Douglas Caddy Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 http://whowhatwhy.org/2016/02/04/breaking-news-list-of-withheld-jfk-assassination-documents/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Roy Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 (edited) Some tantalizing entries here. Thanks, Douglas. >Sigh<, now I'll have to spend days combing 146 pages of tiny print to highlight the ones I will want copies of... Here, by the way, is the pdf list itself: http://whowhatwhy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/JFK-List-of-Denied-Docs-redacted.pdf Edited February 4, 2016 by Stephen Roy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Scally Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Stephen: It appears that the initial reports were not quite as accurate as we might have wished! The summary originally published by whowhatwhy.org said that the files contained, among other things, "Documents related to the media, x-rays of Kennedy’s body, autopsy photographs, the famed Zapruder film, footage shot by Orville Nix and other witnesses." The existence of this specific group of records no longer appears to be the case, and the web page has been amended to reflect this, as follows: - "Note: due to an editing error, an earlier version of this article incorrectly referenced several topics that were not found in the papers. It has been updated to remove those references." Chris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Kelly Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I discuss the new document list of withheld records at Http://JFKCountercoup.blogspot.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Neal Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 (edited) I discuss the new document list of withheld records at Http://JFKCountercoup.blogspot.com Bill, OR ANYONE! Looking at the records that were denied for many years and have now been released, have the releasing agencies ever been challenged when it appears that National Security was not an issue, and the records should never have been denied? Thanks for any thoughts, Tom Edited February 12, 2016 by Tom Neal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Kelly Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 Good question Tom, New analysis of these records will include that question BK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Kaiser Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 Stephen: It appears that the initial reports were not quite as accurate as we might have wished! The summary originally published by whowhatwhy.org said that the files contained, among other things, "Documents related to the media, x-rays of Kennedy’s body, autopsy photographs, the famed Zapruder film, footage shot by Orville Nix and other witnesses." The existence of this specific group of records no longer appears to be the case, and the web page has been amended to reflect this, as follows: - "Note: due to an editing error, an earlier version of this article incorrectly referenced several topics that were not found in the papers. It has been updated to remove those references." Chris. It appears that the initial reports were not quite as accurate as we might have wished! There's enough testosterone in all these forms, no need for me to mention I was among the first, if not, the first to tell you. "I told you so." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Neal Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 Good question Tom, New analysis of these records will include that question BK Excellent. Thanks, Bill Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Kaiser Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 (edited) Good question Tom, New analysis of these records will include that question BK Excellent. Thanks, Bill Tom Bill, OR ANYONE!Looking at the records that were denied for many years and have now been released, have the releasing agencies ever been challenged when it appears that National Security was not an issue, and the records should never have been denied? Thanks for any thoughts, Tom I can hardly wait! Edited February 14, 2016 by Scott Kaiser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now