Jonathan Cohen

3 hours ago, Jean Ceulemans said:

So we have @Mark Ulrik doing what should have been done ages ago, and now he is being accused of alterations?!? Nuts...

Thank you Mark for your time and effort, I´d say you have done a really good job, for the benefit of all!

Amen. Thie logic employed by some people on this forum is absolutely bananas, in my opinion.

Really? Now the evil alterationists are adding "fake necklines" to images that are already absurdly small and low resolution in the first place? Does it ever end?

Roger, do you agree with other claims on this thread that the Sixth Floor Museum is in possession of an "altered" copy of the film?

37 minutes ago, Denis Morissette said:

Of course not. 😂

Great. So now maybe Sandy Larsen can retract his falsehoods about said alteration?

1 hour ago, Denis Morissette said:

It is the copy they’ve had since 2006 and that is available for viewing at the Researcher’s Room.

In other words, it certainly has not been "altered" within the past few years for the purposes of embarrassing specific researchers, as has been claimed..

Yawn. Once again, we're subjected to "every film and photo taken in Dealey Plaza is altered." 

5 hours ago, Jean Ceulemans said:

I can tell you I was not happy seeing Groden introducing a fake without referring to it as such.

The fact that people have let Groden off the hook for this is pretty telling about the evidentiary standards of many so-called JFK assassination research.

2 hours ago, Joe Bauer said:

Are the backyard photos fake?

Nope!

2 hours ago, Joe Bauer said:

Do the rifle and pistol shown in those match the ones held as evidence by the DPD and FBI?

Yes, they do.

4 hours ago, David Josephs said:

@James Norwood @Sandy Larsen

So we're all ok with a Moderator of this forum putting HORNE in the same category as SPECTER and POSNER?

 

Neither James Norwood or Sandy Larsen are moderators of this forum.

59 minutes ago, Gil Jesus said:

They're brainwashed into believing that a biological male who says he is a female, is the same as a female and thus can compete in women's sports. As a result, women are getting destroyed by "trans women" in their own sports. Why not give the trans their own sports ? Why not give the trans their own restrooms ?

Doesn't that make more sense than allowing biological men into ladies rooms used by 8 year old girls ?

Hardly surprised to see more disgusting, anti-trans BS here from Gil Jesus, who previously lectured this forum that "only God" can decide a person's gender. Moderators: I beg of you to remove this content.

14 minutes ago, Sandy Larsen said:

 

1. Photo densitometery has proven that the back part of Kennedy's head at 313 and several frames afterward are artificially too dark to be natural.
2. A massive blowout wound occurs during these same frames, centered on Kennedy's right temple. Yet the autopsy photos show his right temple to be intact, as does the autopsy report.
3. Not a single witness saw the massive right-temple wound.

Every single one of those statements is false.

11 minutes ago, Sandy Larsen said:

Given that it has been proven that the Z film has been altered, I believe that the Hawkeye Works theory is correct.

No such thing has been proven at all, ever, in any form - especially on this forum.

13 hours ago, W. Niederhut said:

Certainly, some alternative theories are flawed, but no honest, informed person accepts the Lone Nut theory.

This is a troubling statement, particularly coming from a forum moderator ...

1 hour ago, Sandy Larsen said:

I have a great deal more respect for a person who has studied a seemingly irreconcilably contradictory situation-- like 911 or Harvey & Lee -- and formulated a theory explaining it, than for a person who disparages such a theory out of ignorance and offers no alternative explanation.

You're joking, right? Alternative explanations for EVERY major "Harvey & Lee" talking point have been provided here and numerous other places.

5 hours ago, W. Niederhut said:

        James DiEugenio and Denny Zartman commented, accurately, on the Fred Litwin podcast thread that it is a shame to see this kind of propaganda on the Education Forum.       

But yet it's OK for people to run amok on this forum with absolute and utter nonsense like the "Harvey and Lee" theory? What's the difference? Who is the arbiter of what's "disinformation" and what's not?

1 hour ago, Kevin Balch said:

If Lundahl and McCone were not in on the plot, weren’t they shocked by the conclusion of multiple shooters from the briefing boards?

Careful, Kevin. You're making far too much sense for the alterationists on this thread :).

17 minutes ago, Denny Zartman said:

According to James Files

There's your first problem right there!

On 7/25/2024 at 12:36 AM, Kevin Balch said:

If Brugioni saw a camera original or a first generation copy on Saturday night, why didn’t he see the (supposed) limo stop?

If Zapruder filmed all or parts of the motorcade at 48 frames per second, why wasn’t this noted when the film was projected in Dallas or at NPIC on Saturday night?

If the film was altered, what is the explanation of the (supposed) correlation of the timing of the four shots from the acoustics evidence with the Zapruder film?

All great questions, Kevin. They reveal the massive alteration theory to be a house of cards.

29 minutes ago, W. Niederhut said:

Herr Ulrik

Is that really necessary?

35 minutes ago, Pete Mellor said:

The Secret Service's stripping of JFK's protection in Dallas followed by their Bethesda casket conjuring tricks alone would incite any reasonable person to question the validity of other aspects of the case.

Nobody said you can't "question the validity of other aspects of the case." The problem is that when you actually look at the EVIDENCE, the notion of massive alteration of the assassination film and photo record is shown to be absolute nonsense.

Uh huhhh.. so if that's actually Lansdale in the tramps photo, what was he doing? Why made him move over to where the tramps were at that very moment, especially in light of the facts that the tramps were in fact nothing but actual tramps and not in any way whatsoever connected to the assassination?

57 minutes ago, Sandy Larsen said:

Though I'm surprised you found a flaw in it, given that nobody else has been able to. What exactly is the flaw?

Or are you just making stuff up again?

The flaw is the entire premise! As Pat very capably explained to you, "there is no scientific or historical basis for selecting statements and then claiming these statements 'prove' what you claim to be true. A scientist or an historian might take from this that these statements suggest a certain scenario, but there is no such thing as 'proof.'"

1 hour ago, Tom Gram said:

So yes, the only “evidence” the Z-film was ever in Rochester at all is sole-source second-hand 34 year-old hearsay from a witness with major credibility problems. 

Lastly, the CIA HRG did NOT confirm the Z-film was in Rochester. All they did was tell the ARRB that the name “Hawkeye works” was still classified TS/SCI, and that the McMahon interview must be marked and stored accordingly. That’s it. They did not comment at all on the substance of McMahon’s claims. 

Thank you, Tom. Once again, Sandy Larsen is completely wrong with his "statistical proofs" above.

5 hours ago, Sandy Larsen said:

Roughly 40 of the 45 gaping head wound witnesses said early on that the wound was located on the back of the head and not at the top. It is statistically impossible for that many witnesses to all get the location wrong.

So Jeremy is wrong in this instance.

This is proof that the Z film has been altered. As has the back-of-head autopsy photo.

Sandy Larsen has proved absolutely nothing with his "statistics," and his insistence on repeating this from thread to thread hardly makes his argument more convincing.

2 hours ago, Robert Morrow said:

There is EVIDENCE but you don't have to believe it. Prouty, Krulak and Morrow all think that was Lansdale in that pic with the three tramps. You are welcome to have a different point of view.

Unfortunately, I don't believe it, and hardly any veteran researcher I know does either.