The Truth About Oswald's Birth Certificate

[Sandy Larsen]

2 hours ago, Karl Kinaski said:

http://wtracyparnell.blogspot.com/2017/01/the-truth-about-oswalds-birth.html

 

So this is Armstrong in the possession of Oswalds birth certificate, not making it public for a  one and a half decade while throwing around bullxxxx about it, watching researchers running around in circles.  That's the deed of an disinfo agent.  -- HARVEY&LEE is a very skillful disinfo-doorstopper: full of accurate details, but used in the context of a funny theory of two IC-created Oswalds acting as IC assets almost from the cradle to the grave. To a reader of this book, my advice would be: take the accurate details out of the book and throw the Armstrong Two Ossi Theory out of the window, which is nothing but a silly tale, created to muddy the waters of 22.11.1963. HARVEY&LEE is not a Conspiracy book, it is Smoke and Mirrors to confuse honest assassination researchers. Jim Hargrove is not a researcher, he is Armstrongs Internet man, promoting the silly  premise of H&L ... IMO

PS The late Jack White was a victim of Armstrongs Disinfo-book and campaign. 

KK

Karl,

Oswald's 1958 dental chart indicates that his prosthesis (false tooth) had failed and that therefore he needed a new one. Yet his exhumed body shows there had never been a false tooth nor a need for one. Thereby proving that there were two Oswalds.

How do YOU account for that?

Here's the dental chart:

 

Here's a closeup of the "Prosthesis Required" field:

 

 

[Karl Kinaski]

 

The game with identities is well known in this never ending murder case. There were 4 to 6 Oswalds, (the Bolton-Ford Ossi, N.O, the Lincoln-Mercury Ossi, Dallas, the Odio-Ossi, Dallas, the firing ranch Ossi, Dallas, the Mexico-city Ossi etc...),  BUT there was no Oswald-CLONE, created from childhood on, which is the main-idea of the Armstrong book ... the CIA started to create an Oswald 201 file in Dec 1960. One purpose of such a file is to create parallel résumés of one person. It is flashy that the first documented incident with a false Oswald occurred just a month later in Oswalds Hometown N.O., on 20.1.1961, the day JFK was sworn into office. (The Bolton Ford incident.) 

 

I am fine with that ... I do not need the Armstrong/Hargrove Hokuspokus 

[Jim Hargrove]

15 minutes ago, Karl Kinaski said:

There were 4 to 6 Oswalds

Which two of the "4 to 6 Oswalds" did Laura Kittrell talk to at the Texas Employment Commission just weeks before the assassination?

Following are two pages of Gaeton Fonzi's 1978 report of his interview with Kittrell. 

 

 

[Jim Hargrove]

25 minutes ago, Karl Kinaski said:

There were 4 to 6 Oswalds

Which two of the "4 to 6 Oswalds" in 1958 were treated for VD on the Japanese mainland while the other sailed the high seas aboard the U.S.S. Skagit and was stationed in Taiwan?

 

 

 

 

 

[Sandy Larsen]

 

34 minutes ago, Karl Kinaski said:

 

5 hours ago, Sandy Larsen said:

Karl,

Oswald's 1958 dental chart indicates that his prosthesis (false tooth) had failed and that therefore he needed a new one. Yet his exhumed body shows there had never been a false tooth nor a need for one. Thereby proving that there were two Oswalds.

How do YOU account for that?

 I do not need the Armstrong/Hargrove Hokuspokus 

 

You can't or don't want to attempt refuting H&L evidence, Karl?

Fine.  But maybe you shouldn't go spouting your mouth off about a theory you can't refute.

 

Edited April 4, 2018 by Sandy Larsen

[Karl Kinaski]

John Newmann wrote a book "Oswald and the CIA", where he presented an impressive list of government -documents showing that Lee Harvey Oswald was closely monitored by FBI CIA and James Jesus Angleton himself  prior to the assassination. Newman said, he wrote a book about. "Oswald the file". I am waiting for a equal book "HARVEY the file", written by Armstrong ...  But wait a minute: there is no HARVEY Oswald paper-trail. There is not a single official FBI or CIA document showing that HARVEY was closely monitored and a person of interest to Angleton. Why? Because Harvey is a figment of Armstrongs imagination. He merged the 4 to 6 or more Oswald imposter's, that where active prior to the assassination, some of them not even resembling Oswald (The Mexico City Oswald and the Lincoln/Mercury Oswald, and therefore not resembling Harvey!) into one individual he called Harvey Oswald. Thats a useless operation, except it is meant to confuse the CTer community, a goal witch HARVEY AND LEE has achieved ... To answer the question WHO KILLED KENNEDY AND WHY the book HARVEY AND LEE attributes nada ... 

[Jim Hargrove]

5 hours ago, Karl Kinaski said:

To answer the question WHO KILLED KENNEDY AND WHY the book HARVEY AND LEE attributes nada ... 

Obviously written by a man who has never read Harvey and Lee and has no idea of what is in it.

The full title of the book Karl claims to hate so much is "Harvey & Lee: How the CIA framed Oswald."  John accuses high-ranking CIA officials of planning the pubic execution of JFK; specifically ex-CIA director Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, JJ Angleton, David A. Phillips, and Howard Hunt.  One of the main reasons for the hit was to provoke an invasion of Cuba. Many other JFK researchers agree with these conclusions.

Karl thinks he will find full documentation of two Oswalds in CIA files?  He thinks that with a straight face?  Actually, it was Hoover's job to HIDE evidence of the two Oswalds, because it would expose what CIA accountant James Wilcott called "the Oswald Project," a creature of U.S. Intel.  Why on earth do you suppose Hoover sent out agents to confiscate "Oswald's" grade school records and teen-aged employment records before even determining whether other U.S. officials were targeted for assassination of if there were co-conspirators involved in the Kennedy case?  Nevertheless, it is difficult to make an entire life disappear, and Hoover made plenty of mistakes. By working with the documents he neglected to hide or alter, we can learn the truth.

Karl apparently gets himself all enraged over the question of whether there were two Oswalds, as John and I believe, or "4 to 6 Oswalds," as he says he believes. How many times does a fellow have to get impersonated before Karl begins to wonder if there is a simpler solution?  Half a dozen times?  Two dozen times?

 

Edited April 4, 2018 by Jim Hargrove