Jump to content
The Education Forum

DEPOPULATION - what elites want -

Steven Gaal

By Steven Gaal
in Political Conspiracies

 Share

Recommended Posts

Steven Gaal Newbie

Steven Gaal

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Even IF true how does this support your claims? // Colby

There is an increase in the use of electromagnetic weapons.

If a depopulation plan were to be initiated electromagnetic weapons could be part of the scheme. (Gaal)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^o0o^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

An idea Ive had for more than 15 years on depopulation.

Use two types of biological agents.

1) one biological agent has high infectivity but ultra low lethality

and has some type of skin eruption.

2a) another biological agent has ultra low infectivity but high lethality and elites have unpublicized cure.

2b) Release both agents, but the MSM conflate the two on purpose.

3) large scale marshal law invoked. Movement of vast populations world wide hindered. Communications disrupted.

4) electromagntic beam kills many but attributed to conflated 'as one' biological agents.

5) first cure a Phoney cure that kills more , but establishment works hard (YES AND IN ON IT REPORTERS WORK HARD TO GET STORY OUT OF Second cure invention and implementation and hard,hard,hard working establishment) .

CULLED POPULATION MANIPULATED TO BE GRATEFUL TO THE ESTABLISHMENT.

LONG LIVE OUR WONDEROUS BENEFICENT LEADERS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

###############

Colby,"Mr. Gaal arent you impressed by the MSM as shown in the Movie 'All the CDC's Men' in the coverage of the world wide epidemic ? "

===========

YUP, just as much as in 'All the Presidents Men' movie ( LIKE COVERUP) (Gaal)

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 379
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Len Colby Rookie

Len Colby

Posted
Posted

Even IF true how does this support your claims? // Colby

There is an increase in the use of electromagnetic weapons.

If a depopulation plan were to be initiated electromagnetic weapons could be part of the scheme. (Gaal)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^o0o^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

An idea Ive had for more than 15 years on depopulation.

[...]

To make a long story short it is only relevant to this thread via a far-fetched fantasy conjured up by someone whose lack of any relevant expertise is compounded by his difficulty understanding what he reads and memory problems. Gee I can't think of anything more rock solid than that.

Oh and explain to us how “electromagntic beam kills many but attributed to conflated 'as one' biological agents” would work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steven Gaal Newbie

Steven Gaal

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

his difficulty understanding what he reads and memory problems // Colby

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Well seems you have relevant expertise to evaluate depopulation ?? Where did you get this expertise ??

Its your claim I dont remember or comprehend because you have emotional problems.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Oh and explain to us how “electromagntic beam kills many but attributed to conflated 'as one' biological agents” would work. // Colby

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Is the US the royal WE ????

Historically the energy beam proposal from space to earth has been microwave not laser as now proposed ,but both can be but up at the same time.

COLBY NEEDS TO BE SPOON FED

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The beam disrupts communication leaving only controlled media outlets.

Drones can release the Biological agents using the cover of terrorist monitoring.

Biologic agent released first with skin eruptions in worldwide pandemic mode.

Second lethal agent released near controlled media outlets. In on it media assets given unpublicized cure.

Graphic death throes videos given wide spread release.

Fake social media assets given same secret cure. Vivid grotesque reports also come from Social media.

Martial law declared disrupting travel,isolating area from area.

Private planes are accused of spreading the infection after martial law. This covers up the drone infection release.

A key fact is that the second lethal biological has such a low infectivity that normal governmental

quarantine methods would stop the infection by said second agent but thats not apparent because of the deaths by the space beam. If the second lethal infection gets out of hand into areas that want to be preserved ,

said space beam can be a great firewall ad hoc quarantine.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The beam takes out targeted shipping worldwide. (as this is also an avenue of communication).

Of course oil tankers keep operational to help military operations.

The land attack begins. Done in a manner to decrease communication.

The beam kills in a 'U' pattern from seashore to seashore.Opposite the first 'U' pattern is a second mirror 'U' pattern killing beam from seashore to seashore. A third beam pattern connects the two 'U's.making a type of box between the first two 'U's.

The killing beam then finishes off the areas inside the 'U's.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Phoney killing cure given out to eager exhausted fearful lemmings.

Second real cure given out......however a great depopulation has occured.....the people are more than ready to accept a NWO. As previuosly stated none of this occurs in the current time frame,

#########################################

Jake Whitney Daily Beast 2/21/13

=============================

(According to the war correspondent Michael Hastings, DoD now employs 27,000 media professionals at $4.7 billion per year and even creates phony Facebook and Twitter accounts of pro-American Afghans.) This huge PR machine has been accompanied by a strategy of public disengagement—through policies like the elimination of the draft, a refusal to raise wartime taxes, and an increasing reliance on long-range weapons like drones. All of this makes war far less impactful to most Americans.

############################

Here is a bottom line question. When numbered crunched is the space beam economically sound ??

My understanding is that the answer is no. So why is it being proposed at all (see above (#168) Obama now on board with idea) ?

Not economically sound.

So why is it being proposed at all ? WHY ??

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Len Colby Rookie

Len Colby

Posted
Posted (edited)

his difficulty understanding what he reads and memory problems // Colby

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Well seems you have relevant expertise to evaluate depopulation ?? Where did you get this expertise ??

I never claimed such expertise, nor am I pushing far-fetched theories about them.

Its your claim I dont remember or comprehend because you have emotional problems.

No, it based on repeated instances of you citing sources which don't support your claims.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Oh and explain to us how “electromagntic beam kills many but attributed to conflated 'as one' biological agents” would work. // Colby

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Is the US the royal WE ????

No it is as in the other people following this thread and me.

Historically the energy beam proposal from space to earth has been microwave not laser as now proposed ,but both can be but up at the same time.

COLBY NEEDS TO BE SPOON FED

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The beam disrupts communication leaving only controlled media outlets.

Drones can release the Biological agents using the cover of terrorist monitoring.

Biologic agent released first with skin eruptions in worldwide pandemic mode.

Second lethal agent released near controlled media outlets. In on it media assets given unpublicized cure.

Graphic death throes videos given wide spread release.

Fake social media assets given same secret cure. Vivid grotesque reports also come from Social media.

Martial law declared disrupting travel,isolating area from area.

Private planes are accused of spreading the infection after martial law. This covers up the drone infection release.

A key fact is that the second lethal biological has such a low infectivity that normal governmental

quarantine methods would stop the infection by said second agent but thats not apparent because of the deaths by the space beam. If the second lethal infection gets out of hand into areas that want to be preserved ,

said space beam can be a great firewall ad hoc quarantine.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The beam takes out targeted shipping worldwide. (as this is also an avenue of communication).

Of course oil tankers keep operational to help military operations.

The land attack begins. Done in a manner to decrease communication.

The beam kills in a 'U' pattern from seashore to seashore.Opposite the first 'U' pattern is a second mirror 'U' pattern killing beam from seashore to seashore. A third beam pattern connects the two 'U's.making a type of box between the first two 'U's.

The killing beam then finishes off the areas inside the 'U's.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Phoney killing cure given out to eager exhausted fearful lemmings.

Second real cure given out......however a great depopulation has occured.....the people are more than ready to accept a NWO. As previuosly stated none of this occurs in the current time frame,

#########################################

Jake Whitney Daily Beast 2/21/13

=============================

(According to the war correspondent Michael Hastings, DoD now employs 27,000 media professionals at $4.7 billion per year and even creates phony Facebook and Twitter accounts of pro-American Afghans.) This huge PR machine has been accompanied by a strategy of public disengagement—through policies like the elimination of the draft, a refusal to raise wartime taxes, and an increasing reliance on long-range weapons like drones. All of this makes war far less impactful to most Americans.

############################

Here is a bottom line question. When numbered crunched is the space beam economically sound ??

My understanding is that the answer is no. So why is it being proposed at all (see above (#168) Obama now on board with idea) ?

Not economically sound.

So why is it being proposed at all ? WHY ??

Get back to us with sucinct documentation of your claims in many cases you seem not to have looked at the links, or did but didn't understand or unquestioning accepted the views of questionable sources.

Oh yeah and get back to us with a qualified expert who backs your fantasy.

Edited by Len Colby
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steven Gaal Newbie

Steven Gaal

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Oh yeah and get back to us with a qualified expert who backs your fantasy. // Colby

  1. FROM POST # 168 thread

According to RSA member Andrei Ionin, there is little doubt that there will be no need for power plants in space, once other Earth-based energy sources — such as thermonuclear fusion — have been mastered.

“Launching a plant to orbit and operating it there is very expensive — to say nothing of the environmental impact for the Earth,” Ionin says.

“God forbid the laser beam moves out of position. What will happen to the Earth then?" Ionin asks. "We don’t know how such offsets may influence the ozone layer. What if the laser starts burning holes in it? (Historically the energy beam proposal from space to earth has been microwave not laser as now proposed ,but both can be but up at the same time.Gaal)

2. Depopulation is a real philosophical idea held by numerous elites.

This is shown in the starting posts of this long thread.

3. Here is a bottom line question. When numbered crunched is the space beam economically sound ??

My understanding is that the answer is no. So why is it being proposed at all (see above (#168) Obama now on board with idea) ?

Not economically sound.

So why is it being proposed at all ? WHY ??

4. DO THE MATH

http://physics.ucsd....ed-solar-power/

BTW he talks about safety. Why does he do that ? ANSWER BECAUSE IT CAN BE 'UNSAFE'

However there is no assumption of making the beam do 'unsafe things on purpose'.

++++++++++

IF YOU HAVE A and C and D, then you can extrapolate 'B'. Mr. Colby time and again cant seem to do this mental procedure. If extrapolating 'B' would go against the establishment ,Mr. Colby just cant do it time again to

infinitum.

FROM MOVIE 1984

MR. SMITH IF THE STATE SAYS THIS IS FIVE ,ITS FIVE.(interrogator only holding up 4 fingers)

Would Colby say 5 or 4 ?? Dear Reader I think you know the answer.

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Len Colby Rookie

Len Colby

Posted
Posted (edited)

Wow a reply in 20 plus minutes, do you live here?

OK you've posted reasonable evidence it is not economically viable, but tell us - how much is being spent on this?

Edited by Len Colby
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steven Gaal Newbie

Steven Gaal

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

You might recall (if you dont have a memory problem),that Simkin started a thread that talked about the 21 TRILLION (thats the T not B word) in the offshore private accounts. Of course a lot of that is the ye old dictatorial leader skimming and organized crime monies ,however, its not beyond the pale that a portion of these trillions are slated for secret NWO operations . Central Banks can make money digitally out of whole cloth if BIS goes along. (and the BIS is part of NWO scheme). The issue of space beams has been an idea knocked around for decades (even the NAZI may have looked into the idea). On the net there is talk of DARPA work on releasing chemicals/(biologicals ?) via drones. When lift to orbit becomes cheaper the energy space beam will most likely become a reality ........duck !!!!!!!!!!!! Some of that private money could fund biological research in secret now . Government monies are working and perfecting drones as I type.

The space energy beam may not ever be economical, but all it needs to be is closely economical and the MSM/governments can cover up this detail. As stated previously China,India and Russia must be on board.

Later when cheaper orbit lift obtained a burst of monies from the trillions can put the project into final stage. This burst of money would be inflationary over time and elites hate inflation,however, how would this matter ??

The depopulated worlds NWO government could/would make a new currency.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

#####################o0o######################

NASA Funding Satellite That Would Beam Solar Power Down to Earth

Written by Megan Treacy on 17/04/12

solar-satellite.jpg

NASA is providing Artemis Innovation Management Solutions with seed money to build a satellite that could collect solar energy and beam it back down to Earth. Harvesting solar energy from space has been talked about for a long time, but has been deemed too expensive or the technology just wasn't there. Now with former NASA engineer John Mankins at the helm, it looks like this concept is finally set to take off.

The turning point for this technology is all due to the biomimetic design that Mankins came up with, which mimics how flower petals collect solar energy. The petals would be covered with small, thin-film mirrors that could be curved to direct sunlight to solar cells. The satellite would be positioned far enough away from the Earth so that it will never be in the dark. The energy collected would be converted into microwaves that could be beamed or broadcast back to Earth where electricity would be generated. The design allows for the use of small, lightweight mirrors and solar cells so that the satellite could be constructed and transported at a not-ridiculous cost.

The potential for this technology is huge. The satellite could feasibly send a constant stream of microwaves because of its position -- possibly thousands of megawatts worth. That constant stream of unlimited energy would utlimately make any upfront costs totally negligible and could bring a huge leap in amount of renewable energy fed to the grid. Truly, this is the stuff that clean tech dreams **** are made of.

The NASA funding is for a proof of concept study that could lead to a prototype being built if all checks out. That prototype would then be tested in near-Earth orbit and then, fingers crossed, full scale satellites would be built and launched.

via Phys.org

Images via John Mankins **** SELLING POINT (GAAL) Its ECO GOOD !! ITS ECO GOOD !! WE MUST HAVE IT !!!!

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steven Gaal Newbie

Steven Gaal

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

What Must a Humanoid Disaster-Response Robot Do to Win DARPA's Challenge?

By Rebecca Boyle Posted 04.11.2012 at 2:01 pm

robots%20rock.jpg

Robots to the Rescue This disaster scene is part of DARPA's new Robotics Challenge. The robot on the left is fixing a leaky pipe, and the robot on the right is breaking through a wall using a power tool. DARPA

DARPA has some details about its new Robotics Challenge, which we first told you about last week. Anyone have a robot that can drive a car for a $2 million prize?

Formally announced Tuesday, the new challenge will take place during the next two years, with the first phase kicking off in October. The goal is to develop robots that can work in dangerous environments engineered for humans, not robots. They could potentially protect humans from harm by making repairs or scouting terrain. DARPA specifically mentions the nuclear disaster at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi power plant as an example of why this type of robot would be useful.

(How about inject a phoney vaccine cure ?? Human I am from the government and here to help you. Please uncover your arm for saving injection......beep ) Gaal or (How about replace workers in dangerous areas after a depopulated world is created ?? beep !)

The challenge is not focused strictly on humanoid robots, but some of the tasks — like driving a car and climbing a ladder — could be difficult for non-humanoid body plans to accomplish.

Interestingly, the competition is open to international teams, even those with no connections to an American company or lab — DARPA may be aware that American development of humanoid robots has lagged behind our counterparts in Europe and Asia.

Like we first heard last week, the challenge consists of several difficult tasks. The robot must:

  • Drive an ATV or other similar utility vehicle, operating all the controls, ignition, steering and brakes.
  • Walk across uneven, debris-strewn terrain.
  • Clear a rock or cinder block from a doorway, turn a handle and open a door.
  • Climb a ladder and move across a catwalk (potentially one of the trickiest tasks, because a human would have to use arms and legs to do this).
  • Break open a concrete wall, like the drilling robot is doing in the image above.
  • Find and fix a leaking pipe, as the other robot is doing in the picture.
  • Remove and replace a small pump.

These are just examples; the formal challenge will be more specific, according to the solicitation. DARPA might make it more difficult depending on how things proceed.

Competitors can take part along three tracks: Track A would involve building a complete system, including software and hardware; Track B could be software only, developed using competitive funds; Track C could be software only, using a competitor’s own funds; and Track D would be a complete system developed at the competitor’s own expense.

The agency is opting for a big-tent view, seeking input from universities, companies of all sizes and even individuals. “Achieving true innovation in robotics, and thus success in this challenge, will require contributions from communities beyond traditional robotics developers,” the agency’s announcement says.

In that sense, DARPA may be taking a cue from the success of the Flypmode crowdsourced car, also the brainchild of a nontraditional source. And the agency expects this competition to stimulate a new generation of robot enthusiasts and builders, such as through the FIRST robotics competition.

“The work of the global robotics community brought us to this point—robots do save lives, do increase efficiencies and do lead us to consider new capabilities,” said Gill Pratt, DARPA program manager, in a statement. “What we need to do now is move beyond the state of the art.”

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Len Colby Rookie

Len Colby

Posted
Posted

Formally announced Tuesday, the new challenge will take place during the next two years, with the first phase kicking off in October. The goal is to develop robots that can work in dangerous environments engineered for humans, not robots. They could potentially protect humans from harm by making repairs or scouting terrain. DARPA specifically mentions the nuclear disaster at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi power plant as an example of why this type of robot would be useful.

(How about inject a phoney vaccine cure ?? Human I am from the government and here to help you. Please uncover your arm for saving injection......beep ) Gaal or (How about replace workers in dangerous areas after a depopulated world is created ?? beep !)

Paranoid drivel with no basis in reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Len Colby Rookie

Len Colby

Posted
Posted

You might recall (if you dont have a memory problem),that Simkin started a thread that talked about the 21 TRILLION (thats the T not B word) in the offshore private accounts. Of course a lot of that is the ye old dictatorial leader skimming and organized crime monies ,however, its not beyond the pale that a portion of these trillions are slated for secret NWO operations .

It should have been clear from context I was talking about schemes to use satellites to produce solar energy how much is supposedly being spent on them?

Central Banks can make money digitally out of whole cloth if BIS goes along. (and the BIS is part of NWO scheme).

Citations for both claims por favor

The issue of space beams has been an idea knocked around for decades (even the NAZI may have looked into the idea).

Get back to us with evidence the idea of using them as WMD's has been “knocked around”, then get back to us with evidence they could kill-off many people surreptitiously.

On the net there is talk of DARPA work on releasing chemicals/(biologicals ?) via drones. When lift to orbit becomes cheaper the energy space beam will most likely become a reality ........duck !!!!!!!!!!!! Some of that private money could fund biological research in secret now . Government monies are working and perfecting drones as I type. Later when cheaper orbit lift obtained a burst of monies from the trillions can put the project into final stage. This burst of money would be inflationary over time and elites hate inflation,however, how would this matter ??

The depopulated worlds NWO government could/would make a new currency.

Take a deep breath. You're babbling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steven Gaal Newbie

Steven Gaal

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

It should have been clear from context I was talking about schemes to use satellites to produce solar energy how much is supposedly being spent on them? // COLBY

==================

Gee SEED MONEY (NOT MUCH) DIDNT YOU READ POST # 187 ?? Seem you have a very bad habit on commenting on thing you havent read. FROM POST # 187 repeated below

NASA Funding Satellite That Would Beam Solar Power Down to Earth

Written by Megan Treacy on 17/04/12

solar-satellite.jpg

NASA is providing Artemis Innovation Management Solutions with seed money to build a satellite that could collect solar energy and beam it back down to Earth. Harvesting solar energy from space has been talked about for a long time, but has been deemed too expensive or the technology just wasn't there. Now with former NASA engineer John Mankins at the helm, it looks like this concept is finally set to take off.

The turning point for this technology is all due to the biomimetic design that Mankins came up with, which mimics how flower petals collect solar energy. The petals would be covered with small, thin-film mirrors that could be curved to direct sunlight to solar cells. The satellite would be positioned far enough away from the Earth so that it will never be in the dark. The energy collected would be converted into microwaves that could be beamed or broadcast back to Earth where electricity would be generated. The design allows for the use of small, lightweight mirrors and solar cells so that the satellite could be constructed and transported at a not-ridiculous cost.

The potential for this technology is huge. The satellite could feasibly send a constant stream of microwaves because of its position -- possibly thousands of megawatts worth. That constant stream of unlimited energy would utlimately make any upfront costs totally negligible and could bring a huge leap in amount of renewable energy fed to the grid. Truly, this is the stuff that clean tech dreams **** are made of.

The NASA funding is for a proof of concept study that could lead to a prototype being built if all checks out. That prototype would then be tested in near-Earth orbit and then, fingers crossed, full scale satellites would be built and launched.

via Phys.org

Images via John Mankins **** SELLING POINT (GAAL) Its ECO GOOD !! ITS ECO GOOD !! WE MUST HAVE IT !!!!

################################

Central Banks can make money digitally out of whole cloth if BIS goes along. (and the BIS is part of NWO scheme). GAAL

Citations for both claims por favor // COLBY

GOLLY I HAD THIS BELOW ON THE INTERNET THREAD (Poor memory ?? Gaal)

see http://www.bilderberg.org/bis.htm

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

(How about inject a phoney vaccine cure ?? Human I am from the government and here to help you. Please uncover your arm for saving injection......beep ) Gaal

or (How about replace workers in dangerous areas after a depopulated world is created ?? beep !)

Paranoid drivel with no basis in reality. //Colby


    • ==============================================

    [*] Robots in the Medical Field

    www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/5a0e30/robots-in-medical-field/Cached

    Jan 16, 2012 – But what happens when you visit any hospital and you will find robots carrying first-aid trays going into private wards to give injections to the ...

  • Fuzzy information processing and robotics research
    dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=800174.809789
    You +1'd this publicly. Undoby PP Wang - 1982
    It is perhaps not too far fetched to think of a robot with the “sensitivity” required to give injections to patients in a hospital. A robot might be programmed to roam ...

  • A Novel Epicardial Crawling Robot for Myocardial Injections
    www.ri.cmu.edu › Research › Browse PublicationsCached
    The HeartLander miniature mobile robot has the ability to adhere to the epicardium, travel to the operative site, and perform intramyocardial injections under ...
  • ############################
    COLBY INTERNET HACK (see JUST ABOVE COLBY COMMENTS AND MY RESPONSE) WHAT CAN I SAY , HE SEEM ONLY TO HAVE THE ESTABLISHMENT REALITY .....WHICH CAN BE PURE FANTASY.

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Len Colby Rookie

Len Colby

Posted
Posted

It should have been clear from context I was talking about schemes to use satellites to produce solar energy how much is supposedly being spent on them? // COLBY

==================

Gee SEED MONEY (NOT MUCH) DIDNT YOU READ POST # 187 ??

Exactly, they don't seem to be spending a lot of money on this, thus there is no basis for your paranoid drivel.

Seem you have a very bad habit on commenting on thing you havent read.

I read that, which is why I asked (see above). Your comment is quite ironic since I have repeatedly caught you posting links and text “you havent [sic] read”or videos you haven't watched. The author doesn't agree with your 'experts' such schemes are inherently not economically viable. And presumably the owners of/investors in the private company disagree as well, how carefully did you read it?

Central Banks can make money digitally out of whole cloth if BIS goes along. (and the BIS is part of NWO scheme). GAAL

Citations for both claims por favor // COLBY

GOLLY I HAD THIS BELOW ON INTERNET THREAD (Poor memory ?? Gaal)

see http://www.bilderberg.org/bis.htm

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

A page from a kook site with various articles on it cite any relevant excerpts that support your fantasy. And I'm under no obligation to look at every link you post especially since you often post ones you haven't bothered to look at yourself.

(How about inject a phoney vaccine cure ?? Human I am from the government and here to help you. Please uncover your arm for saving injection......beep ) Gaal

or (How about replace workers in dangerous areas after a depopulated world is created ?? beep !)

Paranoid drivel with no basis in reality. //Colby



    • ==============================================

    [*]

    Robots in the Medical Field

    www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/5a0e30/robots-in-medical-field/Cached

    Jan 16, 2012 – But what happens when you visit any hospital and you will find robots carrying first-aid trays going into private wards to give injections to the ...


  • Fuzzy information processing and robotics research
    dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=800174.809789
    You +1'd this publicly. Undoby PP Wang - 1982
    It is perhaps not too far fetched to think of a robot with the “sensitivity” required to give injections to patients in a hospital. A robot might be programmed to roam ...

While technically releasable the scenario you propose is “Paranoid drivel with no basis in reality”

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steven Gaal Newbie

Steven Gaal

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

While technically releasable the scenario you propose is “Paranoid drivel with no basis in reality”

// Colby

+++++++++++++++++++++ Sunday at the Colby's

YES ELITES LOVE ME

YES ELITES LOVE ME

YES ELITES LOVE ME

THE NYT/WASHPO TELL ME SO

Depopulation is a real philosophical idea held by numerous elites.

This is shown in the starting posts of this long thread.

+++++++++++++++++

Exactly, they don't seem to be spending a lot of money on this, thus there is no basis for your paranoid drivel. // Colby

Reading comprehension and/or memory may be a problem for some. TWICE I STATED the key point is making orbit lift cheaper. If someone didnt catch that ,please rerread. Satellite to ground aiming/microwave technology are not new. I stated Drone science is already being funded. I also stated that funding on biologicals could be done in secret with NWO funds. (poor memory). Orbit Lift is now being funded (common knowledge). Only a small amount of seed money is need now to at this time to put together pieces already present.

#######################################

I read that, which is why I asked (see above). Your comment is quite ironic since I have repeatedly caught you posting links and text “you havent [sic] read”or videos you haven't watched. The author doesn't agree with your 'experts' such schemes are inherently not economically viable. And presumably the owners of/investors in the private company disagree as well, how carefully did you read it? // COLBY

?? HUH THE SCIENTIST SAYS IT NOT ECONOMICAL . THE DREAMING PIE IN THE SKY INVESTORS NEED A REALITY CHECK. HOW IRONIC I have repeatedly caught you commenting on posting links and text “you havent [sic] read”or videos you haven't watched. YOU DISAGREE WITH MY INTERPRETATION AND THEN YOU SAY I DIDNT READ IT. PLEASE STOP THIS DISINGENUOS ARGUMENTITIVE LINE . I WONDER ARE YOU A FRAUD OR A FOOL ? I'LL GIVE YOU THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT AND THINK THE LATTER. (Gaal)

FROM POST # 185 above

In Summary

I sense that people have a tendency to think space is easy. We have lots of satellites, we’ve gone to the Moon (remember that?!), we used to have a space shuttle program, and we have seen many movies and television shows set in space. But space is a very challenging environment, and it is extremely costly and difficult to deliver things there. If you go to the Fed-Ex site to get delivery costs, you immediately get hung up on not knowing the postal-code for space. Once in space, failures cannot be serviced. The usual mitigation strategy is redundancy, adding weight and cost. A space-based solar power system might sound very cool and futuristic, and it may seem at first blush an obvious answer to intermittency, but this comes at a big cost. Among the possibly unanticipated challenges:

  • The gain over the a good location on the ground is only a factor of 3 (2.4× in summer, 4.2× in winter at 35° latitude).
  • It’s almost as hard to get energy back to the ground as it is to get the equipment into space in the first place.
  • The microwave link faces problems with transmission through the atmosphere, and also flirts with roasting ducks on the wing.
  • Diffraction of the downlink beam, together with energy density limits, means that very large areas of the ground still need to be dedicated to energy collection.

Traditional solar photovoltaics in good locations can accomplish much the same for much reduced cost, and with only a few times more land than the microwave link approach would demand. The installations will be serviceable and will last longer. Batteries seem an easier way to cover storage shortcomings than launching stuff to space. I did not even address solar thermal schemes in this post, which competes well with photovoltaics and can very naturally build in storage capability.

I am left puzzled as to why we would want to take a harder, more expensive road to solar power. I think it is just not intuitive to most how difficult and expensive space is. And perhaps they think it’s very futuristic and cool to push our power generation out to space: it fits the preferred narrative about where we’re going. I don’t know—I’m just guessing.

Astronomers frequently face this issue: should we build a telescope/observatory on the ground, or launch something into space? The prevailing wisdom is that if the science can be accomplished on the ground, then by golly you’d best do it that way. You’ll have the result sooner, at less expense, and with a greater chance of success. The lion’s share of astronomical advance is carried out from the ground. Space is reserved for those places where there is no other way. The atmosphere blocks many interesting wavelengths, creates turbulence that makes high-resolution imaging difficult, and produces variations in transmission that make it impossible to measure fluxes to high precision. The rotating Earth gets in the way of continuous observation of a single target for long periods. Some of the more exciting (an well-publicized) discoveries come from space missions, because these avenues are not generally available to us, increasing discovery potential.

Space-based solar power contains little intrinsic advantage that we can get “only from space.” It looks like a wash at best, and the astronomers would say “don’t bother.”

IN SUMMARY NOT ECONOMICAL GAAL

#######################################

Quote

The issue of space beams has been an idea knocked around for decades (even the NAZI may have looked into the idea). GAAL

Get back to us with evidence the idea of using them as WMD's has been “knocked around”, then get back to us with evidence they could kill-off many people surreptitiously.// COLBY

=========

Beam it down, Scotty

Harvesting solar power in space, for use on Earth, comes a step closer to reality

Jun 23rd 2011

THE idea of collecting solar energy in space and beaming it to Earth has been around for at least 70 years. In “Reason”, a short story by Isaac Asimov that was published in 1941, a space station transmits energy collected from the sun to various planets using microwave beams.

The advantage of intercepting sunlight in space, instead of letting it find its own way through the atmosphere, is that so much gets absorbed by the air. By converting it to the right frequency first (one of the so-called windows in the atmosphere, in which little energy is absorbed) a space-based collector could, enthusiasts claim, yield on average five times as much power as one located on the ground.

The disadvantage is cost. Launching and maintaining suitable satellites would be ludicrously expensive. But perhaps not, if the satellites were small and the customers specialised. Military expeditions, rescuers in disaster zones, remote desalination plants and scientific-research bases might be willing to pay for such power from the sky. And a research group based at the University of Surrey, in England, hopes that in a few years it will be possible to offer it to them.

WOW how off can you Be !!!! ????? Are you a fool or a fraud ? I will give you the benefit of doubt on the matter and think the latter. (Gaal)

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steven Gaal Newbie

Steven Gaal

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Get back to us with any qualified experts who say such devices could be used to surreptitiously kill large swaths of humanity and that the symptoms could be mistaken as being of biological origin // COLBY

+++++++++++++++++++

TWO EXPERTS ALREADY CITED INDICATE SPACE ENERGY BEAMS DANGEROUS

SATELLITE aiming technology here.

Solar Cells to electrical to microwave technology already here.

Drone technology already here.

Lifting to orbit technology already here (but expensive), however in a pinch TRILLIONS of dollars in secret accounts (Source Mr. Simkin).

QUISLING MSM and FALSE SOCIAL MEDIA ALREADY IN PLACE. (see above DOD and propaganda social media army)

ONLY BIOLOGICAL LACKING.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Now to repeat (for the slow upstairs,wink)

1.ELITES WANT DEPOPULATION

2. DEPOPULTION WONT OCCUR UNTIL LATTER (AS PREVIOUSLY STATED = RUSSIA HAS WEST QUISLING LEADER and INDIA LEADERSHIP BRIBED,then deal struct with ISOLATED CHINA,CIRCA 2040 plus minus two years.)

3.QUISLING MSM and FALSE SOCIAL MEDIA ALREADY IN PLACE

4. ITS THE MEDIA THAT REPORT FALSE STORY FROM CORRUPTED WHO/CDC OF TWO DISEASES CONFLATED

CDC/WHO release.

WORLD WIDE ALERT . LETHAL HIGHLY CONTAGIOUS VIRUS CAUSES SKIN ERRUPTIONS IN 5 % OF CASES . AGENT IS 99.9 % Lethal. ((BUT ITS TWO BIOLOGICALS ,BUT PANDEMIC SKIN HELPS SELL IDEA OF WIDE SPREAD DEATH TO OCCUR)) SAMPLES MUST ONLY BE OBSERVED/TAKEN TO LEVEL FOUR CONTAINMENT. // END RELEASE

Few level 4 labs will be outside of WESTS control (maybe sabotage one/two labs not in control).......who would / could counter the story ???????????????? answer NONE

############################

LOTS OF WORK BEING DONE ON HOW HIGH INFECTIVITY OF 1918 FLU.

wiki

1918 flu pandemic

Bleeding from the ears and petechial hemorrhages in the skin also occurred.

Knobler S, Mack A, Mahmoud A, Lemon S (ed.). The Story of Influenza". The Threat of Pandemic Influenza: Are We Ready? pp60-61

=========================

(EMERGING Zoonotic virus is a virus that coluld spread in a large way to humans.)

Hendra virus has a high human mortality rate | Australian Medical ...https://ama.com.au/media/hendra-virus-has-high-human-mortality-rateCached

Sep 4, 2011 – Hendra virus (HeV) infection in humans is an emerging zoonotic disease that has a high mortality rate but low infectivity, according to the latest ...

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...