Israel behind the bombs shipped from Yemen?

[Len Colby]

I note that you left out some of the text from the page you got "HOW TO SPOT AN ANTISEMITIC HATE CRIME HOAX" from

"No One Twirls Chickens Like A Judaic"

"Do you support the actions and behaviour of worldwide Jewry?"

"<< ESSAYS >>

THE JEWISH CULTURE OF DECEIT

ANTI SEMITISM AS A POLITICAL WEAPON

A STRAIGHT LOOK AT THE JEWISH LOBBY

THE JEWISH QUESTION - AN INFORMATIVE ESSAY

THE UGLY ISRAELI

JEWISH POWER"

I guess you simply "forgot" to supply the link, fixed that for you:

http://thejewishtribe.blogspot.com/2010/09/how-to-spot-antisemitic-hate-crime-hoax.html

[Steven Gaal]

I note that you left out some of the text from the page you got "HOW TO SPOT AN ANTISEMITIC HATE CRIME HOAX" from

"No One Twirls Chickens Like A Judaic"

"Do you support the actions and behaviour of worldwide Jewry?"

"<< ESSAYS >>

THE JEWISH CULTURE OF DECEIT

ANTI SEMITISM AS A POLITICAL WEAPON

A STRAIGHT LOOK AT THE JEWISH LOBBY

THE JEWISH QUESTION - AN INFORMATIVE ESSAY

THE UGLY ISRAELI

JEWISH POWER"

I guess you simply "forgot" to supply the link, fixed that for you:

http://thejewishtribe.blogspot.com/2010/09/how-to-spot-antisemitic-hate-crime-hoax.html

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Now below from the Jeruselem Post. Len , Yosef thinks you LEN ( even I !!!!!) are the master race. Yosef maybe the worlds top TORAH scholar. On U Tube you will find a great number of videos of young Israeli men proclaiming genetic superiorty over all other races......

Yosef: Gentiles exist only to serve Jews

By JONAH MANDEL

10/18/2010 05:13

According to Rabbi, the lives of non-Jews in Israel are safeguarded by divinity, to prevent losses to Jews.

Talkbacks (98)

The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews, according to Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the head of Shas’s Council of Torah Sages and a senior Sephardi adjudicator.

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel,” he said in his weekly Saturday night sermon on the laws regarding the actions non-Jews are permitted to perform on Shabbat.

According to Yosef, the lives of non-Jews in Israel are safeguarded by divinity, to prevent losses to Jews.

“In Israel, death has no dominion over them... With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money.

This is his servant... That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew,” Yosef said.

“Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat.

That is why gentiles were created,” he added.

Yosef’s Saturday night sermons have seen many controversial statements from the 90-year-old rabbi. In August, Yosef caused a diplomatic uproar when he wished a plague upon the Palestinian people and their leaders, a curse he retracted a few weeks later, when he blessed them along with all of Israel’s other peace-seeking neighbors.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

BACK TO CHOKE POINT YEMEN below

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=21920

Who or what is Anwar al-Awlaki? ???????????????

As documented by Michel Chossudovsky in America’s “War on Terrorism”, “Islamic terrorism”, including “Al-Qaeda” are assets of the CIA, a myth designed to obscure a vast covert operation and global war agenda. The “Militant Islamic Network” is a military-intelligence network that has been “run” on behalf of Anglo-American interests.

Now “Al-Qaeda”, the eternal covert operation and propaganda apparatus, has been given a facelift. A new generation of Osama bin Laden “disciples” threatens the world, now led by "homegrown Al-Qaeda" terrorists with operational ties to AQAP.

Anwar Al-Awlaki, an AQAP regional commander, has become the western media’s public enemy number one. The New Mexico-born cleric is a prime suspect for the foiled UPS cargo plane bomb plot (which US and Saudi intelligence knew about several weeks before it happened.), even though Yemeni officials are not clear about his role. He is wanted in Yemen for a suspected role for the October killing of a French oil company executive, and also wanted for the failed bombing of a US-bound plane in December 2009. He is also accused of having an e-mail connection to the November 2009 Fort Hood shooting, and for giving jihadist sermons.

Atop the CIA’s “capture or kill” list, Al-Awlaki has been connected to 9/11 through reported associations with some of the so-called 9/11 hijackers. The rise of Al-Awlaki coincides with the naming of Adnan Shukrijumah as a new leader of “Al-Qaeda” global operations with an alleged connection to 9/11.

Just as Osama bin Laden has allegedly been hiding in the mountains of Afghanistan for almost a decade without detection, Al-Awlaki is reportedly in a mountain hideout in Yemen, where he is difficult if not impossible to locate.

A close examination of Al-Awlaki’s life reveals a bizarre career throughout which he has been thoroughly monitored and interrogated by the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, and arrested and interrogated numerous times:

The Awar Al-Awlaki Timeline

What demands scrutiny is the fact that, despite his dangerous profile, and being covered like a blanket by intelligence authorities, Al-Awlaki has been permitted to live and travel freely and extensively throughout the US and the world, in such places as San Diego, California (where the Al-Qaeda cell was under scrutiny by FBI informants), and Falls Church, Virginia, a short distance from CIA headquarters.

It has been thoroughly documented by investigators such as Mike Ruppert that Al-Qaeda (an intelligence front to begin with) has not only been thoroughly penetrated by intelligence agencies and law enforcement. From Ruppert’s Crossing the Rubicon:

“Long before 9/11, US and foreign intelligence had achieved penetrations of al Qaeda by all three methods [human, signals and electronic intelligence-LC] and in many differing circumstances in a manner that suggests there was very little that al Qaeda did that the Bush administration and many other governments were not aware of…The bottom line is that, based upon what is known about successful intelligence penetrations for years prior to the attacks of 9/11, Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda could not have sneezed without the CIA or the NSA knowing about it.”

To highlight one specific example, consider Al-Awlaki’s San Diego connection, and an operational relationship with 9/11 hijacker Nawaf Alhamzi (which Al-Awlaki has himself has denied, but US officials insist).

Quoting Ruppert:

“Two of the 9/11 hijackers, Nawaf Alhamzi and Khalid Almidhar share the distinction of having been active al Qaeda members connected to multiple terror attacks and also having been among the most closely watched, yet completely free to travel even while they were wanted men...the CIA, the FBI, and the NSA had been watching these two since at least 1999, but also that these agencies at times acted in ways to conceal or protect the pair’s movements from law enforcement agencies who had shown interest in them…”

“…Even after the two had been listed as possible terror suspects, they were allowed to re-enter the US after the Malaysia meeting [an Al-Qaeda summit-LC]---their visas unchallenged---and to live openly in San Diego.”

Another similarity between Al-Awlaki and the other US military-trained 9/11 “hijackers” with whom he is connected was a penchant for vice: Al-Awlaki has been arrested repeatedly for soliciting prostitutes.

Quoting Ruppert again:

“If the core of the 19 hijackers were US government OPFOR [opposition force intelligence assets-LC] , it would account for certain details of Mohammed Atta’s life, like his penchants for strip clubs, liquor, and women. These are hardly the passions of a devout Muslim about to become a martyr. Special Operations personnel, have, however, been known to engage in these vices from time to time.”

Despite the pronouncements of unreliable government authorities, and assumptive mainstream media reporting, it is unclear if any named Al-Qaeda mastermind is an intelligence asset, a double/triple agent, a political plant, a pawn, or “real” terrorist created in response to decades of military-intelligence provocations.

No terror incident, no mention of “terrorists” can be accepted at face value without full and open inquiries into the activities of military-intelligence agencies that utilize and manage “terror” assets, and the high government officials who orchestrate global war strategies in the name of “anti-terrorism”. Such disclosure has been rendered impossible, given the world power structure that shields true “evil doers” from all scrutiny and all law.

What is known about Anwar Al-Awlaki’s profile, however, is highly suspicious, and smacks of an intelligence "legend". Or are the repeated patterns mere coincidence?

As written Ruppert in Crossing the Rubicon:

“Given the degree of documented intelligence penetration of al Qaeda; the fact that Osama bin Laden had been a CIA asset during the first Afghan conflict against the Soviets; the fact that a number of the so-called hijackers and/or al Qaeda members had been trained in CIA training camps in Chechnya; had fought in CIA/US-sponsored guerrilla conflicts (e.g. in Kosovo with the KLA in 2000), or had received military training at US installations; given all that, it is reasonable to assume that one or more top al Qaeda officials were in fact double or triple agents…”

“…In covert operations, the best kind of an asset is one that has no idea who is really “running” him. That is not to say that I don’t believe there are terrorists out there who would do any kind of damage they possibly could to the United States. Even if there weren’t any before 9/11 (and there were), the US has gone out of its way to create animosity against this country that is in full flower all over the globe.”

The Big Lie keeps gets bigger

The perpetual threat posed by a fabricated outside enemy, and a fearful world populace, remain the centerpieces of elite policy, and they have been consistently maintained by both Bush/Cheney and Obama administrations. State-manufactured “terrorist” atrocities, provocations and false flag operations continue to elicit violent reaction in the form of “real” terrorism, in endless cycles.

It is ramped up when world leaders seek to manipulate populations at times of crisis. With the US government and the world economy teetering on the brink of collapse, and with a politically neutered Obama administration s for its political survival, a major crisis is at hand. War, the “war on terrorism” and other forms of aggression will be inflicted, in order to appease right-wing extremists, while conveniently serving larger elite agendas across the "Grand Area".

Edited November 16, 2010 by Steven Gaal

[Len Colby]

That's right Steve us Jews (the others and I, not you and I) want to take over the world and through our secret manipulations we have nearly succeeded. For what ever reasons your mother and grand ma left you in the dark. The master plan was all spelled out in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. And of course there are no known example of members of other races proclaiming theirs to be superior this is a uniquely Jews characteristic.

Hitler got our number which is why we “declared war on” Germany for no good reason and we started WW2 just get rid of him and millions of excess Gentiles. The Holocaust was a hoax of course, some of us did die in the camps but that was due poor sanitary conditions brought on by our ignoring basic concepts of hygiene, Allied bombing and food shortages brought on by the war.

And yes of course 9/11 and the “War on Terror” are all part of the master plan. Benjamin Freedman tried to tell the truth decades ago and was unjustly ridiculed for doing so. As for me I am not another Freedman because it’s gotten to point the Zionist controlled media has so brainwashed the public in the Western World even most of those who consider themselves CT’s won’t believe the truth even when Jews like Rabbi Yosef and I explicitly explain it.

Here is a photo of one of the latest adepts he’s part of our plan enlist the schwartzas we tried this decades ago with Sammy Davis Jr. but it didn’t pan out.

Here’s a video since you are so partial to YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJa9iaINsn0&feature=related

[Steven Gaal]

LEN Colby ,big joke man...No Len it is a real issue. How about a more scholarly approach ? Look your jokes are getting a little bit old.

THE JEWISH SELF-CONCEPTION OF INTELLECTUAL, MORAL, AND SPIRITUAL SUPERIORITY

"Jewish intelligence, integrity and intellect, as a matter

of record, predominates in all branches of scientific discoveries,modern advancements and commercial enterprises, in all parts of the world, swaying destinies of various people and conducting the affairs of numerous nations, guiding opinionsand sentiments in the press, pulpit, rostrum, cathedra, reducingor increasing the instrumentality of exchanges, bourses, money

markets and financial operations ..."

--Nachman Heller, 1928, p. 23

While Orthodox Jews still bluntly claim God's unabashed favoritism, more secular Jews' self-congratulation repeatedly highlights a disproportionate number of Jewish Nobel prize winners, as well as other ambitious and famous scientists, philosophers, writers, and their attendant legion of achievers, not as an expression of a self-promotive ethic, culturally-cultivated ambition, tradition of scholarship, nepotistic networks, or strong communal and personal economic base in support of self-advancement, but of a smug Jewish intellectual "essence." "Nearly a fourth of the Nobel prizes in physiology and medicine," writes Jewish author Miles Storfer, "have been awarded to people of Jewish faith or heritage ... and more than a fifth of the prizes in physics have been awarded to people of Jewish descent." [sTORFER, p. 322] "Pointing to the high proportion of Jewish Nobel Laureates," says Joshua Halberstam, "... is a custom practiced around Jewish tables everywhere." [HALBERSTAM, p. 55]

"Now American Jewish culture basically comes down to 'anything produced by a Jew is Jewish,'" complains Leon Wieseltier," This is an insult to the intelligence. It is also not far from the Nazi idea." [bERSHTEL, p. 118] In Russia, in the late 1970s, a Jew from Odessa told the American Jewish Congress that "it was kind of a hobby [among Jews] to collect the names of famous Jews who hide their identity [in the Soviet Union]." [ROTHCHILD, 1985, p. 38]

Albert Einstein, for instance (whose virtuous image was sourly damaged with the revelation of some particularly degrading and dictatorial letters to his non-Jewish wife) is always trotted out as the quintessential genius Jew. No doubt such people are talented, among a world of talent. Such parading of Jewish brain scions, however, avoids the behind-the-scenes fact that the formal recognition of Nobel, Pulitzer, and other "prized" individuals as the current "best" in any given field inevitably has at least as much to do with competitive networking, connections, hustling, power, self-promotion, visibility, class, status, and/or academic cliques as they do with talent.

The Nobel Prize system -- whatever else it is -- is an elitist enterprise: a network, a self-referential club that favors those with particular socio-economic advantages. It parallels in structure the incestuous traditional self-promotive Jewish model. In a 1977 study of American Nobel Prize winners (laureates) in science, Harriet Zuckerman determined that:

* 82% of Nobel winners had fathers who were professionals, managers,

or proprietors. [p. 65]

* Nobel winners were twice as likely as losers to have come from a

"professional" families, and a bit more likely than others to "have

fathers in business." [p. 65]

* Only 15% of the winners came from "blue-collar or white collar"

families. [p. 65]

* More than half of the 92 Nobel laureates surveyed "had worked as

students, post doctorates, or junior collaborators under older laureates.

[p. 116]

* There was a "fair amount of intermarriage between laureates and the kin

of laureates." [p. 97]

* Six laureates shared the prize with their mentors. [p. 116]

* Laureates tend to come from elite universities. [p. 116]

* "Elite masters [Nobel laureates] can mobilize resources for their

apprentices [future laureates]," including fellowships, grants, jobs,

and publication possibilities in influential journals. [p. 132]

* The prestige of the Nobel Prize has been used to "confer legitimacy"

upon "ideological, political, commercial, and military" ventures. [p. 23]

Zuckerman even devotes sections of her book to "Self-confidence" and "Upward Mobility in Academe" to help explain Nobel victories. For Albert Einstein's part, notes Robert Schulman (Director of the Einstein Papers Project, some 43,000 letters, notes, papers, and other documents the scientist left behind): "In these pages we can closely observe Einstein and his solitary path to the [theory of] general relativity, and which personal relations are sometimes callously sacrificed in the name of scientific ambition." [OVERBYE, p. 11] Einstein also left Germany during World War I "to dodge military service," had an illegitimate daughter, and "considered breaking off his engagement to his cousin Elisa Einstein and marrying her 20-year old daughter, Ilse, instead." Einstein's executor, Otto Nathan, "protective on Einstein's public image," delayed for years the public release of the papers by filing a lawsuit to control their handling. [OVERBYE, p. 11]

An embittered African critic dismisses entirely the Nobel prize system, and its "peace prize," as nothing but a status and political game for the powerful:

"One does not win the Nobel; it is bestowed upon one. All we

hear is an announcement that some Scandinavian cabal, in its

mysterious wisdom, has decided thus and thus. All that the

public is admitted to is the ceremony held for the alleged

winners in a contest whose rules and venues and officials

are shadowy." [bLACK WORLD, p. 8]

Edward Epstein's 1996 expose of the fraudulent life of Armand Hammer, in an entire chapter notes the Jewish billionaire's heavy lobbying in the last year of his life to win the top Nobel award, finally getting Israel's prime minister, Menachem Begin, "to be Hammer's sponsor for the peace prize." [EPSTEIN, 1996, p. 332-343] That year's try was unsuccessful, and he died before he could attempt it again.

The traditional Jewish fixation upon intellectual activities as the foremost expression of superiority (as distinct from the "earthy" and "physical") is reflected in this description of East European Jewry by Zborowski and Herzog:

"Because the head is the container of brains, it is treated with tender

care ... The symbolism is pervasive. The head of the table, the head

of the bed, the head of the fish which the approving husband presents

to his wife, each carries its honorific connotations ... One part of the

body that comes close to disgust is the feet, especially the toes. They

are furthest from the head, lowest, and nearest to the ground."

[ZBOROWSKI, p. 359]

Traditional Yiddish folklore often reflects on the Jewish self-conception of marked intelligence:

"Jews never have enough of anything except brains." [KUMOVE, S.,

1985, p. 140]

"God protect us from Jewish chutspeh [pushiness], Jewish mouths,

and Jewish brains." [KUMOVE, S., 1985, p. 44]

"Better the little Jewish brain than the big Goyish head." [KUMOVE, S.,

1985, p. 104]

Two Jewish co-authors created a term to describe Jewry through the ages: "intellectual gladiators." "We [Americans]," write Stephen Slavin and Mary Pradt, "define any job demanding considerable intelligence as 'Jewish work.'" [sLAVIN, p. 60] With so many brilliant Jews in Europe before the Holocaust, Joshua Halberstam thinks that "it is likely that were it not for Auschwitz we would now have a cure for cancer." [HALBERSTAM, p. 48] Myths of Jewish superiority are also noted by Susan Schneider from a feminist perspective:

"Jewish women have always assured themselves that they were different;

yet even with the tenderness and emotional expression many Jewish men

permit themselves there is another kind of male feeling of superiority at

work -- this time a superiority based on precisely the spiritual and

intellectual capacity that Jewish men declared as their specialty ...

Intellectual rather than physical prowess is the determinant value of the

Jewish male's value on his place in the pecking order." [sCHNEIDER, p.

294]

In a search for charitable aid from the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies to help Jewish mentally handicapped children at an institution called Willowbrook that was being phased out, two researchers were perturbed by the Jewish organization's formal response. David and Sheila Rothman wrote that

"Troubled by the plight of Willowbrook's Jewish residents, the

Federation did appoint a committee to explore why Jews who were

generally in the foreground in providing services [were].... in this

area .... behind other faiths. (The answer came back that 'the emphasis

in Judaism on intellectual achievement tends to set off Jewish retardates

more sharply from other Jews.'") [original author's parenthesis:

ROTHMAN, p. 159]

"It is extraordinarily difficult for American Jews," says American Jewish scholar Charles Silberman, "to expunge [their] sense of superiority ... however much they may try to suppress it." [sILBERMAN, p. 80] "Jews still possess a feeling of superiority," wrote Marshall Sklare, "although more in the moral and intellectual realms now than in the area of spiritual affairs ... Leaving the (Jewish identity) group becomes a psychological threat: such a move is viewed not as an advancement but as cutting oneself off from a claim of superiority." [sILBERMAN, p. 81]

"The Jew who has cut off his traditional religion," wrote J. O. Hertzler, "... and has become an agnostic or atheist, is still considered to be a Jew and probably still, unconsciously, holds to the tribal spirit of superiority even though he no longer observes the ceremonial minutiae." [HERTZLER, p. 68] In a study of native-born Jews in modern Israel, Herbert Russcol and Margarit Banai note traditional Jewish self-identity in the widespread haughty arrogance among those of the Jewish state:

"But there is a deeper reason, perhaps for his chauvinism: the inbred, self-congratulatory

Jewish sense of superiority. Real or imagined, this superiority always infuriates

the gentile. Denied a homeland, vilified, the Jew turned his vision inward and fed

on his spiritual arrogance. He huddled in ghettos and rejoiced in his four

thousand years of apartness, of uniqueness." [RUSSCOL/BANAI, 1970, p. 173]

In 1984, Mordechai Nisan, a lecturer at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, published an article in Kivvunim, the journal of the World Zionist Congress. Nisan proclaimed that

"While it is true that the Jews are a particular people, they nonetheless

are designated as a 'light unto the nations.' This function is imposed

on the Jews who strive to be a living aristocracy among the nations,

a nation that has deeper historical roots, greater spiritual obligation,

higher moral standards, and more powerful intellectual capacities than

others. This vision which diverges from the widely accepted

egalitarianism approach, is not at all based on an arbitrary hostility

towards non-Jews, but rather on a fundamental existential understanding

of the quality of Jewish peoplehood." [HARKABI, p. 153]

"Thus," says Yehoshafat Harkabi, "the concept of the 'Chosen People' as an aristocracy provides sanction for the unequal and discriminatory treatment of non-Jews." [HARKABI, p. 153]

Alan Dershowitz notes his feelings about his Jewish identity when he was a Yale law student:

"When I went home for the Jewish holidays, I told my parents about the

brilliant teachers at Yale: Goldstein, Pollack, Bickel, Skolnick, Schwartz.

Then I told them about the most brilliant of my teachers: Calabresi.

Without missing a beat, my mother asked, 'Is he an Italian Jew?' Angrily

I said, 'Don't be so parochial. He's an Italian Catholic. Not all smart

people have to have Jewish blood.' Several months later, I learned that

Guido Calabresi was in fact descended from Italian Jews."

[DERSHOWTIZ, p. 50]

Ronald Brauner, also Jewish, notes his feelings after reading a book by Dr. Oliver Sacks: "Truth be told, as I read, my chauvinism also kicked in, as it always does. This guy is terrific! His book is one of the best I have ever read! The insights and sensitivities are remarkable! How could any one person be so brilliant, so on-target, so profound? ... he must be Jewish! (that happens to you, too, sometimes, doesn't it?) ... [but] ultimately, sublime talent, insight and ability notwithstanding, a person doesn't 'have it all together' until his Jewish component is also integrated into his work. Somehow, some way, each of us is bound to reflect our Jewishness in what we do." [bRAUNER, R., p. 35]

Virginia Dominguez, an American visiting professor in Israel, wrote in 1989 that

"Who is Jewish matters. I doubt very much that I am the only non-Jew

who discovered only while visiting or living in Israel that many

internationally known figures like movie stars, artists, writers, scientists,

and athletes whose religious and ethnic identity I had never thought

about are Jewish. The Israeli media points to their Jewish identity with

few exceptions, in interviews with them or stories about them. This

tendency to point out the Jewishness of such figures jars with the

sense outside Israel that a similar reference in a non-Jewish newspaper

invites the charge of anti-Semitism." [DOMINGUEZ, p. 127]

Norman Cantor, a New York University professor, claims -- with breathtaking arrogance -- on his dedication page for The Jewish Experience (1996) that a "world without Jews is a world devoid of humanity." This insult to anyone not Jewish -- ascribing to all non-Jews a lack of "humanity" -- is reiterated in his later insistence in the same book that Jews are "a uniquely superior group with an indomitable drive for creativity and accomplishment," (CANTOR, p. 311) and that "the time may be coming when the genetic superiority of Jews can be calmly discussed ... " (p. 312)

In his other recent volume, The Sacred Chain (1994), a history of Jews, Cantor continually reiterates his narcissistic thesis for understanding his own people, and certainly himself: their genetic superiority over others.

"Once the Jews were emancipated, too many younger Jews of

superior capability could not find places in society and the

economy that were adequate for the exercise of their talents." [p. 277]

"The Jews, once emancipated and given opportunity for mobility,

were genetically so superior that market capitalism could not

accommodate some of this superior species ... " [p. 277]

"The Jews are a superior people intellectually and as long as Jewish

genes exist, the extraordinary impact Jews have had in the twentieth

century will continue indefinitely." [p. 423]

"Although millions of Jews had carried their Eastern European

impoverishment with them to the West, their literary, native

intelligence, religion-controlled moral disciples and super genetic

quality made them excellent prospects for upward mobility in

Western society." [p. 232]

"The genetic superiority of the Jews will be extended and as long

as its carriers are individually free and privileged to pursue their

interests in science, philosophy, literature and the arts, highly

advantageous consequences for humanity will follow."

These are not the self-obsessed ravings of a lunatic fringe element a hundred years ago, but those of a prominent Jewish professor today who gives current voice to an old strand of Jewish ideology in a book by a major publisher, HarperCollins.

Other old Jewish racist narcissists Cantor drags out in The Jewish Experience include, again, the ancient Talmudic scholar, Maimonides, who says that "God has distinguished us from the rest of mankind" (p. 314), and another, Judah Halevi, who, according to Cantor, "was a kind of Jewish nationalist [who] believed not only in the superiority of Judaism but in the intrinsic superior quality of Jews over other people." (p. 316) (Halevi believed, adds Arnold Eisen, in "a hereditary capacity inhering in the Jewish people which uniquely prepared it for the reception of divine revelation.") [EISEN, p. 18]

Yet Cantor seems ambiguously torn between the polar values of human universalism and Jewish racism. While championing racism himself, elsewhere he seemingly condemns it:

"Racism is itself a central doctrine in traditional Judaism and Jewish

cultural history. The Hebrew Bible is blatantly racist, with all the talk

about the seed of Abraham, the chosen people, and Israel as the light

to other nations. Orthodox Jews in their many prayers still thank God

daily that he did not make Jews 'like the other people of the earth.'

If this isn't racism, what is?"

Yet Cantor states in the same book what he apparently sees as objective science, and not a manifestation of the very racism he decries:

"Why did Jews as an immigrant group [in America] do better than the

Irish or Italians? Perhaps it was innately superior genes, better

selective breeding." [CANTOR, p. 389]

The contemporary Jewish scholar, Raphael Patai devotes over fifty pages in his The Jewish Mind to claim evidence for "Jewish pre-eminence" and intellectual superiority over non-Jews. Not surprisingly, when Patai suggests that Jews are genetically superior in intelligence to others, he stoops so low as to quote from whom he inevitably must, the race theory of a German Nazi, Hans Gunther, to embellish a Jewish "survival of the fittest" argument. In this Darwinian and Jewish martyrological view, over the centuries natural selection favored only the smartest Jews in a hostile Gentile environment. [PATAI, p. 304-305]

In one racist "scientific" theory to prove Jewish superiority, Patai lists scholars Norbert Weiner, J.B.S. Haldane, and Lewis S. Feuer as those who suggest that, because the Christian Church offered literate advancement only to those who chose a religious career that included celibacy, the real brains of the Gentile pack died out. As another Jewish author, Nathaniel Weyl, explains this theory:

"The intellectual eminence of the Jews is the result of a two-thousand-

year process of selective breeding for intelligence ... If the abolition

of priestly celibacy gave Protestant countries a genetic advantage over

Catholic ones in respect to brain power, similar institutional factors gave

Jews a genetic advantage over Christians." [WEYL, N., 1968, p. 10-12]

The insistent championing of Jewish genetic intellectual superiority over non-Jews surfaces from time to time in Jewish scholarship. Psychologist Benjamin Goodnick, for instance, was even taken aback by a fellow Jew, Peter Gay (one of Sigmund Freud's biographers) and his resistance to Jewish genetic superiority claims. Goodnick says that:

"One tends to wonder why Gay belabors the issue of Jewishness. He

seems deeply disturbed that Jews might be different from others and

resists forcefully '... the untenable notion that Jews are by endowment

more intelligent than other people.' His view is strange, especially

since he recognized that 'history is a Darwinian battle.' A brief survey

of Jewish history would have suggested that the persecutions and

decimations of the Jewish people over the millennia inevitably led to

a survival of the fittest. It would appear that Gay did not take the

opportunity to note, for example, the disproportionate number of

Jewish Nobel prize winners..." [GOODNICK, p. 108]

This insistent Jewish notion of their superiority over others -- however secularized -- has deep roots in the old Chosen People mythology of the Judaic religion. As Eva (Etzioni) and Zvi Halevy see it:

"This element of Judaism [the Chosen People idea] may be unattractive

for those who boast of modern universalistic values; and if viewed from

an unfavourable angle, it can be argued that it is quasi-racist dogma. It

is probably no longer acceptable in its original version to most non-

Orthodox modern Jews. In a modified, less obvious, and less explicit

form, however, it probably continues to exert a discernible influence on

the Jewish self-image, and the Jews' conception of their place in the

modern world." [HALEVY, p. 60-61]

These Jewish authors further argue that modern Jews continue to exhibit a "compulsion" to prove themselves superior to others, fulfilling in at least practical -- if not religious -- daily form the Chosen People dogma. This intrinsic Jewish arrogance as part of their communal identity has often been noted and commented upon by irritated non-Jews across history, and occasionally by Jews themselves. It is sometimes admitted (rarely in public) by Jewish thinkers to be a major factor in a veritable solicitation of animosity and hostility from others. There is a marked tendency, writes C. G. Schoenfeld, "of certain Jews to display what might be described as a kind of intellectual conceit or arrogance. As Ernest Jones [another biographer of Freud] has phrased it, 'some Jews exhibit a curious 'superiority complex' in respect to brain power. And so readily does this seeming conceit or arrogance appear to provoke hostile reactions that some psychoanalysts believe such to be its prime [albeit unconscious] purpose -- that, in short, the basic psychic function served by this seeming arrogance is to help fulfill unconscious masochistic needs." [sCHOENFELD, p. 28]

Masochism or not, consciously attracting anti-Semitism or not, the animosity engendered towards Jews who think they're better than anyone else has always served the purpose of further alienating Jews throughout history from the mainstream societies in which they lived, which was what Orthodox rabbinical literature has consistently dictated to be desirable.

Even without religious, genetic, or even secularly messianic rationales for Jewish superiority, it endures of its own self-propulsion. The Jewish novelist Philip Roth, says Arnold Eisen, "could have been speaking for many American Jews when he noted in 1963 that, while the Jewish culture transmitted to him by his parents was at best fragmentary, he had 'received whole a psychology which could be expressed in three words: Jews are better.'" [EISEN, p. 135] "I was always aware that I was Jewish," recalls singer Eddie Fisher, "every minute of my life I was aware that I was Jewish ... I felt like I belonged to a very special club and I was proud of that." [FISHER, E., 1999, p. 9]

Jewish author Eric Kahler, with no apparent intent of self-reflective sarcasm, recalls that

"One day when I was discussing the problem of anti-Semitism with Austrian-Jewish poet Richard Beer-Hofmann, he said to me: 'I am not at all astonished at the fact that they hate us and persecute us. But what I cannot understand is why do they not marvel at us more than they do?" [KAHLER, E., 1967, p. 1]

The notion that Jews are intellectually superior to non-Jews has a long history of racist development in the Jewish community. For hundreds of years, for example, in Eastern Europe Jewish children were socialized to the idea. Jewish scholars Zborowski and Herzog note that

"A series of contrasts is set up in the [Jewish] child, who grew up to

regard certain behavior as characteristic of Gentiles. Among Jews he

expected to find emphasis on intellect, a sense of moderation, cherishing

of spiritual values, cultivation of rational, goal-directed activities,

a 'beautiful' family life. Among Gentiles he looks for the opposite of

each item: emphasis on the body, excess, blind instinct, sexual license

and ruthless force." [ZBOROWSKI, p. 152]

Are these not the quintessential stereotypes of any racist toward out-group Others, rendering them as veritable beasts?

There are of course other angles to Jewish arrogance, one by which Jewish tradition conveniently blames Gentiles even for uncivil excesses in their own (Jewish) psychological selves. Rudolph Lowenstein writes that

"The ostentatious, patronizing, arrogant behavior of some Jews is

another source of irritation to Gentiles, since it contains disguised elements

of hostility which are recognized as such by both Jews and Gentiles.

These successful Jews are trying to compensate for all the humiliations

they suffered in the past not because they were poor but because

they were Jews. It is in some ways an attempt to rehabilitate the

whole Jewish people through their own success." [LOWENSTEIN, p.

130]

A common term for Jewish arrogant "pushiness" comes from their own culture: there is a Yiddish word for it -- chutzpah. Alan Dershowitz romanticizes the term:

"To the perpetrator of chutzpah, it means boldness, assertiveness,

a willingness to demand what is due, to defy tradition, to challenge

authority, to raise eyebrows. To the victim of chutzpah, it means

unmitigated gall, nerve, uppityness, arrogance, hypocritical demanding.

It is truly in the eye of the beholder." [DERSHOWITZ, p. 18]

Jacob Neusner sees the root of the Jewish self-compulsion with the concept of their collective superiority to be rooted in its psychoanalytic opposite:

"Being Jewish is being different. Being Jewish is not as good as being

gentile. The father, toward whom guilt is already present, is Jewish and

[has a] child. The normal guilt of the earliest school years may thus turn

into hatred of the father -- or it may produce hatred of the self as a

surrogate for hatred of the father." [NEUSNER, p. 56]

Jewish hatred is more familiarly redirected by Michael Lerner:

"Hostility towards non-Jews has evolved into a distinct culture of

anti-goyism.. [and] it may be as prevalent among American

Jewish liberals as among Israeli right-wingers ... It's no secret

that Jews disparage non-Jews behind their backs. Some Jews

brag about tricking them in business, others shun them socially."

[LERNER, Goyim, p. 430]

"Chauvinism, or rabid nationalism," wrote Clement Greenberg, in an article entitled Self-Hatred and Jewish Chauvinism, "history tells us, is a means usually of compensating for a sense of collective failure ... It is with its first taste of success that a people musters up the nerve to begin actively compensating for its sense of inferiority -- usually by arrogance and self-praise." [GREENBERG, p. 427-428] "All the big talk current now too of 'Jewish pride' and 'proud Jews,'" argued Israeli scholar Boas Evron in 1995, "... is the pathetic expression of a desperate feeling that there is nothing to be proud of." [EVRON, p. 114]

In addressing Jewish elitism, Kenneth Clark notes in a Jewish periodical that

"Hypersensitivity about Jewishness among Jews may take many forms,

including the constant concern with racial and religious problem, a

seemingly compulsive need to discuss the problems and hardships of

the Jewish people even in situations in which these are not relevant;

and the tendency to relate almost any social problem or event to the

problems of Jews. Another manifestation of protective hypersensitivity

seems to be a tendency among some Jews to perpetuate the assumption

of the superiority of the Jewish people and to explain the persecutions

of Jews throughout history as proof of resentment and envy which

Gentiles have of Jewish superiority ... " [CLARK, p. 123]

In the 1920s, a Jewish Polish poet, Antoni Slominski, remarked that "I know very few Jews who are not convinced of the superiority of the Jewish race. For that reason this nation ... does not even neglect even the smallest of reproaches ... Those Jews who complain about the lack of tolerance of others are the least tolerant." [PIOTROWSKI, p. 39]

"The rise of Jewish nationalism since the turn of the century," wrote William Zukerman of the Jewish Newsletter in 1960, "[has swung the pendelum] violently from self-criticism to self-pride, self-righteousness, and a feeling of superiority. The Jewish press, pulpit, and Defense agencies are constantly engaged in telling the Jews how clever, talented and generous they are, how many famous doctors, scientists, authors, and musicians they produce, and how many hundreds of millions of dollars they contribute to help their brethren in Israel. This constant emphasis on Jewish accomplishment is reflected in a morbid chauvinism which is as unpleasant to others as it is harmful to Jews." [ZUKERMAN, p. 68]

In 1993, Jewish psychologist and author Judith Sills complained that Jews carry with them psychological "excess baggage," defined as preoccupations with "materialism and superiority." The Jewish Exponent noted that

"Materialism, she says, causes Jewish men to carry a tremendous amount

of anger toward each other, and that makes it very hard for the single

adults in our community to marry. Superiority, the flip side of inferiority,

creates ill will among the Christian majority, Sills said, because it is

expressed in an insulting way: 'I am special. I am valuable. I am better

than you. I am a Jew and you are a goy. I am the 'Chosen People.' I am

in this special tribe. You are a shiksa.'" [TEITELBAUM, L, p. 1x]

"The Jewish superiority complex," notes Jewish author James Yaffe, "may have an element of belligerence in it. It isn't enough for the Jew to feel superior to the gentile; he must let the gentile know it ... [YAFFE, J., 1968, p. 67] ... Sooner or later most Jews will confess -- diffidently, apologetically, defensively -- that they do think Jews are smarter than other people ... This pride has deep roots in Jewish tradition." [YAFFE, J. 1968, p. 221] Ever strong in 1994, Benjamin Ginsberg notes that "Jews often, secretly or not so secretly, conceive themselves to be morally and intellectually superior to their neighbors ... a Yiddish synonym for dullard or dope is "goyischer kopf," that is, someone who thinks like a non-Jew." [GINSBERG, p. 8]

"New York mayor Ed Koch," once remarked Jewish TV talk show host Larry (Zieger) King, "represents a lot of things I don't like about Jews. An incredible ego. Every sentence begins with 'I' ... That brashness." [sIMONS, p. 138] Various Jews in very public lights fit this genre. New York Democratic Congressman, and well-known feminist, Bella Abzug, for example, had a reputation for being "rude and obnoxious." Barry Gray (born Bernard Yaroslaw) at radio station WMCA in New York City, was "brash, abrasive [and] opinionated. [He] was the talk-show titan listeners love to hate, [and] is still going [in 1973] after more than a quarter of a century at the mike." [bLACKWELL, E., 1973, p. 2, 208]

"A Jew," declares old Yiddish folklore,

"is composed of twenty-eight per cent fear, two per cent sugar, and

seventy per cent nerve." [KUMOVE, S., 1985, p. 44]

"Offer a Jew a ride and he throws you out of your own wagon."

[KUMOVE, S., 1985, p. 45]

"Regardless of what Jews do for a living," says Gerald Krefetz, "and they seem to do everything from running the largest chemical company in the United States to operating three out of four retail establishments in New York City, they seem to think that their activities are prestigious. This pride is perhaps deceptive but it ... serves Jews well. By thinking highly of themselves, they stretch their abilities and embellish their conceits. Humility is not a Jewish trait." [KREFETZ, p. 18]

Jewish scholar Stephen Whitfield uses the following joke from Jewish circles to, as he says, "demonstrate the meaning of Jewish identity in America”:

"Three converts to Episcopalianism are drinking together in their

ritzy country club, when they begin explaining the reasons for their

switch from Judaism.

'I converted out of love,' the first one said. Seeing the dubious

looks on his friends' faces, he added, 'Not for Christianity but for

a Christian girl. As you know, my wife insisted that I convert.'

'And I converted in order to succeed in law,' the second one said.

'I would never have been appointed a federal judge if I hadn't

become an Episcopalian.'

'I converted because I think the teachings of Christianity are

superior to those of Judaism,' the third one added.

'Whom are you trying to kid?' the first man answered with

considerable heat, 'What do you take us for -- a couple of goyim?'"

[WHITFIELD, American, p. 73]

Ultimately, it is really not difficult to understand where the normative Jewish sense (even secularly) of a collective elite self comes from. As the Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion notes:

"The frequent biblical emphasis on the election of Israel led to the

idea, also found in later rabbinical literature, that there was a moral or

even racial excellence inherent in the Jewish people as such, and

references to the superiority of those what are 'of the seed of

Abraham our Father' abound. Inevitably the doctrine of election also

led to an ethnocentric view of world history."

[WERBLOWSKY, p. 158]

[Len Colby]

LEN Colby ,big joke man...No Len it is a real issue. How about a more scholarly approach ? Look your jokes are getting a little bit old.

THE JEWISH SELF-CONCEPTION OF INTELLECTUAL, MORAL, AND SPIRITUAL SUPERIORITY

There is no reason to treat you with anything but contempt and derision. I detest bigotry and find your compulsion to put an ethnic group which is [supposedly] part of your heritage in a negative light appalling. It reminds me of Brazilians who obviously have African and/or “Indian” ancestors making bigoted comments about those races.

Yes it is true most Jews take pride in the fact that they (we) are disproportionately represented among the highly accomplished and yes some even believe that Jews as a group are superior to non-Jews. There is nothing wrong with the former, it simply part of human nature many/most people take pride in the accomplishments of their ‘people’. The latter can be considered negative but is hardly unique to Jews and once again you can find zealots of most ethnic/religious groups proclaiming theirs is superior to all others.

None of this of course has anything to do with your and Duff’s belief the ‘Joooz’ were behind the Yemen package bombs, if you get around to posting any evidence that was the case I will probably reply but if you continue with your anti-Semitic crap expect no further replies.

Once again you forgot to provide the link to what you posted. I assume you ‘grocked’ that the name of the site “Jewish Tribal Review” would make the prejudices of the author all too clear.

http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/open.htm

Quite ironic that you admonish me to take “a more scholarly approach”? When have you posted your own research here? You posted a chapter from an anonymously written internet only book. Its claims are largely rubbish for example it simply is not true that “Einstein also left Germany during World War I "to dodge military service””. He moved TO Berlin from Switzerland in 1914 and stayed there till 1933. He was 35 – 9 years-old during the war hardly an age when someone with no military experience would be conscripted.

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/einstein-bio.html

[Steven Gaal]

Your posts have diverted attention from Yemen as a geopolitical prize. Yemen, a small piece on the grand chessboard of Angloamerican Imperialism. This may be your "ultimate purpose". If you were paid-to-post, then this would be a desired outcome.You have 'opinionated' so many things,its hard to get around them all. IMHO you falsely present yourself as a defender of what is responsible and right. It seems you have a lot of time on your hands. Hopefully I will be able to leave the forum as a poster by Nov. 29th. I will spend more time spreading the Gospel.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^XXXX

Now to address your numerous perfidious falsifications. I never,never used the terms Joooz,Protocols and or Jewish Banking Conspiracy. I believe you are trying to cause an incorrect impression of myself. This may be an additional "ultimate purpose". You keep mentioning a fellow named "Duff". Duff as a boogyman of antisemitism. I only read Duff since the thread started. I said in this thread,"lets stop talking about Duff",but you seem fixated on the man. I dont think my position on Jewish people differs much from Norman Finkelstein. The WWII German society became unbalanced as is Israel's today. SEE

http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^XXXX

As I stated clearly in another thread (Colby did read) to paraphrase myself,'the heart of the banker world power grab is the City of London'. As Colby should know the vast,vast majority of bankers in said city are not Jews. Colby made it seem I've talked about a ,"Jewish Banking Conspiracy". This is something I never,never said SIR !! Colby's response might remind oneself of a type of 'victimization'. Colby's belittlement of me smacks of arrogance/superiorty. Colby used the term irony in his post. I think Mr.Colby should look in a mirror to find Mr.Irony staring back at him. SG

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^XXXX

SEE City of London

BTW I did an edit search and the word Jew is not mentioned at all in the link below...who woulda thunk it,NOT COLBY !!

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:hWEe-0o4uFkJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London+http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Edited November 19, 2010 by Steven Gaal

[Len Colby]

Your posts have diverted attention from Yemen as a geopolitical prize. Yemen, a small piece on the grand chessboard of Angloamerican Imperialism.

No, you not I changed the subject away the Yemen bomb plot. You did this thrice, in posts 10, 17 and 19.

"This may be your "ultimate purpose". If you were paid-to-post, then this would be a desired outcome.You have 'opinionated' so many things,its hard to get around them all. IMHO you falsely present yourself as a defender of what is responsible and right. It seems you have a lot of time on your hands."

Uuuuuh you need to check the forum rules.

"Hopefully I will be able to leave the forum as a poster by Nov. 29th. I will spend more time spreading the Gospel."

You said previous you would be leaving for 9 months and came back in less than 2 weeks. Out of curiosity which denomination do you belong to?

"Now to address your numerous perfidious falsifications. I never,never used the terms Joooz,Protocols and or Jewish Banking Conspiracy. I believe you are trying to cause an incorrect impression of myself".

I never said you used those terms, do you know what satire is? You do however keep posting anti-Semitic tracts and pushed the notion Jews were behind the Yemen package bombs.

The only time I even sarcastically hinted that you backed the “Jewish Banking Conspiracy” (I never used the term) is when you cited the Rothschild family 4 times even though it had nothing to do with your point. You implied that they were among the owners of UBS (which is supposedly pulling Obama’s strings) even though your cited source did not say this. I replied “Oh no the Rothschilds, thems Joooz ain't they? Ooooh!!”. The Rothschilds are of course the ultimate bogeymen of the “Jewish Banking Conspiracy” so provide an innocent explanation as to why you mentioned them but none of the other Swiss billionaires when your point was about UBS.

You must really think the forum’s readership is quite stupid IF you don’t think they can tell the difference between your actual comments and my send up, not that there is such a big difference.

"This may be an additional "ultimate purpose". You keep mentioning a fellow named "Duff". Duff as a boogyman of antisemitism. I only read Duff since the thread started. I said in this thread,"lets stop talking about Duff",but you seem fixated on the man."

Duff’s theories about the Yemen plot were the original subject of the thread. Note you repeat violations of the forum rules

"I dont think my position on Jewish people differs much from Norman Finkelstein. The WWII German society became unbalanced as is Israel's today. SEE http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/ "

That just shows how confused you are he is anti-Zionist not anti-Semitic. Link to any articles on his site with a viewpoint remotely similar to the ‘Jewish Tribal Review” BS. The closest he gets is being rightly critical of those who scam Holocaust reparations.

"As I stated clearly in another thread (Colby did read) to paraphrase myself,'the heart of the banker world power grab is the City of London'. As Colby should know the vast,vast majority of bankers in said city are not Jews. Colby made it seem I've talked about a ,"Jewish Banking Conspiracy". This is something I never,never said SIR !! Colby's response might remind oneself of a type of 'victimization'. Colby's belittlement of me smacks of arrogance/superiorty."

• Yes, how typically Jewish of me.

• See my point about your mention of the Rothschilds above

"Colby used the term irony in his post. I think Mr.Colby should look in a mirror to find Mr.Irony staring back at him. SG"

Actually I used the word ‘ironic’ you need to understand the difference between intentional and unintentional irony. BTW I am not a very big fan of Mr.Irony, he is quite over rated.

SEE City of London

BTW I did an edit search and the word Jew is not mentioned at all in the link below...who woulda thunk it,NOT COLBY !!

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:hWEe-0o4uFkJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London+http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

• Strawman

• See my point about your mention of the Rothschilds above

[Steven Gaal]

BACK IN 2008 +++++++++ BACK IN 2008+++++++++BACK IN 2008

Attack on U.S. Embassy in Yemen Linked to Mossad

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

by wakeupfromyourslumber

Saturday Oct 11th, 2008 5:34 PM

Dubai, Oct 8 (IANS) A terrorist cell busted in Yemen last month after a suicide attack on the US embassy there had links with an Israeli intelligence agency, the state-run Saba news agency reported.The report, quoting an unnamed source, said investigations and data retrieved from a computer seized from the cell, showed there was correspondence between the Islamic Jihad group’s deputy leader Bassam Abdullah Fadhel Al-Haidari and an Israeli intelligence agency. Saba quoted the source as saying that the correspondence between the two sides included a request from the Israeli side to implement terrorist attacks inside Yemen.

Wed, 2008-10-08

Remember the attack on the U.S. embassy in Yemen last month that took the lives of eighteen people? A group calling themselves "Islamic Jihad" claimed responsibility for the blast. It has a nice, scary ring to it hasn't it? "Islamic Jihad" also happens to be the name of a group that operates out of Gaza.

"Islamic Jihad" pointedly mentioned its affiliation with al Qaeda after claiming responsibility for the September 17 U.S. embassy bombing:

"We, the Organisation of Islamic Jihad, belonging to the Al-Qaeda network, repeat our demand of (Yemeni President) Ali Abdullah Saleh to free our detained brothers within 48 hours," said a statement signed by self-proclaimed leader Abu Ghaith al-Yamani.

Former agent for French military intelligence Pierre-Henry Bunel has this to say about 'al Qaeda':

"The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the 'devil' only in order to drive the 'TV watcher' to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism..."

Well now the Yemeni authorities have arrested a group of these al Qaeda-backed militants with, surprise surprise, links to Israeli intelligence.

From BBC News:

Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh has said the security forces have arrested a group of alleged Islamist militants linked to Israeli intelligence.

Mr Saleh did not say what evidence had been found to show the group's links with Israel, a regional enemy of Yemen.

The arrests were connected with an attack on the US embassy in Sanaa last month which killed at least 18 people, official sources were quoted saying.

Israel's foreign ministry has rejected the accusation as "totally ridiculous".

"A terrorist cell was arrested and will be referred to the judicial authorities for its links with the Israeli intelligence services," Mr Saleh told a gathering at al-Mukalla University in Hadramawt province.

"Details of the trial will be announced later. You will hear about what goes on in the proceedings," he added.

The 17 September attack was the second to target the US embassy since April. Militants detonated car bombs before firing rockets at the heavily fortified building.

Mr Saleh did not identify the suspects, but official sources were quoted saying it was same cell - led by a militant called Abu al-Ghaith al-Yamani - whose arrest was announced a week after the attack.

An Israeli foreign ministry spokesman said the Yemeni president's statement was without foundation.

"To believe that Israel would create Islamist cells in Yemen is really far-fetched. This is yet another victory for the proponents of conspiracy theories," Igal Palmor said in remarks reported by AFP.

And from the Yemen Observer:

President Saleh revealed on Monday that security forces in Yemen caught an espionage network for Israel made up of Arab nationals. This announcement came during his speech in front of MP's, Shura Council members, local council members, scholars and military and security leaders at Hadhramout University.

According to the president the suspected spies will be brought before the courts shortly in a public trial after investigations are complete.

The network was comprised of 40 people from different Arab nationalities spying for Mossad, the Israeli international intelligence said sources from National and Political Security Units. The members of the espionage network entered Yemen on the premise of conducting business, tourism and even for preaching in mosques. Saleh said that the suspected spies form a terrorism cell that uses also Islam to reach their targets.Members were arrested individually and found to be in possession of detailed maps for sensitive security sites, intelligence telecommunication units and advanced tracking devices.

And from another Oct 8 news report:

Dubai, Oct 8 (IANS) A terrorist cell busted in Yemen last month after a suicide attack on the US embassy there had links with an Israeli intelligence agency, the state-run Saba news agency reported.The report, quoting an unnamed source, said investigations and data retrieved from a computer seized from the cell, showed there was correspondence between the Islamic Jihad group’s deputy leader Bassam Abdullah Fadhel Al-Haidari and an Israeli intelligence agency.

Saba quoted the source as saying that the correspondence between the two sides included a request from the Israeli side to implement terrorist attacks inside Yemen.

Source:

Attack on U.S. Embassy in Yemen Linked to Mossad | Wake Up From Your Slumber

Referenced links:

Yemen blasts: Islamic Jihad claims responsibility for US embassy attack - Telegraph

Islamic Jihad Movement in Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fake Al Qaeda

AFP: Yemen rounds up suspects after US embassy attack

The Truth Seeker - Al Qaeda – The Database

- Google News

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Yemen seizes 'Israel-linked' cell

Espionage network for Israel arrested in Yemen

Terrorist cell busted in Yemen had links with Israel

Saba Net - Yemen news agency

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

and to continue the theme.......

BACK IN 1963 XXXX BACK IN 1963 XXXXXX BACK IN 1963 XXXXX

Israeli False Flag Attack on U.S. Motivated 1963 Senate Investigations - Newly Declassified Files

WASHINGTON, Nov. 9, 2010 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Fears of false flag and foreign funded covert operations designed to influence U.S. policy drove the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to launch exhaustive investigations and call for warranted enforcement of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). A newly declassified March 17, 1961 memo unsealed and released by the National Archives and Records Administration on October 21, 2010 outlined the Senate's rationale for investigating Israel lobbying groups and other foreign agents active across the United States.

"In recent years there has been an increasing number of incidents involving attempts by foreign governments, or their agents, to influence the conduct of American foreign policy by techniques outside normal diplomatic channels.....there have been occasions when representatives of other governments have been privately accused of engaging in covert activities within the United States and elsewhere, for the purpose of influencing United States Policy (the Lavon Affair)."

The Lavon Affair refers to a false flag Israeli terrorist bombing plot code named "Operation Susannah" against U.S. targets in Egypt. It was designed to reverse U.S. policy pressuring British withdrawals and reverting control of the Suez Canal to Egypt. Israeli agents infiltrating as Arabs were discovered, arrested and criminally prosecuted in Egypt when their explosives malfunctioned, leading to a crisis in the Israeli government.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which mentioned Lavon twice in the three page memo, expressed concerns about investigating such sensitive matters. "There would undoubtedly (even with care) be instances which would lead to foreign governmental protests, to violent attacks by special groups in the United States..." The declassified files are now available at: http://www.irmep.org/ila/forrel

The declassified Senate memo suggested three avenues for investigation. "I. Public receipt of testimony from Department of Justice and Department of State....II. Public receipt of testimony from selected law and public relations firms....III Executive (perhaps public) receipt of testimony on the Lavon Affair, and similar 'grey area' activities..."

The Senate investigated the foreign agents of many countries in 1962, held hearings throughout 1963, and published redacted records. Preliminary findings led the Department of Justice to order the American Zionist Council to register and publicly disclose its Israeli-funded clandestine lobbying activities under FARA. The AZC promptly shut down and reorganized within its lobbying division, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which incorporated six weeks after the AZC FARA order, but refused to register as an Israeli foreign agent.

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is the nation's record keeper. It retains 1%-3% of the most important documents of business conducted by the United States Federal government. The Israel Lobby Archive, http://IRmep.org/ila, is a unit of the Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy in Washington.

SOURCE Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy

Edited November 21, 2010 by Steven Gaal

[Len Colby]

BACK IN 2008 +++++++++ BACK IN 2008+++++++++BACK IN 2008

Attack on U.S. Embassy in Yemen Linked to Mossad

[...]

Dubai, Oct 8 (IANS) A terrorist cell busted in Yemen last month after a suicide attack on the US embassy there had links with an Israeli intelligence agency, the state-run Saba news agency reported. The report, quoting an unnamed source, said investigations and data retrieved from a computer seized from the cell, showed there was correspondence between the Islamic Jihad group’s deputy leader Bassam Abdullah Fadhel Al-Haidari and an Israeli intelligence agency.

From BBC News:

Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh has said the security forces have arrested a group of alleged Islamist militants linked to Israeli intelligence.

Mr Saleh did not say what evidence had been found to show the group's links with Israel, a regional enemy of Yemen.

So Yemen’s “the state-run…news agency” “quoted an unnamed source” who said “investigations and data retrieved from a computer seized from the cell, showed there was correspondence between the Islamic Jihad group’s deputy leader Bassam Abdullah Fadhel Al-Haidari and an Israeli intelligence agency”

But apparently this evidence was never made available and later the country’s president citing no evidence made a similar claim. Is Mr. Saleh trustworthy? Let’s see he is a dictator who has been in power since 1978 when his predecessor was assassinated. In 2005 he said "I will not contest the [2006] elections... we have to train ourselves in the practice of peaceful succession" but he soon reneged an opposition leader described the reversal as a “farce”

http://web.archive.org/web/20050911061721/http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/D53A04F7-58E8-4CE5-BB03-446780BB6E50.htm

http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=27058

He supposedly won the 2006 election with 77.2% of the vote but the opposition said the vote was rigged. Al-Jazeera reported he “enjoys near-absolute Power”

http://web.archive.org/web/20070311003840rn_1/english.aljazeera.net/English/archive/archive?ArchiveId=36226

But it’s not just the opposition which is critical of the dictator “members of his own political party clarified that he is linked to corruption and allows other around him to follow the trend.”

MP's Yasser Al-Awadhi, Ahmad Al-Maisari, and Mohammed Abdul ilaah Al-Qadi, during interviews with independent newspapers this month all stressed on the matter, causing more damage for the already fragile ruling (GPC) party.

According to the members, Saleh allows those close to him to be corrupt, as well as those loyal to him and his party. Members of his family are considered to be the most that benefit from the corruption, as a cover up by the president is always expected according to the members.

[…]

The interviews with the three MP's is one of the reason why the government is trying desperately to pass on a law that does not allow citizens to attack the president and considers it a crime, under the slogan of protecting the unity of Yemen.

http://www.yemenpost.net/10/Reports/2.htm

In other words all there is, is:

- the claims, unsupported by any evidence, of a corrupt dictator who is coming under attack by members of his own party

- the claims of news agency controlled by the dictator that an unnamed source had some (apparently) never released evidence.

Israeli False Flag Attack on U.S. Motivated 1963 Senate Investigations - Newly Declassified Files

WASHINGTON, Nov. 9, 2010 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Fears of false flag and foreign funded covert operations designed to influence U.S. policy drove the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to launch exhaustive investigations and call for warranted enforcement of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). A newly declassified March 17, 1961 memo unsealed and released by the National Archives and Records Administration on October 21, 2010 outlined the Senate's rationale for investigating Israel lobbying groups and other foreign agents active across the United States.

IRMEP's spin of the 1961 Senate Intelligence Committee staff memo in there PRESS RELEASE was very misleading. Looking at the document as a whole rather than cherry picking a few sentences does not support the claim the Lavon Affair or the Israel lobby were the impetus for the 1963 Senate investigation.

From page 1

“Activities of the China Loby, the Spanish lobby, the Dominican lobby, the Vietnamese lobby and others are frequently referred to in the press, but there is very little precise information on what the do or how they do it”

From page 2

“He [the Attorney General] should then discuss with the committee specific examples of registration. Who represents China, Spain, Soviet Union, Dominican Republic Franceand the United Kingdom etc.”

“Public receipt of the testimony of officers of such groups the Committee of a Million, the Zionists, Captive Nations groups, the English Speaking Union. etc.

Note that I’m quoting the version IRMEP posted on there website

http://www.irmep.org/ila/forrel/03171961.pdf

I take your failure to reply to my previous post as a tacit admission that you and your posts are anti-Semitic.

Edited November 21, 2010 by Len Colby

[Steven Gaal]

Staying on topic as requested. Now Ive 56 hours of work this week. Will answer you when I have the time. <DELETED BY MODERATOR> sg

http://blog.newvoices.org/?p=425 sorry removed video (but read comments then go --- see )

http://www.tu.tv/vid...salem-on-eve-of

http://blog.newvoices.org/?p=4924

Edited November 23, 2010 by Evan Burton

[Len Colby]

OK I get so you cop to being an anti-Semite but think your scorn is justified because we deserve it.

Of course there aren’t any white American evangelical assholes

http://www.thoughtequity.com/video/clip/184210_034.do

Now I could make all sorts of generalizations about white American Protestants but that would be rather stupid wouldn’t it. Perhaps you’d be happier posting here

Edited November 23, 2010 by Len Colby

[Steven Gaal]

Now several times you said I was not telling the truth about my Jewish heritage. This is offensive and a flame...moderators please take note. PART ONE ONLY (BUSY)

I cop to being trying to be fair. Since I posted I have a big work week and I have also Thanksgiving matters. I cop to thinking you are a poor reader. I never used the term Jewish Conspiracy. Here is what I have said before. The Rothschilds work within (within ,yes within, go back and look what I posted) the frame work of Banking Interests centered in London that want a federation of central banks that dominate the worlds contries. Now amoung these interests are old monied families of Europe like the Catholic Royals of Spain and other non-Jewish Royals of Europe and many of the Protestant banking families of the Netherland and yes Jewish Banking families. The Rothchild were one of the first international then globalist banking houses. They are contra-similar to the indicator animal used when looking at environmental degredation of a particular ecosystem. If this animal is down in number,then ecological problems are indicated in this area. If Rothschild are there ,then there is likelihood of the British Centered Banking power grab/influence is high in said particular issue. For UBS I gave internet info of a list of 12 Swiss billionaires owners were one was Rothchild. The other 11 maybe connected with the London group,however, to see Rothschild one has enough info to look for other evidence.Which I did (!!) and posted this from the UBS article,for one of Obama's economic advisors was Skull & Bones which I take as British leaning. BTW I dont think Skull & Bones let in any Jews until the late 1970s. They were formed in 1832. Now of course per the way you work = you will say now I compared Rothschild to animals,I did no such thing.

Edited November 25, 2010 by Steven Gaal

[Len Colby]

Now several times you said I was not telling the truth about my Jewish heritage. This is offensive and a flame...moderators please take note. PART ONE ONLY (BUSY)

I unless I forgot about/missed the other times questioned if you really were of Jewish decent, that was in post 20, you’re replied twice since then w/no objections.

I cop to being trying to be fair. Since I posted I have a big work week and I have also Thanksgiving matters. I cop to thinking you are a poor reader. I never used the term Jewish Conspiracy.

LOL I am “a poor reader”? I never said or insinuated you “used the term Jewish Conspiracy” but you keep posting stuff that puts Jews in a bad light. I could for example post stuff from white supremacists saying how bad black people are and examples of African-Americans acting badly and that would be racist just as your posts are anti-Semitic. I guess you think posting stuff that vilifies members of an ethnic-religious group is "trying to be fair"

Here is what I have said before. The Rothschilds work within (within ,yes within, go back and look what I posted) the frame work of Banking Interests centered in London that want a federation of central banks that dominate the worlds contries. Now amoung these interests are old monied families of Europe like the Catholic Royals of Spain and other non-Jewish Royals of Europe and many of the Protestant banking families of the Netherland and yes Jewish Banking families. The Rothchild were one of the first international then globalist banking houses. They are contra-similar to the indicator animal used when looking at environmental degredation of a particular ecosystem. If this animal is down in number,then ecological problems are indicated in this area. If Rothschild are there ,then there is likelihood of the British Centered Banking power grab/influence is high in said particular issue. For UBS I gave internet info of a list of 12 Swiss billionaires owners were one was Rothchild.

LOL I’m the “a poor reader”? Your source listed 4 “Swiss billionaires owners” of UBS none of whom were Rothschilds

“Christoph Blocher $3.6 billion ( UBS, Novartis )”

“Marcel Ospel (UBS) $2 billion”

“Thomas Schmidheiny $4.4 billion (UBS)

Stephan Schmidheiny $3.6 billion (UBS)”

While it lists 13 Rothschilds it only listed an affiliation for 1 but no mention of which bank(s)

“Baron Benjamin Rothschild $5.4 billion ( banking )”

The other 11 maybe connected with the London group,however, to see Rothschild one has enough info to look for other evidence.Which I did (!!) and posted this from the UBS article,for one of Obama's economic advisors was Skull & Bones which I take as British leaning. BTW I dont think Skull & Bones let in any Jews until the late 1970s. They were formed in 1832. Now of course per the way you work = you will say now I compared Rothschild to animals,I did no such thing.

Despite your delusions to the contrary the article did not provide strong evidence UBS has great influence on Obama and made no mention of the Rothschilds or S & B, nor have produced any evidence the latter are British agents.

[Steven Gaal]

Now several times you said I was not telling the truth about my Jewish heritage. This is offensive and a flame...moderators please take note. PART ONE ONLY (BUSY)

I unless I forgot about/missed the other times questioned if you really were of Jewish decent, that was in post 20, you’re replied twice since then w/no objections.

I cop to being trying to be fair. Since I posted I have a big work week and I have also Thanksgiving matters. I cop to thinking you are a poor reader. I never used the term Jewish Conspiracy.

LOL I am “a poor reader”? I never said or insinuated you “used the term Jewish Conspiracy” but you keep posting stuff that puts Jews in a bad light. I could for example post stuff from white supremacists saying how bad black people are and examples of African-Americans acting badly and that would be racist just as your posts are anti-Semitic. I guess you think posting stuff that vilifies members of an ethnic-religious group is "trying to be fair"

Here is what I have said before. The Rothschilds work within (within ,yes within, go back and look what I posted) the frame work of Banking Interests centered in London that want a federation of central banks that dominate the worlds contries. Now amoung these interests are old monied families of Europe like the Catholic Royals of Spain and other non-Jewish Royals of Europe and many of the Protestant banking families of the Netherland and yes Jewish Banking families. The Rothchild were one of the first international then globalist banking houses. They are contra-similar to the indicator animal used when looking at environmental degredation of a particular ecosystem. If this animal is down in number,then ecological problems are indicated in this area. If Rothschild are there ,then there is likelihood of the British Centered Banking power grab/influence is high in said particular issue. For UBS I gave internet info of a list of 12 Swiss billionaires owners were one was Rothchild.

LOL I’m the “a poor reader”? Your source listed 4 “Swiss billionaires owners” of UBS none of whom were Rothschilds

“Christoph Blocher $3.6 billion ( UBS, Novartis )”

“Marcel Ospel (UBS) $2 billion”

“Thomas Schmidheiny $4.4 billion (UBS)

Stephan Schmidheiny $3.6 billion (UBS)”

While it lists 13 Rothschilds it only listed an affiliation for 1 but no mention of which bank(s)

“Baron Benjamin Rothschild $5.4 billion ( banking )”

The other 11 maybe connected with the London group,however, to see Rothschild one has enough info to look for other evidence.Which I did (!!) and posted this from the UBS article,for one of Obama's economic advisors was Skull & Bones which I take as British leaning. BTW I dont think Skull & Bones let in any Jews until the late 1970s. They were formed in 1832. Now of course per the way you work = you will say now I compared Rothschild to animals,I did no such thing.

Despite your delusions to the contrary the article did not provide strong evidence UBS has great influence on Obama and made no mention of the Rothschilds or S & B, nor have produced any evidence the latter are British agents.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++************************************************

COLBY SAYS,S & B not influence foreign policy and also not British connected

STEVE SAY answer in 4 parts

Influence of Skull & Bones in Politics PART 1

Although a secret organization, the Skull and Bones has exerted an enormous influence in the politics and foreign policy of this country for at least 150 years. The only way this can be proven, since many of the motives and records are secret, is to examine the political appointments of various presidents. A pattern of power is revealed when Skull and Bones members are identified as filling many of these appointments. Kris Millegan’s web site The Bobble Boys: http://www.ctrl.org/boodleboys/boodleboys1.html reveals a few examples. He quotes historian and special assistant to JFK, Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. “These men helped establish a distinguished network connecting Wall Street, Washington, worthy foundations and proper clubs. The New York and legal community was the heart of the American Establishment. Its household deities were Henry L. Stimson and Elihu Root* ; its present leaders, Robert A. Lovett and John J. McCloy; its front organizations, the Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie foundations and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). “

William Taft (initiated into Skull and Bones in 1878) was elected president of the U.S. in 1909 and President Harding appointed him Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in 1921, which he served until his death in 1930.

Henry L. Stimson (initiated into the Skull and Bones 1888) was appointed to seven high government positions by seven presidents. His first appointment was Secretary of War by President Taft. His last appointment was Secretary of War under President Roosevelt and Truman. Mr. Millegan states at his web site: “He was “ultimately responsible” for the internment of Japanese-American citizens in WWII and oversaw the Manhattan Project, America’s atomic bomb program. Stimson also took credit for swaying Truman into dropping “the bomb” on Japan.”

In the JFK administration Skull and Bones members played an important role in dictating policy. According to the paper entitled George Bush, Skull & Bones and the New World Order by Paul Goldstein & Jeffrey Steinberg, it states that Kennedy had personally asked Robert A. Lovett, a partner in the Wall Street investment firm of Brown Brothers, to join his Cabinet. Robert A. Lovett did not want to become a part of JFK’s administration. Instead, he recommended a number of Bonesmen into the critical posts. McGeorge Bundy was appointed Kennedy’s National Security Adviser. Averell Harriman was made Under Secretary of State for Asian Affairs, a position that placed him in charge of many of the most critical decisions along with the disaster in Vietnam. William Bundy remained in a senior post at CIA (see website http://www.parascope.com/articles/0997/whitepaper.htm).

These men and others in JFK’s administration had more control over foreign policy than JFK did as president. There was a network of secret societies besides Skull and Bones, such as Council of Foreign Affairs (CFR) that also dictated policy.

Two quotes in the book Rule by Secrecy by Jim Marrs confirms this. Special Advisor to JFK John K. Galbraith said: “Those of us who had worked for the Kennedy election were tolerated in the government for that reason and had say, but foreign policy was still with the Council of Foreign Relation people (p. 127).” The Former Ambassador to Saigon, Frederick F. Nolting said: “The axis of Lodge (CFR) and Harriman (CFR) was too strong for President Kennedy to thwart or overcome (p. 130).”

These are just a few instances of the CFR’s influence in the world of U.S. politics. This should be proof to the skeptic that there are secret organizations that dictate polices of the country without the consent of the American people.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ PART 2

HISTORY OF "THE ORDER" AND THE IMPERIALISTIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL 'DESIGN' OF THE UNITED STATES VERY MUCH INTERTWINED

The history of Skull and Bones is intimately involved with the expansion of the military industrial complex from Connecticut's "arsenal of democracy"; with the expansion of the oil raw material regime and the demotion of other choices of energy with the design to create a political monopoly on energy supplies; as mentioned above, with the land grant university frameworks in the United States (started by Bonesmembers and monopolized by them in Connecticut and New York for 30 years--it is Skull and Bones financial cronyism which built Cornell University in New York and Yale University in Connecticut, while other universities suffered). Educationally or scientifically, Bonesmen started the American History Association, and were involved in the "scientific racism" eugenics policies in the early 20th century United States. Bonesmembers are involved in innumerable wars which are typically started without any evidence of danger or started on entirely false pretexts, in the history of the United States. Up to ten Bonesmen filled the Directors of J.P. Morgan's huge Guaranty Trust in the early part of the 20th century. Bonesmen were extensively involved in other huge international private banks like Brown Brothers, Harriman as well. Sutton's books explore these issues.

Based on historical analysis of institutions that Bones are involved in, drawn from information in the 1833-1985 membership roster, their effect on the United States has been to turn it into a very secretive, aristocratic, warmongering, and centralized operation of power in many "public" institutions ranging from education, the military, corporations, courts, and political representation.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

PART 3

Secrecy In Statecraft: A Brief Look At The Life Of Allen Dulles

Posted on October 26, 2010 by Elias Alias

Let’s begin with a brief quotation from the American Historical Association, as found at this page on their Internet website:

http://www.historians.org/info/AHA_History/gacraig.htm

There, we read:

“How the State asserts its authority in foreign affairs has been described by Stanley Hoffmann in a passage that emphasizes the degree to which its sphere of action is composed not of determinable but of uncertain factors that it is the duty of statecraft to assess, shape, and exploit. Statecraft, Hoffmann has claimed,

‘emanates from a milieu—the domestic society—whose values, political and social institutions, experiences, and patterns of authority are never entirely fixed or coherent, never point only in one direction, and, while ruling out certain choices, leave a considerable margin for maneuver …; and statecraft operates in a milieu—the international system—that has repeatedly been defined as an arena for competition for multiple stakes, with uncertain rules which the players … hammer out by trial and error, and characterized by moves which, however cleverly calculated, are more like wagers than rational adaptations of means to ends.’”

(Hoffmann, Gulliver’s Troubles: or, The Setting of American Foreign Policy (New York, 1968), xvi.)”

end quoted passage from American Historical Association article by Gordon A. Craig.

~

As we note Mr. Hoffmann’s observation that ‘statecraft’ emanates within the system of a domestic society and comes to operate within what is called an ‘international system’, we approach also a phenomenon known as “Policy”. It is as though Statecraft produces or affects or influences Policy, and in some circles that supposition is upheld as the prime purpose of Statecraft. Policy is shaped, produced, and made manifest through history by the workings of Statecraft, so we may say as a premise that Statecraft in some ways produces Policy, and that Policy is the outcome of the practice of Statecraft.

I would suggest that there is Domestic Policy, and there is Foreign Policy, and there is, even for some individuals at this late date in American history, Personal Policy. I am supposing that Foreign Policy is derived from the sum total of activities within Domestic Policy, and that Domestic Policy must derive from the interacting and originating Personal Policy of as many individuals as may exist, interact, and/or compete within the domestic totality.

American history may be seen as a long sequence of competing efforts to shape Policy. Competitors in Statecraft within a society may be called “Players”. We may now like to view the world through the life of one very active and involved Player named Allen Dulles. But Allen Welsh Dulles had a brother, John Foster Dulles, and because both brothers contributed in significant ways to American foreign Policy it is difficult to treat of one without also treating of the other. But let us focus primarily on Allen Dulles.

“We no longer have permanent principles, but permanent interests, which we pursue to the exclusion of all else.”

- Lord Palmerston, British Prime Minister at the time of the Opium Wars

~

To begin, let us go back into history and note that in the late 1700s a handful of radical malcontents in the North American British colonies had taken a disliking for British “Policy”. Their consensus opinions, shared and enhanced by the pooling of their interacting perceptions, led to the American Revolution which we commemorate each Fourth of July as “Independence Day”. As an exercise of Statecraft, the American Revolution was hardly sophisticated. In fact, it was a rather blunt and brutal affair, a boisterous bout of Brit-bashing which cheered, in its final military victory, a previously meek and submissive western world, a world which sought a more direct and compatible representation of itself as regarded the Policy of governance.

What these Players did was quite illegal, and the authority of the Throne sought to control them by the employment of what we today would call “law enforcement” which acted in the name of British Security. Warrants were issued for the arrest of some of those Players. Other Players who preferred to be law-abiding and subservient to the Throne and who were content to prosper under the authority of that Throne and its Policy included traditional British Tory “Houses” of wealth, security, and comfort. A number of New England families of the Tory persuasion had long held business relations with the mother country, England.

To such families, George Washington’s band of violent malcontents and illegal efforts at revolution seemed to pose a threat to their secure and profitable relations with England. It was from such understandable motives that the “Loyalist” opponents to the Revolution came. Many Tory families, to which we may refer as “Houses”, resisted the revolution, snitched-off the troop movements of Washington’s army, aided the British soldiers, manipulated finances and other leverages, and in general tried to assist the Throne in maintaining its authority over its Colonies. The prevalent view of the day was that England legally owned the Colonies, which were therefore legally subject to the Throne’s “foreign policy”, or, as we now may call it, the Throne’s “distant domestic Policy”. In truth, our American Revolution was an act of outlawry, was illegal, employed much violence and death-dealing, and could successfully be prosecuted as such in any court which might try the culprits. In today’s political jargon, our founding fathers would be called “insurgents” and “terrorists”.

But perhaps any Policy is dependent upon, among other factors, the ‘power’ to govern the subjects of said Policy and to overcome any opposition to said Policy. The power of governance may be seen to be dependent upon at least one hierarchy in authority, so let us think about hierarchy and authority for a moment. We read in a book by Joel Kramer and Diana Alstad, entitled “The Guru Papers” (1), this accounting of it -

“Hierarchy is a way of structuring power; authority is a way of exercising power; and ultimately morality is the way authority is justified.”

Whether the Throne used the term or not, the British Policy consisted of what Stanley Hoffman in the quotation above called “Statecraft” as perceived and employed in the governance of the individuals who comprised the populations of the Colonies in North America. Statecraft. As Mr. Hoffman notes, Statecraft emanates from domestic society and operates in the international community as “Policy”.

Remembering the fact that various New England Tory ‘Houses’ held close business ties with the British Empire, let us now recall this passage from Chaitkin and Tarpley:

“Young South Carolinian Joseph Heatly Dulles, whose family bought their slaves with the money from contract-security work for the British conquerors in India, was in a previous secret Yale group, the “Society of Brothers in Unity.” At Yale Dulles worked with the Northern secessionists and attached himself to Daniel Lord; their two families clove together in the fashion of a gang. The Lords became powerful Anglo-American Wall Street lawyers, and J.H. Dulles’s grandson was the father of Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles.” – From George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography by Anton Chaitkin and Webster G. Tarpley. (2)

I wish to note here that the British Empire has given us a precedent in which a Western Civilized Empire, of and with a “Christian bent”, did indeed exercise as a matter of official “Foreign Policy” the international smuggling of a narcotic drug (opium) for the expressed purpose of bolstering the Empire’s economy, and displayed a willingness under Lord Palmerston (Prime Minister of Great Britain) to use military force (the British Navy’s battleships) to protect and expand its smuggling enterprises. This is now known history, and is a precedent.

The key word here is precedent. It was official Policy and it incorporated the Bank of England’s relations with the Throne, so that we now can see a combination of financial and military forces working in tandem to effect and expedite British governmental Policy to smuggle opium into China. The unrestricted light of knowable history shows today quite clearly that the British Navy was employed to force China to accept British importation of opium into China, and shows that such deeds were matters of British Foreign Policy. Lord Palmerston contributed to that style of statecraft.

Joseph Heatly Dulles, while not working for the House of Russell in direct opium-smuggling, was instead involved in the slave trade until relocating to South Carolina and Pennsylvania. Because the British East India Company was involved in both opium-smuggling and slave-shipping, and because he was at Yale, we find it easy to understand that J. H. Dulles would have been in contact, directly or indirectly, with those New England Tory Houses who were in business with the opium-smuggling aspect of the East India Company, and we now know that J. H. Dulles was a member in a secret society at Yale. It is from those early associations that we today draw the parallels which may be seen by association as a, perhaps – or perhaps not – un-organized collusion. From such roots sprang Allen Welsh Dulles and John Foster Dulles.

~

Allen Welsh Dulles was born on April 7, 1893, to Allen Macy Dulles and Edith Foster Dulles. Edith was the daughter of General John Watson Foster, former Secretary of State, former U.S. Army General during the Civil War, and former U.S. envoy to Spain. In the definitive biography of Allen Dulles written by Peter Grose we read the following:

“If the family of John Watson Foster savored life at the summit of Washington society at the turn of the twentieth century, the Dulles side of the family was ever mindful of the truer aristocracy of birth. The Irish family name had been Douglas before being softened in the course of the seventeenth century. It was Dulles on arrival in the New World in 1779, borne by a bounder from Limerick who had fled to Holland concealed in a large butter churn, enlisted in the Dutch East India Company, and managed to make his way to Bombay, where he assembled something of a fortune – his descendants chose not to inquire just how he did it. Arriving eventually in South Carolina, this Joseph Dulles helped defend Charleston in the siege of the Revolutionary War, then managed a good marriage to the heiress of a cotton plantation, with its attendant Negro slaves. He prospered in commerce. Their one surviving child, a ‘delicate boy’, they sent away to Yale. In the remote north this frail offspring survived to the age of eighty and fathered eight hearty children, who in turn produced sons and grandsons, including the serious pastor Allen Macy Dulles, who sought betrothal to the daughter of General Foster. The Dulles and Foster families were joined in January 1886….” (3)

In the 1920s both brothers were lawyers in the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell where they specialized in international law. They devoted boundless energies to the needs of another Wall Street firm – Harriman Brothers. (Harriman Brothers would later merge with Brown and Company, and today trades on the New York Stock Exchange as “Brown Brothers Harriman”.)

Harriman Brothers was deeply involved in the reconstruction of Germany after World War I. The most powerful partners in Harriman Brothers were E. Roland Harriman, his brother Averell Harriman, and George Herbert Walker. When Prescott Sheldon Bush, our current President’s grandfather, married George Herbert Walker’s daughter, he was not a powerful man, but one who was about to become powerful – with the assistance of the Harrimans and their partner, George Herbert Walker.

In marrying the daughter of George Herbert Walker, a young Prescott Bush was brought into the management at Harriman Brothers. Eventually, when Harriman Brothers created “Union Banking Corporation” as an umbrella bank overseeing more than a hundred Wall Street corporate ventures of trade with Nazi Germany, Prescott Bush was elevated to a Director’s status at Union Banking Corporation. Because the most prominent Wall Street lawyers who did the interfacing of international law to arrange American business access to the rebuilding of Germany were in intimate contact with the leadership of Harriman Brothers and Union Banking Corporation, Prescott Bush certainly worked with Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles. On page 258 of Grose’s “Gentleman Spy” we read:

“Future great names of America’s intelligence service were among the reverent callers to Allen’s suite: Kermit “Kim” Roosevelt, grandson of Theodore, collecting stories for an official history of the OSS; Tracy Barnes, reliving the days with Countess Ciano; Richard Helms, bringing news of Germany; Frank Wisner… ; Per Jacobsson and Royall Tyler passed through New York; Jacobsson had been named managing director of the International Monetary Fund, and Tyler was to be head of the Paris office of the World Bank.

“Old friends like these would complement the dinner parties on Sixty-first Street or join the gentlemen’s lunches on Wall Street. After one such, the investment banker Prescott Bush remembered Allen fondly; ‘He entertained us beautifully, as only he could. We thought afterwards how much fun it was to get on the inside of things. And yet, when he was gone, we discovered that he had really told us nothing, but nothing.’” (4) [Emphasis Peter Grose, in original.]

Prescott Bush was Skull and Bones; the Dulles brothers were Council on Foreign Relations with Yale connections going back to their great grandfather. The mother of the Harriman brothers hosted the 1932 World Conference on Eugenics in New York City and brought in the man who would become Adolph Hitler’s master Eugenicist, Ernst Rudin, whom the elder Mrs. Harriman lauded publicly in the press by noting that it was unfortunate that more Americans did not agree with Mr. Rudin’s and Adolph Hitler’s views on “racial purity”.

While this is all established in the public record, in newspaper archives, the Congressional record, old magazine articles and interviews, State Department files, books, and in corporate records which are available to the public today, it yet strikes me as horribly ugly to have to realize that a death-cult with connections to European schools of the occult, (Skull and Bones, as brought to Yale from Germany/England occult banking-elite families by W. H. Russell) – and the most powerful private-sector think-tank to ever directly affect U.S. foreign Policy, (the CFR) – and Hitlerian principles of eugenics, (“racial purity”) – were each and all combined and represented in fact – not just symbolically – by the business partnership between the Harriman family, the George Herbert Walker family, and the Prescott Bush family. That their commonality takes each family back to the anti-American Revolution treacheries of the old Tory Houses of New England, the loyalists who opposed our independence, only further stitches an ugly warp and woof into the fabric of American history. Allen Dulles was right in the thick of all that; he was a player.

From Dr. Dennis L. Cuddy (5) we learn that President Woodrow Wilson had in 1913 published “The New Freedom”. In it President Woodrow Wilson noted: “Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U. S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

International business needed international law, which called for international lawyers. Allen Dulles of the prestigious law firm on Wall Street, Sullivan and Cromwell, was one of those lawyers in the 1920s and throughout the 1930s when Wall Street assisted the buildup of the Third Reich. Today we know that IBM furnished the computer which Adolph Hitler used to number the Jews. We know that Exxon’s parent corporation, Standard Oil of New Jersey, a Rockefeller corporation, did patent-sharing with I.G. Farben of Nazi Germany to put the fuel in Hitler’s trucks and tanks and aircraft. We know that some of the ownership of the Hamburg-Amerika steamship lines sat on the board of Union Banking Corporation with Prescott Bush, who used Hamburg-Amerika to channel payroll funding of Hitler’s Brown Shirts. We also know that Fritz Thyssen held a presence at Prescott Bush’s Union Banking Corporation. Allen Dulles played a role in all that.

We also know that on October 20, 1942, ten months after we had declared war on Germany, the assets of Prescott Bush’s Union Banking Corporation were seized by U.S. government vesting order number 248 under the “Trading With The Enemy Act”. President Roosevelt’s Alien Property Custodian, who signed the vesting order, was Leo T. Crowley. George Herbert Walker, the Harrimans, and Bush had continued to do business with Nazi Germany for months after the U.S. Congress declared war on Germany. In the middle of it all stood Allen Dulles, who would join his brother while President Truman was still in office to arrange the damage control that was needed after Hitler’s fall.

Allen Dulles was the Wall Street lawyer who had done a lion’s share of the financial arrangements which empowered Adolph Hitler and his Nazi party across the 1930s. In 1947 he went to Clark Clifford and assisted in the creation of the “National Security Act of 1947”, which Truman signed into law. That National Security Act of 1947 created among other things the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). It additionally created the National Security Council (NSC) at the White House and, with upgrades in 1949, created something especially secret – the “Black Budget”. In effect, it created the the mold or template for a “shadow government” which would function inside our supposedly representative government in total secrecy.

As an example, we note that the former Director of FHA and Assistant Secretary of HUD under Bush 41, Ms Catherine Austin Fitts – previously of Dillon, Read, & Co., Inc. on Wall Street – has revealed a fifty-nine billion dollar deficit at HUD which is attributed to covert money-theft by CIA. (6)

But the primary focus at present is the fact that two lawyers who had arranged the interfacing of international law to facilitate the rise of the Third Reich in Germany subsequently assisted Clark Clifford in composing the National Security Act of 1947, and helped create thereby the CIA. (When we look into the BCCI affair we shall note that, much later, Mr. Clifford assisted the very CIA which he had helped create by introducing BCCI illegally and fraudulently into this nation, and we shall look at the Congressional investigation into Clifford in conjunction with its investigation of BCCI – one of the CIA’s largest drug-smuggling, illegal arms shipping, and money-laundering banks which was shut down by various governments, including England, and investigated by the U.S. Congress.)

Some things which might be done with a brand new Central Intelligence Agency

No one representing the European oligarchies wasted any time once they had the CIA installed under official government roofs in America. One of the first matters in which the CIA engaged secret action, upon the suggestion of Allen Dulles, is called “Operation Paperclip”, in which the CIA salvaged several hundred German Nazi war criminals and snatched them out from under the Nuremberg War Crimes trials by hiding them inside the CIA. I would like to emphasize that point – the newly-created CIA, itself created by Clark Clifford and two of Hitler’s biggest Wall Street lawyers, immediately hid known Nazi war criminals inside its secret corridors and offices, here and abroad, and spared them from international justice after the fall of Hitler. I would submit for consideration that that pregnant fact itself, as one interesting fact among others, gives birth to more than simple speculation regarding ulterior motives in the mind of Allen Dulles.

Among the Nazis brought into the CIA was Reinhard Gehlen, the triple-agent who had masterminded Hitler’s eastern European spy sectors. That travesty was Allen Dulles’ idea, worked through the very CIA he had helped create. Another despicable Nazi war criminal hidden inside the CIA was Klaus Barbie.

Another nefarious deed by Allen Dulles was the initiation at CIA of “Project MK-ULTRA”, which was the umbrella code-name for the CIA’s mind-control research and development (R&D). Much of MK-ULTRA involved the various talents of the Nazi war criminals whom Dulles had hidden inside CIA. MK-ULTRA was finally investigated by the U.S. Senate, which stood aghast at learning that then-DCI Richard Helms deliberately ordered the destruction of CIA’s records on MK-ULTRA prior to being served by the Senate committee. It is estimated that about eighty percent of CIA’s MK-ULTRA records were destroyed before the Senate could obtain them, but Senator Ted Kennedy noted that the ten to twenty percent of remaining records were “damning enough”. Unwitting American citizens and American military personnel had been used in mind-control experiments which included the use of very serious drugs. The entire project was to study the science of mind control. (7 and

Moving forward in time, Allen Dulles became the DCI (Director of Central Intelligence) at the CIA he had helped create. He was President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s DCI. As DCI of CIA under Eisenhower, Allen Dulles was tasked with the briefing of the next incoming President, John F. Kennedy, when Eisenhower was leaving office. At the briefings which touched on Eisenhower’s secret plans to invade Cuba, which Allen Dulles had to sell to the incoming Kennedy, was another Skull and Bonesman, Richard Bissell, the number-three man at CIA. Kennedy granted the needed new “Finding” to carry on with the process of training a clandestine army for invading Cuba. But Kennedy made it clear that the U.S. government could not possibly be overtly involved in this illegal invasion – a fact which precluded the use of U.S. military aircraft as support for the beach landing assault. Dulles and Bissell had other notions, but they left Kennedy slightly in the dark about their truest intentions regarding exposure of U.S. involvement in the invasion.

Anyone may wonder how I could say that “Dulles and Bissell had other notions”. Aside from other sources which indicate that Dulles and Bissell withheld from Kennedy some information regarding the full details of their plan, such as their secret intent to force Kennedy to use U.S. aircraft at the height of the invasion, there are the following passages from Gentleman Spy by Peter Grose -

~Begin quoted passage from Gentleman Spy, pages 519 – 522:

The Bay of Pigs plan was conceived upon two major premises, both of which were misunderstood by President Kennedy and the people closest to him: the so-called guerrilla option for the invading force and the need for an air strike to accompany the landing. A further misreading, most serious of all, became fully evident only in Allen’s troubled reflections years later.

But when the president and his policy advisers considered the Cuban operation again on March 11, Kennedy vetoed the Trinidad plan as too “spectacular”; he asked instead for a more obscure site for a “quiet” landing, “without having the appearance of a World War II-type amphibious assault.” The myth that the invasion could be kept covert died hard. Within the next five days Bissell and his team shifted the proposed landing site to a little bay near near the thinly populated swamp of the Zapata Peninsula, the Bahia de Cochinos, or Bay of Pigs. Never was the eager informality of the CIA’s operating culture shown up to such disadvantage. In later years Bissell was admirably candid in a critique of his own lapse:

“It was rather lightheartedly assumed … that the swampy regions around the Bay of Pigs, while utterly different geographically from the mountains near Trinidad, could support guerrilla operations. With hindsight, this assumption was highly questionable and, in any event, was not carefully researched in the planning of the operation. The implications for the ‘guerrilla option’ of the shift from Trinidad to the Bay of Pigs were never made clear to the President … Those in charge of the operation must accept a serious responsibility for having ill-informed the President on this aspect of the operation.” (Richard Bissell)

Allen looked back in harsh judgment on his own culpability: “I should have said, ‘Mr. President, if you’re not willing to permit us to take the steps necessary to …substantially immobilize the Cuban air force (which was a very small and crotchety and defective air force at that time), the plan to get this brigade ashore with its equipment and supplies is a faulty one.’”

But Allen did not say this to Kennedy. Nor did Bissell or General Pearre Cabell, Allen’s principal deputy, as they sat in the secretary of state’s office late Sunday night, April 16, when Rusk called the president to present their arguments for reinstating the air strike. Kennedy was unpersuaded. Rusk removed the telephone from his ear and held it out across the desk, inviting Cabell or Bissell to make their case to the president directly. Weary and discouraged, they declined.

A far more serious malfunction of policy and intelligence occurred in the experience of the Bay of Pigs. Some officials at the time may have harbored their private suspicions, but the official inquiry that Kennedy ordered immediately after the disaster took scant notice of it. Only twenty-three years later did vague suspicion become admitted fact, through the study of handwritten notes Allen made in retirement. In 1965, after Kennedy’s death, Allen wrote about the Bay of Pigs, in effect replying to criticism of CIA’s mismanagement of an operation gone wrong. But when it came to submitting the manuscript for publication, he held back. Clover noted after Allen’s death that he decided against publishing his account “because there was so much more in his favor he could have said, if he had been at liberty to do so.”

Perhaps, but the fact remains that for decades to come CIA was accused of violating the trusts of the democracy that created it, of arrogance in the absence of accountability, of operating like an “invisible government”. CIA stalwarts scoffed at the charges, but it can now be argued convincingly that in the Bay of Pigs operation the clandestine services were behaving just as the critics charged.

From the start and throughout, both Eisenhower and Kennedy had been adamant that no United States military personnel would be permitted to participate in any combat action against Cuba. Kennedy had said as much in a press conference on April 12, the week before the landing: “There will not be, under any conditions, an intervention in Cuba by the United States armed forces.” The leadership of CIA ultimately did not accept the president’s words. Whatever the stated policy, Allen and those around him adhered to the comfortable belief that the armed forces of the United States would back them up in preventing the failure of a covert action, no matter how botched or ill conceived it turned out to be.

Evidence for this serious charge appears in Allen’s typed and hand-written, coffee-stained notes, which were preserved with his personal papers at Princeton. In this tentative form he voiced candid explanation for his failure to disabuse Kennedy of the key misunderstandings, about the guerrilla option and the covert nature of the invasion.

“[We] never raised objections to repeated emphasis [by the President] that the operation: a) must be carried through without any ‘combat’ action by U.S.A. Military forces; must remain quiet [and] disavowable by [the] U.S. government; c) must be a quiet operation yet must rouse internal revolt vs. Castro and create a center to which anti-Castroites will defect. [We] did not want to raise these issues … which might only harden the decision against the type of action we required. We felt that when the chips were down – when the crisis arose in reality – any action required for success would be authorized rather than permit the enterprise to fail…. We believed that in a time of crisis we could gain what we might have lost if we provoked an argument [in advance].”

~ End quoted passages from Gentleman Spy by Peter Grose.

So there we have it. Kennedy, a new generation’s newly-elected President, it now appears, did not have the “old school” savvy with which to anticipate the CIA’s capability for getting its way and for presuming to leverage White House Policy by necessity. Call it clandestine statecraft. I wish to confess my gratitude to Peter Grose for including this candid glimpse in his biography of Allen Dulles, and salute him for being honest on this matter, despite the fact that I am not a fan of Peter Grose’s world view. (Recall, he also wrote the flowery history of the CFR which is on their website. www.cfr.org )

Long story shortened, the invasion of 1961, known forever as the Bay of Pigs Fiasco, blew up in the CIA’s face – and in Kennedy’s face. In an attempt to save face, Kennedy ordered an investigation, and he subsequently fired Allen Dulles from his post as DCI of CIA.

Some time later John F. Kennedy was shot dead in Dallas, Texas.

After Kennedy’s murder, Allen Welsh Dulles, the man who had helped engineer the rise of the Third Reich, the man who had helped create the CIA, the man who had sat finally atop CIA as Eisenhower’s DCI, the man who had initiated the CIA’s “mind-control” research, the man who had staffed the CIA with Nazi war criminals, the man who held oversight responsibility for the failed and disgraceful Bay of Pigs, the man who was fired from atop the CIA by President Kennedy – was appointed by President Lyndon B. Johnson to sit atop the Warren Commission which would investigate the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

~

Statecraft. Secrecy. Security. The three faces of Allen Dulles.

Without delving more deeply into the many intrigues and mysteries of the man, we must agree that Allen Welsh Dulles was quite the Player in U.S. Policy, both foreign and domestic. Allow me to sum up some of the high points of his career in Statecraft thusly:

1: Allen Welsh Dulles was a lawyer at Sullivan and Cromwell on Wall Street, and an early member in the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations).

2: He worked the international legal interface between Wall Street firms and the build-up of the Third Reich in Nazi Germany.

3: He specifically served the legal needs of two financial organizations on Wall Street which supported Hitler’s Nazi infrastructure – Harriman Brothers and Union Banking Corporation – both of which were seized by the government under the Trading With The Enemy Act.

4: After Hitler’s defeat, Allen Dulles assisted Clark Clifford in writing the National Security Act of 1947, which created the National Security State, which supplanted the Federal government of the United States of America. That act also created the Black Budget, the NSC, and the CIA.

5: In the CIA’s formative years Allen Dulles initiated Operation Paperclip, which brought into the U.S. Intelligence community hundreds of Nazi war criminals, and deliberately hid them from war crimes prosecution. Allen Dulles initiated, using those Nazi war criminals, Project MK-ULTRA, which was the centerpiece in CIA’s mind-control (behavior control) research and development – a legacy investigated by the U.S. Senate.

6: Allen Dulles became DCI at CIA under Dwight D. Eisenhower, then briefed the incoming John F. Kennedy on Ike’s secret plans to invade Cuba with a clandestine CIA-trained army of mercenaries.

7: Allen Dulles and Richard Bissell oversaw the Bay of Pigs invasion, which blew-back in Kennedy’s face and caused Kennedy to investigate the invasion, and its sources at CIA, publicly.

8: John F. Kennedy subsequently fired Allen Dulles from his post as DCI of the very CIA which Dulles had created, after which John F. Kennedy was shot dead in Dallas, Texas.

9: LBJ appointed Allen Dulles to the staff of the Warren Commission to investigate Kennedy’s murder.

10: The American pubic, by and large, accepted this and did not revolt against treasonous criminality by one of the 20th Century’s greatest workers of secret Statecraft.

I close by noting that transparency is absolutely necessary in any representative government. When government deceives the citizenry behind a cloak of ‘national-security secrecy’ and clandestine statecraft, that government cannot be said to be representative at all. When government is given the “legal right” to lie, which is exactly what is at the core of the National Security Act of 1947, democracy cannot exist, even in a Republic of law. Today’s woes, both internationally and domestically, may in large part be traced back to this sort of mischief in statecraft. But consider this: if the press and the media fail to bring such things to public attention, and if the NEA, by controlling the content of public school textbooks, suppresses this sort of American history, can Americans be truly said to be informed when they go to election booths? And finally, I ask: If Senators Burns and Baucus both voted for the National ID card, (which they both did), the so-called REAL ID ACT, what may we say about their sense of loyalty to our personal freedom and liberty as Americans and Montanans, and how else should we interpret that sort of statecraft if not a deliberate abuse of our vested power and our trust?

~

Notes:

1) The Guru Papers: Masks of Authoritarian Power

by Joel Kramer and Diana Alstad; North Atlantic Books, Frog LTD, PO Box 12327, Berkeley, California, 94712. ISBN: 1-883319-00-5.

2) George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography

by Webster Griffin Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin; Executive Intelligence Review; Washington, D.C.; 1992.Fascimile Edition – Reprinted and copyrighted 2004 by ProgressivePress.com, an imprint of “Tree of Life Books”; P.O. Box 126; Joshua Tree, CA 92252; Second printing February 2005; ISBN: 0-930852-92-3. Original edition 1992: ISBN: k0-943235-05-7; Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 91-78005; EIB 92-002; Executive Intelligence Review, P.O. Box 17390, Washington, D.C. 20041-0390.

3) Gentleman Spy: The Life of Allen Dulles

by Peter Grose; A Richard Todd Book, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, New York, 1994; copyright 1994 by Peter Grose; ISBN: 0-395-51607-2

4) Ibid; page 258

5) Dr. Dennis L. Cuddy in his essay: A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER as found in the Internet, here: (link good as of January, 2006) http://www.psicounsel.com/NWOchron.html

6)) http://www.solari.com/

Catherine Austin Fitts is author of the Foreword in Michael Ruppert’s “Crossing The Rubicon”. As President of Solari, Inc., Catherine is currently spearheading the Solari Circles Campaign to help make healthy local living economies the best investment worldwide. Catherine’s article on the Black Budget and Market Manipulations is on-line here: http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=116&contentid=1259

7) Operation Paper Clip is easily Googled on the Internet, but perhaps one of the best sources from which to begin to learn of this project by CIA is at Wikipedia, here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip

Acid Dreams by Martin Lee and Bruce Shlain; copyright 1985; Grove Press edition ISBN: 0-394-55013-7; Evergreen edition

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^PART 4 talks about CFR and British

http://books.google.com/books?id=HYJ7JzK-cS0C&dq=factors+that+influence+foreign+policy+CFR+%22British%22&printsec=frontcover&source=in&hl=en&ei=pZnxTKW7AZHmsQPz4sDUCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=11&ved=0CDsQ6AEwCg#v=onepage&q&f=false