Jump to content
The Education Forum

Terry Mauro

Members
  • Posts

    1,791
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Terry Mauro

  1. Whatever you believe, do not believe the lies posted on DPF about this forum. There are many lies posted amongst the truth. People should listen to Dawn - a voice of reason amongst the cacophony that exists about Peter on the DPF.

    That came as a surprise to me as well. Meanwhile Drago and Guyatt come across as total idiots despite the facts

    • PETER made the charges of sexual harrasment and posted Andy's e-mail THERE
    • His ally Jack spilled the beans here and
    • Its a fact a female member made such a complaint
    • to collect punative damages he will have to show the charge was false and John and/or Andy knew so

    They think he has a case for liable.

    He could try suing Cigdem but I imagine Turkish liable law isn't generous as its British counterpart especially if the plantiff is an obviously crazy foreigner

    Thanks for the nice neat summary and free legal advice.

    http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMjE0...X379_SY400_.jpg

  2. Kraft Management were brought before a Parliament sub committee yesterday to explain why, despite assurances to the contrary, they were closing Cadbury plants and moving the jobs abroad. thier expaination? cadbury had already commited themselves to opening plants in Poland and Kraft felt that as the money had already been invested they had no choice but to do the same. they apparantly had no idea the Cadbury had been doing this, despite being advised and bankrolled by RBS, the same bank that played the same roll for Cadbury. Capitalism in motion.

    The RBS is part of the group of banks owned by the British Royal family known as the Inter Alpha Group. Inter Alpha Group is fronted by the Rothschild family and it includes Banco Santander.

    The Inter Alpha Group were formed in 1971 after President Nixon was pursuaded to kill the Bretton Woods monetary system.

    http://www.inter-alpha.com/

  3. FDR 1st ran (and won) as a Democrat in 1910, JFK did so in 1946, neither was ever associated with another party or a fringe political movement, the latter's family has been associated with the party since before he was born. Show us any evidence Rodgers had any prior involvement with the Party. She is part of a political movement that the party has always made an effort to disassociate itself with.

    Len, FDR and JFK are not Democrats for the same reason Phillip Morris, (Altria} isn't an American Company, because Lyndon says they aint.

    Stephen,

    It seems you have trouble discriminating between a republic and an Empire.

    From EIR 2007

    The islands of the Caribbean have long played a key role in the British Empire's assault against the United States. The Brits set up the offshore banking centers in the Caribbean to pave the way for the explosion of narcotics out of Ibero-America, then used the proceeds from the dope trade to take over the U.S. financial system. The result of this cultural, political, and financial warfare by the Brits and their pirates of the Caribbean is the creation of the largest financial bubble in world history, a giant casino which is now collapsing.

    http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2007/3437...9;s_island.html

    No Terry, I have no such trouble. You on the other hand seem to think that using Larouche to butress an earlier Larouche quote constitutes evidence, it doesn't, it just represents further ramblings from a, frankly, unhinged mind. its a bit like asking Hitler who was responsible for WW2. Although I imagine in the Larouche walled garden that would be Britain.

    Stephen , are you disputing the claim that 90% of the hedge funds are incorporated in the Cayman Islands?

    Are you suggesting that the Queen could not regulate of eliminate these dirty financial networks if she so wished?

    You brought up the hedge fund issue but when you are confronted with their real ownership you default to a meaningless ad hom attack.

    If you have proof that this isnt true then by all means I would like to see it.

  4. Terry thanks for posting that article which backs most of what I’ve been saying and undermines your claim most of her voters knew what her positions were. It indicated other reasons she might have one including being the 1st candidate listed and the overlapping Texas House race being between two African Americans.

    The fact that Rodgers won a primary with extremely low turnout in an open primary state for a seat her party had no chance of winning proves nothing. Nor is the possibility that a candidate with zero chance of winning the final election got cross over votes during a primary analogous to party nominees getting cross over votes in competitive races on Election Day. Nor is there much evidence JFK, who barely won with less than 50% of the vote against one of the least charismatic men to run for president, had support from Republicans. The popular vote in 1960 was similar to that in 1948 and 1968 The larger margins of victory in 1952, 1956 and 1964 probably had more to do with the candidates personas than politics. The US’s dramatic near overnight drop from one of its greatest economic booms to its worst ever depression obviously was the major factor in the dramatic shift in party allegiance between 1928 and 1932.

    You continue to show that you are incapable of independent thought and merely parrot your guru and his disciples

    Kesha Rogers was all over her district with campaign material and a 18 foot banner that read "Impeach Obama and save NASA". She was the only Democrat campaiging in her district. Everyone knew she was was calling for the impeachment of President Obama and saving NASA. There was no doubt about what she was doing.

    Most of the coverage of her victory included her call to impeach Obama.

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz...q=&gs_rfai=

    As far as being a parrot you do a pretty good job yourself. Nothing you just wrote hasn't already been offered as an excuse from those shocked by the election results. Like loser Doug Blatt, who lost to Kesha Rogers because he and his party supporters offered nothing to the voters. He told Dem's that Kesha wasnt a real Democrat and that she wanted to impeach the President. So even Kesha's opponent was spreading the news.

    Your analysis is typically wrong. From our argument on derivatives (which blew up in 2007), to Kennedy's space program, to Obama's popularity, you're always wrong.

    Do you know why you're always wrong? It's your method, which is nothing more than sophistry.

  5. This is such a typical evolution of thinking in a patriarchial world. I can only suggest that people read some Germaine Greer ( and try to understand it ) plus books such as ''The Womens Room'', and many others.

    edit:typo

    *******************************************************************

    TOOL

    10,000 Days

    Listen to the tales and romanticize,

    How we follow the path of the hero

    Boast about the day when the rivers overrun,

    How we'll rise to the height of our halo.

    Listen to the tales as we all rationalize

    Our way into the arms of the savior

    Feigning all the trials and the tribulations,

    None of us have actually been there,

    Not like you...

    Ignorant siblings in the congregation

    Gather around spewing sympathy,

    Spare me...

    None of them can even hold a candle up to you,

    Blinded by choices these hypocrites won't see

    But enough about the collective Judas

    Who could deny you were the one who illuminated

    my little piece of the divine?

    This little light of mine, the gift you passed onto me,

    I'm gonna let it shine,

    to guide you safely on your way

    Your way home...

    Oh, what are they gonna do when the lights go down

    without you to guide them all to Zion?

    What are they gonna do when the rivers overrun

    other than tremble incessantly?

    High is the way

    But all eyes are upon the ground.

    You are the light and the way

    They'll only read about

    I only pray heaven knows

    When to lift you out

    10,000 days in the fire is long enough.

    You're going home...

    You're the only one who can hold your head up high,

    Shake your fist at the gates saying,

    "I have come home now!

    Fetch me the spirit, the son and the father,

    Tell them their pillar of faith has ascended.

    It's time now!

    My time now!

    Give me my

    "Give me my wings!"...

    Give me my (x5)

    "Give me my wings!"

    You are the light, the way, that they will only read about

    Set as I am in my ways and my arrogance

    Burden of proof tossed upon the believers.

    You were my witness, my eyes, my evidence,

    Judith Marie, unconditional one.

    Daylight dims leaving cold fluorescent

    Difficult to see you in this light.

    Please forgive this bold suggestion, but

    Should you see your maker's face tonight

    Look him in the eye

    Look him in the eye and tell him

    I never lived a lie, never took a life,

    But surely saved one

    Hallelujah,

    It's time for you to bring me home.

    Copyright 2006 from the album of the same name

  6. Kesha Rogers ran on a platform - impeach Obama, save NASA from destruction by Obama, put the failed banks through bankruptcy reorganization, create a national credit system (as we had in the 19th century) and invest in high speed rail, rapid deployment of nuclear power plants, big new water projects, etc. She was clear and the voters endorsed this platform.

    http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/20...peach_obama.php

    Kesha Rogers for Congress

    http://www.kesharogers.com/

    _______________________________________________

    Right on, Kesha. But Colby says you're "not a real Democrat" so you'll just have to go away (there's that ubiquitous Right/Left paradigm again, and again, and again). Only those who can show that they were branded with a 'D' or 'R' immediately after exiting the womb are allowed to participate.

    JG

    John,

    Being from Boston have you ever heard of an organization known as "the Vault"?

    Quote from EIR magazine:

    I can also tell much of the history of the world: For example, the assassination of Aldo Moro, the former Prime Minister of Italy, is part of this. Many other assassinations of heads of government and state, or figures of that prominence, are part of this. This is part of the operations against us, and against me, over particularly the past, or more than, 30 years.

    So, we're familiar with this.

    Now, it laying on our plate. What's the problem? I haven't seen the book itself. I've audited this 13-minute audio interview, with him. I've gone over it carefully. The story is there; it's an important story, it's a valid story. He names names in the interview, like Stone & Webster in New York, in Boston, and so forth. Firms like that, that he worked for, which were engaged in this. I know them. I know the Boston operation, of which he was a part, the Boston-based operation: It's called "the Vault." It was the organization which controlled the Dukakis governorship of Massachusetts. And it was over this issue, that I ran against Democratic pre-candidate Dukakis, in 1988: Because, I knew he was, and had been, tool of the Vault, which is one of the organizations behind the group, which this fellow describes as the "economic hit-men," for whom he worked, out of Boston in particular.

    So, we know much of this thing.

    http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2004/3147perkins_book.html

  7. Peter has asked this be posted:

    I would however,

    mention that in one about six months into the exchange she says to me

    Quote: At 11:22 12/31/2008, you wrote:

    My dear Peter,

    You're a true gentleman. I'm so glad I've met someone like you.

    Cigdem

    Quite the strawman since as he notes later

    "I also note the supposedly 'offending' email was dated 5/21/09."

    It was such friendship throughout. Even

    a few nice e-mails after the one announced as 'the smoking gun'

    If true this would be a mitigating factor I think Cigdem should clarify this but a prior friendly exchange doesn't justify unwanted sexual harassment. However based on Jack and Drago's comments at the DPF Peter wasn't the only older male she contacted.......

    You just don’t know when to quit, do you dumb#ass?

    When the controversy got heated, you contacted her privately and suggested she ”step forward” as “the mystery woman.” When she declined your invitation, you let everyone know anyway.

    And now you STILL think this is some kind of point-counterpoint debate where you make “points of order” and calls for clarification among those fellow lunatics you live with and feed off of

    But on this one point at least, it ought to be made clear that anyone who gives it even the least bit of thought – a lot to ask for here – might come to the much more likely conclusion that it was “older males” such as Drago and Lemkin who initiated the contacts, not the other way around (and as it plays out in their nasty old minds)

    Other than saying that, I want you to know that if I ever see your ignorant face in real life I plan to sh#t on it.

    Other than saying that, I want you to know that if I ever see your ignorant face in real life I plan to sh#t on it.

    Your too late. GG Allin beat you to that act years ago :lol:

  8. I agree that we'll never discover the truth about the assassination of JFK, for one simple, pedantic reason. We already have.

    Agreed, we already know JFK was the victim of an ambush, a covert operation conducted by trained operatives working on a need to know basis who are under the policy of plausible deniability, and that they were affiliated with a domestic intelligence network that is still functioning today.

    Now it's just a matter of filling in the blanks with the names of the guilty.

    And that we are doing.

    BK

    I don't consider Permindex to be a domestic agency.They were responsible for the murder of JFK and the cover up. Permindex was run out of Montreal by British SOE Louis Mortimer Bloomfield. Permindex had been identified by French intelligence as being the agency responsible for the murder attempts against President Charles de Gaulle.

    Permindex was also linked to the murder of Italian industrialist Enrico Mattei in 1962

    From 1962 to 1968 you see the wholesale replacement of all the post WWII reconstructionist leaders- Mattei,(Italy) Kennedy (USA) Macmillian (Great Britian),Charles de gaulle (France) , and Konrad Adenauer (Germany). Poof, the world turned on a dime during this period and it hasnt returned yet.

    The plot that resulted in the murder of JFK was not a domestic affair.

    .

  9. I feel John Simkin is angered and has acted on that rage. Why not cool off and then make an intellectual decision?

    Peter Lemkin is high strung. Are we going to lose him because of his temperament? I was surprised to read the following, Mr. Simkin:

    "However, this is the democratic decision that has been made and there will be no turning back. If you don’t like it, you are free to join Peter on his Deep Politics Forum." -- John Simkin

    Kathy C

    I always surprised that you have been posting comments on the Deep Politics Forum suggesting that I am a disinformation agent. If you really believe that I am not sure what you are doing remaining a member of this forum.

    The reason people post on this forum as it provides a large audience for their views. I suspect that while that continues they will continue to post of this forum while spreading lies about me on other forums. Enjoy.

    John, I believe she wrote that Rich Dellarosa considered you an disinformation agent.

  10. This is turning into a real soap opera. Now that Cigdem Gole has identified herself, I am a bit baffled by her post. If I'd been in Peter's shoes, I would have expected her to state emphatically that this was overblown, a misunderstanding, whatever. I would have expected her to dismiss any claims of harrassment more emphaticaly. Instead, it seems to be a tepid, self-serving swipe at Peter. I don't know anything about what transpired between you two- but if you're going to go so far as to identify the subject line of his email as "cyber sex," then it seems to me you are stil making a vague accusation against him.

    I would urge Cigdem to post the entire email exchanges at this point, because all you've done is raise doubts again. From his emails and posts on the DPF forum, Peter seems obviously distraught about all this, and maintains he did nothing wrong. If that's the case, I think Cidgem owes it to him to clear his name publicly, since the charges were made on a public forum.

    Don,

    I am in total agreement with you. To write that the subject line of an email read "cyber sex" hardly explains anything.

    C'mon Cigdem did Peter Lemkin sexually harass you or not?

  11. FDR 1st ran (and won) as a Democrat in 1910, JFK did so in 1946, neither was ever associated with another party or a fringe political movement, the latter's family has been associated with the party since before he was born. Show us any evidence Rodgers had any prior involvement with the Party. She is part of a political movement that the party has always made an effort to disassociate itself with.

    Len, FDR and JFK are not Democrats for the same reason Phillip Morris, (Altria} isn't an American Company, because Lyndon says they aint.

    Stephen,

    It seems you have trouble discriminating between a republic and an Empire.

    From EIR 2007

    The islands of the Caribbean have long played a key role in the British Empire's assault against the United States. The Brits set up the offshore banking centers in the Caribbean to pave the way for the explosion of narcotics out of Ibero-America, then used the proceeds from the dope trade to take over the U.S. financial system. The result of this cultural, political, and financial warfare by the Brits and their pirates of the Caribbean is the creation of the largest financial bubble in world history, a giant casino which is now collapsing.

    http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2007/3437...9;s_island.html

  12. Recall that FDR won the Presidency by creating a new majority coalition of labor, farmers, intellectuals, white and black, taking the Democratic Party out of the hands of the London-New York financiers and Southern racists who had dominated it since the days of Andrew Jackson and slavery.

    Recall that John F. Kennedy strove to revive FDR's nationalism and anti-colonialism, resisting the Vietnam War scenario. The Kennedy assassination allowed financiers such as Morgan, Rockefeller, Harriman, Rothschild, Paul Volcker (Federal Reserve), Felix Rohatyn (Lazard Frères), and McGeorge Bundy (Ford Foundation) to overturn America's whole mission for industrial progress, and move toward erasing the American Revolution itself.

    http://www.larouchepub.com/pr/site_package...failed_ahc.html

  13. Rest in peace, my friend.

    GO_SECURE

    monk

    Rich was one of the most honorable men I ever came to know, not only in the research community, but in life.

    He ran a tight ship and didn't suffer fools lightly. I will never forget him. He was like a brother to me.

    And, I will treasure the friendship and sisterhood I have had the good fortune to have been able to forge with Shelby over the last decade.

    We shall carry on, with dignity and respect for his memory, as a friend, a brother, and a human being.

    We shall go in peace.

    Theresa C. Mauro

  14. BTW, what is it about real, and provable conspiracies that nobody on this board seems to like. Even Andy would agree with this one.

    Sadly, the moon landing deniers among us would claim that Apollo was a real and provable conspiracy, and that anyone who disagrees is a blind, lying fool. B)

    Of course it was a conspiracy. President Kennedy conspired with other members of his administration to set as official policy of the Kennedy administration, landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to earth. Then they brought congress into the conspiracy by requesting and receiving several billion dollars to fund the project. Kennedy then conspired with media to trumpet the benefits of such a large scientific undertaking.

    Lastly Kennedy conspired with the American public selling them on the idea that space travel was a critical part of advancing science and technology for the good of the human race. Kennedy uplifted every single American citizen with this space exploration conspiracy. He made them look to the stars and plan for a better future for all.

    Kennedy was also planning to colonize mars using the moon as the launch point. It was a giant conspiracy launched by John F. Kennedy and his supporters/advisors.

    Kennedy's enemies then conspired to kill him and shut down his NASA moon landing project.

    Everything is a conspiracy. That's how human beings get things done.

    Only an idiot would deny the existence of conspiracy.

  15. I say the voters that voted for Kesha Rogers were affirming their desire to impeach President Obama. The people of district 22 were well aware of Kesha's call to impeach Obama. Every local paper cited this. This call to impeach was the major reason she won the election.

    Len on the other hand suggest her victory was a cross over effect of Republican and independent voters.

    Colby also makes the unfounded claim that she is not a real Democrat. If that's the case then neither was FDR or JFK.

  16. I take it we are to assume that Kraft is an American company? That's rubbish. It's owned by Phillip Morris since 1988?

    http://www.larouchepub.com/other/1995/2249..._companies.html

    And more recent news.

    In 2000, Philip Morris (renamed Altria in 2003) acquired Nabisco Holdings for $18.9 billion and merged the company with Kraft Foods the same year.[8] In 2001, Philip Morris sold 280 million Kraft shares via the third-largest IPO of all time, retaining an 88.1% stake in the company.

    And as far as these hedge funds, 85% to 90% of these hedge funds are incorporated outside the USA in the Cayman Islands.

    You should talk to the Queen Stephen maybe she'll enact some FDR type regulations against these nasty Cayman Island based hedge funds :lol:

  17. This win seems to be out of right field

    Democrat with ties to LaRouche calling for Obama to be impeached

    By CHRIS MORAN

    Copyright 2010 Houston Chronicle

    March 6, 2010, 7:23AM

    Kesha Rogers called for the impeachment of President Barack Obama as the centerpiece of her campaign for Congress, and on Tuesday she won the nomination of her party.

    The Democratic Party.

    It was no stealth campaign. Rogers shouted it from a sound truck that cruised the four-county 22nd Congressional District. She posted an 18-foot banner emblazoned with the message “Save NASA. Impeach Obama” on street corners. Her Web site is filled with videos and periodic policy statements documenting her stand.

    During the campaign, Rogers denounced warnings of global warming as imperialist genocide, proclaimed that London banking interests are bent on ruining America's economy and accused Obama of “pissing on the legacy of President John F. Kennedy” in proposing to end NASA's Constellation program.

    “I can't believe that most people who voted for her knew that she wants to” impeach Obama, losing candidate Doug Blatt states on his Web site. “I do believe that most of them didn't do any research about the candidates before voting.”

    One Democratic blogger already has posted instructions on how to de-select Rogers from a straight party ticket vote.

    When a spokesman for Republican incumbent Pete Olson was asked for reaction, he barely suppressed his mirth.

    “You never take an election for granted,” said Chris Homan, “but you, perhaps, wonder whether the Democrats in this district have profoundly changed their views on the president. She didn't hide her position.”

    LaRouche organizer

    Rogers, 33, of Stafford, is a volunteer organizer for the LaRouche Youth Movement.

    Lyndon LaRouche, 87, is an economist and frequent candidate for president who runs as a Democrat. Detractors call him a conspiracy theorist and cult leader. Supporters see him as a visionary willing to buck the establishment. He has run for president eight times since 1976, including a 1992 campaign from prison while serving five years of a 15-year mail fraud sentence.

    The threat of impeachment is leverage to push for an end to Wall Street bailouts and restore funding for manned space travel, Rogers explained.

    “If anybody's serious about saving NASA or addressing this economic crisis, they're going to have to put this impeachment question on the table,” she said.

    Rogers has been pushing for Democratic Party reform since at least 2006, when she was unsuccessful in a bid to become the state party chair at its convention.

    “One of the things the LaRouchites are able to do is to engage young people,” said Gerry Birnberg, chairman of the Harris County Democratic Party. “If she can turn out young people to vote for Democrats, all the better.”

    Birnberg said Rogers has much to commend her. He said his main objection to her candidacy is her association with LaRouche, and that if she instead held many of the same views but belonged to a group called “LBJ Democrats,” her ideas would appear much more mainstream.

    Birnberg and Rogers both said much of LaRouche's economic thinking is in line with Franklin D. Roosevelt's, including investment in public works, separating commercial from investment banking and opposition to corporatism.

    Rogers won a majority of the Democratic vote Tuesday against Blatt, a development analyst, and ordained minister Freddie John Wieder Jr.

    Her Web site trumpets her victory with the headline: “The message is clear: Barack Obama has to go.”

    chris.moran@chron.com

    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headli...ro/6899832.html

  18. Kesha Rogers ran on the platform to impeach President Obama and won the primary going away. Len Colby is wrong as usual.

    And it's the American people who are getting "creamed". Colby seems to over look that fact.

    MR. GIBBS: Hold on, let me --

    Q -- the 22nd district in Texas was won by a young African American, Kesha Rogers, who had the first point on her program was the impeachment of President Obama for a violation of the general welfare clause of the Constitution, largely because of this so-called health care bill. What does this victory say to the President about the general mood in the public today with regard to his program?

    MR. GIBBS: I can't read anything into the primary results in a district in Texas about the general mood of the country, except to know that the general mood of the country is that they want Democrats and Republicans to work together to get something done on health care.

    And again, we know what happens if we walk away. People get letters where their health insurance goes up 40 percent. Small businesses drop their coverage. Parents are on the phone with insurance companies listening to somebody say, "We're not going to cover your child's illness because we think it's based on a preexisting condition." That's what happens. That's what happens if -- even as we're so close -- we walk away.

    http://www.articleant.com/gen/13978-briefi...bs--3-4-10.html

  19. Kesha Rogers ran on a platform - impeach Obama, save NASA from destruction by Obama, put the failed banks through bankruptcy reorganization, create a national credit system (as we had in the 19th century) and invest in high speed rail, rapid deployment of nuclear power plants, big new water projects, etc. She was clear and the voters endorsed this platform.

    http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/20...peach_obama.php

    Kesha Rogers for Congress

    http://www.kesharogers.com/

  20. In January 2001 Lyndon LaRouche gave a webcast. During the Q&A pedriod he was asked a question by a member of the Black Caucus regarding Bush's nomination of John Ashcroft for Attorney General.

    The answer LaRouche gave to the audience was far more insightful, going beyond the Ashcroft question where he spoke on the nature of the incoming Bush Administration and the problems they would have passing any meaningful policies.

    LaRouche made the assessment that Bush and the people behind him would use certain "methods" in order to prevent any political opposition. What LaRouche suggested is that the Bush Administration would create "provocations" in order to create a situation of "crisis management" which would allow them to rule the country.

    LaRouche mentions the "Special Warfare" types.

    Lastly LaRouche warns that the Bush administration and those behind the scenes supporting Bush, when "pushed to the wall" would resort to provocations similiar to the Reichstag Fire, in order to "rule by emergency decree".

    LaRouche said "That's their method, know it".

    On September 11, 2001 the World Trade Center was destroyed along with the attack in Washington that created exactly the pre text LaRouche warned about. 911 allowed the still born Bush Administration to run policy from 2001 to 2009. This included the ill conceived War on Terror in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=32...260910701909343

  21. Sykes-Picot Assassination in Dubai

    Feb. 18 (EIRNS)--The international media has been filled with

    reports on the investigation of the assassination of Hamas

    operative Mahmoud al-Mabhouh last month in Dubai, and where the

    authorities have identified 11 suspects whose pictures were seen

    on bogus passports from Britain, France, Ireland, and Germany.

    While the Dubai authorities have said they were nearly one

    hundred percent sure it was an Israeli Mossad operation, the

    British, French and Irish foreign offices have summoned the

    Israeli ambassadors for an explanation. But now there are

    indications pointing to the possibility that this was nothing

    less than a "Sykes-Picot" assassination.

    The London {Independent}'s veteran Beirut-based

    correspondent Robert Fisk wrote in today's edition that the real

    story is that there was total collusion between Israel, the

    British, and other Europeans. He writes that the United Arab

    Emirates "suspect -- only suspect, mark you -- that Europe's

    `security collaboration' with Israel has crossed a line into

    illegality, where British passports (and those of other EU

    nations) can now be used to send Israeli agents into the Gulf to

    kill Israel's enemies."

    He reports that he received a call by an "impeccable" source

    from Abu Dhabi, who told him "the British passports are real.

    They are hologram pictures with the biometric stamp. They are not

    forged or fake. The names were really there. If you can fake a

    hologram or biometric stamp, what does this mean?" The source

    went on, "There are 18 people involved in the killing of Mahmoud

    al-Mabhouh. Besides the 11 already named, there are two

    Palestinians who are being interrogated and five others,

    including a woman. She was part of the team that staked out the

    hotel lobby."

    The source sent an SMS message later, saying, "The command

    room of the operation was in Austria [sic--in fact, all things

    are "sic" in this report--DEA] ... meaning the suspects when here

    did not talk to each other but thru the command room on separate

    lines to avoid detection or linking themselves to one another...

    but it was detected and identified OK??"

    The source went on, "We have sent out details of the 11

    named people to Interpol. Interpol has circulated them to 188

    countries -- but why hasn't Britain warned foreign nations that

    these people are using passports in these names?... We have

    identified five credit cards belonging to these people, all

    issued in the United States."

    While the EU countries and Britain are cooperating, the

    source said he found it very strange that, "not one of the

    countries we have been speaking to has notified Interpol of the

    passports used in their name. Why not?"

    He concludes on a very interesting note: "Collusion is a

    word the Arabs understand. It speaks of the 1956 Suez War, when

    Britain and France cooperated with Israel to invade Egypt. Both

    London and Paris denied the plot. They were lying. But for an

    Arab Gulf country which suspects its former masters (the U.K., by

    name) may have connived in the murder of a visiting Hamas

    official, this is apparently now too much. There is much more to

    come out of this story. We will wait to see if there are any

    replies in Europe."

    The question Fisk does not ask, is whether this is a

    brilliant piece of intelligence work by Abu Dhabi, or was there

    cooperation that could also pin it on Britain as well? [dea]

×
×
  • Create New...