regarding Ms. Oliver's role in the incidents I report. Duper, dupe, and/or exaggerator? I simply have no way to know. The events at Lancer took place as I describe them. Charles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Gratz Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 Jack wrote: Evidently Gratz missed my comparison of the photos. Certain anomalies seem apparent. Take a look. Sorry, Mr. White (well, at least I called you Mr.) I missed the post with the anomalies pointed out. I am sure the video coverage would answer those questions. Ruby a patsy? In the same way as LHO, he was "used" by the plotters. Jack, I certainly do not understood what you mean here. For those who believe LHO was telling the truth when he said he was a "patsy" most believe that he had no idea that JFK was going to be killed and was certainly not a witting part of the conspiracy. If Ruby was more than a "lone nut" and killed LHO at someone's order, that certainly does not make him a "patsy" in my book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now