Jump to content
The Education Forum

Ian Kingsbury

Members
  • Content Count

    488
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Ian Kingsbury

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday 10/05/1956

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    just far enough north of London
  • Interests
    Coaching football ,reading ,watching West Ham when pos. trying not to comment on West Ham when pos. unhealthy thirst for knowledge any knowledge.

Recent Profile Visitors

13,037 profile views
  1. Ian Kingsbury Nobody testified to a bullet wound in the throat at Parkland or Bethesda, and John Stringer autopsy photographer in his AARB questioning indicated the probe from the shallow back wound did not enter the chest cavity with the lungs removed,Dr. Perry stated 3-5 mm slightly oval ENTRY wound , he cut through this in order to place a trach pipe in the throat as the hand breather was having no effect ,no debris in the throat(otherwise the trach tube could not have passed) David Lifton measured the wound as 1 inch deep and it did not cross the trac
  2. Nobody testified to a bullet wound in the throat at Parkland or Bethesda,

    and John Stringer autopsy photographer in his AARB questioning 

    indicated the probe from the shallow back wound did not enter the chest cavity with the lungs removed,Dr. Perry stated 3-5 mm slightly oval ENTRY wound , he cut through this in order to place a trach pipe in the throat as the hand breather was having no effect ,no debris in the throat(otherwise the trach tube could not have passed) David Lifton measured the wound as 1 inch deep and it did not cross the trachea.

    The entry wound was only seen after the cutting of the shirt and tie,therefore the bullet would have to pass through a minimum of 15layers of cloth which it did not as the tie only has a small slit and does not penetrate all the layers making up the tie.
    same with the shirt the slits line up when buttoned.

    Dr. Perry did not leave the throat in the same way we see at Bethesda,but then nobody has seen the official Stringer Photographs

    just the Fox edition With the military towel under the head and not taken by Stringer ,Although he was ordered to sign for the envelope containing

    the false pictures as were others these “authorisations” were utilised

    By the Justice Department through the senate and Church committee
    hearings .

    the Justice Department also wrote Humes scripts for the NBC “ Oswald did it “ specials.

  3. Hey Bill, just a theory but considering witness testimony of there being two men seen in the windows, and the reports of the "fake" SS agents in and around the building and the two unidentified "plain clothes" coming down the stairs. I'm thinking it was a classic sniper team. Shooter and Spotter. The Shooter hides the weapon and the spotter rearranges the boxes to resemble a fighting position and frame "the patsy". This gives them time to complete both actions and then head down the stairs. They split up, one goes out the back and one goes out the front. If they encounter anyone they can show
  4. Bill If we eliminate all but "strangers" in the TSBD at the time and places We have put them it leaves Jack Edwin Dougherty. And we know very,very little about him! Where do you start? Ian
  5. Theres is no peice of evidence that will convince YOU! And never will be.
  6. Almost correct no proof in 1963 Less proof of Oswalds guilt now And the AARB DID NOT HAPPEN DAVE! Have you found out who pm is yet!
  7. All the kings horses and all the kings men Humpty dumpty sat on a wall Could not put Humty together again Humpty dumpty had a great fall In the correct order is a rhyme Otherwise they are just STATEMENTS Personally i think he was pushed How many people did Truly vouch for?
  8. I think they would have to admit that Bill Hicks was correct "No fkin Oswald in the window"
  9. Robin, Thank you so much for uploading these higher-quality frames from Darnell. I certainly will not be renaming Prayer Man 'Prayer Woman', because the frame above puts the matter pretty much beyond doubt: This is Lee Oswald. The womanly appearance is due to the fact that a ) his sleeves are rolled up; b ) the eye is confusing the back of a woman's head with part of Lee's torso. Here's the woman in question's lower leg and foot: If you place your finger to the screen to cover where her head should be, the chief source of the 'Prayer Woman' illusion becomes apparent. This is Lee O
  10. Robert Have you read this thread? http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19782&hl=%2Bdesham+%2Bdenham#entry263986 Ian
  11. Sean Both Baker and Truly knew Oswald was "in the building" therefore they could put him Anywhere they wanted by shift the witness evidence to not conflict too much with thier story. What this does is add more weight to the fact that the 3rd/4th floor "Arrest" by Denham did occur!. This also supports the twin evidence we see with Braden and Florer and the two sets of tramps. Also remember Braden said in his HSCA. Evidence that they were bringing out The rifle holding it by the STRING! A quick shift of evidence can move the time and location or by ommiting it altogether helps their
  12. According to Armstrong and Bakers first day affadavit there was a meeting on the third Or fourth floor involving Truly and a man in a tan jacket. Officer Denham arrested a man on the third/fourth floor acting suspiciously Also seen by sawyer and officer Hill and is in Trenthams report! FLORER/BRADEN were apprehended acter third floor incidents. If they can switch floors how much more difficult to switch buildings? Denham was on traffic at Elm and Houston is there a mix up useful to Confuse like all the double evidence we see right through this case? If prayer man is Oswald then Baker d
  13. In absence of a veiw at other research on this matter. Are some assuming its not Oswald because :- He has to get to the lunchroom so Baker can avoid the man on the 3rd/4th floor? He could not be there and on the 6th floor as the same man is seen just after the shots He had just arrived from the grassy knoll?. Oswald mentions guiding someone to a payphone?
×
×
  • Create New...