Joseph Backes

I'm "surprised" too (to put it mildly). I have no idea when Lawson made the statement. If he knows anything about guns, he knows the oft quoted statement that (usually) a bullet "goes in small" and "comes out big." So I don't understand why, at this late date, he is claiming (on the one hand) that he saw a large hole at the back of JFK's head, and yet insists there were no shots from the front. On the other hand, any statement made decades later--when he never included such information in his original report--is really not of very much use, from the standpoint of evidence. DSL 6/17/10 1:50 AM PDT Los Angeles, CA David, Don't discount evidence merely because it comes late to the party. The people of Derry in Ireland can tell you that. What I think happened here is one of two things, either the writer put this in, or it's the ol' cognitive dissonance. This will probably be brought to Lawson's attention at some time and he will correct the record saying the writer of the article got something wrong, or more likely we have something that has happened over and over again in this case. People dig their heels in and say "no conspiracy, no conspiracy," and "the Warren Commission was right," and then they tell their story which is in conflict with some aspect the Warren Commission version. Many are completely ignorant that the story they are telling is in conflict with the WC version. The Connallys believed in the WC but always gave a version of the shooting that was in direct conflict with it. They always said JFK was hit, then John (Connally) was hit then JFK was hit in the head. They never understood that was not the WC version, that their version did not support the WC version. Perhaps Lawson really doesn't know that his statement, if this is indeed what he said to the writer of the article, has never been said before by him. Perhaps we are dealing with yet another witness who had his testimony altered, or dropped into the black hole of "discussion off the record." I think we should call for the 6th Floor to open up and invite JFK researchers to this Secret Service get together. At least allow us to ask questions. This is an important issue that should be pursued. Exactly what did Lawson see? Joe Backes

See - http://hamptonroads.com/2010/06/do-you-remember-where-you-were-he-does-jfk#rfq Also - http://justiceforkennedy.blogspot.com/2010/06/virginian-pilot-article-on-winston.html

See - http://justiceforkennedy.blogspot.com/2010/06/opportunity-calling.html

Ha! I like it. Joe

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!! And down goes Specter! Hello Senator Joe Sestak! Well, he still has to fight some Repug in the ggeneral election but I think he'll win. What a great night!

Rep. Joe Sestak appears t be winning as of 10:15 p.m. tonight May 18, 2010. YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AP: SESTAK WINS!!!!!!

http://justiceforking.blogspot.com/2010/05...ience-road.html Joe Backes

Thanks folks. There is a great article on this topic by Mark Bridger "The Myth of the Depository Roll Call," in The Dealey Plaza Echo, Vol. 11 No. 2 July 2007 which is on the Mary Ferrell site. See - http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/...mp;relPageId=41 Also, Sylvia Meagher, "Accessories After the Fact," p. 85-90.

Hello, I hope someone can help me. I'm looking for a source in a book, or in the WC or HSCA, or a document, that proves that LHO was not the only employee unaccounted for from the TSBD after the assassination. Thank you. Joe Backes

That should tell you all you need to know about Gary (not his real name) Mack. Joe Backes

Hello, See - http://justiceforkennedy.blogspot.com/2010...-air-right.html Joe Backes

Hello all, It's been hard to keep up with the advances in the case made by Doug Horne. I still have not read his 5 volumes. I have tried to make a point of listening to his interviews on radio and podcasts. Recently, he was on in 4 parts on Jim Fetzer's podcast called "The Real Deal." I have made a transcript. First, a word about them. I make them for my own benefit as they help me, and I offer them free to all as they will probably help you too. I do so freely. I would appreciate it if you find them valuable to consider making a donation, a whole dollar amount please. And a word to Josiah Thompson, I am not up on the latest alteration vs. anti-alteration war waging on this forum and or elsewhere, though this alteration idea is gaining some traction with me. Jim Fetzer insults you pretty severely in these transcripts. I do not share Fetzer's view of you. So, to make this fair and or fun for you, play the Jim Fetzer drinking game. Everytime Fetzer refers to himself, his books, his conference, and his podcast, always in the most (cough) humble of terms (cough) have a drink. Enjoy! See - www.justiceforkennedy.blogspot.com Joseph Backes

"...your statement that one Congressional Oversight hearing would be sufficient. I think not. " Bill Kelly That is not what I said, and I'm getting tired of you. I want to get a congressional hearing on the JFK Act and how poorly it is being implemented since the sunsetting of the ARRB. If, we can get one it would be a very positive start. But, NOOOOO, You are hell bent on doing everything you possibly can do to prevent anything of the kind from happening. You want everything, multiple hearings from multiple committees, you want a grand jury in Dallas, you want the body exhumed, and lots of other things, you want all of it immediately, right now, and even if you did get all of that you would still want everyone to believe what you believe in the case, you will use your beliefs as a litmus test, as a bludgeon, before you will support any movement by anyone towards anything. And you do all of this as though you are an advocate for a congressional hearing, when nothing could be further from the truth. You didn't even notice that you spelled the congressman's name wrong! I had to tell you how to correctly spell Rep. Edolphus Towns name over and over again. And after correcting it, you're still insulting to him! You have on your blog, "...and will happen as soon as someone convinces Edolphus Towns (D. N.Y.), the chairman of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, to do his job and hold them." That is insulting to Rep. Edolphus Towns. I can't get it into your head that insulting the man accomplishes nothing. You are self-defeating. You are ridiculous. So, Goodbye, Bill Kelly. Goodbye.

Hello, I made a transcript of Doug Horne's appearance on Black Op Radio from Dec 10, 2009. It's available on my blog www.justiceforkennedy.blogspot.com While you're there you can order a copy of his 5 volumes through the Amazon.com link on the top left side. Joe Backes

John, Thanks for informing us. I'm sorry to hear of his death. Joe Backes I found an online obit from Legacy.com Mr. Harold (Hal) Verb Died on December 4, 2009. Born in Philadelphia on April 14, 1931, he moved to San Francisco in 1962 and worked as a printer and bookseller. He declared his atheism at age 17 after reading works by Emanuel Haldeman-Julius, and eventually acquired one of the largest collections of the author's "Blue Books" in the U.S. A recognized pioneer in the Bay Area atheist movement, he was on the board of American Atheists' local chapter and later helped to form Atheists of the San Francisco Region. Hal will be missed by the Bay Area atheist community. Hal Verb guest book: http://www.legacy.com/gb2/default.aspx?bookid=2843405698416

John, Thanks for informing us. I'm sorry to hear of his death. Joe Backes I found an online obit from Legacy.com Mr. Harold (Hal) Verb Died on December 4, 2009. Born in Philadelphia on April 14, 1931, he moved to San Francisco in 1962 and worked as a printer and bookseller. He declared his atheism at age 17 after reading works by Emanuel Haldeman-Julius, and eventually acquired one of the largest collections of the author's "Blue Books" in the U.S. A recognized pioneer in the Bay Area atheist movement, he was on the board of American Atheists' local chapter and later helped to form Atheists of the San Francisco Region. Hal will be missed by the Bay Area atheist community.

John, Thanks for informing us. I'm sorry to hear of his death. Joe Backes

Jack, Can you post exactly where John Woods found this? Was this in the JFK Records Collection at Archives II? If so, did it have a RIF#? Was there any document number associated with this photo? Joe Backes

Ha! Thanks Bernice. You can see me back behind the speaker at 8:47, and then again between 9:11--9:14. I was trying to adjust my backpack. That first speaker, BTW, was Mike Brownlow. We found you , there he is PAT.... YOU CANNOT GET AWAY EVEN WITH A BACKPACK ADJUSTMENT... TAKE CARE HOPE YOU HAD A GRAND TIME...BEST B.. I'm there too. At about 2:21 - 2:23 I walk in front of the camera. Dark hair, dark blue suit jacket. Behind me a guy named Russell, don't remember his last name and Ian Griggs, of Dealey Plaza, U.K. are talking to each other. Earlier there's a guy, older looking gentleman, with a hat and what looks like an ascot around his neck, that's Ernie Brandt, a man who came forward about 5 or 6 years ago and says he was a witness to the assassination. I haven't met anyone yet who believes him. At about 4:25 there's this guy in a blue shirt who helps Groden sell stuff. He's talking about the Tippit murder. Behind him are two women and a man. The woman with white hair, a black top and red skirt, and a leather strap of a purse or handbag is J. D. Tippit's widow. I know this because I saw on TV where she was interviewed. There was a local Dallas TV channel that had a news segment where someone has a car made up to look exactly like what Tippit was driving. At about 6:03, no, the dog did not answer to the name lambchop. At 6:05 in a red-ish brown kind of plaid shirt and bluejeans, that's Larry Hancock. Joe Backes

THE JFK CASE: WHAT INFORMANTS ARE STILL OUT THERE? By Bill Simpich (about the author) Page 1 of 3 page(s) For OpEdNews: Bill Simpich - Writer There are many questions about the JFK assassination that can easily be answered - but only by eyewitnesses who aren't going to be alive for much longer. Do the math: It was 46 years ago this week. It's time for these eyewitnesses to tell their stories - or for the rest of us to at least know who to ask. Thanks to the JFK Act of 1992 passed in the wake of Oliver Stone's well-known movie, many of the assassination documents were released in the last few years - but the rest are being held back to 2017 or even later. These documents are filled with blacked-out portions that hide the names of the informants and sources of the spy agencies. Some of these names we can figure out. I'll name a couple of them here. Others have gone public. All these names need to be public, before more of these sources pass away from old age. Here's why it's important. Whether or not Oswald was a spy, he was in the middle of some intriguing operations centered in New York City a and Mexico City during the months before Kennedy was shot. The purpose of these operations was not merely to spy on the pro-Castro Fair Play for Cuba Committee, which was the main antiwar network of the era and similar to United for Peace and Justice or ANSWER. Rather, the goal was to isolate Castro's government in the eyes of the world and to pave the way for a second invasion of Cuba, much like George Bush's second invasion of Iraq. These operations appear to have been used by someone - whether it was Oswald or someone else - as “protective cover” behind which they could engineer the assassination of JFK, causing the intelligence bureaucracies to instinctively cover up and protect their jobs and pensions, even at the cost of concealing known evidence about Oswald. Who was using who? Individual claims for privacy are important. But in this case, justice demands that all available information be brought forward now. Embedded in this history are the strategies that push the American people into war - over and over again. It's Time for Fair Play for the FPCC In November, 1962, one month after the Cuban missile crisis, the New York papers were filled with headlines about a Cuban plot to bomb Bloomingdale's, other midtown shopping establishments, and military installations throughout the metropolitan area. Arrested were one of the members of the UN Cuban mission and two members of the Casa Cuba Club, a club of pro-Castro Cuban exiles allied with the politically active Fair Play for Cuba Committee (FPCC) headquartered in New York. This supposed 9/11-style plot was denounced by Attorney General Robert Kennedy and was yet another major black eye for Cuba and its allies. Whether this plot was real or faked, the evidence was never tested in court - the supposed saboteurs were returned to Cuba in April 1963 in exchange for CIA officials that Cuba refused to return in the recently-completed prisoner exchange from the failed Bay of Pigs invasion. When Lee Harvey Oswald wrote his first letter to the Fair Play for Cuba Committee HQ in New York in April 1963, he asked for “forty to fifty” free copies of a 40 page pamphlet. In a remarkable turn of events many years later, the author of the pamphlets turned out to be holding a receipt for 45 of these pamphlets from the CIA Acquisitions Division. These pamphlets were mailed to Oswald by FPCC worker Victor Thomas Vicente. Earlier this year, I was able to identify Vicente as a key informant for both the CIA and the FBI's New York branch. After mailing the pamphlets, Vicente provided Oswald's letter to the FBI New York office as part of a “black bag job”, where he let FBI agents into the FPCC office so they could photograph the documents. During the summer of 1963, the CIA sent Victor Vicente to Mexico City, then known as the “spy capital of the world”, and then to Havana to meet directly with Castro and Che Guevara and to film his travels for review upon his return to New York. On September 16, 1963, John Tilton of the CIA's maritime operations branch sent a memo to the FBI asking for help in an operation designed to make the Fair Play for Cuba Committee look bad. He asked the FBI to provide FPCC stationery and an FPCC mailing list. Again, Victor Vicente took care of that request during the next month, and included in his package correspondence from Oswald. Another request made by Tilton was to plant “deceptive information” to embarrass the FPCC in areas where it had support. This may have been the reason for Oswald's trip to Mexico, whether he knew it or not. Oswald got in line to get a Mexican visa the day after Tilton's letter. Standing right in front of Oswald in line was William Gaudet, an editor of Latin American Reports, who worked with both the CIA and the FBI. It's time to look at the impersonation of Oswald In late September, Oswald visited the Cuban and Soviet embassies in Mexico City for the purpose of getting visas to visit both countries. As Oswald was a former defector to the Soviet Union and was planning on traveling with his Russian-born wife, CIA officials such as Cuba chief David Phillips admitted "we covered this man all the time." After Oswald's capture on November 22, the HQ Mexico desk chief John Whitten wrote that among his fellow employees at Langley, “the effect was electric”. Two well-informed staffers had a footrace down the corridor for Oswald's file. Many very strange events occurred during Oswald's visit. One is that although there was constant CIA photographic surveillance of those two embassies, the public has never seen a picture of Oswald in Mexico. Although the CIA's Mexico City chief of station Win Scott had been asking since October for a good photo of Oswald to compare against the photos they believed they had taken of Oswald, headquarters had never supplied one. Even though Scott was supposedly warned by his assistant Anne Goodpasture that she "felt that it should not be sent out" as he might have the wrong picture of Oswald, he sent to DC immediately after the assassination a picture of a man that he wrongly claimed was “a certain person who is known to you” at the Soviet embassy. After the dust settled, Scott came up with good pictures of Oswald standing outside the Cuban embassy, and two CIA men backed this story. These photos were removed from Scott's safe after his 1971 death by counterintelligence chief James Angleton, and have never seen the light of day. Meanwhile, Scott sent a tape of Oswald calling the Cuban consulate on October 1 along with the picture. The FBI reported in writing that not only was the photo the wrong one, but the tape was not Oswald's voice! This tape is the strongest evidence that Oswald was actually impersonated in Mexico City. That tape, like Scott's photos of Oswald, was also in the safe and has also been buried in the dark recesses of the government's archives. We still don't even know who at the FBI listened to the tape. The CIA said nothing about Oswald's visits to the Cuban embassy in their lengthy memos about Oswald's activities in Mexico City. Richard Helms explained later that it was to “protect sources”. These sources may exist to this day, and may even shed light on the impersonation of Oswald. J. Edgar Hoover called LBJ and reported the impersonation of Oswald to him. LBJ was aware that the CIA was trying to preserve "freedom of movement" to make the argument that Oswald's ties to Cuba were the basis to declare war. Once Oswald was assassinated by Ruby on November 24, LBJ and the FBI both seized the opportunity to proclaim that Oswald acted alone, and proceeded to conduct a cursory investigation - rather than open up a discussion of Oswald's possible sponsors that led to danger no matter where the evidence might go. When the House Committee on Assassinations tried to interview the photographer (known variously as LIONION-1, LIFEUD-22, and LILILLY-1) of the Cuban embassy in the late 70s, the CIA interviewer initially assured them "no problem", set up an elaborate process to protect his identity, and then waited them out until the committee was about to disband at the end of 1978. In effect, the CIA told the committee - "oh, we told you months ago, he's in Madrid, and it would be a lot of work to make it happen. In fact, Alberto Rodriguez Gallego had been in Madrid since 1972, with the CIA complaining that he might be a "double agent" To my knowledge, nobody's ever conducted a full-on interview of Alberto Rodriguez Gallego. Why did the CIA distrust their own operatives immediately after Oswald's visit to Mexico? Gallego has been questioned before, as had most of the CIA's surveillance operatives who were in contact with Oswald - but this questioning took place before JFK's assassination. In studying the recently released records, I found previously unreported lie detector tests conducted not just on Gallego, but on the two CIA agents that ran the much bigger intelligence operation on the Soviet embassy; technical support on the embassy watch (LIMUST) the mobile surveillance team that followed Oswald (LIEMBRACE); most of the members of the airport surveillance operation of Cuban travelers (LIFIRE) and the intelligence operation at the university (LIMOTOR). They even polygraphed the political operative that supported people stuck in the city for weeks trying to get a Cuban visa (AMSUPER-1) and the political operatives in the city of Monterrey where Oswald's bus stopped overnight (LIVALVE-1 and others). All of these lie detector tests were conducted in the two weeks immediately after Oswald's departure. Except for possibly the Mexican students - a story that is a story in itself - I see no indication that polygraphs were scheduled for any of these operatives, nor that they had been polygraphed for years before Oswald's visit. What happened during Oswald's visit to trigger all this distrust among the CIA's most trusted operatives? There is one final new story I need to tell about the Mexican CIA station - this one goes back to the first months of 1963 and illustrates the nasty nature of CIA business. The Guatemalan Coup of March 1963 During 1963, on orders from headquarters, station chief Win Scott conducted a self-described harassment campaign against the former President of Guatelmala, Juan Jose Arevalo. This harassment included mailing “poisoned” candy to Arevalo's family (which included five children) as he campaigned for a second chance to serve as president while in exile in Mexico City. These documents also reveal that the CIA staged a scenario designed to make Arevalo believe that the Cubans at the embassy were planning to bomb him. The Cuban government was allied with the Guatemalan dissidents, and this was an effort to split Arevalo from other dissidents. There was even a faked “montage” photo of Arevalo standing with a Soviet military attache that was released to the Guatemalan newspapers during this shortened campaign, which ended abruptly with a military coup before the election. This military coup plunged Guatemala deeper into more than thirty years of terrible civil war that claimed 200,000 lives. After the Guatemalan coup, Arevalo finally left Mexico for good the day after the Kennedy assassination, with the CIA monitoring his movements very closely during those final two months. Juan Jose Arevalo was known as the FDR of Guatemala. His supporters, known throughout the Americas as “Arevalistas”, praised him for bringing democracy, free speech, and social services to his part of the world between 1944 and 1951 as Guatemala's first President. In exile in Mexico City, Arevalo was returning to the national stage by running for President a second time until a military coup ended his chances in March 1963. Why was his family receiving death threats over the telephone and “poisoned” candy in the mail? Why were Cubans supposedly planning to bomb him? Why were the newspapers trying to ruin his campaign by running phony pictures with him alongside a Soviet general? David Phillips, the CIA's chief of covert actions during this era, had won a Distinguished Service Medal, one of his agency's highest awards, for his work in overthrowing the Guatemala government. Throughout the early sixties, he was active in operations designed to undermine the FPCC. In early October, 1963, Phillips was transferred to become chief of Cuban operations and doubtlessly played a role in the decision to engage in mass polygraphs. The montage photo is eerily reminiscent of a famous March 1963 photo of an armed Lee Harvey Oswald holding together in his fist the newspapers of the Socialist Workers Party and the Communist Party. One of the only projects that those two parties were ever able to work together was in the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, which Oswald joined the next month. In one way, whether this photo is real or faked is immaterial. The photo was created to ensure that Oswald was seen as a person who could bring Communist forces together around Cuba with the power of the gun. That remains Oswald's image to this very day. If those of us in the United States are serious about understanding our history in places like Guatemala and in Cuba, we will take action in the next few years to ensure that all of the documents about this era are fully released, including the names of the sources and informants. If that happens, we will learn a lot more about how "dirty tricks" affected US history as well as those in other lands. Write Congress and call on them to enforce the JFK Act by releasing all the documents and all the government's sources of information. When the American people are willing to take an unblinking look at ourselves and our institutions, the Kennedy assassination will no longer be a mystery. - Bill Simpich is a civil rights attorney and an antiwar activist in the San Francisco Bay Area. He can be reached at bsimpich@gmail.com

You beat me to it, Jack. See - http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/JFK-Investigati...e-69782592.html Also - http://texashistory.unt.edu/explore/collec...owse/?start=190 Joe Backes

Hi Joseph, it was on October 25, 1961 when General Lucius Clay at Checkpoint Charlie let 10 tanks arrived. Very close to the border. On October 27, 30 tanks from each side, USSR and USA were confronting for about 16 hours. Unfortunately i don't know the name of the unit. I have this information from a german website. Hope it helps a bit Martin Hi Martin, It helps. Thanks. But, what I'm really interested in is where the tanks came from. I believe they came from West Germany and crossed East Germany until they got to Berlin. I'd love to see any photo of the crossing into East Germany, if anything like that exists. I want to know how long did it take to get to Berlin? I vaguely remember John Newman mentioning this, I think at a JFK conference somewhere. Joe Backes

Hello, I need a citation. JFK sent tanks across the East German border to defend West Berlin in the Berlin crisis. I want to know the date and the unit name of the tank division. I'm having trouble finding this and would appreciate any help. Thanks very much. Joe Backes

Bernice, I'm amazed! I had not seen that photo of JFK with Caroline and lambchop. I've seen another photo very like this one, maybe there were several taken that day. There's one on the cover of a big coffee table picture book. Email me at joebackes@gmail.com, and tell me where you've got these images from. Thanks. Joe Bernice, You've jumped the gun a bit here. I do not have images or video of this on my blog as yet. I merely wrote about Wallace Milam's discovery, but I was still looking for photographic material to demonstrate it. I'll show what you've got and posted here. BTW, if you know if this clip is online, youtube,com or elsewere let me know and I'll put that on my blog to. Joe Backes HI JOE..sorry if i jumped the gun somewhat but this was such good news, well to me anyway..so many witnesses are and continue to be attacked and as we now are seeing hopefully once more with new info coming to light.....she has been unfairly....HERE IS THE WEE GIF I HAVE SAVED THAT I HAVE OF LAMB CHOP THIS HAS BEEN OUT FOR MANY YEARS SINCE...93 AS REPORTED BY CONNIE....KRITZBERG AND EVEN THOUGH THIS HAS BEEN POSTED IN THE PAST ON SEVERAL FORUMS THEY WHOMEVER, MAKE EXCUSES AND STILL CANNOT CHANGE THEIR PRE CONCEIVED IDEAS.....WHERE IT HAS APPEARED...THEY STILL ACCUSE HER OF MANY THINGS.......I DOUBT NOW, NO MATTER WHAT YOU DO FIND AND POST AND MANY THANKS FOR SUCH...THEY WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO ADMIT THEY WERE IN ERROR.IMO..EAT CROW YOU PEOPLES WHOMEVER AGAIN.......MANY THANKS FOR YOUR WORK.TAKE CARE B http://jfkhistory.com/whitedog.gif I have watched it many times, now one thing I notice is that no woman handles a small bouquet of flowers, by clutching it in the middle of such, it is held by the stems, and the last time we see whatever, it appears to be a small bulky item, of perhaps the same thickness and is squarish, ?? and if you notice as her left thumb, grasps it in the middle...whatever gives as if it was stuffed with something soft ? could be..?..well I imagine flowers would also do that, but..?? Could it be she was not only given a small bouquet of white flowers but also, a Lamb Chop, Dog or such......?? I realize it is an aside, but Jean has been given such a hard time over the years for her recollections, and one of the few that stood firm.....but they say because she lied about this, she lied about all...b/s...imo..So whenever I come across anything that may prove such, Ihave snaggled it.BELOW IS ALSO the information From "Secrets from the Sixth Floor Window".. 1994.BY .Connie Kritzberg.. page.178.. Jean Hill "A statement made to me by Jean Hill plagued her for years, and bothered me as well. She said there was a "fluffy white dog" between the President and Jackie. She was ridiculed by a number of people, she related , in her story written by Bill Sloan entitled "The Last Dissenting Witness". I found the statement somewhat embarassing, and I wished I had considered omitting it,( Nov.22/63 for her newspaper story, I believe she is referring to...bm..) but there was no time for reflection. Copy boys were relentless in seizing the paragraphs almost before the paragraph was typed.. Only in 1993 was television news coverage shown which portrayed Jackie Kennedy accepting a small white "Lambchops" stuffed animal which she showed to Jack and carried to the limousine with her. Jean Hill was vindicated, and I was vastly relieved both of us when the footage was shown to participants at the 1993 ASK symposium held in Dallas. Hill had been ill, her father had recently died, and she did not see the comforting clip. On what small and relatively insignificant points of fact reputations rest...."end... I guess the problem is, was that those in attendance at the 93 Ask, in Dallas did not get the information out.......?? Too bad, as Jean is still ridiculed on this subject, they still use it...on the web... I believe I recall Jack White saying that he met Jean quite often over the years, and spoke with her many times, and she never changed her story...I Think it was Jean that was called the "cookie lady"...during Oliver Stone's filming the "JFK movie, or was that Mary Moorman.....?? and looked forward to her arriving....with the treats... The Lamb Chops and Jackie photos I posted are from Jack White's research ...work..TO WHOM THE SOME IMO THEY OWE AN APOLOGY TO ALSO.... B.M ...........P.S SEEN BELOW IS A PHOTO OF JFK AND CAROLINE WITH HER PUPPET LAMB CHOP THAT HAD BEEN SEEN PUBLICIZED PREVIOUSLY IN MAGAZINES..

Bernice, You've jumped the gun a bit here. I do not have images or video of this on my blog as yet. I merely wrote about Wallace Milam's discovery, but I was still looking for photographic material to demonstrate it. I'll show what you've got and posted here. BTW, if you know if this clip is online, youtube,com or elsewere let me know and I'll put that on my blog to. Joe Backes