To the Internet Hustings!

[Nathaniel Heidenheimer]

If the implications of the Kennedy Assassination become burried for history will we be to blame?

How much of what we think of "solving" the Kennedy Assassination is research, and how much is SPREADING THIS KNOWLEDGE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR COTENTEMPORARY DEMOCRACY around the body poltic?

The new book by David Talbot offers an opportunity to reach a new wide audience. It will never be hyped the way Case Closed was, so its up to us to make the implications of the past bear on the present in the minds of younger readers, who have been systematically brainwashed into believing that the Assassination has no implications for thier lives.

A good way to do this is by starting threads ON SITES THAT GET A LOT OF HITS.

Then breadcrumbs can be left leading people to Spartacus and Ed. Forum.

We do not want to be left like monks, isolated the wider social discourse, or even worse, poltical scientists. If this happens the Cover Up wins even if we

"solve" the assassination while talking quitly amongst myselves, I mean ourselves.

For examples on how to do this AND TO CLEARLY SHOW THAT THERE IS WIDE INTEREST IF ANYONE DARES BROACH THE SUBJECT SHOULD ANYONE RAISE THE TOPIC SEE THESE THREADS.

http://www.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=454299

http://www.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=454243

I have been guilty of lamenting the lack of awareness of new developments in the case and thier deep implications for the politics of today. Am I myself guilty by not serving as a guide to this new evidence?