Bill Brown

"But you still need to work on distinguishing right from left." No. I need to work on distinguishing V1 from V1'.

What is your response to this...? In the Zapruder Film frame of reference, V1 = 0, M2 << M1, and V2' is also small. So we can simplify as: M2*V2 = M1*V1' + M3*V3 M1, M2, V2, V1', and V3 are either known or may be reasonably estimated. In the Zapruder Film, we *observe* both V1' and V3 to be left-to-right (> 0). Thus, V2 > 0, and the bullet is moving left-to-right.

Okay. So V1 is before impact. V1' is after impact. But this is where you get it wrong... You said: "It doesn't matter if M2 is a bullet, a baseball bat, or a frying pan." But it does matter. A bullet will not transfer the same amount of kinetic energy to the head that a baseball bat or a frying pan will.

Again, you said: "V1 is the velocity of JFK's head before impact". That is a direct quote. YOU were confused by the terms "before" and "after". It has nothing to do with my determination of right and left. That is why you weren't making any sense.

Again, you said: "V1 is the velocity of JFK's head before impact". That is a direct quote. That is why you weren't making any sense.

"Then, notice that V1' is knocked violently from right-to-left during the fatal head shot." But you (mistakenly?) said that V1 "is the velocity of JFK's head before impact". You're not making any sense.

"A misintepretation is an error that may well be innocent in nature, while posting false evidence could be construed as intentional. This is why it's always important to cite your sources." Then please, once and for all, "cite your source" for your claim that William Scoggins was lying (face down?) in the street and therefore is a bad witness to use for Oswald as the felling cop-killer.

Let's say that 65% of the public believe Kennedy was assassinated as a result of a conspiracy and 35% believe Oswald acted alone. Let's say of the 65%, there are a dozen different conspiracy theories. Splitting it up evenly, we have each of the dozen conspiracy theories taking up about 5% to 6% of those polled. Now, we have the idea that Oswald acted alone taking up 35% of those polled. Therefore, the idea that Oswald acted alone is the most popular theory.

From Ken Rahn's Website, re: The Autopsy & The Bullet's Path Through The Back & Neck: Back/neck wound (page 3) "Situated on the upper right posterior thorax just above the upper border of the scapula there is a 7 x 4 millimeter oval wound. This wound is measured to be 14 cm. from the tip of the right acromion process and 14 cm. below the tip of the right mastoid process." Throat wound (page 3) "Situated in the low anterior neck at approximately the level of the third and fourth tracheal rings is a 6.5 cm. long transverse wound with widely gaping irregular edges. (The depth and character of these wounds will be further described below.)" Back/neck wound and throat wound again (pages 4–5) "2. The second wound presumably of entry is that described above in the upper right posterior thorax. Beneath the skin there is ecchymosis [escape of blood into the tissues from ruptured blood vessels] of subcutaneous tissue and musculature. The missile path through the fascia and musculature cannot be easily probed. The wound presumably of exit was that described by Dr. Malcolm Perry of Dallas in the low anterior cervical region. When observed by Dr. Perry the wound measured "a few millimeters in diameter", however it was extended as a tracheostomy incision and thus its character is distorted at the time of autopsy. However, there is considerable ecchymosis of the strap muscles of the right side of the neck and of the fascia about the trachea adjacent to the line of the tracheostomy wound. The third point of reference in connecting these two wounds is the apex (supra-clavicular portion) of the right pleural cavity. In this region there is contusion of the parietal pleura and of the extreme apical portion of the right upper lobe of the lung. In both instances the diameter of contusion and ecchymosis at the point of maximal involvement measures 5 cm. Both the visceral and parietal pleura are intact overlying these areas of trauma." Thoracic cavity (page 5) "The bony cage is unremarkable. The thoracic organs are in their normal positions and relationships and there is no increase in free pleural fluid. The above described area of contusion in the apical portion of the right pleural cavity is noted." Lungs (page 5) "The lungs are of essentially similar appearance the right weighing 320 Gm., the left 290 Gm. The lungs are well aerated with smooth glistening pleural surfaces and gray-pink color. A 5 cm. diameter area of purplish red discoloration and increased firmness to palpation is situated in the apical portion of the right upper lobe. This corresponds to the similar area described in the overlying parietal pleura. Incision in this region reveals recent hemorrhage into pulmonary parenchyma." Summary (page 6; third paragraph) "The other missile entered the right superior posterior thorax above the scapula and traversed the soft tissues of the supra-scapular and the supra-clavicular portions of the base of the right side of the neck. This missile produced contusions of the right apical parietal pleura and of the apical portion of the right upper lobe of the lung. The missile contused the strap muscles of the right side of the neck, damaged the trachea and made its exit through the anterior surface of the neck. As far as can be ascertained this missile struck no bony structure in its path through the body."

Explain V1 and V3 moving right to left.

"Solved by cops that couldn't even correctly identify a rifle they held in their own hands." Nonsense. J.C. Day (certainly a "cop") immediately noted that the rifle was "6.5 Made Italy".

Posted by Nick Nalli over at the JFK Truth Be Told Facebook group... Nope, this is a literally non sequitur. The so-called "Harvard Educated CT" should ask for his tuition money back. In the Zapruder Film frame of reference, V1 = 0, M2 << M1, and V2' is also small. So we can simplify as: M2*V2 = M1*V1' + M3*V3 M1, M2, V2, V1', and V3 are either known or may be reasonably estimated. In the Zapruder Film, we *observe* both V1' and V3 to be left-to-right (> 0). Thus, V2 > 0, and the bullet is moving left-to-right. This is still "handwaving," IMO, but one can get the gist. The reasoning in the 2018 Heliyon paper is a more thorough and conclusive.

Oswald arrives at the rooming house at 12:58 and is back in his room "just long enough to grab a jacket", per Earlene Roberts' testimony. Therefore, he's out the door by 12:59 to 1:00.

My point is obvious. Since Markham never mentioned a 1:12 bus or a 1:22 bus, then no one has the right to claim which bus it was that Markham was trying to catch. Get it now?

It is my opinion that she did not leave her apartment at 1:04. The time stamps on the police tapes support my opinion.