Michael Clark Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, Thomas Graves said: Michael, Are you answering for Mr. Simpkin? Are you his official spokesperson? -- Tommy Tommy, Have you read this thread? I am a volunteer time-saver. Cheers, Michael Edited May 20, 2017 by Michael Clark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Michael Clark said: Tommy, Have you read this thread? I am a volunteer time-saver. Cheers, Michae Michael, If I, admittedly against the new Forum rule, "bump" my post to Mr. Simkin before the mandatory 24 hours have come-and-gone, will you once again cover it up with one of your little covering "posts"? -- Thomas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 Tommy, Give me some time. I will re-vist this very interesting thread. I will, therefrom, answer your questions for you..... .... because it is such an interesting thread. Cheers, Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Michael Clark said: Tommy, Give me some time. I will re-vist this very interesting thread. I will, therefrom, answer your questions for you..... .... because it is such an interesting thread. Cheers, Michael Michael, I should warn you, I suppose, that about an hour ago I sent a longish post to Kathy Beckett regarding your goading behavior ever since the infamous "Nice post, Toomy" incident (which itself is "water under the bridge" as far as I'm concerned). My offer still stands. We can converse civilly by PM (or insult each other by PM -- whichever you prefer), but I would prefer that you cease and desist trying to disrupt and / or "hide" so many of my posts with your, so-far IMHO shortish and inane, "replies". -- Thomas Edited May 20, 2017 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Thomas Graves said: Michael, I should warn you, I suppose, that about an hour ago I sent a longish post to Kathy Beckett regarding your goading behavior ever since the infamous "Nice post, Toomy" incident (which itself is "water under the bridge" as far as I'm concerned). -- Thomas PS My offer still stands. We can converse civilly by PM (or insult each other by PM -- whichever you prefer), but I would prefer that you cease and desist trying to disrupt and / or "hide" so many of my posts with your, so-far IMHO inane, "replies". -- Thomas Tommy I've been duly warned. It feels like a threat. Cheers, Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Michael Clark said: Tommy I've been duly warned. It feels like a threat. Cheers, Michael Michael, It's not a "threat" for the simple reason that it's something that I've already done. I suppose "a heads up" would be a better way for you to put it. Shall I try to copy-and-paste a copy of it to you via PM? Look at it this way -- It could be the beginning of a wonderful "relationship"! -- Thomas Edited May 20, 2017 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Clark Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 Tommy, You are disturbing me while I re-read this very interesting thread. Cheers, Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now