Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 Scoff if you wish...but NASA spent millions perfectingways to make faked moon photos. Jack <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Using the detailed plaster models, they were even able to depict the lunar capsule above the "moon terrain". Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 Scoff if you wish...but NASA spent millions perfectingways to make faked moon photos. Jack <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Using the detailed plaster models, they were even able to depict the lunar capsule above the "moon terrain". Jack <{POST_SNAPBACK}> For the scientific types on the Education Forum: Here the fakesters made a major astronomy mistake in showing the "earth" over the plaster models... they made it the wrong scale, and also show TWO different LIGHTING PHASES...an impossibility for Apollo 11. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 (edited) delete Edited December 19, 2004 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 Here is another interesting comparison of two consecutive exposuresfrom Apollo 11. Aldrin is carrying two pieces of the Seismic Experiment. Between exposures, as he takes a couple of steps, the equipment seems to undergo a considerable transformation. Also, the two pieces were to be carried like a dumbbell by a "carrying bar" connecting them. The bar is not seen, and Aldrin seems to be holding each piece awkwardly using some unseen "handle" on top. Jack <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Here is a companion study showing lighting from different directions. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 Aldrin is shown with both gray boots and white boots. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 When using studio lighting with more than one light, cross-shadows are a constant problem for photographers. The only light source on the moon was the sun. No artificial light sources were taken. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 The prop men made a mistake here. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 An incredible lighting blunder. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 An incredible lighting blunder.Jack <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Another lighting mistake...shadows going different directions, but the sun is only in one direction. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 (edited) post deleted, bad illustration Edited December 19, 2004 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 Different moonscape from same window. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 Another mistake. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 More bad lighting, three consecutive photos. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 More bad lighting, three consecutive photos.Jack <{POST_SNAPBACK}> In this composite, the sun is seen behind the LEM...but the light source is from the OPPOSITE direction. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 19, 2004 Author Share Posted December 19, 2004 A scientific question. A scientific answer needed. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now