-
Posts
1,301 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Michael Crane
-
-
I am referencing a bullet "entrance" in the temple area where the hairline meets.
Take a look at page 84 in Robert Groden`s "The Killing of a President" (paper back) for better reference.The circular type hole that looks to be blown out on the top half.
*Of course we are talking about the right side.
-
Thomas,
With no disrespect intended,do you still believe that JFK was not "hit" in the side of the head (temple area) a wound I believe the mortician said he covered up with wax?
* I could be wrong about the mortician saying that,but I did read somewhere that it was covered up with wax.
** BTW I hate rabbit holes.
-
It`s probably old news to most of the prestigious researchers that this forum has onboard but,it was "new" to me & hopefully news that the forum can benefit from knowing about.
-
Oswalds Shadow
I just wanted to ask if anybody knows what time this comes on the West Coast? (PST)
-
Bernice,
I must say that is by far,the best image I have ever seen regarding the condition of the head at the time of the shooting (specifically the back of the head) and now I can honestly say that,I am no longer convinced that there was something sinister about the area that this "black area" appears.I do however remain skeptical.
Thank you so much for the kind gesture.
-
I`m pretty sure that this must have been brought up & discussed before sometime on this forum but,it seems like everytime I see an image of frame 313 (give or take a few frames) there always seems to be a "black area" in the back of the Presidents head that prevents us from seeing the damage done in that area.
Is there any images out there enhanced or not,that gives us a clear view of the condition that the Presidents head was in at that time?
Any information or opinions is encouraged & appreciated.
-
Alot of changes taking place in the faster version.I believe that the Police Officer passing by on the motorcycle,could possibly distort the sequence.
-
Sneaky bastids are pulling disappearing acts.
-
Upon closer inspection,it appears that the gentleman in the hat seems to be
A) Walking down a sloped terrain
B)Gotten shorter
c) Changed locations
D) None of the above
-
This one is over my head.I`m not sure if your suggesting that the distance is not correct or the background scenery is not correct.Something tells me that this might possiby be a case of a Incredible Shrinking Man?
Brain dead minds wanna know.
-
I also believe that the actor pretending to having a epileptic seizure,was using the same method a magician does using "slight of hand."
-
Bishop = Phillips IMO
I cant remember where I read it but,it was somewhere in the book "Someone would have talked" that persuaded me to come to this opinion.
Just my .02
-
I think that the assassination was planned in New Orleans,carried out in Dallas,and covered up in Washington.
IMHO there must have been a small group or individuals in the government,military & organized crime that were involved in this conspiracy.That a decision was made,that JFK had to be eliminated,and the guilty parties,would never have to worry about being brought to justice.
-
Thomas,
In your honest opinion,do you truthfully & honestly believe that there is no evidence in this case, that has not been in some way,fabricated,altered,supressed or eliminated in any capacity?
-
I will respectfully say that opinions vary.
That is all.
-
"Thanks, Jack. However, it is true that witnesses can often be mistaken. There is a famous law school exercise where unexpectedly two or three people burst into the classroom, do something strange, say a few words, and leave. The recollection of the law students re the description of the intruders and what they did varies widely."
Not that it matter`s,but I can specifically recall this happening to me when I was in the 8th grade (I`m 43 years old) and all I can remember was a man bursting into are classroom with a hat,dark glasses and asking question/s in a loud voice.
-
Thank you for the quick response Tim,
I`m just not sure how hard it would be to make up some "new or different" documents today that could say whatever they want them to say,and pass them off as the originals.
-
As silly & un-educated as this is going to sound,I am going to ask anyways...I would like to know if,there is a way to verify,that the sealed documents are the originals,and not some re-productions?
It would not surprize me that if,and when,the documents are finally released,that they might contain some false or re-typed information.
Any help in this area would be greatly appreciated.
-
I could have sworn that I read somewhere that JEH was telling LBJ in a memo that they know that a sniper was on the 5th floor.Could be wrong though.
-
Kathleen,
I have not killed anyone.There are just some things in life that I know are facts.
-
"You have to stand behind the victim in order to do it. "
Not true.
There are many,many more kinds of carotid artery chokes.The only difference is the way that they are applied.
-
The choke holds that you are referring to are commonly used in MMA (Mixed Martial Arts) and is called a rear naked choke in BJJ (Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu) & Judo circles.A rear naked choke cuts off the blood supply to the brain,while a guillotine choke (windpipe) cuts off the oxygen supply to the brain.
The Rear Naked Choke is also utilized in Law Enforcement & is referred to as a "Vascular Neck Restraint"
Anyone in the State of California that "chokes" a person out can face the charge of attempted murder.
*The safest & fastest way to revive a person that has been choked out (not killed) is to lay them on their back & lift their legs up.Another quick way to revive them is to sit them up and put pressure (with a knee) in the middle of the back and wave their arms in a circular motion.
-
Does he smoke or write letters?
-
To me it appears in the gif that Chris made on the first page that one set of windows seem to be more "square" in appearance,then change into smaller "rectangle" shape`s.
Just my .02
Mary Sitzman
in JFK Assassination Debate
Posted · Edited by Michael Crane
Bernice,
I can`t thank you enough for taking the time trying to verify my statement.I have edited this post because of my reading comprehension.I just noticed that it wasn`t Mr. Robinson`s statements that I was reading but somebody else`s notes.I do believe that I might not be that far off on my position about the wax.
Once again thank you for contributing your time in this matter.
Michael Crane.