Jack White Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 A researcher has enhanced some Apollo photos and come up with images of the huge distinctive light bulbs used in the moonset fixtures. Maybe Mr. Light will recognize the type of bulb from its shape. Bet he won't tell us though. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin M. West Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Ever plan to take down any of the old, debunked material on aulis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 A researcher has enhanced some Apollo photos andcome up with images of the huge distinctive light bulbs used in the moonset fixtures. Maybe Mr. Light will recognize the type of bulb from its shape. Bet he won't tell us though. Jack A bit early to be crowing about this supposed evidence since it hasn't been presented yet! Get back to us when the images have been posted, don't forget to tell him to include image numbers and if possile links to uncropped high resolution copies. Considering all the times you've been shown to have been wrong and refused to admit it and worse the times you selectively cropped photos or swore you never said things you had, it's more than a bit ironic that you insinuate that another member of this forum is intellectually dishonest. Craig is often quite rude but I've never seen evidence that he has intentionally been deceptive, especially concerning photography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted May 11, 2007 Author Share Posted May 11, 2007 Ever plan to take down any of the old, debunked material on aulis? Take that up with David Percy; he has not yet seen any DEBUNKED material. In fact, his new material is from new researchers providing NEW proofs to some of my original observations. Some of it is quite stunning. Several more instances of BLACKED-IN skys are quite irrrefutable evidence of retouching alleged originals. I did not do any of this NEW research. Precision timing of the "jump salute" video showing the astronaut kicking up dirt...shows that the astronaut stays in the air THREE TIMES LONGER than it takes for the dirt to fall...a different gravity rate for dirt and man! An anomalous "bootprint" with 12 "sole ribs" instead of 9 is not explainable. But my favorite is the enhancement which shows the "light bulb"; it uses an enhancement technique that had not occurred to me. After seeing it, I took the same photo and enhanced it five different ways with the technique, and got the same result! Good luck "debunking" this. There is no believeable explanation. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin M. West Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Can't wait to see it, I'm sure it's quality work. You know, the 'hang time' of an object depends on more than just gravity, it also depends on it's initial velocity. There is no reason the dirt should have the same initial velocity as the astronaut. The bootprint I'll have to see, I can only guess now that it's 2 overlapping prints. We'll see. No idea what you're talking about with the "light bulb", but I eagerly await the "evidence". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Greer Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 (edited) Ever plan to take down any of the old, debunked material on aulis? Take that up with David Percy; he has not yet seen any DEBUNKED material. OK I've emailed Aulis several photos displayed on this forum on the thread entitled Jack White's Study On Anomalous Shadows, let's see what the response is. Edited May 11, 2007 by Dave Greer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin M. West Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 By the way jack, there are several threads in this forum where you stopped posting as soon as your work was shown to be wrong. Any comment? For example: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=8510 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Jack, Could you make a post in this thread when the material is up on the website? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duane Daman Posted May 13, 2007 Share Posted May 13, 2007 (edited) A researcher has enhanced some Apollo photos andcome up with images of the huge distinctive light bulbs used in the moonset fixtures. Maybe Mr. Light will recognize the type of bulb from its shape. Bet he won't tell us though. Jack Jack ... I'm glad to hear that you will have some new studies up on Aulis soom .. I'm looking forward to that .... Maybe I can use them in my next YouTube video ... Meanwhile , here's a new little game for all of those are still living in the land of geekdom by the river called denial . I just posted this on another thread here, but for some reason Mr. Light didn't seem to want to play . (Image removed by Evan Burton; Reason: not relevant, also posted on another thread) Edited May 14, 2007 by Evan Burton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted May 14, 2007 Author Share Posted May 14, 2007 I am going to ask Bernice to post an image here from an Apollo photo, showing a large piece of lighting equipment, consisting of a large reflector pan, bulb, and likely a scrim, which softens the detail. File number? You figure it out. You guys never do any research, so why should I help you? There are plenty of clues in the image to help you. Have fun. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernice Moore Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 Posted for Jack White.. B.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted May 14, 2007 Author Share Posted May 14, 2007 By the way jack, there are several threads in this forum where you stopped posting as soon as your work was shown to be wrong. Any comment?For example: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=8510 None of my studies has been "shown to be wrong." No comment is necessary. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted May 14, 2007 Author Share Posted May 14, 2007 Ever plan to take down any of the old, debunked material on aulis? Take that up with David Percy; he has not yet seen any DEBUNKED material. OK I've emailed Aulis several photos displayed on this forum on the thread entitled Jack White's Study On Anomalous Shadows, let's see what the response is. Thanks. That study was not as clear as it should have been. I have simplified it for easier comprehension by those visually challenged. JacK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 By the way jack, there are several threads in this forum where you stopped posting as soon as your work was shown to be wrong. Any comment?For example: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=8510 None of my studies has been "shown to be wrong." No comment is necessary. Jack Is that an intellectually honest statement Jack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted May 14, 2007 Share Posted May 14, 2007 Ever plan to take down any of the old, debunked material on aulis? Take that up with David Percy; he has not yet seen any DEBUNKED material. OK I've emailed Aulis several photos displayed on this forum on the thread entitled Jack White's Study On Anomalous Shadows, let's see what the response is. Thanks. That study was not as clear as it should have been. I have simplified it for easier comprehension by those visually challenged. JacK You might want to re-write your study once again. It appears to have been written by the intellectually challenged and the photographically ignorant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now