Francesca Akhtar Posted May 16, 2007 Share Posted May 16, 2007 Nice to see the good old British political system trying to protect their own interests as usual! I'd be interested to see what the situation is on the other side of the pond from some of the American members. Would such a thing be tolerated there? I received this information in an email from the Liberal Democrat party today and thought it rather revealing: This Friday the Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill will once again be debated on the floor of the House of Commons. Liberal Democrat MPs at Westminster, spearheaded by Norman Baker and Simon Hughes, are working hard to stop it. You can help us by contacting your MP - via www.writetothem.com - and asking them to publicly declare their opposition to the Bill. The proposal is a private member’s bill, introduced by David Maclean, a Conservative MP. If passed, it would exempt both Houses of Parliament and all communications between MPs and public authorities from the scope of the Freedom of Information Act. The effect would be to remove any obligation for details of MPs’ expenses to be made public. However, the expenses of other public figures and senior officials such as judges, councillors and civil servants would remain accessible under FOI legislation. It would also mean that members of the public would not be able to find out the advice or policy opinions that their own MP had expressed to public bodies. For example, responses to public consultation exercises, representations to planning authorities and letters to NHS professionals on the provision of local health services would no longer be publicly accessible under the Freedom of Information Act. Supporters of the amendment say that they are concerned about preventing constituents’ correspondence from being disclosed. However, correspondence about constituents’ personal affairs which contains personal data is already exempt from the Act and also protected by the provisions of the Data Protection Act. An unholy alliance of Conservative and Labour MPs is backing this attempt to water down public access to freedom of information. They have the clear support of the government, which, unusually, did not block the Bill at Second Reading and therefore seems happy to see its own Freedom of Information Act watered down. This is unacceptable. Of all public servants, MPs have least right to be exempt from public scrutiny. We are elected to represent our constituents’ interests and to maintain high standards in public life. The Freedom of Information Act is a vital tool for allowing members of the public to assess whether their MPs are doing so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now