Guest Stephen Turner Posted April 27, 2005 Share Posted April 27, 2005 I belive the motive for this is contained in the document,"Project for the new American century." With its talk of "Full spectrum dominance" And the need for a "New Pearl Harbour." Amongst its authours were people like, Perle, O'Neill & Cheney, People who now surround the Ignorant Bush.(A man who choose's stupidity over Wisdom, & appears proud of his ignorance!!!)Indeed many of them were in Bush the first's Government. I belive that the Neo-Cons knew about Bin-Ladens plans, and decided to turn a blind eye, for political and strategic reasons.This "New Pearl Harbour" has allowed the Bush gang to go for "Full Sectrum Dominance" abroad, whilst passing such anti- democratic legislation as the Patriot Act at home. Bush is that most dangerous of Men.... A dedicated fool....! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 (edited) If anyone can give me an alternative reason for the strange behaviour of Bush, the Secret service, Andrew Card, etc, Please feel free to put me out of my misery. But be warned, I dont go a bundle on multiple coinsidences. Here's somthing else I noticed. When Card approaches Bush in the classroom, He stoopes whispers in Dubya's ear for about 5 seconds, Then up's and leaves. Now hold on, this is his commander in chief, Yet Bush says nothing to Card, nor is he given time to. Bush, supposedly, is the only person who can give the order to intercept the hi-jacked flights. By their own admission, at this point they have no idea how many planes have been"jacked".Is it not possible that Bush might have needed to ask a few Questions, give a few orders, at this point? Yet he just sits there, like a bump on a log. THIS IS NOT HOW PRESIDENTS ACT, nor how s/s agents act, nor presidential aides. Go figure........ Oh, & please no nonsence about Bush not wanting to scare the children. 1,There was no need to scare them, An excuse about important matters needing his attention would have served 2, they would have been more than scared if a 747 had payed a" Flying" visit...!! Edited April 28, 2005 by Stephen Turner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted April 28, 2005 Author Share Posted April 28, 2005 Thanks, Steven, for your informative postings on this subject. It is about time people start to notice that 911 was an inside job. Your post on the PNAC is a good starting place. You can also learn a lot by Googling Bush Crime Family, Bush Eugenics, and Bush Skull and Bones. Now that I am pretty much finished with Apollo and JFK studies, I am spending nearly all my research time on 911. I have discovered about a dozen faked photos so far, which will eventually be posted on the Aulis website. Now the question is...why did the Pentagon feel it necessary to fake photos if the official story is true? Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted April 29, 2005 Share Posted April 29, 2005 (edited) Thank you, Jack. I should say that I will not be joining any debate about photographic/video Evidence, I dont have the"Chops". What I do Understand however is Behavior & Motivation, especially the criminal variety( I have over 20 years working with young offenders..) I am putting together a longer post looking at the behavior of Bush in the days running up to 9-11. I also want to concentrate on the neo-con agenda, their need for spectical, and a false narrative, that they and they alone control. Steve " Do you want a vision of the future Winston? Imagine a boot, stamping on a human face FOR EVER." 1984.......!!!!!!!! Edited April 29, 2005 by Stephen Turner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted April 29, 2005 Share Posted April 29, 2005 (edited) Historically, These ploys, Grand (false) narrative, Control of reality, use of the spectacular, Have been the hallmarks of Dictator's. Both the boogymen of the 20th Century,( Hitler & Stalin ) Used them to great effect. Reality in Stalins Soviet Russia, was what ever Stalin & the politbureo said it was. Any refusenics were branded as" Counter revolutionarys," or "Facists" And went on a one way trip to Siberia. "Your either with us or with the terrorists" (George Bush, Nov 2001) In Germany, the destruction of the parliament biulding, allows Hitler to lay the blame at the feet of his internal enemy's. 9-11 allows Bush to pusue his goal of " Full spectrum dominance" By blaming his external enemy's The " Evildoers" The common thread here is FEAR, If you instill enough dread into the population you can get away with almost anything. I shall put together a much longer post about this,and the perculiar psychology of the Neo-Cons, after the Bank Holiday. & before anyone suggests it, i'm not conflating Bush with Hitler or Stalin, I'm saying that he uses very similar psychological tactics to gain control of the popular imagination.(Such as it is...) "If your going to tell a lie, make sure it is big enough to be beliveable" Adolph Hitler... Edited April 29, 2005 by Stephen Turner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted April 29, 2005 Author Share Posted April 29, 2005 Steven...you are on the right track. Keep up the good work. I look forward to any future analysis on this. Evil runs deeper than most people are equipped to cope with. My favorite quote along the lines of your thesis: QUOTE: "All this was inspired by the principle that in the big lie there is always a certain force of acceptance; because the majority of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the depths of their emotions than consciously or willfully; and thus in the simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell lies in little matters, but would be too ashamed to resort to telling big, repeated lies. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others would have the rudeness to distort the truth so blatantly. Even though the facts which prove this may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation." Who said this? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adolph Hitler Mien Kampf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted April 29, 2005 Share Posted April 29, 2005 (edited) Jack.... That quotes on the money as regards Neo-Con thinking. Orwell would'nt be at all surprised......In fact he's probably having a chuckle at our expense.. "So, Napoleon explained to the other animals, that Snowball had come in the night ,and destroyed the windmill." Animal Farm.....!!! Edited April 29, 2005 by Stephen Turner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanet Clark Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Stephen Thanks for putting some thoughful analysis out there for the members to consider. I appreciate the real courage that takes. Also, it brought respected member Jack White out of hiding. As the "Magic Christian" Guy Grand used to say in the Terry Southern novel: "Lets make it a little hot for them" Cheers to all, thanks for the great FORUM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Thank you Shanet.. I am putting together a much L O N G E R post on this subject, I will hopefully get it out by tomorrow. It concerns the relationships the Bush family have with many of the groups they blame for 9-11, and much more. After that I will return to JTR ( I am starting a seminar thread and hope to get other "Ripperologists" to post...) Steve... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Also, it brought respected member Jack White out of hiding. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> And why was he hiding I wonder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 (edited) Just a quick thought...... The more I think about the incident between Card/ Bush the more STRANGE it becomes. According to Andrew Card, the words he used were "Mr President America is under attack." This according to Bush's testimony is the first he knows of any sustained attack ("& I thought there,s one terrible pilot".) Yet, apparantly, he requires no further briefing from Card. Now answer me this, how did Bush know that there were not 10,20,50,100, hi-jacked aircraft, and that some were not heading for, oh say, neuclear power stations, or carrying enough toxic material to wipe out whole cities. The answer is, based on his testimony he could not have known, just another coincidence???? Edited May 3, 2005 by Stephen Turner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted May 3, 2005 Author Share Posted May 3, 2005 I have not been in hiding at all. I have been busy analyzing 911 "official" photos for fakery for a new section of Aulis at their request. So far I have discovered proof of at least a dozen FAKED PHOTOS released by the Department of Defense. If the official story is true, why did they fake photos? In addition to the faked photos, it is clear that the Pentagon CRIME SCENE itself was MANIPULATED by the addition of fake evidence and faked activities. Check Aulis for additional details in coming weeks. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 White sez: "If the official story is true, why did they fake photos?" ROFLMAO! With your miserable track record at spotting fake photos, we can all rest assured that the official DOD images are good as gold! Aulis is the land of fruits and nuts, a perfect place for your "work". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 StephenThanks for putting some thoughful analysis out there for the members to consider. I appreciate the real courage that takes. Also, it brought respected member Jack White out of hiding. As the "Magic Christian" Guy Grand used to say in the Terry Southern novel: "Lets make it a little hot for them" Cheers to all, thanks for the great FORUM. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What courage? With all due respect to Steven, all hs is doing is parroting Michael Moore and even Bin Laden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 (edited) Hi Craig.... I had hoped that this thread could be free from name-calling, Oh well!!! Rather than make vague generalizations, give me an alternative take on my last post, or indeed, any of the points I have raised. As I have said I dont know enough about photo/video analysis to make valid points,my speciality is in interpretation of behavior. ESPECIALLY CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR. Regards Steve.. Edited May 4, 2005 by Stephen Turner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now