Michael Griffith Posted August 4 Share Posted August 4 True to form, we have the usual far-left folks in this forum claiming that the "MAGA" Supreme Court's recent decision on presidential immunity makes the president a "dictator" and puts democracy in "chains." I wonder how many of these folks have actually bothered to read the decision itself (LINK). If they would bother to read the decision, they would discover that their claims about it are a mix of exaggeration and outright fabrication. I would especially recommend Justice Barrett's concurring-in-part opinion. I would also recommend reading the oral arguments that were made to the court (LINK). Here are some good analyses of the decision that provide balance against the hysterical claims about it that we're seeing in this forum: An Overview of the Supreme Court's Presidential Immunity Decision - American Cornerstone Institute Supreme Court strikes proper balance on presidential immunity - Washington Examiner Heritage Legal Experts: SCOTUS Rightfully Protects Presidents from Politicized Prosecutions | The Heritage Foundation SCOTUS Agrees Presidents Have Immunity From Criminal Prosecutions (thefederalist.com) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Varnell Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 21 hours ago, Michael Griffith said: True to form, we have the usual far-left folks in this forum claiming that the "MAGA" Supreme Court's recent decision on presidential immunity makes the president a "dictator" and puts democracy in "chains." I wonder how many of these folks have actually bothered to read the decision itself (LINK). Supreme Court Trashed by Republican Judge: 'Abominable' https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-immunity-donald-trump-judge-j-michael-luttig-1922099 Luttig said: "The Supreme Court's decision in Donald Trump v. the United States represents the un-souling of America. America's democracy and the rule of the law are the heart and soul of America—it is our democracy and the rule of law that has made America the envy of the world and the beacon of freedom to the world for almost 250 years. "The Supreme Court cut the heart and soul out of America with this abominable decision, of constitutional interpretation or, should I say, so-called constitutional interpretation." 21 hours ago, Michael Griffith said: If they would bother to read the decision, they would discover that their claims about it are a mix of exaggeration and outright fabrication. I would especially recommend Justice Barrett's concurring-in-part opinion. I would also recommend reading the oral arguments that were made to the court (LINK). 21 hours ago, Michael Griffith said: Here are some good analyses of the decision that provide balance against the hysterical claims about it that we're seeing in this forum: An Overview of the Supreme Court's Presidential Immunity Decision - American Cornerstone Institute This is Ben Carson's project. Carson was on a short list of Trump VPs. He's a doctor, not a legal scholar. 21 hours ago, Michael Griffith said: Supreme Court strikes proper balance on presidential immunity - Washington Examiner Washington Examiner – Bias and Credibility https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/ 21 hours ago, Michael Griffith said: Heritage Legal Experts: SCOTUS Rightfully Protects Presidents from Politicized Prosecutions | The Heritage Foundation The heritage Foundation authored the notorious "Project 2025" blueprint for dictatorship, a text so noxious Trump is furiously trying to disown it. 21 hours ago, Michael Griffith said: SCOTUS Agrees Presidents Have Immunity From Criminal Prosecutions (thefederalist.com) Published by Ben Domenech. Washington Post's left-baiting blogger is fired for plagiarism https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2006/mar/27/news.usnews Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now