Jump to content
The Education Forum

A 7/7 link to check out


Recommended Posts

http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-terror-rehearsal.html

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Secret Wars: One Hundred Years of British Intelligence Inside MI5 ...www.amazon.com › ... › Business & Culture › HistoryCached

You +1'd this publicly. Undo

Secret Wars: One Hundred Years of British Intelligence Inside MI5 and MI6: ... Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights ...

Does this mean Reed Elsevier gets good looks inside MI5 and MI6 OR is Reed Elsevier INSIDE OF MI6 and MI5 ?????????????????????????????????????????

================================

Peter Power decided to leave the following comment in which he finally reveals the client for whom his terror rehearsal operation was being run:

There has been much nonsense written about why my company ran an exercise on 7 July 2005 that had very close parallels to the real thing that day. Since then I have made several attempts to add my own comments to numerous sites that seem to get increasingly excited about their own conspiracy theories and in the process exclude any rational debate. It seems those who occupy the world of finding conspiracy theories to replace just about any coincidence, do not want to have any dialogue with those offering a different view, but I have not yet given up hope. I am therefore hoping, perhaps naively, that someone might like to read an honest and factual account about a particular exercise my company ran in London three years ago.

Unfortunately, the BBC have just postponed a programme in their ‘conspiracy files’ series that would have done this. Our client three years ago agreed to be named in the BBC programme since the attitude of the producer and his team was very balanced (several conspiracy theorists were also invited to take part). We even allowed our complete exercise material to be made available to the BBC. Regrettably broadcasting it now might jeopardise an ongoing court case, so they had little choice about postponing it to next year.

Early in 2005 Reed Elsevier, an organisation specialising in information and publishing that employs 1,000 people in and around London, asked us to help them prepare an effective crisis management plan and rehearse it before sign-off. Several draft scenarios were drawn up and the crisis team themselves set the exercise date and time: 9.00am on 7 July.

The test was planned as a table-top walk through for about six people (the CM team) in a lecture room with all injects simulated. Everything was on MS PowerPoint. The location of their Central London office near to Chancery Lane was chosen as one test site. With many staff travelling to work via the London underground system, the chosen exercise simulated incendiary devices on three trains, very similar to a real IRA attack in 1992, as well as other events.

As there had been eighteen terrorist bomb attacks on tube trains prior to 2005, choosing the London Underground was logical rather than just prescient. With this in mind it was hardly surprising that Deutsche Bank had run a similar exercise a few days before and, prior to that, a multi-agency (and much publicised) exercise code-named Osiris II had simulated a terrorist attack at Bank tube station. Moreover, I had also taken part in a BBC Panorama programme in 2004 as a panellist alongside Michael Portillo MP et al, in an unscripted debate (we had no idea at all what the scenario was to be?) on how London might once again, deal with terrorist attacks, only this time it was fictional (created entirely by the BBC).

In short, some of the research for our exercise had already been done. The scenario developed for our client even started by using fictitious news items from the Panorama programme then, as with any walk through exercise, events unfolded solely on a screen as dictated by the facilitator without any external injects or actions beyond the exercise room. Also factored into the scenario was to be an above ground fictitious bomb exploding not far from the head office of the protected Jewish Chronicle magazine where for exercise purposes, our imagined terrorists would have been aware that commuters would now be walking to work (past a building already considered a target) as some tube stations would have been closed.

Of just eight nearby tube stations that fell within possible exercise's scope, three were chosen that, by coincidence, were involved in the awful drama that actually took place on 7 July 2005. A level of scenario validation that on this occasion, we could have done without.

An exercise that turns into the real thing is not that unusual.*For example, in January 2003, thirty people were injured when a tube train derailed and hit a wall at speed. At the same time, the City of London Police were running an exercise for their central casualty bureau where the team quickly abandoned their plans and swung into action to cope with the real thing.

For a surprising number of people such coincidents cannot be accepted as such. There just has to be a conspiracy behind them, despite the obvious point that painstaking research will always identify probable above possible scenarios. By the way, the only reason I was asked to speak on TV news that day, when there was still much confusion about the real tragedies, was to encourage more organisations to thoroughly plan their own exercises knowing the threat of terrorism is and remains, very real. One tragic consequence being Islam, a great Abrahamic, monotheistic faith (along with Judaism and Christianity), has undeservedly become vilified by some people.

Peter Power

Visor Consultants

Friday, October 03, 2008 1:29:00 PM

##############################

* GAAL How do you say BS in England ?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

More on Peter Power

http://www.julyseven...suspension.html

Peter Power the man who loves the POWERS that be !!

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JUN 26/2012

Another Look at the 7/7 Tube Terror Attack

written by Gordon Pollard

7/7 After Seven: Bombs and Lies in London (First of Three Parts)

by Gordon Pollard

---------------------------------------------------

Were the bombings on the London underground on July 7th, 2005, really carried out by four young Muslim “suicide terrorists” or were they actually orchestrated by former Prime Minister Tony Blair and carried out by black ops commandos of the British army’s Force Reconnaissance Regiment to stoke public fear and keep the “war on terrorism” rolling along?

That is the fascinating question explored by British researcher Dr. Nick Kollerstrom in his brilliant new expose, Terror on the Tube, in which he peers “behind the veil of 7/7” to try to discover the truth about who was responsible for the shocking events that day.

For the past seven years we have been told repeatedly by the British authorities that four “homemade bombs” were exploded in London on 7/7 (three in underground trains and one in a double-decker bus) by four British-born Muslims (Mohammed Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Germaine Lindsay and Hasib Hussein) who brought the explosives with them in rucksacks on the train from Luton.

But recently, thanks to the work of Kollerstrom and other researchers, serious doubts have been cast on that official story, and many people in Britain and around the world have begun wondering whether something very different happened in London that morning.

[Originally published in the Victoria Street Newz July 2012 issue.]

Indeed, in his well-documented 328-page presentation, Kollerstrom makes a compelling case that the four young Muslims were innocent patsies who had been lured into participating in “anti-terrorism drills” – which, by a remarkable “coincidence,” were being staged in London on the morning of 7/7 – and were set up so they could be blamed for the bombs which were actually planted and detonated by commandos of the Force Reconnaissance Regiment.

Kollerstrom notes that by the summer of 2005 much of the fear and hysteria that had been whipped up by the phony 9/11 “terrorist attacks” in the United States had dissipated in Britain and Tony Blair and his super-hawk cronies were becoming alarmed that the “war on terrorism” was losing momentum and peace seemed to be breaking out, so to speak.

It became clear to Blair and his gungho-for-war inner circle, Kollerstrom believes, that something had to be done to scare the public into continuing to support the phony war on terrorism in general and the bogus wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in particular – and it was decided that what had to be done was to stage false-flag “bomb attacks” in London and blame them on “Muslim terrorists.”

Kollerstrom puts together a complex “jigsaw puzzle” consisting of hundreds of pieces of evidence, and one has to carefully examine each of these pieces before one can see clearly the picture that emerges from this “puzzle.”

Unfortunately, it isn’t possible, of course, for us to look at all of the “pieces of the puzzle” in this article, but we will look at twenty of the most important points Kollerstrom makes: seven in this issue, seven in the August edition and six more in the September edition.

Contrary to the official story that just four bombs were exploded in London on July 7th, 2005, there is overwhelming evidence that at least twelve bombs were detonated – and possibly as many as seventeen. There were many more bomb blasts than could possibly have been produced by the four alleged suicide bombers.

By far the most authoritative independent expert on the forensic evidence related to the events of 7/7 is David Minahan, a veteran forensic analyst who worked for many years as a claims investigator for a London-based insurance company. After carefully examining hundreds of pieces of evidence for more than a year, Minahan produced a meticulously documented dossier entitled A Forensic Analysis of the 7/7 London Bombings.

In that document he concludes there is indisputable evidence that, in addition to the bomb that blew up a bus in Tavistock Square, at least eleven bombs were exploded in the underground, including multiple blasts near the Aldgate, Edgware Road and Russell Square stations. There is also some evidence, he says, that as many as five more bombs were exploded on 7/7, though that evidence is not as clear-cut as the evidence for the other twelve.

“It is obvious to anyone who studies the evidence,” Minahan says, “that the authorities have carried out a massive cover-up and campaign of disinformation about what happened in London on July 7th, 2005.

Not surprisingly, Minahan’s study has been totally blacked out of the mainstream media, which dutifully parrot the government’s four-bomb story. But the report is an invaluable historical document and, as Kollerstrom notes, if any honest public inquiry is ever held into 7/7, the Minahan dossier would be the obvious place to begin.

The enormous explosive force produced and devastating damage caused by the bombs in London on 7/7 clearly resulted from the use of high-powered military-grade explosives such as C4. The explosions were many times more powerful than could have been caused by the “homemade TATP explosives” allegedly used by the four “suicide bombers” – and, indeed, the authorities publicly acknowledged C4 had been used for five days following 7/7 until they abruptly changed their story and began claiming the blasts had been caused by four Muslim kids with backpack bombs.

In the days following 7/7, all of the police officials and forensic experts agreed the bomb blasts had involved the use of the high-powered military plastic explosive C4 and that the explosions had been detonated by remote-control. Indeed, the media reported traces of C4 had been found at all of the blast sites and that some fragments of remote-control timing and detonating equipment had also been found in the rubble.

French anti-terrorism chief Christophe Chaboud, who came to London to assist with the investigation, said the evidence showed there was massive damage in the underground caused by “high-powered military-grade plastic explosives” and the main concern should be to find out how “terrorists” had been able to acquire such explosives as C4, which are very tightly controlled and usually available only to elite military units.

Similar comments were made by Vincent Cannistro, former head of the CIA’s counter-terrorism centre, who said it was “highly disturbing” that pieces of “sophisticated remote-control detonation equipment” had been found in the debris at some of the blast sites along with traces of military-grade explosives. He and other officials called for “a Europe-wide investigation” to get to the bottom of the matter.

Scotland Yard Deputy Assistant Commissioner Brian Paddick said: “It is clear that high explosives were used in the attacks and they were not home-made.”

Suddenly, however, on July 12th it was announced out of the blue that “exceptional investigative work” by the London Metropolitan Police had uncovered “evidence” that the bombings had actually been carried out by four young Muslim “suicide bombers” using the explosive TATP, which they had brewed themselves in a bathtub in Leeds and brought into London in rucksacks on the morning of 7/7.

“As I floated through the air,” he recalls, “I was wondering if I’d be alive when I came down.”

At that point all of the initial reports about C4 and remote-control detonators were, to use Kollerstrom’s words, “airbrushed out of history,” never to be mentioned again by the authorities.

Everyone was now told to believe instead the Muslim-kids-with-TATP story – though, as we will see later, the TATP story would also change many times over the past seven years and, indeed, to this day the authorities still can’t, or won’t, provide a clear honest answer to the simple question of what explosives were used in the 7/7 bombings.

At least some of the bomb blasts in the underground, and possibly all of them, were clearly caused by explosives planted under the train carriages – not by explosives carried into the carriages in rucksacks, as officially claimed.

Among the dozens of survivors who said there were explosions underneath the trains on which they were travelling was Ray Whitehurst, the driver of a Circle Line train bombed near Edgware Road Station. The front part of the train was thrust upward so violently, Whitehurst recalls, that “it was lifted right up off the rails.”

A passenger on the Edgware train, David Gardiner, gave a dramatic account of being blown upwards and hitting his head on the roof of the coach. “As I floated through the air,” he recalls, “I was wondering if I’d be alive when I came down.”

At the Aldgate station, survivor Mustafa Kurtuldu said the train he was on was also “lifted up off the rails,” and another passenger Bruce Lait said a huge hole was blown in the floor of the carriage. “The metal,” Lait said, “was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. While the authorities say the bomb was left in a bag, I don’t remember anybody being where the bomb was or any bag.”

Lait’s account is corroborated by other passengers such as Emma Brown and Terence Hiscock and by a police officer, Lizzie Kenworthy, who was one of the first rescue workers to enter the coach and found “a big hole in the centre of the floor with the metal twisted upward.”

At the blast site near Russell Square of the 112 passengers who survived, not one remembered seeing alleged bomber Germaine Lindsay or any rucksack – but several reported their coach being lifted off the rails. Survivors Joe Orr and Gracia Homiguez gave especially vivid accounts of a huge blast from below ripping apart the floor of the carriage and blowing off the feet and legs of a number of passengers.

Journalist Mark Honigsbaum of The Guardian stood outside the Edgware Road station all morning on 7/7 speaking to survivors as they were evacuated – and he was told repeatedly the bombs had exploded underneath the trains. For example, one survivor recalled that “the tiles and covers on the floor of the train suddenly flew up.” Sadly, Honigsbaum later performed some Houdini-like contortions to try to reconcile his on-the-spot reporting on 7/7 with the official bombs-inside-the-carriages story that the authorities started telling on July 12th – but by that time the truth-bearing genie was already out of the lamp!

As for who likely planted the bombs under the trains, Kollerstrom and a number of other 7/7 critics believe the evidence clearly points to the Force Reconnaissance Regiment, the super-secret black ops unit which had been created on April 6th, 2005 – just three months before 7/7. “The FRR,” Kollerstrom notes, “was completely above the law and had a license to kill – and all its members were trained in sophisticated bomb-making technology.”

Two other leading 7/7 critics, retired Australian police officer Andrew MacGregor and French researcher Thierry Meyssan, also believe the explosives were almost certainly planted under the trains by FRR commandos. “Realistically,” Meyssan says, “no one else could possibly have acquired explosives such as C4 and then carried out such an operation without being detected.”

The official story that the only trains bombed in the London underground on 7/7 were the three on which alleged bombers Mohammed Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer and Germaine Lindsay were travelling away from King’s Cross station was flatly contradicted by credible testimony from a number of passengers aboard trains going toward King’s Cross station who said their trains were also bombed.

One of the most important witnesses in the 7/7 story was an Indian passenger named Kurush Anklesaria who thought he would be taking a routine trip on the London underground that morning. As it turned out, however, Anklesaria’s recollections about what happened that day would flatly contradict the government’s official version on no fewer than three counts.

First, the Circle Line train on which Anklesaria was travelling and which he said was bombed was not one of the three trains that the authorities claim were the only ones bombed on 7/7. Secondly, Anklesaria says the train he was aboard was travelling toward King’s Cross station, not away from it. And thirdly, Anklesaria says the floor of the train he was on was ripped open by a powerful blast that clearly seemed to be caused by explosives underneath the train, not inside the carriage.

So, if Anklesaria’s testimony is honest and accurate (and there is every reason to believe it is), on that basis alone the government’s official story about 7/7 is down the tube, if you will pardon the expression! It should also be noted Anklesaria’s testimony was corroborated by a number of other credible witnesses, including Eamon Spellman, Zeyned Basci, Mandy Yu, Aaron Roche and Grassiere Homiguez.

Moreover, two American girls who were sight-seeing that morning, Katie and Emily Benton, said they were travelling eastwards out of Paddington and toward King’s Cross station when the train they were on was rocked by a huge explosion.

And perhaps the most poignant evidence contradicting the official story came from a young man named James White, who wasn’t on the London underground that morning but who testified he received a phone call from his girlfriend Jenny Nicholson just minutes before the train on which she was travelling toward King’s Cross station was bombed and she was killed. on -- not, as one might have expected, to reassure the British people that a full-scale independent inquiry would be held to determine who had committed these atrocities – but instead to declare, without offering a shred of evidence, that he already knew Islamic extremists were responsible and there was no need for any independent investigation.

Blair’s statement, made less than eight hours after the bombings, was especially astounding in view of the fact that the London Metropolitan Police publicly acknowledged the following morning that it was still unclear who had carried out the bombings and the investigation remained wide open.

As the weeks and months went by, Blair continued to stonewall, steadfastly refusing to hold an independent public inquiry even when a large group of exasperated 7/7 survivors and relatives of those who had been killed sent an impassioned letter to the Home Office on May 1st, 2007, calling for “an independent and impartial public inquiry” into 7/7. Blair also brusquely rejected a motion passed on May 28th, 2007, by the Greater London Council calling for an independent inquiry.

The official reason Blair gave was that an independent inquiry would be “a ludicrous waste of resources” but, as Kollerstrom clearly demonstrates in his book, the real reason was that the story Blair was telling the British people about 7/7 was a pack of lies from beginning to end and he knew it would collapse within a matter of minutes if subjected to critical scrutiny at an honest inquiry.

By quickly declaring on the evening of 7/7 that the bombings had been carried out by “Islamic extremists,” Blair established the “official story” of what had happened and, unfortunately, from that point on hardly anyone was brave enough to publicly question that official version. Almost all of the public, the police, politicians, news media, academics and judiciary blindly accepted Blair’s story like docile, unquestioning little lambs – and everywhere that Tony went the lambs were sure to go!

Another huge red flag was unfurled at seven o’clock on the evening of 7/7 when Peter Power, president of Visor Consulting and a former top official of Scotland Yard, went on the BBC and claimed that one of history’s greatest “coincidences” had supposedly taken place that day: his company just happened to be carrying out anti-terrorism exercises in the London underground at the same time and in the same locations where the real “terrorist attacks” occurred.

A visibly shaken Power said “the hairs on the back of (his) neck had stood up” when he learned that “by an amazing coincidence” there had been real “terror attacks” that morning at the same Aldgate, Edgware Road and Russell Square stations where his company had been carrying out simulated anti-terrorism exercises.

Actually, of course, as Kollerstrom notes, the odds against such a “coincidence” happening would be more than a billion to one, and it is much more likely these “anti-terror drills” were really being used as a cover to help the authorities carry out the 7/7 fraud.

Moreover, as those familiar with the 9/11 evidence will recall, by another remarkable “coincidence,” Vice-President Dick Cheney just happened to have arranged for “war games” involving planes flying into skyscrapers in New York City to be held on the morning of September 11th, 2001. The odds against such “anti-terror exercises” being scheduled by pure coincidence for both 9/11 and 7/7 would be more than a trillion to one!

As 7/7 critic Andrew MacGregor notes, these anti-terror drills appear to have played a key role in facilitating the 7/7 fraud. “The evidence indicates,” MacGregor says, “that Mohammed Sidique Khan and his ‘co-conspirators’ were among dozens of people who had been hired by Visor Consultants to take part in these drills – but the four young men had no idea they were being set up to be ‘suicide bombers.’” Another 7/7 expert Anthony John Hill agrees “the four men were clearly lured into these exercises so they could be used as patsies in a classic ‘false-flag’ operation.”

When Peter Power was asked who had ordered the counter-terrorism drills, he stonewalled for months before finally revealing his main client was a relatively obscure company called Reed Elsevier. Many are skeptical about that claim, however, and it remains unclear to this day who was really behind these anti-terrorism exercises.

Nor is it clear why Power chose to make his startling public disclosure on the evening of 7/7 – but Kollerstrom and some others believe it was likely a case of self-preservation. It seems clear Power had not been told by the inner circle of 7/7 planners exactly what was going to occur that day, so when he saw what happened to the four young Muslim patsies, Power probably felt his best defense against possibly suffering a similar fate was to go public about the anti-terror exercises.

The so-called “evidence” which the authorities produced to demonstrate the guilt of the four young Muslims accused of the bombings was flimsy at best and much of it was downright ridiculous.

The alleged ring-leader of the “7/7 terrorists,” Mohammed Sidique Khan, must surely have been the most unusual “suicide bomber” in history since he apparently managed to blow himself up in no fewer than four different locations!

In different parts of the government’s Official Narrative of Events, published ten months after 7/7, we are told identifiable fragments of Khan’s body and pieces of his clothing and personal belongings were found splattered about at Aldgate Station, Edgware Road Station and Tavistock Square. And five years later, in evidence presented at Justice Heather Hallett’s official inquest, we learned this astonishingly ubiquitous “suicide bomber” must also have been present at Russell Square since his cellphone was reportedly found in the rubble at that blast site.

Eventually the authorities officially placed the elusive Khan in a coach near Edgware Road Station where he supposedly blew himself to smithereens with a rucksack full of TATP explosives, though conveniently leaving behind a number of paper and plastic identification documents which survived the blast in remarkably good condition.

Initially the police couldn’t find a single witness who had remembered seeing anyone resembling Khan or any rucksack in the coach – but, more than two months later, a passenger name Dan Biddle, who had been severely injured in the explosion and who was relentlessly questioned by police and repeatedly shown pictures of Khan while he recovered in hospital, said he “remembered” seeing Khan. This pathetic “witness” is the only person who claims to have seen Khan in the train, or anywhere else in London for that matter, on 7/7.

Meanwhile, at the blast site at Russell Square, the official story was equally absurd. As we noted earlier, not a single one of the 112 survivors of that explosion remembered seeing alleged bomber Germaine Lindsay or the large rucksack he had supposedly been carrying. Indeed, a passenger named Jude Obi, who we are told was sitting right next to Lindsay when he allegedly blew himself up, astonishingly wasn’t injured at all and walked away from the scene. Obi not only didn’t notice Lindsay or any rucksack but says he didn’t even realize that a bomb had been exploded. “I thought at first”, Obi says, “that the train had been derailed.”

The official account was similarly ridiculous in the case of the train bombed at Aldgate Station where passengers William Walsh and Greg Shannon, who were supposedly sitting right next to Shehzad Tanweer when he allegedly blew himself into 52 tiny pieces, sustained only minor injuries in the blast and neither remembered seeing Tanweer or any rucksack. Fortunately for the authorities, however, this remarkably considerate “jihadist” had brought along on his “suicide mission” a number of identification documents, which all miraculously survived the explosion in quite good condition.

But of all the nonsense concerning magically surviving identification documents, the funniest – and most embarrassing to the authorities – occurred at the site of the bus bombing at Tavistock Square when police proudly trumpeted they had found in the rubble the driver’s license of alleged bomber Hasib Hussein. That “discovery” soon had to be “airbrushed out of history,” however, when it turned out Hussein didn’t have a driver’s license. While it still isn’t clear who planted the phony “driver’s license,” it obviously wasn’t Secret Agent 007. This was much more likely the work of Secret Agent 000!

By this time it shouldn’t be surprising to learn that neither Mia Scott nor Sapna Khimani, the passengers in the seats next to the one in which Hasib Hussein was supposedly sitting, had noticed the huge teenager or the large rucksack he was allegedly carrying. Indeed, not a single passenger on the bus remembered seeing Hussein – at least not until five years after 7/7! In 2010 one of the bus passengers, Lisa French, who had been severely traumatized by the explosion and who had received years of psychiatric treatment, told police she finally “remembered” seeing Hussein on the bus. Pathetically, the police quickly jumped on her “recollection” claiming they now had a witness who placed Hussein at the crime scene.

Actually the question of whether or not Hussein had been aboard the bus could have been answered definitively by viewing the videotapes from the four surveillance cameras on the bus – but the police said, unfortunately, those cameras had not been turned on that day. That claim was flatly contradicted by officials of Stagecoach Transport, which owned the bus. They said the cameras had been working and the tapes had been turned over to the Metropolitan Police. Nonetheless, the authorities continue to stonewall to this day, insisting no surveillance pictures were taken on the bus.

We should also look at one more of the most notably ridiculous parts of the 7/7 farce: the story of how the four “suicide bombers” travelled from Luton to London that morning. In the government’s Official Narrative of Events, published on June 5th, 2006, we are told there is incontrovertible evidence they took the 7:40 a.m. Thameslink train from Luton to King’s Cross Station. But on July 11th, 2006, a red–faced Home Secretary John Reid admitted in Parliament there hadn’t been any 7:40 a.m. train from Luton to King’s Cross Station on the morning of July 7th, 2005!

++++++++++++++++++++++++=++********************+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

In next month’s Street Newz, when we continue our look at the dark and ghastly but nonetheless fascinating story of what really happened in London on July 7th, 2005, we will see that:

• Key parts of the official version of 7/7, especially the story about the explosives, changed many times over the past seven years – some “evidence” magically appeared while other “evidence” magically disappeared.

• There was a lot of hocus-pocus with surveillance pictures in London and Luton as some photos were “doctored” and some time-stamps were falsified to incriminate the four alleged suicide bombers.

• The surveillance system on the London underground on 7/7 was controlled, not by British transport officials, but by Verint Systems, an Israeli security company headed by Dan Bodner and Kobi Alexander, two highly controversial former senior officers in the Israeli Army.

• Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who was visiting London on July 7th, 2005, received advance warning of the bombings according to a report on Israeli Army News.

• Overall control of the London Transport System on 7/7 was in the hands of Bob Kiley, a notoriously hawkish former high-level official in the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency.

• A mysterious shooting incident occurred at Canary Wharf in East London on the morning of 7/7 and it appears some of the alleged suicide bombers might have been executed at that time.

• Claims by the authorities that the alleged suicide bombers left large amounts of explosives in a car at Luton and in a bathtub at Leeds are almost certainly bogus.

Gordon Pollard, who is a native of Victoria, has a MA in History from Columbia University in New York City and a BA in History and English from the University of Victoria. After working for 10 years as a journalist in B.C., Alberta, and Ontario, Gordon spent 20 years teaching English and History in Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Zimbabwe and Sri Lanka.

########################################################

Secret Wars: One Hundred Years of British Intelligence Inside MI5 ...www.amazon.com › ... › Business & Culture › HistoryCached

You +1'd this publicly. Undo

Secret Wars: One Hundred Years of British Intelligence Inside MI5 and MI6: ... Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights ...

Does this mean Reed Elsevier gets good looks inside MI5 and MI6 OR is Reed Elsevier INSIDE OF MI6 and MI5 ?????????????????????????????????????????

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JUN 26/2012

Another Look at the 7/7 Tube Terror Attack

written by Gordon Pollard

7/7 After Seven: Bombs and Lies in London (First of Three Parts)

by Gordon Pollard

---------------------------------------------------

Were the bombings on the London underground on July 7th, 2005, really carried out by four young Muslim “suicide terrorists” or were they actually orchestrated by former Prime Minister Tony Blair and carried out by black ops commandos of the British army’s Force Reconnaissance Regiment to stoke public fear and keep the “war on terrorism” rolling along?

That is the fascinating question explored by British researcher Dr. Nick Kollerstrom in his brilliant new expose, Terror on the Tube, in which he peers “behind the veil of 7/7” to try to discover the truth about who was responsible for the shocking events that day.

Nicholas Kollerstrom is a science historian turned Holocaust denier and all round conspiracy theorist, AFAICT he has no relevant expertise relating to terrorism or explosives. Kollerstrom wrote “the only intentional mass extermination program in the concentration camps of WW2 was targeted at Germans [after the war]… in French and American-run concentration camps” and “Let us hope the schoolchildren visitors are properly taught about the elegant swimming-pool at Auschwitz, built by the inmates, who would sunbathe there on Saturday and Sunday afternoons while watching the water-polo matches.” He is not a credible source, nothing he says can e believed unless we has access to his sources.

By far the most authoritative independent expert on the forensic evidence related to the events of 7/7 is David Minahan, a veteran forensic analyst who worked for many years as a claims investigator for a London-based insurance company. After carefully examining hundreds of pieces of evidence for more than a year, Minahan produced a meticulously documented dossier entitled A Forensic Analysis of the 7/7 London Bombings.

In that document he concludes there is indisputable evidence that, in addition to the bomb that blew up a bus in Tavistock Square, at least eleven bombs were exploded in the underground, including multiple blasts near the Aldgate, Edgware Road and Russell Square stations. There is also some evidence, he says, that as many as five more bombs were exploded on 7/7, though that evidence is not as clear-cut as the evidence for the other twelve.

An insurance claims investigator? I’ve never heard of one having forensic expertise relating to explosives. He wrote: "I was by occupation a claims investigator for an insurance company and later a leading firm of solicitors so I have some experience of "forensic" matters. I was also some years ago the National President of a major Trade Union (MSF now merged with the AEEU to form Amicus). Hmmm “SOME experience” and use of scare around forensic it seem even he doesn’t categorize himself as “a veteran forensic analyst” and skimming through his report it seems the “hundreds of pieces of evidence” he “carefully examin[ed]” were media accounts

http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/J7-london-bombings-dossier/index.html

Two other leading 7/7 critics, retired Australian police officer Andrew MacGregor and French researcher Thierry Meyssan, also believe the explosives were almost certainly planted under the trains by FRR commandos. “Realistically,” Meyssan says, “no one else could possibly have acquired explosives such as C4 and then carried out such an operation without being detected.”

LOL “Hunt the Boeing” Meyssan again and an elderly Australian cop? Since we are not told about either’s terrorism or explosives experience/expertise they don’t have any.

Another huge red flag was unfurled at seven o’clock on the evening of 7/7 when Peter Power, president of Visor Consulting and a former top official of Scotland Yard, went on the BBC and claimed that one of history’s greatest “coincidences” had supposedly taken place that day: his company just happened to be carrying out anti-terrorism exercises in the London underground at the same time and in the same locations where the real “terrorist attacks” occurred.

A visibly shaken Power said “the hairs on the back of (his) neck had stood up” when he learned that “by an amazing coincidence” there had been real “terror attacks” that morning at the same Aldgate, Edgware Road and Russell Square stations where his company had been carrying out simulated anti-terrorism exercises.

Actually, of course, as Kollerstrom notes, the odds against such a “coincidence” happening would be more than a billion to one, and it is much more likely these “anti-terror drills” were really being used as a cover to help the authorities carry out the 7/7 fraud.

Moreover, as those familiar with the 9/11 evidence will recall, by another remarkable “coincidence,” Vice-President Dick Cheney just happened to have arranged for “war games” involving planes flying into skyscrapers in New York City to be held on the morning of September 11th, 2001. The odds against such “anti-terror exercises” being scheduled by pure coincidence for both 9/11 and 7/7 would be more than a trillion to one!

Already dealt with

http://www.911myths.com/html/7_7_exercise_probabilities.html

When Peter Power was asked who had ordered the counter-terrorism drills, he stonewalled for months before finally revealing his main client was a relatively obscure company called Reed Elsevier. Many are skeptical about that claim, however, and it remains unclear to this day who was really behind these anti-terrorism exercises.

[...]

Secret Wars: One Hundred Years of British Intelligence Inside MI5 ...www.amazon.com › ... › Business & Culture › HistoryCached

You +1'd this publicly. Undo

Secret Wars: One Hundred Years of British Intelligence Inside MI5 and MI6: ... Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights ...

Does this mean Reed Elsevier gets good looks inside MI5 and MI6 OR is Reed Elsevier INSIDE OF MI6 and MI5 ?????????????????????????????????????????

1) Elsevier is not by any means "obscure" it is a major publisher and one of the largest publishers of scholarly journals, they even published the supposedly peer-reviewed book about 9/11

2) Atmost the book suggests the author was tied to MI6 but based on its Amazon page it was based on declasified information.

http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Wars-Hundred-British-Intelligence/dp/0312379986

Link to comment
Share on other sites

COLBY // Elsevier is not by any means "obscure" it is a major publisher and one of the largest publishers of scholarly journals, they even published the supposedly peer-reviewed book about 9/11 // END Colby )

###################################################

Gee How big were they 5 years ago ? Could be the word REWARDED. sg

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Strong growth profile

• Combined business double digit revenue CAGR for past 5 years

• Real drivers of growth in the future

– Automation of routine but critical business tasks

– Solutions for emerging mobile banking markets

– Workflow to help make banks’ counterparty onboarding compliant

– Expansion into important new markets such as China

• Continuing to target double digit growth for the future

==============

http://www.reedelsev...nar-RBI-RX.pdf1)

##########

########## FOUND THIS ON NET

Choicepoint

-

Primary Industry: Information Technology and Services

ChoicePoint (previous NYSE ticker symbol CPS) was a data aggregation company based in Alpharetta, near Atlanta, Georgia, United States, that acted as a private intelligence service to government and industry. It was purchased in February 2008 by Reed Elsevier (parent corporation of LexisNexis) in a cash deal for $3.6 billion USD. ChoicePoint combined personal data sourced from multiple public and private databases for sale…

More on 'Choicepoint' at Wikipedia » flag

Ashcroft also orders the FBI to develop “data mining” technology to probe for “hidden links” among the citizens in its growing cache of electronic data. The FBI complies, using the same technology used by the CIA, which itself is barred from keeping such files on US citizens. Ashcroft extends the mandate even further, allowing the FBI to compile consumer data from private data-collection firms such as ChoicePoint and LexisNexis, though Ashcroft’s predecessors had ruled that compiling such data would violate citizens’ constitutional rights to privacy. Soon, FBI field offices will have access to ChoicePoiint databases in their squad rooms. Adding this commercially provided data to the NSL-based data gleaned by the FBI, and the FBI will soon have a wealth of data on hundreds of thousands of US citizens never accused of a crime. Former Republican congressman Bob Barr, and many others, strenuously object to the practice, but their concerns are largely ignored. {Washington Post,}

GEE GOVERMENTS WOULD ONLY LET SAFE/LOYAL COMPANIES INTO THESE TYPES OF OPEREATIONS...inside job.

############################################

Secret Wars: One Hundred Years of British Intelligence Inside MI5 ...www.amazon.com › Books › History › Europe › EnglandCached - Similar

You +1'd this publicly. Undo

Secret Wars: One Hundred Years of British Intelligence Inside MI5 and MI6 ... the roles that British intelligence played in the Allied victory in World War II; the ...

GEE THANK YOU OH GLORIOUS INTELL SERVICES,PROTECTING US AGAINST NAZI THREAT !!!!

OVERALL A PRO INTELL BOOK

#######################

politics.co.uk

GEE COLBY SAID DECLASSIFIED SOURCES ??????

============

In order to enjoy this book any reader is forced to accept the limitations of reporting on the spy services. The paper trail appears sound enough, yet crucially no source notes are listed in this history of '100 years of MI5 and MI6'. In fairness to Thomas, he makes the following disclaimer explaining how human contact should take precedence over following papers: "The recall of those well-placed sources was often more revealing than reading stacks of documents, sometimes marked with SECRET or TOP SECRET."

Unfortunately for those with historical or academic leanings, any book proclaiming itself a 'history' must have verified sources. This is admittedly near impossible when writing about spies; interviews with former spooks and trusted sources can never bear fruit because they invariably ignore any further questioning. 'Neither confirm nor deny' is the slogan, as spies continue today to avoid tacitly promoting the existence of stories or claims.

Domestic sources aside, the book is exciting for its direct quotations from a rich bed of foreign sources. Bearing in mind that Thomas has used them extensively in previous intelligence bestseller Gideon's Spies, we still enjoy the thoughts of a number of former CIA and Mossad directors who underpin a pulsating narrative. The standout contributor is Marcus Wolff, the infamous chief of the former East German Stasi. And closer to home we even receive the insights of a former consulting psychiatrist to MI5 and MI6.

Broad in scope, Inside British Intelligence cleverly combines a lightness of touch (the Nigella revelations) with anecdotes that illustrate Thomas' unrivalled understanding of the worldwide intelligence network. According to newspapers, in October MI5 will publish a carefully vetted official history by Cambridge historian Christopher Andrew. The offical MI6 book by history professor Keith Jeffrey is not due until next year, and will inexplicably end in 1949. As with celebrity biographies, it is often the unofficial ones which contain the best revelations and the most accurate all-round narrative. As it so happens, they tend to be the most enjoyable as well.

############################

GEE INSURANCE CLAIMS INVESTIGATORS INVESTIGATE EXPLOSIONS !! WHO WOULDA (or shouda) thunk it .

  • Investigation - Coalition Against Insurance Fraud
    www.insurancefraud.org/services_category.lasso?...InvestigationCached
    You +1'd this publicly. UndoWe specialize in insurance claim investigations that include video surveillance, ... Our staff of trained insurance investigators conducts surveillance for workers ..... fire scene reconstruction, consulting, training, and explosion investigation. ... as well as throughout the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Middle East.

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL Gaal the 'skeptic' unquestioningly accepts a company's undocumented claims about growth made in an investment prospectus. What does he think Elsevier was "rewarded" for doing? Giving truther rubbish the undeserved veneer of having been published by a highly respected academic publisher?

http://www.amazon.com/The-Hidden-History-9-11/product-reviews/158322825X/ref=cm_cr_dp_see_all_btm?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1&sortBy=bySubmissionDateDescending

Link to comment
Share on other sites

############################

GEE INSURANCE CLAIMS INVESTIGATORS INVESTIGATE EXPLOSIONS !! WHO WOULDA (or shouda) thunk it .

  • Investigation - Coalition Against Insurance Fraud
    www.insurancefraud.org/services_category.lasso?...InvestigationCached
    You +1'd this publicly. UndoWe specialize in insurance claim investigations that include video surveillance, ... Our staff of trained insurance investigators conducts surveillance for workers ..... fire scene reconstruction, consulting, training, and explosion investigation. ... as well as throughout the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Middle East.

There is a quite a difference between supposedly accidental explosions and terrorist bombings and the supposed expert never claimed expertise in either. From my previous post (underlining added):

An insurance claims investigator? I’ve never heard of one having forensic expertise relating to explosives. He wrote:
"I was by occupation a claims investigator for an insurance company and later a leading firm of solicitors so I have some experience of "forensic" matters. I was also some years ago the National President of a major Trade Union (MSF now merged with the AEEU to form Amicus). Hmmm “SOME experience” and use of scare around forensic
it seems even he doesn’t categorize himself as “a veteran forensic analyst” and skimming through his report it seems the “hundreds of pieces of evidence” he “carefully examin[ed]” were media accounts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL Gaal the 'skeptic' unquestioningly accepts a company's undocumented claims about growth made in an investment prospectus. What does he think Elsevier was "rewarded" for doing? Giving truther rubbish the undeserved veneer of having been published by a highly respected academic publisher?

http://www.amazon.co...nDateDescending

#################################

highly respected academic publisher (Reed Elsevier ) ? END COLBY

Gaal // So full of Baloney ++

What we have is a deep intell company Reed Elsevier .

_________________________________________

LexisNexis Offers Secure Search For US Intel Community

-----------------------------------------------------------

In 2004 Reed Elsevier, the U.K.-based parent company of LexisNexis, bought Seisint, a company specializing in rapid data fusion, to enhance the potential of LexisNexis Advanced Government Solutions. LexisNexis' Advanced Government Solutions Intelligence Analysis Solutions component can rapidly extract critical information from massive databases.

By John C.K. Daly

(( TIA used Seisint http://en.wikipedia....mation_Exchange))

The Total Information Awareness program (run by John Pointdexter) mined and linked all government and commercial databases: 20 billion records including bank records, motor-vehicle records, driver's licenses with digital photographs, credit histories, family, Social Security #, names of neighbors and landlords… for “interesting” associations. It was supposedly shut down after a public outcry in 2003, but in reality it was just shifted to the Commerce Dept., and renamed the Matrix: the Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange - built by Florida’s Seisint Inc. after 9-11, and run by ex-drug smuggler Hank Asher, whose company performed the Felon Purge against mostly black Florida voters in the 2000 election (42% inaccurate, according to our research*). “Seisint turned over the resulting 120,000 names - people the company claimed had a high terrorism quotient... - to federal and Florida law enforcement authorities.”-- St. Petersburg Times. Seisint has since been sold to Lexis/Nexis after Asher was forced out.

=========================================

International Correspondent

Washington (UPI) Jul 27, 2006

LexisNexis has broadened its information-sharing services for government intelligence and security agencies. LexisNexis Advanced Government Solutions is a secure research tool for national security use, which provides federal agencies with secure and easily accessible data, which can be accessed through a secure Internet connection or internally via agency systems where LexisNexis data has been integrated into internal data files.

Federal Computer World reported on July 24 that LexisNexis' main business remains its searchable database of 5 billion articles and public and international records. According to LexisNexis Special Services Chief Executive Officer Norm Willox, the idea behind LexisNexis Advanced Government Solutions is to provide the material to the government for intelligence and national security applications, allowing federal agencies to effectively manage the volume and variety of relevant data.

Willox said, "The technology makes analysts more efficient and faster at locating the information they need to develop intelligence products ... to detect and defeat threats to n

ational security."

============================================================

http://www.mediadb.e...lc.html?type=98

In March 2008, Reed Elsevier acquired ChoicePoint Inc. from Alpharetta, Georgia for 4,1 billion Pounds, a company that specialises in accumulating data of all kind. The disputed business model is defined as follows: ChoicePoint gathers free information in order to sell that very information in return for money. The data that is sold by the company to third parties such as insurances, marketing companies and governmental institutions, includes dossiers about individuals. These dossiers have already been created for more than 200 million US-American citizens and can be up to 20 pages thick. They include information such as credit data, vehicle registrations, criminal records, buying activities and results of drug tests. Yet, it is not only the data of US-American citizens that is being collected. Europe and Latin America have been on ChoicePoint’s radar for quite some time. ChoicePoint’s databases grew to such an extent over the last few years, they ended up being larger and more accurate than the official databases of the US authorities.

Ever since 9/11 and the adoption of the controversial Patriot Act, government authorities such as the immigration authority, the NSA or the FBI are allowed to access the personal data stored at ChoicePoint without a warrant.

Data protection activist Robert O’Harrow shed some light on the wheelings and dealings of ChoicePoint in his book ‘No Place to Hide’. He documents how the company, founded in 1997, initially rated the risks for insurance companies to insure specific clients. The company slowly transformed into a privately operated secret service through the acquisition of approximately 50 companies in subsequent years. The next step was to agree on contracts with the US ministry of Justice and CIA. In this manner, ChoicePoint turned into on of the most powerful companies in the USA. By now, the company can influence who boards an airplane, gets a position in a company or who is granted a credit. By the way, the top floor of the company is made up of the ‘Who is who’ of the (neo)conservative wing of the Republican party. The list of employees that worked for ChoicePoint includes William Crowell (Former NSA director), Vin Weber (Lobbyist and former congressman) and Viet D. Dinh (Author of the Patriot Act-law)

_________________

Reed Elsevier The Key to understanding of the "WHO" of 7/7.

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hallelujah, Glory be to our great God

The evil ones of 7/7 wont get away with it........GOD is Holy.....they will be punished..God exists,hell exists......Hallelujah, Glory be to our great God !!!!!!!!!!

NEW VIDEO

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

NO 7:40 train

CCTV turned off

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name *** but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on."

-

((Reed Elsevier ***))

For background on Reed Elsevier see posts #1,#3,#5 and #8 of this thread

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19256entry256233

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Our Great God

By: Todd Agnew and Rebecca St. James

Eternal God, unchanging

Mysterious and unknown

Your boundless love, unfailing

In grace and mercy shown

Bright seraphim in ceaseless flight around Your glorious throne

They raise their voices day and night in praise to You alone

Hallelujah, Glory be to our great God

Lord, we are weak and frail

Helpless in the storm

Surround us with Your angels

Hold us in Your arms

Our cold and ruthless enemy, his pleasure is our harm

Rise up, O Lord, and he will flee before our sovereign God

Let every creature in the sea and every flying bird

Let every mountain, every field and valley of the earth

Let all the moons and all the stars in all the universe

Sing praises to the living God who rules them by His word

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gaal pretty obviously is intentionally scrambling the threads he participates in simultaneously making off topic posts on them and starting various on the same topic. Unfortunately that Holocaust denying PoS Kollerstom has not yet left this mortal coil. The first major points of the video is nonsense i didn't have the patience to watch the rest.

http://www.911myths.com/html/7_7_exercise_probabilities.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. John 8:32

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20833633/What-Happened-at-Canary-Wharf-on-7th-July-2005

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

see also below

southeastasianews.org

THE GHOST TRAINS

Unfortunately for the people who have organised the event, the train that the four Muslim actors are supposed to catch, the 07:40 AM train to Kings’ Cross Thameslink, has been cancelled and the next one too, so they cannot possibly make it in time to catch the tube-trains, that they were supposed to catch, as part of the training exercise.

The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry, as the Hand of God interferes.

======================================================================

In spite of official confirmation that the 07:40 AM train was cancelled, and the next one too, the Home Office report still

contains the lie that the non-existent 07:40 AM train was the one that the four Muslims caught.

The authorities have to keep lying about it, in order to continue to try to make the public believe, that three of the four Muslim men, who boarded a train from Luton to King’s Cross, arrived in time to catch the three tube-trains that blew up.

In so doing, the authorities make it perfectly clear, that the truth of what happened that day is of no importance to them.

It is obvious from their actions that the only thing that is important to the authorities, is to make us believe what they had already planned to make us believe, even when the facts prove it to be a lie.

The first available train the Muslim actors can catch, gets them to King’s Cross after the tube trains have already left without them.

Hasib Hussain splits off from the other three at King’s Cross Thameslink station, because he still has time to catch the number 30 bus, as his part in the mock-terror exercise.

When the tube-trains they were supposed to catch are blown up, the other three smell a rat and realise they have been duped, and are Muslim patsies who will be blamed for the attacks, and everyone knows what happened to Lee Harvey Oswald.

The Muslims are not from London.

Their homes are many miles away, and so they are like fish out of water, and have no idea what to do, or where to go and hide.

They realise that they can’t go home, and do not know anyone in London whom they can trust.

The phones are all not working, first of all because they were jammed, and then shut down by the authorities, so they cannot phone anyone to tell them what has happened.

What can they do to prevent themselves from being wrongly blamed for the explosions?

What would you do in that situation?

On one of the early TV news broadcasts that day, a newsreader announced that a report has come in, that three of the terrorists involved in the bombings have been shot and killed, by the anti-terrorist branch of the police, at Canary Wharf, in the Docklands area of London’s East-end.

The announcement was made only once, and never repeated, for obvious reasons.

How could suicide-bombers possibly have survived the tube-train bombings, and then been in the Docklands to be shot?

In a New Zealand Herald newspaper article it says that two people were shot dead outside the HSBC building, and in Canada's Globe and Mail newspaper only one.

There is another newspaper report, that the police shot a suicide bomber outside the Credit Suisse First Boston Bank, which is approximately 1,400 feet, or 467 yards, away from the HSBC building, measured door to door.

The two buildings are very different in both shape and size, and 467 yards apart, and thus they are not easily confused with each other.

-----------------

POLICE were yesterday probing reports a man had been "neutralised" outside Canary Wharf. It is believed the man was shot dead by police marksmen outside the Credit Suisse First Boston bank. South London Press:-

-----------------

That means that the police shot and killed at least three suicide-bombers in Canary Wharf, on 7/7/2005.

How could suicide-bombers, who were supposed to have blown themselves up on the three tube-trains, have survived and been shot-dead at Canary Wharf?

If we have at least three of the four "suicide-bombers" shot dead at Canary Wharf, and we KNOW they weren't on the tube-trains that blew up, because the 07:40 AM train from Luton to King's Cross was cancelled that day, then we have overwhelming proof that they did not blow the tube-trains up, and that the blowing up of the three tube-trains was an inside-job.

At the Canary Wharf Docklands site there are media companies, for the Muslim patsies to have told their story to and cleared their names, if they could, and two possible escape routes, via air from the nearby London City Airport, that has flights to 34 destinations in the U.K. and Europe, and, if they couldn’t fly out, there was the possibility of getting a boat across the channel to France.

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only 8 minutes before your last post I said "Gaal pretty obviously is intentionally scrambling the threads he participates in simultaneously making off topic posts on them and starting various on the same topic"

Thanks for making my point!

Len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what role do you think the supposed drill played in the 'plot'?

Oh and why would a company aligned with the forces of darkness (FoDa*) publish a major 'truther' book?

*translate this from Portuguese to English

Edited by Len Colby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...