D.P.D. GUS ROSE About the "Minox" Camera

[Don Roberdeau]

D.P.D. GUS ROSE About the "Minox" Camera

Good Day.... Comments from D.P.D. detective GUS ROSE about OSWALD's "Minox" camera taped during ROSE's deposition to the HSCA....

<QUOTE>

We found this camera and of course, we brought it and a whole lot of other property in, as possible evidence in the case. And, uh, while we were marking the evidence for later identification by us to be used in evidence we did, Stowall and I, did take a close look at this Minox miniature camera and it did have a roll of film in it. As time passed and after the Warren Commission was appointed, uh, a couple of F.B.I. agents made three different trips to our office to talk to me about this camera. They said that after they had received all the property they found that I had made a mistake, and that really wasn't a camera, it was a Minox light meter. However, as I told them at the time, I was sure that I had not made a mistake, it definitely was a camera and definitely did have film in it. However, they wanted me to change that in our property invoice to read Minox light meter and not read Minox camera. We never did change it. Uh, Captain Fritz instructed me if I was sure I was right not to make any changes in any reports, to stay with what was right.

<END QUOTE>

Best Regards in Research,

Don

Don Roberdeau

U.S.S. John F. Kennedy, CV-67, "Big John," Plank Walker

Sooner, or later, the Truth emerges Clearly

http://members.aol.com/DRoberdeau/JFK/DP.jpg

http://members.aol.com/DRoberdeau/JFK/ROSE...NOUNCEMENT.html

http://members.aol.com/DRoberdeau/JFK/BOND...PINGarnold.html

http://hometown.aol.com/DRoberdeau

T ogether

E veryone

A chieves

M ore

"The appearance of the term 'micro dots' on page 44 of Lee Oswald's address book aroused our suspicions, particularly in that it was associated with the address of the photographic firm where he was once employed."

----MEREDITH GARDNER,

U.S. National Security Agency,

Soviet-Codebreaker

Edited March 16, 2006 by Don Roberdeau

[Ron Ecker]

Has anyone ever put together a list of the ways in which the FBI altered, created, ignored, or destroyed evidence (or attempted to) in the JFK case? In addition to the Minox camera, Hosty's destruction of Oswald's note, the changing of witness statements, the failure to interview some witnesses, the switching of two crucial Z-film frames in Life magazine, the handling of the Tague curb issue, and even today the failure to resolve the Wallace fingerprint issue come to mind. Allowing Albert Osborne to lie repeatedly with impunity to its agents about Oswald should also qualify as ignoring evidence of something.

[Chuck Robbins]

Has anyone ever put together a list of the ways in which the FBI altered, created, ignored, or destroyed evidence (or attempted to) in the JFK case? In addition to the Minox camera, Hosty's destruction of Oswald's note, the changing of witness statements, the failure to interview some witnesses, the switching of two crucial Z-film frames in Life magazine, the handling of the Tague curb issue, and even today the failure to resolve the Wallace fingerprint issue come to mind. Allowing Albert Osborne to lie repeatedly with impunity to its agents about Oswald should also qualify as ignoring evidence of something.

I believe it is called being an accessory after the fact. It is a crime, subject to prosecution, and charges should have been brought against all agents, and their superiors, who aided and abetted in the cover-up of JFK's murder.

Chuck