Wade Frazier

Hi: I just wished Dennis a happy 70th birthday. How time flies. I vividly recall his 40th birthday. It was the only time that I ever talked to Mr. Financier. I saw him a month later, stricken, as his stolen company was used to help steal Dennis’s. Nearly three years later, Dennis was in solitary confinement, writing about how he would not live to see this side of the bars, as the officials would bring him “death by inmate,” and they nearly did. I would not have taken short odds on Dennis living to 70 in those days. It is miraculous that he is alive today. Indiana Jones was not able to save the world by himself, but he took a good run at it. Best, Wade

Hi: I am getting to the end of Gary’s theorizing. Gary was a cop and investigator, after being a World War II sailor. He believed in the law enforcement ideal, and by his life’s end, he was always rooting out corruption. It is easy to find in the USA. Gary’s career ended when he was “asked” to help frame somebody, and when he refused, he was framed instead. That is called being made an offer you cannot refuse, which I know about all too well. As a child, I went to school with the children of one of the framers, who lived in my housing development, and they always dressed fashionably and had plenty of money. Hmmm. Brian O nearly did not survive the “offer” that the USA’s military made to him when he mounted a UFO conference. Dennis nearly did not survive the final “offer” made by the Big Boys before they began playing rough. Don Corleone had no monopoly on making offers that could not be refused. Coming into contact with those “offerors” just comes with the territory. While incredibly brave and virtuous, Gary was no scholar, and he fell for anti-Semitic propaganda, but that was understandable, being harried by Jewish gangsters. When the dust settled in Ventura, I thought that policemen and lawyers were about the lowest forms of life, and if you had told me back then that policemen and lawyers worshipped the devil, I might have believed you. Did Gary connect too many dots? At times, probably, but he also had access to many dots that average people will never glimpse. When you begin to play at the level that Gary did, you can trip the light fantastic. When my close friends and associates received free energy and exotic technology demonstrations (1, 2), they did not seek them out, but they simply came with the territory. Go try to bring disruptive energy technology to market, such as putting the world’s best heating system on people’s homes for free, threatening to carpet the nation with them, and if you survive the experience, you will begin to find out how the world really works, not the TV and newspaper version that is fed to the masses. It is very natural to get kind of conspiracist in one’s orientation when venturing into those realms. There are plenty of cloak-and-dagger games being played at those levels, some at surreal levels, as they toy with humanity and Earth, and they are life-risking levels to play at. And there is no end to armchair critics and “skeptics,” lying out of both sides of their mouths and committing elementary errors of logic as they defend their in-groups, but they don’t have any credibility with me or anybody else who has played at the high levels. The Global Controllers are very real, but Joe Average, punching the clock and riveted to the TV, with a beer in hand, will never encounter them, other than watching or reading some tabloid version of events. Gary played at a different level of the game, and I have immense respect for the courage required to play there. The Ventura County gangsters wrecked Gary’s life and he died in exile, in Oregon, in 2005, fighting all the way. Time for work. Best, Wade

Hi: Here is a little more on Gary’s experiences and theories. Gary’s path was largely set when he was assigned to put Mick Cohen under surveillance. He tailed Cohen all over LA, recorded his conversations with quite a list of luminaries, and placed a listener who spoke Yiddish in a booth next to Cohen’s at a restaurant. One of Cohen’s restaurant meetings was with Menachem Begin, a bona fide terrorist and future prime minister of Israel. Cohen supplied weapons to Israel in its early days. When Begin was Israel’s prime minister, he never went to the UK because he was wanted for murder there. The movie LA Confidential was based on the milieu around Fred Otash. Otash worked with Cohen to use and blackmail celebrities. One of his early successes involved introducing the Italian Stallion Johnny Stompanato to Lana Turner, and Otash had their bed at a Malibu motel wired for sound. Cohen made big money selling the records of their lovemaking session, and when Turner’s daughter murdered Stompanato, that record became a “must have” curio in Hollywood, and Cohen had thousands more records pressed. Gary surveilled the beach party at Peter Lawford’s Malibu home, when JFK was introduced to Marilyn Monroe. Monroe was used as the highest-class hooker in a White House influence-peddling scheme. The USA’s relationship with Israel did not become the close one we see today, in which the USA showers Israel with billions of dollars every year, in history’s most lucrative foreign “aid” deal, until 1967, when Israel proved to be America’s kind of fascists, attacking their Arab neighbors and stealing their land. JFK had aligned himself with Arab and African independence movements, which Gary heard an enraged Cohen and Begin talk about. Cohen tried to get Otash to reproduce his success with Turner and Stompanato and record Monroe and JFK in bed together, to blackmail JFK, but Gary thought that Otash was not successful, although a film of one of their sessions seems to have surfaced in recent years, and was quickly snapped up by an anonymous party. According to Gary, who would have known, when Monroe became unstable and could talk, her handlers murdered her and made it appear a suicide. That was the milieu that Gary operated in, and that meeting with Tower was just part of the scenery. Time to begin my busy week. Best, Wade

Hi Brad: I have just a few minutes before bed. I’ll be writing plenty more on the JFK issue, and yes, many Americans have devoted huge chunks of their lives to the issue. It is hugely divisive, primarily because it brings the legitimacy of our system into question. The American system, capitalism, and the like are only “legitimate” by the superior force that they have always wielded. It is simply might makes right, and JFK discovered that the hard way. Those people who so vociferously defend the Warren Commission’s farce are voting their self-interest, just like virtually all people do. Anonymous forums are not a good idea, IMO, as they encourage juvenile behavior, and I do my best to not be a part of them anymore. You are a real person, and I do my best to only interact with real people. That is a requirement for my forum, for instance. Attacking others from a position of anonymity is truly the coward’s path, and cowards really don’t bother me much, but what a waste of time it is to interact with them. I am finished with the time-wasters. On the book front, my big essay is an online textbook (which will be the closest thing to a book that I will publish), and the JFK issue is a tiny part of it. If I did not have the good fortune to know Gary, I would have probably had little to say about it. But more is coming soon. Best, Wade

Thanks Brad: Sticks and stones and all that. My writings have been assailed for 20 years. That is all trifling, compared to what I survived in my adventures. There are millions of psychotic nattering nabobs out there, and I really don’t care much about what they write. I have seen hundreds of instances of them writing about my work. I am looking for the few who will understand, not the billions who will refuse to. They will not begin to wake up until the next Epoch is delivered into their lives. Then the glimmerings of sentience might begin to appear. I really do hope to help them wake up, but it won’t be with my writings. Best, Wade

Hi: Thanks Brad. I appreciate the warning. I have more to write on Gary’s theories, which were largely based on his experiences, such as the Israeli connection. It is not tame stuff. In 1998, I approached McAdams, he put an early draft of my JFK account into his forum, and the most memorable reply called my account of the Tower meeting a “fairy tale,” Gary a Nazi, and Murphy a coward. Yes, the anonymous coward poster called Audie Murphy a coward. That is easily one of the most memorable trollish posts that I ever saw. I have been stalked by professional trolls, which is why I only post at places like this forum anymore. The trolls come swarming when I post anyplace where they can get to me. I have been assailed by the “skeptics” and other assorted criminals, but I really don’t pay much attention to them, as I have never received an honest, intelligent, and informed critique of my work that attempted to invalidate it. My best critics have always been my allies, as they tried to make my work better. I am not looking to convince anybody who is only interested in defending their in-group. I seek needles in haystacks and know it, and my posts in this forum comprise another one of the beacons that I have set out. Thanks again, Wade

Hi: Here is a post on Gary’s theorizing, before I begin my busy day. A primary theme of my work is that people rarely escape their conditioning, even partially, in their lifetimes. We are required to choose love to awaken to our divinity. There is no other way. People stay asleep partly because their conditioning is in-group conditioning, and there are carrots and sticks to entice or coerce compliance, and hardly anybody has the integrity to question that scarcity-based and egocentric conditioning, so they shuffle along with the herd. Those that I respected the most always drank the Kool-Aid the deepest, in their Boy Scout ways, and they all woke up the hard way, which was part of their radicalization, and I have called them disillusioned idealists. Gary, Dennis, Brian, and Ralph all qualified, and with all of them, I could see how they all, to one degree or another, never quite relinquished all of their baggage. Dennis still believes in the agrarian religion that he was raised with, Brian was codependent with Washington, D.C. to the end, Ralph was still a “patriot,” even after all that he endured, and Gary still believed that justice could be pursued through the legal system, ex-cop that he was. Like them, I woke up the hard way. Unlike them, except for Ralph, I went to business school and still make a living in the business world. It is not an easy dance, and I am the only person in the FE field that I know of who has successfully done that dance. I left the fairy tales of my capitalist indoctrination behind pretty early, but it really took my days with Dennis to finally beat it out of me. Godzilla is capitalism on steroids. I do not believe in the capitalist ideal, but Gary, Brian, Dennis, and Ralph all believed in the American dream, and they all sought their ideals, such as Gary with justice through the legal system, Dennis with his “patriot,” Christian, and businessman’s ideals, and so on. I do my best to not “believe” in any of the ideals of our Epochs, neither the Fourth, Third, nor Second, as all are rooted in scarcity and fear. They all had brief Golden Ages in the early days of exploiting new energy sources, but they were never sustainable. Only the Fifth Epoch will be sustainable, energetically, economically, and environmentally, and humanity will live in absolute, universal, and sustainable abundance for the first time, and will become a Type 1 civilization. Nobody has ever experienced that before, but we have some hints of what that might be like. So, I always try to be mindful of people’s backgrounds and conditioning, and how it has distorted their awareness. One reason why I am so frank about my background, journey, and human foibles is so that my readers can be aware of what mine might be. We are all human, which comes with its blessings and curses. With that preamble out of the way, on to Gary’s theorizing on the JFK hit. I don’t know about Gary’s childhood, but his encounters with Jewish gangsters, beginning with Mick Cohen, gave him views on Jews that could easily be called anti-Semitic. But he tried to keep his efforts focused on Jewish gangsters, not Jews in general, but Gary fell for anti-Semitic propaganda, understandably. Jewish scholars are definitely guilty of playing up the Holocaust, but it does not make Holocaust Denier works valid, and like so many bodies of work, they have a superficial plausibility until somebody does the work and goes deeply on the subject. Ironically, that cop, who witnessed an event in Gary’s book and concurred with Gary’s rendition of it, challenged Gary’s assertions about the Jews (as in their religion worships the devil – heck, many Christian sects saw Jehovah as Satan, understandably), but after the Jewish neocon-assisted invasion of Iraq, that cop asked me if maybe Gary was right all along. Brian briefed some of those Jewish neocons in his space days, and he was disturbed by their behavior. Ashkenazy Jews are humanity’s most “intelligent” ethnic group, and are highly overrepresented for scientific Nobel Prizes, for instance. So, it is natural to conclude that Jewish organized crime might be exceedingly clever, and it appears to be that way. Gary’s book came to focus on Jewish gangsters, perhaps obsessively, whom he called “Mishpucka.” Gary was not shy about naming names, which is partly why they tried to kill him. One judge that gave Gary great pain is Jewish and still sits on the federal bench today, in his 90s, as a noted “liberal” judge, which is great gangster cover. In some ways, Gary saw the Mishpucka as just another organized crime organization built along ethnic lines, just like Italian, Japanese, Irish, Chinese, and Mexican crime syndicates. I have seen the Global Controllers called very organized crime, so the Mishpucka are not much of an aberration, but they are not at the top of the global food chain, IMO. We encountered the Rothschilds on our journey, who probably comprise the most legendary Jewish dynasty, and they are not at the top, either. But I also doubt that the JFK hit originated from the top, anyway, but down a level or three. The Global Controllers have “loftier” concerns. Allen Dulles was the chief “fixer” for the Rockefellers, and he ran the Warren Commission. I think that interposing Hunt’s operation came more from that level of the game, not the Global Controller level. The Jewish connection for the JFK hit was likely down a level from the Dulles level, as useful assets, not masterminds. Take Henry Kissinger, another prominent Jew whom numerous conspiracy theories swirl around. I have connections to covert operations that he was part of, and “Henry” (as his crew calls him) is not anywhere near the top, either. He plays more at the “fixer” level that the Dulles bothers did. The people who really run the show on Earth you have never heard of. While some have named some of the organizations involved, the members who really pull the strings remain anonymous. It is good for business to be that way, and visible actors such as Kissinger, Dulles, that federal judge, Specter, etc., are soldiers, if clever ones, not masterminds. They are generally all what we would call psychopaths, or dark pathers (some were “merely” sociopaths – psychopaths are naturally “talented,” but sociopaths need training). It is merely a hazard of having free will. We had numerous psychopaths sicced on us over the years (1, 2, 3), and they were good at what they did, I’ll grant them that. Selling one’s soul pays well, for a while. Gary encountered Jack Ruby as a VIP member of Cohen’s entourage, as a representative of the Chicago Mob, in 1947. Ruby was no two-bit hood, as the Warren Commission tried to portray him as, but was a long-standing and high-ranking member of the Mob. Ruby’s real name was Jacob Rubenstein, which is as Jewish as it gets. Gary fingered Arlen Specter as one of the “monitors” of Hunt’s operation, to turn his fake assassination plot into a real one. Specter concocted the ridiculous “Magic Bullet” theory, which the entire “Lone Nut” hypothesis on the JFK hit rests on, and Specter was also Jewish. IMO, Gary can be forgiven for believing that the Jewish Mob was behind the JFK hit. They may well have been, but I think that they were likely more along the hit men lines rather than masterminds, although I could be wrong. Gary concluded that Ruby was supposed to kill Oswald immediately after the hit, but that cop Tippit got in the way and Oswald escaped while Tippit was murdered. Ruby was ordered to finish the job, which he did, to tie up that loose end. That is what gangsters of Ruby’s level can be called on to do, and they do it (the consequences can be severe for failing to, such as killing off their family, being tortured to death, etc.). Oswald was framed as the real assassin from the beginning, from the news reports that instantly came out to planting the Magic Bullet at the hospital. How much members of the Dallas PD may have been involved will likely always be a question for me, from Ruby doing the deed at the police station to the Roscoe White connection, etc. But again, I see their involvement as being far less than masterminds and more like covert action assets being orchestrated to play their roles. I have no doubt that the Jewish Mob was involved in the JFK hit in some way, and Ruby’s involvement should erase all doubt. But were they the masterminds who interposed Hunt’s operation? Maybe so, but I think that higher levels of the game orchestrated the hit, and I’ll get to my views in coming posts. I see Gary’s obsession with the Mishpucka as being due to his own encounters with them, and which made him susceptible to anti-Semitic propaganda, which is pretty normal in the USA. Nobody would call Gary a scholar. The USA is history’s most racist nation, I was raised in that racist environment, so Gary’s Jewish writings are all-too-understandable. Time to begin my busy day. Best, Wade

Thanks Brad. I would say that spooks were definitely involved, and just how they did it, I'll never know.

Hi: Gary’s Tower conversation has been called the basis for a master theory on the JFK hit, as it brings in many connections, such as Hunt, the CIA, the FBI, the military and the Cold War battle against communism, George Bush, the Cuban exiles, the Texas connection (just how connected Lyndon Johnson was will likely always be a question), and others. Tower said that there was no way that Oswald would have ever shot that policeman, either. That is the meat of what I have to offer on the JFK hit. I knew Gary, and the way that we met and what we had in common I hope brings more credibility to Gary’s account. He was Audie Murphy’s friend and bodyguard, and a cop and investigator, and he enacted endless lawsuits against the establishment gangsters. He was no anonymous whistleblower, hiding in the weeds, but was a whistleblower in the best sense of the word, risking his life to make noise. In my coming posts, I will get more into Gary’s theorizing on the JFK hit, and get into my views on the matter, in ways that I have not done before. Best, Wade

Hi: Gary’s writings can seem like something from the McCarthy Era, and in a way, they are. Gary was no left-winger. He was a World War II sailor and an old-time policeman who believed that if the law was properly enforced, we could have a more just society. That was definitely part of his friendship with Audie Murphy. Gary did not vote for JFK, but as he began to understand what JFK was doing, he became more sympathetic, and many years before it was fashionable, Gary wrote that JFK was trying to end the Cold War, from reading Anthony Summers’s book and that was why he was murdered. Summers interviewed Gary about his knowledge of Marilyn Monroe’s life and death, for his Monroe book, and Gary was frustrated that Summers kept ignoring whom the evidence pointed to in the JFK hit. By the 1980s, Gary was the most knowledgeable person alive regarding those LA days. Gary knew that Monroe did not commit suicide. She was being used as the world’s highest-class hooker for an influence-peddling scheme that reached into the White House, and when she became a loose cannon, she was murdered. Movies such as LA Confidential and Chinatown were like chapters from Gary’s career. Again, Gary goes off the deep end on Jews and Jewish gangsters before his book is finished, and I can see why. His life was ruined by Jewish gangsters who also tried to kill him, and one still sits on a federal bench to this day, as a noted “liberal” judge (whom Gary saw meeting with Mick Cohen back in 1947, when he had Cohen under surveillance). As I see it, the only real contribution that I can make to the JFK assassination milieu is to note that I knew Gary and that he was describing his meeting with Tower, Decker, and Murphy as accurately as he could. I have no doubt about that. If nothing else, it blows all “lone nut” theories out of the water. Gary had his own ideas about the perpetrators, including Arlen Specter, who was Jewish and who also concocted the Magic Bullet theory. The Jack Ruby connection is undeniable, and Gary met Ruby when he was a high-ranking member of Mick Cohen’s entourage. There are all sorts of juicy nuggets like that in Gary’s work, from his days in LA. What Gary reported as his experiences, I have no doubt about. His theories are another matter. I approached the issues like a scientist or scholar. There are facts and hypothesis, and the scientific ideal is to construct hypotheses that account for all the known facts regarding a phenomenon. While there are many ways to interpret the facts of Gary’s journey, including very differently from how Gary did, for me, the lone nut theory on the JFK hit died in the 1980s. I’ll go into Gary’s theories a little more, and then my own, and present my views on the JFK assassination issue. I part company with many in the JFK researcher crowd on numerous issues. I am not trying to solve the crime, but poking holes in the official story is more my game. Our system is not worth believing in. It is rotten to the core, and I am after bigger game than that, trying to help manifest the biggest event in the human journey. The JFK hit is certainly one of history’s most sensational crimes, and the resultant cover-up should make any thinking person pause, while thinking of our system’s legitimacy. Best, Wade

Hi: I have never written too much about Audie Murphy and the Tower conversation. Murphy was a legend from a bygone era, with nobody in the USA today of his particular stature. Any man of his generation, especially who had been in the military in World War II, immensely respected him. That was surely part of why Tower met with him, Gary, and Gary’s partner. When Murphy announced the trip to Gary, to go meet Tower, it was with a big grin. They flew to the meeting in New Mexico in Murphy’s private plane. Murphy also had some horse business to engage in there, and they did that on the way back to the plane after Tower’s sobering revelation. The documentary evidence that Tower gave to Gary, he gave to Murphy for safekeeping. I have been asked about the envelope by some names in the JFK milieu, but I don’t know what became of it. I never asked Gary. I never felt that I should. After they got back to LA, Gary and his partner knew that it was a situation that they had no business sticking their noses into, and it would definitely risk their lives to. They decided to stay quiet, and a few days later, Murphy called them to his office at Universal Studios, with his grin gone, and told them that Decker had been ringing his phone off the hook. Hunt’s team had recovered from the initial shock of having the operation infiltrated to pull off a real assassination, and the CIA, military, and FBI then went into cover-up mode, and Decker told Murphy to return the envelope, and that Tower had that meeting and gave them that envelope in a moment of panic. Murphy said that they threw the envelope’s contents, torn into pieces, out of the plane on the way back to LA. Decker died in 1970, Murphy the next year in a plane crash that Gary did doubted was an accident, Gary’s partner Frank died several years later, and Tower’s plane crashed in 1991 (the day after another politician died in a plane crash, and their deaths have “curious” coincidences), leaving Gary the last member of that meeting until Gary died in 2005. Gary thought that Arlen “Magic Bullet” Specter was one of the monitors of Hunt’s operation, in order to interpose it and turn it into a real assassination. More on that in later posts, but for now, it is off to bed. Best, Wade

Hi: I have to rush off to work soon, so this will be a short one. There has been plenty of suspicion relating to Bill Decker, the Dallas Sheriff’s Department, and the Dallas Police Department. The Roscoe White story, and how one of the backyard photos ended up in the possession of his widow, is one of the many intriguing connections to the assassination. Obviously, at best, investigative procedures broke down, and Ruby murdered Oswald at the Dallas PD, as he was being transferred to Decker’s custody, so I am very sympathetic that at least some in those jurisdictions were in on it, maybe as infiltrated agents for the CIA, I have heard that the plot was hatched within the Dallas PD, etc. Decker was in JFK’s motorcade. But again, I am going to lean heavily on Gary’s account, in which Decker told him and Audie Murphy: “God only knows how this will turn out so you guys get something straight right now. There was never any conspiracy in my Sheriff’s Department nor in the Dallas PD. I’ve known all these people too long…I’d have known it…believe me, something as crazy as this I’d feel it in my bones.” Then Decker asked them if they wanted to meet who turned out to be John Tower. As I have written plenty, I accept the authenticity of Gary’s account, and I’ll say that Decker’s reaction was genuine, between friends. If the assassination plot involved members of the sheriff’s department or Dallas PD, Decker was not aware of it, and Tower’s story is all about much higher levels of the game, such as military intelligence and the CIA, whose members were double-crossed themselves as the fake assassination plot turned into a real one. Best, Wade

Hi: Gary survived a murder attempt in his battles against the gangsters who run Ventura County, and most of my fellow travelers survived murder attempts, and when they came from the spooks, the methods of murder could become bizarre, with various military toys and exotic weaponry. Murdering the head of state in a hail of bullets was pretty mundane. Hunt concocted some of the hundreds of creative assassination attempts that the CIA tried on Castro. Gary never went quietly, but constantly waged lawsuits, trying to get the evidence into court. When I met him, he told me about how he watched transcripts being altered in court, to erase his testimony. He would file legal motions, and the court clerks would put them straight into the shredder. Any lawyers that he tried to hire were soon threatened with disbarment if they took Gary’s cases, so Gary had to become his own lawyer. His lawsuits would be dismissed for the most frivolous reasons. Just as the dust was settling in Ventura County, Gary ran for sheriff, and a law was quickly passed to make him too old to run for office! Gary was no shrinking violet, hiding in the shadows, but waged his battles right on Main Street. Dennis’s case saw many of the same tactics that Gary told me about. Motions that Dennis filed while in jail, with his million dollar bail, would simply become “lost.” When Mr. Big Time Attorney had enough of the gutter maneuvers by the Ventura County gangsters, he filed suit in federal court. The year before he took our case, he mopped up the floor of the USA’s Supreme Court with the IRS, and the prosecution in Ventura committed some of the very same crimes that he fried IRS agents over, and he was looking forward to mopping up the floor with the goons in Ventura. Not only did the feds dismiss his case, they threatened him with disbarment if he refiled it. As Dennis told me, Mr. Big Time Attorney’s rough treatment while defending Dennis sobered him up. He thought that whipping the IRS took him into the Big Time, but he was rudely disabused of that notion, as the California gangsters treated him like something smelly that they stepped in and unceremoniously wiped from their shoes. Gary told me that the only reason why he was alive was that he never broke the law, no matter how egregious the situation was. If he had ever broken the law, they would have had an excuse to murder him. As it was, they clipped his wings by breaking into his gas station/store and “finding” an extension cord that “violated” the code. It was so extreme that it was like some parody of evil, but we had the same experiences, and when the prosecution made faces at me as I was on the witness stand, it was the turning point of my life. So, Gary’s account of the John Tower conversation has 110% credibility with me. The implications of the Tower conversation should be prime grist for the JFK mill, but until I published my essay, Gary had been ignored by virtually all researchers, except for Michael Collins Piper’s Final Judgment, because Gary took the Jewish mobster angle on his theorizing. Gary met Jack Ruby back in 1947, when he was a VIP member of Mick Cohen’s entourage (Ruby worked for Al Capone early in his career), so Gary’s Jewish mobster theorizing was not too far out there, although my personal belief was that their involvement was as hit men, not masterminds. I consider a mobster shooter team one to be of the likelier suspects, along with some CIA contract agents. I believe that the Cuban exile milieu, which Oswald was up to his neck in, was not only where the fake assassination attempt scheme was hatched, by Hunt, but the real shooters likely hailed from that same milieu, but their efforts were directed from a few levels above people such as Hunt and Tower. You may notice, however, that Jews do not come up at all in the John Tower conversation. The Jewish angle was Gary’s, understandably. Jewish mobsters wrecked his life and tried to kill him, and one in particular still sits on a federal bench to this day, in his 90s, and is a noted “liberal” judge, which is standard gangster cover. Not long before Tower died in a “tragic” plane crash, Gary had a subpoena served on Tower, and Tower looked like he swallowed his shoe when Gary’s pal served it. It has been kind of bizarre to have all manner of fringe-dweller hearsay be key parts of the JFK evidence, while a cop who constantly waged battles in the legal system was almost completely ignored. I’ll soon write on the many implications of the Tower testimony, but for now it is off to work. Best, Wade

Hi: This is going to take more than one post. It is related to another series that I have been writing, on scientific literacy and how we “know” what we know. I’ll say up front that any serious JFK assassination student has encountered numerous theories on who did the shooting. Most “other-than-Oswald” theories have a team doing the deed, from international teams to mobsters to the CIA to the Secret Service to the Dallas PD, etc. I remember one theory in which some aristocrat who could shoot with both hands blazed away from the lawn as the motorcade passed. The theories range from the surreal to the plausible to the likely. For me, just who pulled the trigger(s) is not really all that important. Their employers are infinitely more interesting, and on that score, I doubt that the public will ever truly know, and there are also “free-lance” assassination team theories, too. Whew! I am onboard with the idea that JFK was killed because he angered the oligarchy, the MIC in particular, as he tried to end the Cold War. He then had to go, and every president since JFK has known that his position was dependent on how servile he was, but they all knew that long before they became president. You have to sell your soul to get close to that throne. Sitting American presidents are little more than puppets, and JFK was probably the last president who really tried to rock the boat. The spectacle of his campaign against U.S. Steel has never been seen again, not even remotely. More on that later, but I want to get back to what I “know” about the JFK hit and why. My initial data point is also the strongest for me: I am as close to 100% certain as I can be that Gary reported his meeting with John Tower, et al., as accurately as he could. Gary was a policeman and investigator, and was trained to recall events like that. I have several reasons for believing the veracity and accuracy of Gary’s account, and one is that he went out of his way to help me in my hour of need, which directly led to the biggest miracle that I ever witnessed, as the forces of evil were backed up a few steps and we survived to try again. Dennis wrote his first book from his jail cell when it looked like he would never live to see this side of the bars again. Gary’s book was written after his career had been destroyed, writing between customers at the gas station and store that he bought after his career was wrecked (and Ventura County’s gangsters eventually stole that from him, too). He wrote most of his book in the early 1970s, and his wife typed it up. I wrote diary accounts of my adventures after surviving my first stint with Dennis, and Dennis and Gary did better than I did under far more duress. Their books are remarkable documents. In the late 1990s, a retired policeman befriended me, and he witnessed one of the events in Gary’s book, and Gary told it straight. I independently believed Gary’s account of some events that he wrote of before I ever heard of his book. He named names, many of which I knew and knew of, including the father of my only pal from my Ventura childhood days that I still keep in touch with. For none of the events that Gary wrote of, that I was familiar with, did I ever think that Gary was not writing it as he saw it. My CIA pal Ralph McGehee blew a different kind of whistle, and I have known plenty of whistleblowers and have been called one myself, and I can see why. Insiders such as Gary and Ralph, who risked a great deal to write and publish their books, are in my pantheon, and anybody who thinks that they did it for money or fame does not understand people like that. They did because their consciences would let them do no less. I know the kind all too well. Gary had a violent job, and his wife once told me that Gary was a fighter, not a lover, and he never quit taking on the gangsters that run the system. The data point of that meeting with Tower I have heard called the tent pole of a master theory that brings most pieces of the assassination together under one explanatory scenario. It is one hell of a data point. The players and the way that it happened is the most extraordinary JFK-related event that I have heard of, recorded by one of the participants, who was an active investigator at the time. I never saw any credible piece of evidence contradict any part of what Gary recorded of that meeting. I have seen arguments that Tower and Decker were somehow setting up Gary and Audie Murphy with some disinformation, but it really strains credulity to think so. Murphy and Decker were close friends. I think that Decker had a terrified and anguished John Tower on his hands, and wanted to get something on the record, as some kind of “ace in the hole,” to perhaps protect Tower, but Tower gets conscience points, IMO, for doing what he did. The “facts” that come out of Gary’s account of that meeting are many and important, such as: Oswald was a military intelligence asset; After returning from the Soviet Union, Oswald became part of a covert action talent pool that E. Howard Hunt tapped for what seems for all the world like the CIA’s version of Operation Northwoods, and the CIA, FBI, military, and even members of JFK’s cabinet were in on it; Somebody turned the fake assassination plot into a real one, and the people involved with the fake plan were caught flat-footed (more patsies), and their confusion and fear provided Tower the opportunity to get his story into Murphy’s and Gary’s hands; After their initial shock passed, all the players in the fake assassination plot decided on a cover-up at all costs, in a CYA move. Because of my certainty that Gary was reporting that meeting as accurately as he could, I have not believed any of the “lone nut” stuff since the 1980s. Many aspects of Gary’s account have been vindicated many years later, such as the Northwoods documents and Gary’s statement that JFK was killed because he tried to end the Cold War. The Northwoods revelations also shed new light on the Edwin Walker “assassination attempt,” which Gary also wrote about, and accurately, it seems. I have much, much more to write on this subject. Best, Wade

Hi Brad: Thanks again for the kind words, I have to run off to work now and will reply more tonight, but briefly, the JFK hit was one of the two starkest memories of my childhood, with the other being the Apollo 1 fire a few years later. That was more of a family trauma than a national one, however. People have been suggesting to me for 15 years to parlay my writings into books and advanced degrees, but that is not my path. I am trying to save the world! I’ll write more on Decker, etc., tonight. I give great weight to Gary’s account of his meeting with Decker and Tower, which has always been my center-of-gravity for the JFK hit, and I’ll discuss some possible scenarios around it, some of which have been suggested by others. For me, the bottom line is that Oswald certainly was not the lone nut, and the resultant frame job and cover-up speaks volumes about our system’s legitimacy. But the interests that had JFK killed were likely down the food chain a ways from the people on top. Best, Wade

Hi Brad: I see that you updated your post since I wrote my reply. I’ll buy the idea that the throat shot could have killed JFK by itself (as it likely hit his spinal cord), and the head shot was superfluous. Could the SS guys also have been among the shooters? It would not be the first time that the royal bodyguards helped out with a coup. I have recently been responding to the SS accidental shooting scenario, and if any SS bullets hit JFK, I think it highly unlikely that they were accidental. I admit that I am not very well read on SS-shooter or cop-shooter theories. I have always thought that it was a sniper team. That was some highly accurate shooting, to hit JFK in the throat, back, and head, even if the limo was slowed down for the last shot. I favor marksmen in a triangulation ambush. That is just my opinion, and Oswald was not one of them. Thanks for writing. Best, Wade

Hi Brad: Thanks for the kind words. They mean something, coming from this forum, which has seen many high-quality researchers and scholars in it. Other than reading JFK and the Unspeakable and The Devil’s Chessboard in recent years, I have not studied the JFK hit evidence much since 2001. My center of gravity was always seeing how the evidence fit with Gary’s story, but I ended up getting familiar with the evidence, enough to draw some of my own conclusions. Some of framing Oswald was for that operation to frame Castro, but some was to frame him as the shooter after the hit happened. That would have been a relatively easy frame job, given the framing that had already been done, and the way it was pulled off was brilliant, in that those who participated in the initial Castro frame job, including the FBI, CIA, and military, would have gone into CYA mode, as Decker told Murphy, making the cover-up relatively easy. I think that the double-cross of the Castro framers is partly what created so many threads of evidence that make the JFK assassination issue so complex for serious investigators, and the obvious disinformation from the government, plus the three-ring circus around it (like 9/11), make making sense of it all a tall task indeed. For me, the magic bullet theory made it obvious how strained the official explanation was, to eliminate there being more than one shooter. Dealey Plaza was a perfect setting for a crossfire ambush, and that motorcade route was carefully planned for the operation, not only for the frame Castro operation, but the real hit. To your writings on recent events, you mean that the police may have been involved in murder?! When the dust settled in Ventura, I thought that cops and lawyers were about the lowest forms of life. But Gary was a cop and I have worked with lawyers daily for 15 years or so (corporate, not criminal, law), so I know that there are good people in the ranks, even mostly good people. The drug trade has indeed turned many cops into hit men and the like. A generation ago, I worked with a man who was a former military policeman, in narcotics, and I told him how the judges ran the drug trade in Ventura County, with the police in on it, and his reply was, “Wade, that happens in every county in the USA. The temptation of all of that money is irresistible to them.” So, yes, no big surprise that the cops may have committed mass murders recently, and framed up their victims, etc. After we sprung Dennis from jail, some reporters from an alternative newspaper in Kern County (where Bakersfield is) covered Dennis’s case, and I talked a little with them. They told me about one story that they had been investigating for years in which a couple of cops were high on cocaine, were driving like mad through town, ran a red light, and plowed into a woman’s car. The cops died, as I recall, the woman barely survived, and she was the one being prosecuted for manslaughter or some such inanity, and the Kern County officials were making it stick. I am way closer to stuff like that than I want to discuss right now, but in short, I would not be surprised if cops were involved in those Ohio murders (I used to hike near where those murders happened), and cops and bikers is an explosive mix. Waco sure has been in the news way too much for deadly events in the past generation. Thanks for writing. Best, Wade

Hi: Back to what I “know” and how I know it, I am going to do an ET post. I have never met an ET in the flesh, at least that I know of. All American children have heard plenty about ETs, from the media, with many stories quite old. I suppose that War of the Worlds was the first biggie of the modern era. There has been a strange dichotomy of portraying ETs as malevolent threats or the “Space Brothers” who have been secretly saving us. I think that both views are the result of humans projecting their hopes and fears. Of course, there has also been a cottage industry of debunkers, claiming that it is all a mass delusion, etc. While I heard plenty about UFOs/ETs in my young adult days, and my paranormal experiences made them seem not too unusual, I really did not pay too much attention to the idea, at least until my first stint with Dennis ended. When I began hitting the books, the UFO/ET situation was one of dozens of topics that I tackled. Seth actually told our channeling group where to go watch UFOs in flight and when, and those who went were not disappointed. Quite a few in my circles told me of their UFO encounters, and they were usually high-powered professionals, scientists, etc., not tin-foil hatters. A year after staggering out of my home town, radicalized, I met Brian, and a half-hour later we were driving past the front gates of the world’s largest air force base and joking about the ETs stored there. The next year, Brian mounted a UFO conference, was soon approached by high-ranking military officials to do classified UFO work, and Brian nearly died immediately thereafter. Ten years later, Brian told me that his brush with death was their response to his “no” reply to their “offer,” as he was made an offer that he could not refuse. After I got Brian’s NASA bio published, one of the leading space debunkers took on Brian’s Martian credentials. I had been slimed by the “skeptics” for many years by that time, and considered organized skepticism to be a criminal enterprise, but it was educational to be on the receiving end of a space debunker’s work. How stupid it all was. I was embarrassed for the debunker, even as he attacked my bio work. It was not the slightest bit rational, and when he finished heaving his tawdry “debunking” effort, he flitted off to other debunkery. After many years of seeing the debunkers at work, I am not sure that there is any value to their work. I don’t want them to be the focus of this post, but just wanted to note how invalid their work is. The ET and FE cover-ups are related, and constitute history’s biggest cover-up. I see three ways to become knowledgeable on the UFO/ET issue: Have encounters with them; Be close to people who do; Examine the evidence. I took all three approaches, and I have been to James Gilliland’s Ranch four times between 2005 and 2015, and saw something inexplicable each time, although the first encounter was the most spectacular. I did not need to go see UFOs to “believe” in them, and went to James’s ranch to go see them, in a situation where the odds were high that I would. I would not have traveled to distant lands to do it, but I was willing to do something local with a high probability of success. After Brian’s brush with death, he became a leading supporter of Greer’s Disclosure Project, along with Ed Mitchell, whose views on the ET issue are very close to mine. We had a strange encounter with Jackie Gleason soon before he died, and only many years later did it become clear why. Of course, there is a blizzard of disinformation on this subject, spun by “insiders” and others, with the New Age/conspiracist crowd lapping it up. It is a three-ring circus, and is one of the many minefields that seekers of truth have to try to navigate, and it is not easy. I know as much as I need to know about the subject. I am not waiting for the “Space Brothers” to save us from ourselves, and the “threat” that they represent is almost wholly a concoction of Godzilla and his MIC underlings, as fear is how they stay in the driver’s seat. I will soon write about the moon landings and “insider” revelations. Best, Wade

In reply to a pal in another forum, I am making another JFK post… I’m going to do something that I have not done publicly before, and write about what I think happened on that fateful day and what the best pieces of evidence are, and what does not pass muster. First of all, the entire lone gunman hypothesis rides on the back of the magic bullet theory, and if that does not pass muster, the entire lone gunman theory collapses, as admitted by all sides of the issue. The magic bullet theory is about the most strained body of “logic” that I have seen, Gerald Ford was eventually rewarded with the presidency for his promotion of it, and Arlen Specter was rewarded with a long political career for concocting it. Specter likely came up with it with a little help from his friends, such as Allen Dulles. Let’s start with the bullet’s alleged entry into JFK. JFK had a wound in his back, several inches below his shoulder and inches to the right of his spine. That wound was probed during the autopsy, and it ended in his back. JFK had a wound in the center of his throat, several inches above where that bullet entered his back. That bullet hole was used for the tracheotomy that was performed on JFK at Parkland, and the doctors who used that wound described it as an entrance wound, and you can see how clean the edge of the bullet hole is in the autopsy photos. In order for the magic bullet theory to work for JFK’s wounds, the bullet had to enter his back, make a radical left turn and pass through his vertebra, to pass out of his throat. Right there, the magic bullet theory falls apart. That bullet had to have hit a vertebra in order to exit his throat, and if it did, it would have shattered, as the one that hit his head did. Not only would it have shattered, it would have begun tumbling. It would have left a very messy exit wound, if any, not the clean one in JFK’s throat. But that was only the beginning of the magic bullet’s fanciful flight. According to the official story, that bullet somehow went through JFK’s spine without shattering or even tumbling. If you look at the footage, Connally can be seen being hit by the bullet seconds after JFK clutches at his throat. Connally had the air forcibly ejected from his mouth by the force of the bullet that hit him, seconds after Kennedy clutched his throat. One bullet did not do the damage to both men. The bullet(s?) that hit Connally made several wounds as it traversed his body, also hitting bones. So, one bullet made several changes in direction and plowed through a few bones as it passed through both men, without shattering or even tumbling as it exited JFK’s throat. Nobody but Warren Commission defenders takes that fairytale seriously, but the most bizarre part is still to come. While the bullet left numerous fragments in Connally, it was not recovered…until it was “discovered” on an unused stretcher (neither JFK nor Connally were placed on it) in nearly pristine condition, at the hospital. If you are a student the JFK hit, it is one of many instances when “evidence” magically appeared and disappeared, including the camera used for the backyard photos and JFK’s brain. Again, nobody who did not gulp the Warren Commission’s Kool-Aid takes any part of the magic bullet theory seriously, and the bullet magically appearing on an unused stretcher was obvious evidence of it being planted there to help frame Oswald. So, far from a cover-up, especially of some “accident,” there was an active frame job begun from the day it happened. The magic bullet theory is just one of many instances of preposterous reasoning marshalled by the Warren Commission to arrive at its foregone conclusion. Again, my orientation was to see how the evidence matched Gary’s story, but I ended up getting very familiar with a lot of the evidence. There are many issues with Oswald’s being the lone gunman. The motorcade route was not announced until that morning. How the hell could it be some kind of coincidence for a man without a motive to come running with his rifle of dubious provenance and do the deed? As Gary noted, the one conversation among arms experts across the globe in the weeks after the assassination was that there was no way that Oswald could have put two bullets in Kennedy from that position, in a few seconds, with that cheap Italian rifle. Also, that motorcade slowly taking those hairpin turns through Dealy Plaza acted against Secret Service regulations, and when professional snipers looked at that crime scene, it was a perfect set-up for a crossfire assassination. What a coincidence! Here is what I think happened that day. Some in the Secret Service were in on it, Oswald only knew that his role as the assailant was about to be played, to justify invading Cuba, and the shooters were ready in their positions when the motorcade came around the corner. The so-called sniper’s nest in the book depository was likely just for show and used to frame Oswald, not where any of the shots came from, or at least any important shots from that Carcano. There were probably at least three shooters, triangulated, with one in front, one in back, and one from the side. JFK was hit from the front, first, which was why he grabbed at his throat. At least two shots came from the back in quick succession, hitting him and Connally, and the final shot came from the front, which blew out the back of his head. A piece of his head was what Jackie scrambled onto the back of the limo to retrieve. The chauffeur completely ignored Secret Service protocol by bringing the limo to nearly a complete halt as the fatal shot was fired (which the Zapruder film may have been altered to conceal). The driver was supposed to accelerate and get the hell out of there when the shots rang out, not slam on the brakes, which made the job of the assassins much easier. Something very close to that series of events is what I think happened, and Oswald knew within seconds that he had been set up. He did what he could, but he could spill the beans and had to be taken out immediately, and he was, by some Jewish mobster with the craziest explanation of all: saving Jackie from any more anguish. Ruby was a hit man for Al Capone at the beginning of his career. He was no two-bit hood. I could go on for days about aspects of the official explanation that stink to high heaven. Again, knowing Gary removed any doubt for me that Oswald was anything but a lone nut. Oswald was a military intelligence asset, which is obvious to anybody in the field. As Schweiker said, the fingerprints of intelligence were all over everything about Oswald. He was just another expendable covert action asset, like my relative was. Best, Wade

Hi: Back to what I “know,” how I know, and what my confidence is. Let’s do FE. I first heard of FE from Dennis about Joe Newman, soon before our Seattle company was stolen. Did Newman have anything? Beats me, but Joe gets credit for being the first person that I heard of on the FE front, but Joe also thought that he was The Second Coming, which is a professional hazard in the field. The day after I got to Boston, chasing my teenage dream, Dennis got his first FE idea. I soon brought in Mr. Mentor, to see if we really had anything. He did not call Dennis’s idea “impossible” and eventually proposed marrying Dennis’s heat pump panels with his engine to do FE, which was when we began flying high and Godzilla decided to do something about us. Neither Dennis nor I had even heard of Nikola Tesla back then, we were so ignorant of what we had stumbled into. These were the days before the Internet. But we soon began hearing tales of woe, however, and when they dropped the sledgehammer on us, it was no great surprise, but it was still a shock. The moment when I saw those trucks and cars speed into our parking lot was the beginning of the worst year of my life, by far. When the dust finally settled and soon before I moved away from my home town, never to return, Mr. Researcher told me about his meeting with Sparky Sweet. He did not name Sparky, whose name I did not discover until the next year, when I met Brian, and it was not until several years ago that I discovered that Sparky lived just down the road from us. Sparky had the goods, and no wonder Godzilla became so concerned about our effort. The threat that we presented was not so much Mr. Mentor’s or Victor Fischer’s engines being married to Dennis’s heat pump panels, but Dennis’s teaming up with somebody like Sparky. Of course, Sparky was hounded to a grim and lonely end. A decade after meeting Brian, I met Mark, and heard his story at an NEM meeting in 2003, and I heard plenty about Adam Trombly’s adventures and those of other fellow travelers. Eugene Mallove was murdered a few months later, which spurred Brian to move to South America, understandably. So, I eventually became very immersed in the FE milieu, from my initial, gung-ho ignorance, and a generation ago, one of my very close associates received a little show from people who were likely part of Godzilla’s disenchanted faction, and several years after hearing my friend’s story, I began witnessing Greer’s Disclosure Project witnesses testify, and what some of them described was exactly what my friend was shown. FE and antigravity technology, exotic materials not far removed from Flubber, and other mindboggling toys were demonstrated to my friend, whose eyes were bugging out of his head. I heard plenty more from other fellow travelers over the years. Neither Brian nor I wanted to catalog the stories, like others have, but Brian knew about 25 dead inventor stories, and I got tired of hearing the stories back in the 1980s. Internet surfers and YouTube watchers are never really going to “know,” but my adventures and those of my relatively few fellow travelers removed any doubt I may have harbored about disruptive energy technologies and their organized suppression. I have been in the room with FE prototypes, but what was far more impressive was listening to my fellow travelers describe their adventures. Some had world-class professional standing, aside from their FE activities. I had no credibility problem with them. What my friend saw removed any doubt that I might have harbored about FE and its viability. I don’t need to have a show like that. I have seen enough on my journey, and playing at the level where you get a show like that is also playing at a level where you have risked your life for years. No thanks. I had enough of that for a lifetime. Is that enough for my pupils to “know” that FE technology is at least possible? For my best ones, it is. Sure, there is nothing like seeing it for yourself, but this area is so perilous that unless somebody begins playing at the high levels, risking their lives, they aren’t going to get any closer to working FE devices than interacting with somebody like me, and there are not many like me. Nobody that I know who has played at my level interacts with the public like I do, and I don’t blame them. I have taken plenty of abuse over the years, and even recently, and have gotten pretty picky over the years. My fellow travelers do not bother and wonder what the point is, interacting with the rabble like that. Well, I am looking for needles in haystacks, and this is about the only way that I can do it without risking my life, and I can do it cheaply, too. I don’t need any money to take this approach. Time to go hiking. Best, Wade

I am going to put this one in two threads: Hi: I have a little time to write this weekend. On JFK, one pal wrote this post, and it brings up a good subject for the other forums that I post in. Before the modern era of studying mass extinctions, scientists proposed a hundred hypotheses for the dinosaurs’ extinction. It became an intellectual parlor game, and we now know that virtually none were valid, other than the bolide impact hypothesis, and the volcanism hypothesis still has not gone away, as a big volcanic event happened then and sea levels seesawed. I was just reading something on that this morning. As contentious as the dinosaurs’ demise has been for scientists, it all pales beside the scenarios that have been proposed for JFK’s murder. Probably a thousand different scenarios have been proposed, almost all along the lines of a conspiracy of some kind. As I wrote, the most bizarre that I have personally received is that JFK faked his own death, and I have heard the half-joke that if the Warren Commission had the opportunity to take another crack at it, that they would have concluded that JFK committed suicide! I mention that “accidental” Secret Service theory as an example of the many theories out there. That theory is not as bizarre as the Washington Post’s theory that there were two shooters, who did not know of each other and coincidentally fired at the same instant. Yes, crap that crazy is out there, even spun by such an establishment stalwart as the Washington Post. Most Americans are not aware that a plot very similar to the likely one in Dallas was foiled in Chicago a few weeks before JFK was murdered. There are way too many connections like that one to make any kind of lone nut, “accident,” or “coincidence” theories highly questionable. So, I don’t consider the Secret Service “accident” theory to be very credible. However, there are plenty of lines of evidence that some Secret Service personnel were involved in the assassination, and it can trip the light fantastic to go too far into it, but briefly… One theory says that JFK’s chauffeur did it, based on a misleading analysis of the Zapruder film, where some reflections are interpreted to portray the chauffeur’s turning and firing at JFK during the event. That is just another example of the wackiness around the issue. Here are some lines of evidence that I think are likely valid, while not all point to the perpetrators, they point to something very different from the “lone nut” scenario. Douglas Caddy’s interview is very compelling, and I have no doubt that Lyndon Johnson was every bit as dirty as portrayed, with his own private hit man. The idea that Johnson was involved in the JFK hit has plenty of evidence to at least give it credence, but he really was a minor leaguer. But he may well have been in the know, as far as something going down (as Bush the Second may also have known that something was coming), as when the fatal shots rang out, Johnson dove to the floor of his limo. When the limo got to Parkland Hospital, Johnson ordered the limo cleaned up, thereby compromising the crime scene, and he shared a frank moment with a Congressman as he was sworn in next to a bloody Jackie, as the Congressman winked at what appears to be a grinning Johnson. There were a number of irregularities in the Secret Service’s activities that day, to give weight to the notion that at least some of them were in on it. There has been controversy for 50 years over the Zapruder film and accusations of tampering. I think that the accusations may have something to them, and at least some frames were removed, partly to cover up the fact that the limo came almost to a halt when the fatal shots were fired, exactly contrary to Secret Service procedure. That chauffeur was likely not all that innocent, doing his part to make the head shots easy. There is a photo of him getting off the witness stand at the Warren Commission hearings, wearing a big grin. I really could go on for days on the many lines of evidence that point very clearly away from the “lone nut” Warren Commission version. The Commission was corrupted from the outset, as the man whom JFK fired over the Bay of Pigs, Allen Dulles, ran the commission. That smelled very similar to when Bush the Second appointed Henry Kissinger to head the 9/11 commission. I had a pal from Manhattan, who lived there when 9/11 happened, and she was skeptical of the “inside job” angle on 9/11…until Bush appointed Kissinger, and then she decided that it was probably an inside job after all. I’ll say this about the JFK theories: those that argue that the JFK and RFK hits were unrelated don’t have much credibility with me. The Kennedy family has more than hinted that they were related, and I think it very likely that high-profile assassinations and attempts, with a “lone nut” scapegoat served up each time, became a “sport” in the spook world for about a generation. Also, in those years, FE inventors regularly met untimely ends, and when the spooks take you out, great pains are taken to make it appear as something other than premeditated murder. That just comes with the profession. While there is a mountain of evidence, some very compelling, that point away from the lone assassin hypothesis, if I had not known Gary, I wonder how certain I would have been about the idea that Oswald was not the lone assassin. I think that I would likely be fairly certain, but Gary’s testimony removed all doubt for me, and it has been gratifying over the past quarter-century to see new evidence coming to light that further confirmed Gary’s account of meeting with John Tower. In summary, I am certain the Oswald was not a lone nut, and I am pretty confident that elements of the MIC were behind the hit, as they had the means, motive, and opportunity to both murder JFK and cover it up. While Hunt stated to Caddy that JFK’s murder was to prevent him from revealing ET secrets to the Soviets, I think that that is a bit of a red herring (which even Hunt may have believed), as the high-level spooks had to have known that the Soviets knew plenty themselves about the situation. I think that the likely scenario is that JFK was not compliant enough to corporate America and the military establishment, and was quietly trying to end the Cold War, which was the raison d'etre of the spooks and friends, and a source of endless profits for the MIC, so he had to go. All American presidents since JFK have been outright puppets and they know it, and none have been in the loop on the ET issue. My view on the matter is close to Ed Mitchell’s. But I think that all the Sturm und Drang over identifying just who all was involved and what their role was is a little misguided. The lesson of the JFK hit, to me, is how evil our system is, from top to bottom, in that the head of state can be murdered in broad daylight in front of hundreds of witnesses, and it all got covered up. Trying to finger the assassins more than 50 years later is going to be an exercise in futility, and it serves to muddy the waters, IMO. It is plenty to know that the official version is a pack of lies and the general direction that the assassins likely hailed from. The rest usually flies off into thin evidence and hoary realms of speculation. Again, if you immerse yourself in that milieu for long enough, it can challenge your sanity, and if you ever got close to unmasking the conspirators, your life expectancy would greatly diminish. Best, Wade

Hi: I have a little time to write this weekend. On JFK, one pal wrote this post, and it brings up a good subject for the other forums that I post in. Before the modern era of studying mass extinctions, scientists proposed a hundred hypotheses for the dinosaurs’ extinction. It became an intellectual parlor game, and we now know that virtually none were valid, other than the bolide impact hypothesis, and the volcanism hypothesis still has not gone away, as a big volcanic event happened then and sea levels seesawed. I was just reading something on that this morning. As contentious as the dinosaurs’ demise has been for scientists, it all pales beside the scenarios that have been proposed for JFK’s murder. Probably a thousand different scenarios have been proposed, almost all along the lines of a conspiracy of some kind. As I wrote, the most bizarre that I have personally received is that JFK faked his own death, and I have heard the half-joke that if the Warren Commission had the opportunity to take another crack at it, that they would have concluded that JFK committed suicide! I mention that “accidental” Secret Service theory as an example of the many theories out there. That theory is not as bizarre as the Washington Post’s theory that there were two shooters, who did not know of each other and coincidentally fired at the same instant. Yes, crap that crazy is out there, even spun by such an establishment stalwart as the Washington Post. Most Americans are not aware that a plot very similar to the likely one in Dallas was foiled in Chicago a few weeks before JFK was murdered. There are way too many connections like that one to make any kind of lone nut, “accident,” or “coincidence” theories highly questionable. So, I don’t consider the Secret Service “accident” theory to be very credible. However, there are plenty of lines of evidence that some Secret Service personnel were involved in the assassination, and it can trip the light fantastic to go too far into it, but briefly… One theory says that JFK’s chauffeur did it, based on a misleading analysis of the Zapruder film, where some reflections are interpreted to portray the chauffeur’s turning and firing at JFK during the event. That is just another example of the wackiness around the issue. Here are some lines of evidence that I think are likely valid, while not all point to the perpetrators, they point to something very different from the “lone nut” scenario. Douglas Caddy’s interview is very compelling, and I have no doubt that Lyndon Johnson was every bit as dirty as portrayed, with his own private hit man. The idea that Johnson was involved in the JFK hit has plenty of evidence to at least give it credence, but he really was a minor leaguer. But he may well have been in the know, as far as something going down (as Bush the Second may also have known that something was coming), as when the fatal shots rang out, Johnson dove to the floor of his limo. When the limo got to Parkland Hospital, Johnson ordered the limo cleaned up, thereby compromising the crime scene, and he shared a frank moment with a Congressman as he was sworn in next to a bloody Jackie, as the Congressman winked at what appears to be a grinning Johnson. There were a number of irregularities in the Secret Service’s activities that day, to give weight to the notion that at least some of them were in on it. There has been controversy for 50 years over the Zapruder film and accusations of tampering. I think that the accusations may have something to them, and at least some frames were removed, partly to cover up the fact that the limo came almost to a halt when the fatal shots were fired, exactly contrary to Secret Service procedure. That chauffeur was likely not all that innocent, doing his part to make the head shots easy. There is a photo of him getting off the witness stand at the Warren Commission hearings, wearing a big grin. I really could go on for days on the many lines of evidence that point very clearly away from the “lone nut” Warren Commission version. The Commission was corrupted from the outset, as the man whom JFK fired over the Bay of Pigs, Allen Dulles, ran the commission. That smelled very similar to when Bush the Second appointed Henry Kissinger to head the 9/11 commission. I had a pal from Manhattan, who lived there when 9/11 happened, and she was skeptical of the “inside job” angle on 9/11…until Bush appointed Kissinger, and then she decided that it was probably an inside job after all. I’ll say this about the JFK theories: those that argue that the JFK and RFK hits were unrelated don’t have much credibility with me. The Kennedy family has more than hinted that they were related, and I think it very likely that high-profile assassinations and attempts, with a “lone nut” scapegoat served up each time, became a “sport” in the spook world for about a generation. Also, in those years, FE inventors regularly met untimely ends, and when the spooks take you out, great pains are taken to make it appear as something other than premeditated murder. That just comes with the profession. While there is a mountain of evidence, some very compelling, that point away from the lone assassin hypothesis, if I had not known Gary, I wonder how certain I would have been about the idea that Oswald was not the lone assassin. I think that I would likely be fairly certain, but Gary’s testimony removed all doubt for me, and it has been gratifying over the past quarter-century to see new evidence coming to light that further confirmed Gary’s account of meeting with John Tower. In summary, I am certain the Oswald was not a lone nut, and I am pretty confident that elements of the MIC were behind the hit, as they had the means, motive, and opportunity to both murder JFK and cover it up. While Hunt stated to Caddy that JFK’s murder was to prevent him from revealing ET secrets to the Soviets, I think that that is a bit of a red herring (which even Hunt may have believed), as the high-level spooks had to have known that the Soviets knew plenty themselves about the situation. I think that the likely scenario is that JFK was not compliant enough to corporate America and the military establishment, and was quietly trying to end the Cold War, which was the raison d'etre of the spooks and friends, and a source of endless profits for the MIC, so he had to go. All American presidents since JFK have been outright puppets and they know it, and none have been in the loop on the ET issue. My view on the matter is close to Ed Mitchell’s. But I think that all the Sturm und Drang over identifying just who all was involved and what their role was is a little misguided. The lesson of the JFK hit, to me, is how evil our system is, from top to bottom, in that the head of state can be murdered in broad daylight in front of hundreds of witnesses, and it all got covered up. Trying to finger the assassins more than 50 years later is going to be an exercise in futility, and it serves to muddy the waters, IMO. It is plenty to know that the official version is a pack of lies and the general direction that the assassins likely hailed from. The rest usually flies off into thin evidence and hoary realms of speculation. Again, if you immerse yourself in that milieu for long enough, it can challenge your sanity, and if you ever got close to unmasking the conspirators, your life expectancy would greatly diminish. Best, Wade

I am giving the JFK issue a little more ink, here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=22798&p=329034

Hi: I have a busy day ahead of me, so this will be short, on what we “know” and levels of confidence. I don’t shrink from controversy in my work, but I generally take the scientist’s/scholar’s approach. I largely keep the mystical stuff in its own pond and, really, the main point of the mystical stuff is to show how materialism is a religion that can be easily falsified, and that the high ethics of the masters, guided by love, is really about the only “mystical” orientation that we need. I am going to make some posts on the JFK hit, the moon landings, ETs, FE, “insider revelations,” and maybe some more topics and what I “know” and what my confidence levels are and why. I was five when JFK was murdered, and all that I remember is watching his funeral procession on TV as my mother watched, seemingly sick. My mother worked for the Lyndon Johnson campaign in 1964, and there were LBJ stickers on objects in our house for the remainder of my childhood. My parents always voted Democrat, even though my father was a right-wing redneck. I almost went into the military, which was a family tradition, but a couple of years later, I became a pacifist (as a result of my mystical studies) and that voice in my head sent me to business school, which is the province of Republican voters. Although I aced the curriculum, I never quite fit in. My father thought that the Warren Commission was a cover-up, and JFK came to his military base once and walked right past my father, and when I was older, my father told me that one of his colleagues walked through the halls at work, shouting his approval the day that JFK was murdered. In the USA, the JFK hit was like 9/11 (or Pearl Harbor), in that every American who lived through it knew what they were doing when they heard of it. And all three events could well have been manufactured by the USA’s ruling class, to manipulate the herd. I have the most confidence regarding those three events that JFK was not killed by a lone assassin. Lee Harvey Oswald was just as he said, a “patsy,” but I really did not pay much attention to the JFK assassination until I met Gary Wean. It was the darkest time of my life, and Gary gave me the best advice that I could get: no authority in the USA, or any “human rights” group, was going to intervene in the evil acts taking place in my home town. It was just another day in the USA, as gangsters run it, with politicians little more than puppets. Gary went out of his way to help me in my hour of need, and his advice directly led to my springing Dennis from jail. So, Gary has been in my pantheon from that day forward. It turned out that Gary had the inside scoop on the JFK hit, hearing from John Tower three weeks after the hit that Oswald was a military intelligence operative being used in a CIA plot to stage a fake assassination attempt on JFK, to frame Castro, to justify invading Cuba, and it somehow “backfired.” It was really a small part of his book, and because of what Gary had done, he had complete credibility with me. If Gary said that he heard that story from Tower, he did. That is non-negotiable with me. It turned out that Gary wrote about my home town, and the same interests that he fought, who tried to kill him, had also ruined my life, almost certainly on instructions from higher powers. When Dennis did not take the carrot, it was time for the stick. When I moved away from Ventura, never to return, and hit the books, trying to make sense of what I had survived, the JFK hit was one area that I studied. I have a pretty hefty JFK section in my library. I never saw even one piece of credible evidence that called Gary’s story into question, and evidence kept coming to light over the years that powerfully confirmed it, such as the Operation Northwoods documents. I am 100% certain that Oswald was not some lone nut, but my readers did not have the privilege of knowing Gary. But if people do their homework, the evidence richly supports the idea that JFK was murdered by powerful interests, and it was all covered up, with relatively token efforts taken by Carter and Clinton, after the Warren Commission cover-up. Knowing that Oswald was not some lone nut is a very different issue from knowing exactly who did it. Gary was a cop and professional investigator. He met Jack Ruby while tailing Mick Cohen, and Gary took the Jewish mobster angle in his JFK theorizing. Well, Ruby was a Jewish mobster, so the Jewish mobster angle is not farfetched. For what it is worth, while I believe that mobsters, Jewish and otherwise, were involved, I think that they were more hit men than masterminds. Their interests aligned with those who wanted JFK dead, and they were happy to help. To this day, people approach me with their JFK assassination theories, and the most bizarre that I have been approached with was that JFK staged his own fake assassination so that he could retire from the limelight and let Jackie marry her great love, Ari Onassis. Whew! But that is only the most extreme of the bunch. The recent revelation, that JFK was killed because he was going to reveal the ET presence to the Soviets, is far more credible, but the interests who had JFK killed certainly knew that the Soviets knew plenty themselves, so I think that the ET angle was a red herring justification used on relatively low-level operatives such as Hunt. I am onboard with the idea that the MIC had JFK killed because he tried to end the Cold War, and while Allen Dulles played his malevolent role, and may have been involved in the hit as well as the cover-up, he was likely also a lower-level player. Much bigger hands were moving those chess pieces. Like Gary, I hear from all sorts of people who want to “solve the crime” and finger the assassins. Personally, I think that it is a quixotic goal of dubious value. To me, the lesson of the JFK hit and cover-up is how evil our system is, in that the head of state can be murdered in broad daylight in front of hundreds of witnesses, and it all gets covered up. That is the most important lesson, and attempts to identify the perpetrators seem motivated to absolve our system and serve up the villains, so that we have another out-group to heap scorn on. The enemy is us, not some outside agents, and every one of us, every day, contributes to how our system works. Nobody gets off by repudiating their responsibility for how the system works, not even me. But taking responsibility is the first step to being able to change it, as we cannot change it if we don’t own it. That is how creators go about it, while victims bewail their fate, seeking heroes and villains. I have more to write on JFK, but it is off to work. Best, Wade

Hi: This post will be related to the scientific literacy issue, and has to do with how we “know” what we “know.” I vividly remember my Philosophy 101 class in college, and the arguments from Ancient Greeks, Enlightenment philosophers, to modern philosophers. David Hume was kind of the ultimate rationalist, taking Descartes’s “I think therefore I am” idea further, stating that all that we “know” are the thoughts, and that does not even imply a thinker. Those days of ferment led to today’s scientific method, and similar approaches are used to produce good scholarship. Organized religion is built on faith, and science on doubt. They are diametrically opposed approaches. Materialism, however, is as much of a faith as Christianity is, which materialists do like hearing, but it is true. I easily falsified materialism as a teenager, through my personal experiences, and they are not hard for others to reproduce for themselves, and there has been a great deal of scientific investigation, but since consciousness is a non-material phenomenon, it is not very amenable to the process of materialistic investigation. Consciousness is never going to be presented in a glass case in a museum. Scientists ideally never speak in terms of absolutes (such as “impossible” or “always”), but they deal in levels of confidence, with that ever-present doubt always somewhere in their heads. Take the idea of Earth being spherical. There is actually a hypothesis, with an organization built around it, that Earth is flat, and it is not a joke. Just last year, a pal knew somebody who believed in the Flat Earth hypothesis’s validity. Any teenagers with a little gumption can falsify the Flat Earth hypothesis for themselves. So, the Flat Earth hypothesis is not a very robust one, and no astronauts who have been in space belong to the Flat Earth society. If I hold up a coin and let go, a million times out of a million, that coin will drop to the ground. There is a mysterious force called gravity, which keeps everything on Earth on Earth, unless it can overcome gravity. Hydrogen can overcome Earth’s gravity, if left alone for long enough. Another way is to build a rocket, which is how those spacefaring astronauts no longer believe that Earth is flat. Another is to build antigravity technology, which is one of those sequestered technologies in Godzilla’s Golden Hoard. But not many people are ever invited to a show like that. It could happen to me, but I would rather not play at the level of the game where I become a candidate for that, because I would also be a candidate for being murdered. I do not plan to ever play in that rarified air. I carried the spears of those who played there, and I don’t plan to do that again. Witnessing an antigravity demonstration moves gravity from being a “law” to being something else. The best scientists always made the frank admission that we don’t know what any of it really is, not energy, gravity, light, etc. So, what are scientists confident about? Well, without some amazing technology or strange mystical power, that coin is always going to drop to the floor. For fossil interpretation, there are four general levels of confidence, from inevitable conclusions to guesses. In science, hypotheses come and go. Einstein famously said that every theory was eventually killed by a fact, and he fully expected that his theories would one day fall by the wayside, but that the best parts of his theories would survive in the next ones. Well, a century later, his theories are still going strong, although the Black Science world operates from different theories, the kind that antigravity technologies support. I’ll have more to write on this subject, but it is off to a long day at the office. Best, Wade