Glenn Nall

yes, but it took a left turn with Paul's (and your?) dogma, as exemplified: (after traversing 12,000 miles of webpage): Robert Mueller will be successful in toppling the Trump Presidency in 2018, as the Steele Document is systematically confirmed, and the dominoes of Trump cabinet members fall to Mueller indictments. The Republican candidates for President in 2016 were so maliciously insulted publicly by candidate Trump, that they will turn on him at the last minute, and vote for Impeachment, I predict. The stock market will take a tumble. After taking the oath of office, President Pence will pardon citizen Trump and many others. Then the stock market will begin to recover, and the USA will return to a more normal routine. But no, there's zero chance of a repetition of the JFK Assassination in this case -- because it was the Radical Right who assassinated JFK, and the Radical Right is a devout supporter of President Trump. Is it difficult for you to see the deviation from the stated thread title? AND in fact what you clearly missed was that I quoted and addressed Paul Trejo and not you. Nevertheless, it deviated to one of personal agenda and not JFK related stuff. That was my only point. A good thread ruined, yet the need to agendize (it's a word now) remains. Sad.

What's interesting to me is the fact that someone (Dude#1) happens "to stumble on this by accident." Notwithstanding the fact that this happens all the time, what's fascinating - and realistically exciting - is that there are so many items which are so stumbled upon, and innocently ignored, possibly letting "something" seemingly innocuous remain ignored. There really is no telling when something that is stumbled upon by accident might connect another item or two which would otherwise be left adrift in the sea, and which might actually matter. I wonder how much viable and pertinent data in this investigation is available solely due to a couple of otherwise harmless but connected "revelations." i.e.: "Ok, wait a minute - Henry Crown owned General Dynamics, AND Henry Crown ran Hilton Hotels IN HAVANA, Cuba? AND Gen Dyn's Security officer Frank Pace was one of the nine members of JFK's President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board...?? AND Gen. Maxwell Clark was former security officer for the Fort Worth plant of General Dynamics...??? AND Henry Crown was a close associate of Jack Ruby's 24th Ward (Chicago) boss Jake Arvey...????" WTF????? I think that there is, in something like this, no such thing as "seemingly innocent." Thanks, Steve. (Dude#1)

DUDES! This some real shizzit. For real, great stuff. Thanks!

is that really where you see this thread went...? well, at least my dogma doesn't indicate that.

"And with that, I refrain from all other current political discourse. This is a forum on the assassination of JFK, and should any means be bi-partisan. why is that so hard to understand???"

No, sir. His assertion is, "the Radical Right is a devout supporter of President Trump." this is comprehensive, and by that inaccurate. also, this presupposes a motive, a support of an entity, as opposed to other motives, i.e., that of choosing a lesser of two evils. I am not a Radical Right. I am a Conservative. And I support Trump ardently, for two reasons. The second reason is that he is not Hillary Clinton. I would have voted for Pee Wee Herman over Hillary Clinton. No question about it. So, NO, The Radical Right is NOT a devout supporter of President Trump. His approval numbers prove that. As for your comparisons to the current administration and the JBS, you simply prove our point. The Left ARE predictable, and need to pay attention to the logs in their own eyes before trying to remove the splinters from the Right's. And with that, I refrain from all other current political discourse. This is a forum on the assassination of JFK, and should any means be bi-partisan. why is that so hard to understand???

1) Incorrect. You are politically unaware. 2) and this is relevant to the JFK Assassination how...? 3) ya'll deviate to promote selfish agenda in spite of the Forum's mission to support discussion of the Assassination of John F Kennedy. And then wonder why you're not taken seriously.

You know, Ernie, there's a means of just linking to an article or two without creating a redundant, 6,000 mile long post which people have to scroll past in order to get to any related post. Just sayin'.

Not sure how many of you are aware of this pretty neat website - https://flashbackdallas.com/ - I came across it a while back somehow, and registered for Paula Bosse's periodic (daily/weekly?) newsletters which turn out to be historically quite interesting, to be sure. It seems Paula works very hard on this project - it's NOT JFK Assassin. related, BUT things pop up, and one never knows when or where "something" might pop up. I found some great history on the TSBD from this website (likely how I came across the Flashback Dallas, in fact...) For example: today's newsletter: The Adolphus by Moonlight https://flashbackdallas.com/2018/01/03/the-adolphus-by-moonlight/ Just thought I'd share this link - as I said, this girl works really hard and produces some terrific old shots (i.e. photos of the local Dallas news crew vehicles from I think 1963 WITH replies from older Dallas residents...) and info from Dallas. Ya'll enjoy (if you haven't already ) glenn

Lionel, finally, please once again accept my apologies on behalf of the adults in this forum. I'm sorry you were treated as you were, and I'm sorry you can't attempt some open-mindedness yourself and try to stick it out. Thin skin doesn't work well in here...

there are some really angry people in this forum.

Damn, Paul. Lionel said in his initial post that he was here at the behest of Kathy Becket. I've always known this, and even mentioned it in one of my posts to you. No, you didn't say it was wrong to invite him to the forum, but you damn sure didn't make him feel welcome. He bolted, Paul. And, AS I'VE EMPHASIZED, as far as I know, anyone is welcome, regardless of their stance on the assassination, IDEALLY without insult. AM I WRONG HERE??? So he's promoting a book. SO WHAT? WHAT IS THAT TO YOU? I said yesterday, when I read a xxxxty book, I mark it down as having read a xxxxty book - AND I MOVE ON. You said you were, and are, upset. WHY? If you and Sandy are that bothered by a xxxxty book and need to resort to elementary insult to quell your anguish, then I'd say this forum is not the medicament you're seeking.

Kathy, if you read through the entirety of this thread you'll see that I'M the one who defended Lionel's right to contribute to this forum. I'm the one who called Paul out for being rude to him. I'm the one who defended anyone's right to participate in this forum, regardless of their stance on the assassination. So. There is nothing wrong with that.

Thanks for this, Paul. When I read a xxxxty book, I mark it down as having the experience of having read a xxxxty book (although I rarely get too far into a xxxxty book). Yes, of course - I warned Lionel that once word gets out about his book, it won't sell well from here. I would expect anyone other than the author to disclose a book's premise.

I (we) would probably agree with your objections to his Novel - i simply disagreed with your tactic.

he simply intimates that you were rude.

sorry about that, Lionel. Most of us here are Conspiracy Theorists, and for the same reason you're not - research. unfortunately a few in here are also total effin' jerks who don't have an idea of tolerance and diversity of people who disagree with them in the slightest. We have to put up with them, too. you would have found that many of us ARE open-minded to good research, contrary or not. You've really only heard from a few people, and I'd urge you to ignore a couple of them in the interest of hearing from some patient ones, and in the interest of contribution to - and open-mindedness to - the work. You shouldn't let an a***ole or two to make you run away. I'm quite embarrassed by the way Paul spoke to you; I hold this forum in pretty high regard, despite its thorns. You should be patient and open-minded, too. Contribute and learn. Plus, Sartin came from your country. So... Glenn vive la france

who the hell promotes a book by telling people its "ending???" why the hell would he do that? I already warned him that once the word gets out he'll find few sales from this forum - WITHOUT insulting the man. at least he's not DVP!!! he could have presented his book here with disclosure as to his final thesis. Lord have mercy...

and at the behest of Kathy Becket, by the way. So...

and no one else has promoted their book, however good or bad, on this forum? whatever, Paul. you were rude.

welcome, Lionel. i dare say that if it really is that your thesis ends up being a LHO/lone-gunman one, then I wouldn't expect a lot of sales from this forum. But thanks for sharing.

yet my two questions stand. if the answer to either is "no," then I'd say we have a problem.

that's not fair. now MY post is totally ruined. THANKS, man.

oh, wait - there are half-naked girls in it??? Pics, too????