Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 (edited) The following three attachments are from the Introduction to "Fallacies of the WC Solution". Thought someone may have an interest. Tom P.S. There also exist a "written exam" which deals with the First Shot/CE#399. In the event anyone wishes to "test out" and not have to sit through the full course lecture, let me know and I will hand it out. Tom Perhaps this can be read! Edited August 5, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 4, 2005 Author Share Posted August 4, 2005 (edited) The following three attachments are from the Introduction to "Fallacies of the WC Solution".Thought someone may have an interest. Tom P.S. There also exist a "written exam" which deals with the First Shot/CE#399. In the event anyone wishes to "test out" and not have to sit through the full course lecture, let me know and I will hand it out. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> WC-Fallacies-2 Edited August 4, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 4, 2005 Author Share Posted August 4, 2005 (edited) The following three attachments are from the Introduction to "Fallacies of the WC Solution".Thought someone may have an interest. Tom P.S. There also exist a "written exam" which deals with the First Shot/CE#399. In the event anyone wishes to "test out" and not have to sit through the full course lecture, let me know and I will hand it out. Tom <{POST_SNAPBACK}> WC-Fallacies-2 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> WC-Fallacies-3 Edited August 4, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen Turner Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 Number one, its to small, I cant make out the words. Number two, is it really neccessary to start yet another thread, could this have not been included in your thread "Intro" which you started at 3-24 this pm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 4, 2005 Author Share Posted August 4, 2005 Number one, its to small, I cant make out the words. Number two, is it really neccessary to start yet another thread, could this have not been included in your thread "Intro" which you started at 3-24 this pm. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> An attempt will be made to enlarge and re-present. The prior "Intro" was an Introduction to the WC Solution. This is an "Intro" to the "Fallacies of The Warren Commission Solution" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 5, 2005 Author Share Posted August 5, 2005 (edited) Number one, its to small, I cant make out the words. Number two, is it really neccessary to start yet another thread, could this have not been included in your thread "Intro" which you started at 3-24 this pm. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> An attempt will be made to enlarge and re-present. The prior "Intro" was an Introduction to the WC Solution. This is an "Intro" to the "Fallacies of The Warren Commission Solution" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ReSubmit Edited August 5, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 5, 2005 Author Share Posted August 5, 2005 (edited) Number one, its to small, I cant make out the words. Number two, is it really neccessary to start yet another thread, could this have not been included in your thread "Intro" which you started at 3-24 this pm. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> An attempt will be made to enlarge and re-present. The prior "Intro" was an Introduction to the WC Solution. This is an "Intro" to the "Fallacies of The Warren Commission Solution" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ReSubmit <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ReSubmit-3 Edited August 5, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 5, 2005 Author Share Posted August 5, 2005 (edited) Number one, its to small, I cant make out the words. Number two, is it really neccessary to start yet another thread, could this have not been included in your thread "Intro" which you started at 3-24 this pm. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> An attempt will be made to enlarge and re-present. The prior "Intro" was an Introduction to the WC Solution. This is an "Intro" to the "Fallacies of The Warren Commission Solution" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ReSubmit <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ReSubmit-3 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> This page from the chapter: Where/When, places the term "Substantial Precision" as utilized by the WC, into it's proper perspective. Edited August 5, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 5, 2005 Author Share Posted August 5, 2005 (edited) Number one, its to small, I cant make out the words. Number two, is it really neccessary to start yet another thread, could this have not been included in your thread "Intro" which you started at 3-24 this pm. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> An attempt will be made to enlarge and re-present. The prior "Intro" was an Introduction to the WC Solution. This is an "Intro" to the "Fallacies of The Warren Commission Solution" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ReSubmit <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ReSubmit-3 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> This page from the chapter: Where/When, places the term "Substantial Precision" as utilized by the WC, into it's proper perspective. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> This page from the chapter: The Report, is somewhat applicable and is included. Edited August 5, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas H. Purvis Posted August 5, 2005 Author Share Posted August 5, 2005 (edited) Number one, its to small, I cant make out the words. Number two, is it really neccessary to start yet another thread, could this have not been included in your thread "Intro" which you started at 3-24 this pm. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> An attempt will be made to enlarge and re-present. The prior "Intro" was an Introduction to the WC Solution. This is an "Intro" to the "Fallacies of The Warren Commission Solution" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ReSubmit <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ReSubmit-3 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> This page from the chapter: Where/When, places the term "Substantial Precision" as utilized by the WC, into it's proper perspective. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> This page from the chapter: The Report, is somewhat applicable and is included. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Senator Schweiker, being the gentleman politician, referred to the WC as "Pablum" Those of us like myself, who are generally rude; crude; and socially unacceptable anyway, generally refer to the WC as "Pure Bull Sh**" Edited August 5, 2005 by Thomas H. Purvis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now