Jack White Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 (edited) Please put your answers in the form of an answer. You will be in jeopardy if you fail to answer all questions. Jack Edited January 28, 2010 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 Please put your answers in the form of an answer. You will be in jeopardyif you fail to answer all questions. Jack LOL! (and spews Diet Coke all over the keyboard....) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 28, 2010 Author Share Posted January 28, 2010 Please put your answers in the form of an answer. You will be in jeopardyif you fail to answer all questions. Jack LOL! (and spews Diet Coke all over the keyboard....) That is an incorrect answer. It is not in the form of an answer. Select another category. Do not buzz in unless you know the answers. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 That is an incorrect answer. It is not in the form of an answer.Select another category. Do not buzz in unless you know the answers. Jack (diet coke now being wiped from the monitor) White distraction tactic number 142 in action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 28, 2010 Author Share Posted January 28, 2010 That is an incorrect answer. It is not in the form of an answer.Select another category. Do not buzz in unless you know the answers. Jack (diet coke now being wiped from the monitor) White distraction tactic number 142 in action. These are SERIOUS QUESTIONS. Lamson answers with nonsensical answers. Will someone please give me the correct answers? Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dolva Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 Jack, there's camera motion blur, varying object motion blur, exposure blur. The closer to the photographer, the less evident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 Looks like Brehm and son joey on the left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 28, 2010 Author Share Posted January 28, 2010 Jack, there's camera motion blur, varying object motion blur, exposure blur. The closer to the photographer, the less evident. Lots of blur...but that is not an answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 28, 2010 Author Share Posted January 28, 2010 Looks like Brehm and son joey on the left. Brehm is not farther west than the Newmans. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Logan Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 These are SERIOUS QUESTIONS. Lamson answers with nonsensical answers. Will someoneplease give me the correct answers? Jack 1) There is no one without legs. Mr. Brehm's legs are obscured by blur and by the body and legs of his son. 2) There is no one is a red coat. The coat appears to be red just like the grass and pavement because the right side of Groden's print has been contaminated with a red color cast. 3) The line between the grass and the sidewalk and the curb are no more blurred than the shadow. That's because they are all relatively thin lines in the same plane as the camera's motion. 4) As the flag furls and unfurls it shows more or less of the Presidential Seal which photographs white as in this Hughes frame. 5)There is no motorcycle officer or motorcycle as anyone can see by looking at a better version of the Muchmore frames. In fact, all of your questions can be answered by examining better frames. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 28, 2010 Author Share Posted January 28, 2010 These are SERIOUS QUESTIONS. Lamson answers with nonsensical answers. Will someoneplease give me the correct answers? Jack 1) There is no one without legs. Mr. Brehm's legs are obscured by blur and by the body and legs of his son. 2) There is no one is a red coat. The coat appears to be red just like the grass and pavement because the right side of Groden's print has been contaminated with a red color cast. 3) The line between the grass and the sidewalk and the curb are no more blurred than the shadow. That's because they are all relatively thin lines in the same plane as the camera's motion. 4) As the flag furls and unfurls it shows more or less of the Presidential Seal which photographs white as in this Hughes frame. 5)There is no motorcycle officer or motorcycle as anyone can see by looking at a better version of the Muchmore frames. In fact, all of your questions can be answered by examining better frames. Wrong. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Logan Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 Looks like Brehm and son joey on the left. Brehm is not farther west than the Newmans. Jack From Muchmore's location the Newmans will be to the right of Brehm. Just like in the picture. And Brehm's head will be directly aligned with the corner of the retaining wall. Just like in the better picture. It's Brehm and son. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 28, 2010 Author Share Posted January 28, 2010 Looks like Brehm and son joey on the left. Brehm is not farther west than the Newmans. Jack From Muchmore's location the Newmans will be to the right of Brehm. Just like in the picture. And Brehm's head will be directly aligned with the corner of the retaining wall. Just like in the better picture. It's Brehm and son. wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Logan Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 [Wrong. Jack I'm happy to let everyone judge for themselves. For me, this goes in the "Blonde Babushka Lady" , "Full Flush Left" and "Lambchop" file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 28, 2010 Author Share Posted January 28, 2010 Looks like Brehm and son joey on the left. Brehm is not farther west than the Newmans. Jack Robin...I apologize...you are correct about it being Brehm and son. I have just reviewed my copies of Muchmore, and cannot locate the particular frame I used. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now