Jump to content
The Education Forum
  • Announcements

    • Evan Burton

      OPEN REGISTRATION BY EMAIL ONLY !!! PLEASE CLICK ON THIS TITLE FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR REGISTRATION!:   06/03/2017

      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team

Bill Cheslock

Members
  • Content count

    112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Bill Cheslock

  • Rank
    Experienced Member
  • Birthday 11/28/1944

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Cape Cod, Mass.

Recent Profile Visitors

6,792 profile views
  1. Clint Murchison and the JFK Assassination

    I remember watching "The Guilty Men" and thought the question of whether there was a Murchison party was settled. According to this part of "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" there was indeed a party.
  2. Fire at JFK Library in Boston

    I just heard Wolf Blitzer of CNN report that the event at the JFK Library was a fire and that it has nothing to do with the bombings at the Marathon. Who knows!! The competing networks are trying to get a scoop up on each other. We may hear later that the fire indeed was part of the attack. It's not unlike the reporting that went on after the JFK assassinaion in Dealey Plaza. It's a good question David. I would say that it's very difficult to secure a race that covers 26 miles. The good news is that there are many many surveilance cameras on the race route, and hopefully officials will be able to use them to give us a clearer picture as to who's responsible.
  3. A Shot from The Left

    Thanks Robin. The first photo you posted by Cancellare above is the one I was referring to. When enlarged, we can see ,what seems to me, to be a human like figure to the right of the tree that is the second tree from the end of the overpass. From the street, it's the tree to the right of the motorcycles. I wonder if anyone else can see what I perceive to be a human figure on the south knoll, holding what could be a rifle?
  4. A Shot from The Left

    Excellent Robin. Do you remember a blown up photo of the south knoll? I believe I saw a Cancellare photo of the left side of Elm Street that was made much larger than the original, and that it showed what seems to be a human figure holding a long object that could be a rifle. This was a few years ago, and I can't remember the source. Then again, perhaps it was you. Thanks Bill
  5. Anthony Lewis

    Absolutely no mention of Lewis' writing on the Warren Commission. In the New York Times edition of the "Report Of The Warren Commission, The Assassination Of President Kennedy" (McGraw -Hill Book Company, October 1964) Lewis wrote a preface titled, "On The Release Of The Warren Report," p. xxxi. His six and a half pages starts off supporting the official government version; Oswald was the lone assassin, and there was no conspiracy, foreign or domestic. His pontification continues with agreeing with the Commission's belief that Oswald shot at General Walker, and that the alleged presidential assassin was a malcontent whose own gun fired all the shots and killed President Kennedy. Mr. Lewis categorically dismisses who he calls "mythmakers," those who question the conclusions of the Warren Commission, but assures the reader that the conclusions were correct. The final paragraph of his forward seems to excuse the Secret Service from any fault. He writes that even President Kennedy admitted that it would be easy for anybody who really wanted to shoot the President of the United States. He could get on a high building with a telescopic rifle, and there was nothing anybody could do to defend against such an attempt.
  6. New Website

    Witness-2.blogspot.com. I already have some posts there, one huge one concerning a man who calls himself a hero but is a fake witness to 9/11. Hope all is well. Hi Kathleen I tried to long on to your blogspot, but had no luck. Any suggestions? Thanks Bill
  7. I came across this article below about Sirhan's parole hearing. Should he be paroled and permitted to return to Jordan? Or, should he remain in an American prison? I have mixed feelings. If he was indeed programmed and didn't know what he was involved in, I don't know if he should be kept in prison. On the other hand, if he was knowingly involved, and if he does make parole and returns to Jordan, I believe the RFK assassination investigation, what little is left, will take a plunge into a giant black hole and never be heard from again. This is something, I believe, the American media would welcome. Any thoughts on Sirhan being paroled? Any thoughts on this article below? Thanks Bill http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8355306/Robert-F.-Kennedys-assassin-was-a-real-life-Manchurian-Candidate.html
  8. Greg, with the Kennedy sex maniacs, most of these stories are true. And are relevant both to the JFK assassination AND to the cover up as this post demonstrates. No need to shoot the messenger if you can't handle the message. I get tired of going over to John McAdams web site and seeing this: "He didn't even have the satisfaction of being killed for civil rights . . . . It's — it had to be some silly little Communist." — Jackie Kennedy, on hearing that a leftist had been arrested for her husband's murder. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm Robert Kennedy and Jackie Kennedy were handicapped in speaking the truth of what they knew: that the JFK assassination was a coup d'etat and the result of an elite DOMESTIC conspiracy. One big reason they did not speak up was because RFK and Jackie were having an illicit affair with each other and Robert Kennedy, in particular, did not want to risk having this exposed, which would have killed off his political ambitions for US Senate and the Presidency. After all, Robert Kennedy had TEN kids with Ethel, and here he was spending all this emotional energy, time, and money on Jackie. It is one thing to be a good uncle to John John and Caroline and a close friend to Jackie, it is entirely another to be hopping in the bed with the widow Jackie Kennedy and carrying on with her like 2 teenagers in love. So Jack Kennedy was not the only Kennedy who was BLACKMAILABLE - Robert Kennedy was and he lived in fear of having his affair with Jackie exposed. I have read almost the whole book "Bobby and Jackie" and it convinced me, with countless anecdotes from close Kennedy friends, that the RFK/Jackie affair was quite the reality and an "open secret" among the Kennedy clan. Back to John Kennedy: the ONLY reason Lyndon Johnson got on that Democratic ticket in 1960 was through the use of sexual blackmail and other threats on John Kennedy. In sum, I am researcher in the 1963 Coup d'Etat. I am not some sort of Kennedy groupie or a PR flack along the lines of Karl Rove (Bushes), James Carville (Clintons) or Jack Valenti (Johnson). I try to find the truth whether it is good, bad or ugly. One more thing: save your "disgust" for the character suicide that the Kennedys committed... such as running around on a wife that gave you 10 children. Produce the PROOF of this illicit love affair! PRODUCE THE PROOF! instead of parroting what you have read elsewhere. The entire idea that they, including Joseph Kennedy, Sr., JFK & RFK, were all ultimately "black-mailable" due to their alleged sexual exploits is a claim beyond the pale; it's an unsupported assertion, and is absurd! Here is another take on Heyman and his book. http://www.ctka.net/reviews/heymann.html
  9. Greg, with the Kennedy sex maniacs, most of these stories are true. And are relevant both to the JFK assassination AND to the cover up as this post demonstrates. No need to shoot the messenger if you can't handle the message. I get tired of going over to John McAdams web site and seeing this: "He didn't even have the satisfaction of being killed for civil rights . . . . It's — it had to be some silly little Communist." — Jackie Kennedy, on hearing that a leftist had been arrested for her husband's murder. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm Robert Kennedy and Jackie Kennedy were handicapped in speaking the truth of what they knew: that the JFK assassination was a coup d'etat and the result of an elite DOMESTIC conspiracy. One big reason they did not speak up was because RFK and Jackie were having an illicit affair with each other and Robert Kennedy, in particular, did not want to risk having this exposed, which would have killed off his political ambitions for US Senate and the Presidency. After all, Robert Kennedy had TEN kids with Ethel, and here he was spending all this emotional energy, time, and money on Jackie. It is one thing to be a good uncle to John John and Caroline and a close friend to Jackie, it is entirely another to be hopping in the bed with the widow Jackie Kennedy and carrying on with her like 2 teenagers in love. So Jack Kennedy was not the only Kennedy who was BLACKMAILABLE - Robert Kennedy was and he lived in fear of having his affair with Jackie exposed. I have read almost the whole book "Bobby and Jackie" and it convinced me, with countless anecdotes from close Kennedy friends, that the RFK/Jackie affair was quite the reality and an "open secret" among the Kennedy clan. Back to John Kennedy: the ONLY reason Lyndon Johnson got on that Democratic ticket in 1960 was through the use of sexual blackmail and other threats on John Kennedy. In sum, I am researcher in the 1963 Coup d'Etat. I am not some sort of Kennedy groupie or a PR flack along the lines of Karl Rove (Bushes), James Carville (Clintons) or Jack Valenti (Johnson). I try to find the truth whether it is good, bad or ugly. One more thing: save your "disgust" for the character suicide that the Kennedys committed... such as running around on a wife that gave you 10 children. Produce the PROOF of this illicit love affair! PRODUCE THE PROOF! instead of parroting what you have read elsewhere. The entire idea that they, including Joseph Kennedy, Sr., JFK & RFK, were all ultimately "black-mailable" due to their alleged sexual exploits is a claim beyond the pale; it's an unsupported assertion, and is absurd!
  10. This is yet another example of your uncommonly rich attraction to employing CIRCULARITY when arguing your point. Your assertion is: "This is a great book." My challenge is: "Provide proof that its content is factual." Your reply is: "I (Robert) have proof of the allegations made in this book--and the proof IS CONTAINED IN THE BOOK!." Fallacious idiocy at its finest...
  11. Good summary of presentation by Ed Tatro

    John It is indeed extremely well written and filled with very important information. There is one correction that Ed has been asking those of us who read his article to be aware of. About 35 paragraphs into the article, the paragraph that starts with, "Now we know..." should have the word "not" deleted. Thanks Bill
  12. fbi agent ; lho did not kill jfk

    Thanks Bernice. It's unfortunate this agent didn't expand upon his belief that Oswald wasn't the assassin. I would like to know based on what facts does he make this statement? Or, is it his opinion only? The Milteer connection to the assassination has always been very interesting, to say the least. Instead of putting some pressure on Milteer, the FBI decided to out the informant, Somerset, and ignore the tape recording implicating Milteer. Bill
  13. Biography: Bill Cheslock

    My name is Bill Cheslock and have been researching the assassinations of the 1960's for over forty years now. I live on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, and am a retired history, political science, and special needs teacher. I have taught a course on the assassinations, and have spoken at universities here in the U.S. and Canada.
  14. Tim I don't know very much about rifles and tests to determine if they were fired. However, in a discussion with Gary Mack via e-mail about a year ago, Gary stated there is no test available to determine if a rifle was fired recently, to his knowledge. Bill C You know, I would bet that the DPD and the Sheriff's dept. had plenty of rabbit hunters on the force. I don't know about any scientific test to determine if a gun has been fired or not, but if one sniffs the end of the barrel, he will know immediately if the gun has been shot recently. I remember when I hunted here in the hills of Kentucky as a young man that after I shot at game (whether I hit it or not) I could smell that the gun had been fired. Also, I remember later in the evening, as I was preparing to clean my gun, 2-3 hours (or more), that I could still detect the smell of gunpowder in the barrel. Terry Terry With your description of how to test if a rifle has been fired recently, it seems we don't need a scientific test to determine it. You have to wonder if any of those law enforcement officers who were on the sixth floor had the mind set to do just what you described above. Going a step further, would the aroma of gunpowder be on the casings that were found under the window of the sixth floor? Thanks Bill C
×