Was the Tippit crime scene gunman Curtis LaVerne Craford?

[Guest]

1 hour ago, Bill Brown said:

 

I accept that the "paper-bag revolver" looks like it was discarded by someone for any number of reasons.  What does a revolver discarded to the ground because it was was used in a homicide even look like?  Then explain to me what a revolver discarded to the ground that never was used in a homicide would look like.  Okay?  Would one somehow look different than the other?  If so, how do you make that determination?

 

Or... Are you saying that all revolvers discarded to the ground are definitely homicide-related?

 

quote " for any number of reasons " :  that includes a homicide or not  

 

[Guest]

Just because Greg's first word in this topic was " Consider...", so if one is not willing to consider there is no point in discussing the matter... 

[Ron Ege]

22 minutes ago, Bill Brown said:

 

In this context, the purpose of throwing a weapon out a car window in downtown Dallas, as opposed to a dumpster out back of the Carousel Club in case that was searched, in the scenario proposed, is not to destroy the weapon or ensure or care that the revolver not be found, but to have it not be traceable to the one who threw it out the car window or to those who carried out the killing.

 

So that's it?  Either throw it out a car window or hide it in a dumpster behind the Carousel Club?  These are the only two options to dispose the weapon?

 

Again, the shells found at the scene were linked, to the exclusion of every other weapon in the world, to Oswald's revolver, not this "paper-bag revolver".

Joseph D. Nichol did testify to that, but other experts disagreed.

Not taking sides.  Just sayin'.

As seemingly often happens in the JFK Assassination case, we just don't always - "know what we don't know."

A good thing in a kind of a way.  Having no debate would soon prove to be pretty boring!

 

[Bill Brown]

37 minutes ago, Ron Ege said:

Joseph D. Nichol did testify to that, but other experts disagreed.

Not taking sides.  Just sayin'.

As seemingly often happens in the JFK Assassination case, we just don't always - "know what we don't know."

A good thing in a kind of a way.  Having no debate would soon prove to be pretty boring!

 

 

Joseph D. Nichol did testify to that, but other experts disagreed.

 

No Sir.  You're thinking of the bullet.

 

Nicol said he was able to link one of the bullets to the revolver, while the other experts (Frazier, Killion, Cunningham) could not do so.

 

All four experts agreed that the four shells found at the scene were linked to Oswald's revolver.

 

[Ron Ege]

Apparently, I misunderstood.

What is your take on this?

Especially: "Detective Jim Leavelle, a veteran of the force, told author Joe McBride, author of INTO THE NIGHTMARE that the hulls were useless as evidence."

Perhaps Mr. McBride could comment if the quote is factual?

Thanks.

https://jfkfacts.org/jerry-hills-lies-heart-tippit-shooting/

[Greg Doudna]

On 9/3/2022 at 9:17 AM, Bill Brown said:

Again, the shells found at the scene were linked, to the exclusion of every other weapon in the world, to Oswald's revolver, not this "paper-bag revolver".

See my response to this here:  

 

[Ron Ege]

Greg, read it; excellent.

Most certainly, in the least, reasonable doubt.