Terry Mauro
-
Posts
1,791 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Terry Mauro
-
-
Ironic that Larouche who championed the the Clintons and to a lesser extent Kerry condemns Obama for being pro-choice.
There seems to be little rhyme or reason to his likes and dislikes
Reagan = Good, Bush Sr. (and Jr) = Evil
Clinton (and his wife) = Good. Gore = Evil
Kerry = Good, Dukakis = Evil
Do his followers know what he is talking about? I doubt it, their not understanding him is taken as a sign of his "briliance"
Sure they do. Here is the basis of LaRouche's policies.
"The distinction of man from beast, on which the sacredness
of the life of the individual human foetus, or born person
depends for its protection from the actions of its adversaries,
lies in the society's devotion to the distinction of man from
beast, which lies, uniquely, in not only the existence, but the
promotion of what are those creative powers of the individual
mind of the human individual mind which are the essential, and
only distinction of man from beast among living human
individuals."
Now read this obscure quote and you can see the difference in thinking or viewpoint regarding the nature of man.
''My mother was much less intelligent than my father, but she perceived the dangers of Nazism the same as I did,'' Colby said. ''I recognized at the very beginning what was going to happen to Jewish people.''
Colby was 15 when Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany in 1933, and he urged his parents to leave the country while there was still time. His father refused. The Nazis would need good doctors, he said. Paula wouldn't leave without her husband.
emphasis added
What would the Nazis need good doctors for, their "useless eater" policy?
-
This is for Douglas Caddy who was so eloquent and succinct in his analysis of Lyndon LaRouche.
{A Notre Dame event:}
{{DON'T ASK OBAMA}}
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
{May 18, 2009}
-----------------------------------------------
{In these times, including the} {{New York Times}}, {the
common failure of many highly publicized debates, is that none of
the opposing parties, and few among the members of the audience,
knew virtually anything worthwhile knowing about the purported
subject of that May 17th occasion at Notre Dame University. It
was clearly, a lack of knowledge of elementary morality which
encouraged them to speak more freely, since they were
unencumbered by that burden known as truth. What is actually
important about President Barack Obama's appearance at Notre Dame
University that day, was his certain, curious kind of innocence
of what he had done. He showed no comprehension of the political
issues of life-versus-death which he promised to compromise.}
{Compromise was what he had set upon the table for that
occasion, and, indeed, the compromise, his innocence, called, by
wiser men, his ignorance, was incarnate in himself. His
appearance at that occasion may be therefore compared,
figuratively, to the failure of the man in the crowd who got the
pin of the hand grenade which he was carrying stuck in the belt
of his trousers, and, quite accidentally . . .}
{But, then, he had walked on quickly, hearing the noise some
seconds later; but, he never told his children, and never knew,
himself, how many he had left to die when he had walked away,
pausing to admire himself in his reflection in the pool he
passed, on that weekend's day.}
------------------------------------------------
{Compare President Obama's statements of May 16, with Adolf
Hitler's decree of September 1, 1939, seventy years earlier, on
"lives not worthy to be lived."}
Clearly, a novice U.S. President might be excused, if not
forgiven, for a certain number of sins of ignorance, or, perhaps,
you might be of the opinion that, in this case, it goes the other
way around. However that might be, from one case to another, I am
neither attacking, nor praising President Barack Obama in this
present instance; I am merely pointing to an object, a less than
worthless opinion, which he had happened to have dropped, and
left behind in passing, on his way to, and from, that place.
The fact is, clearly, President Obama's conduct suggests,
that he, like the world's worst drug-pusher, George Soros, is
apparently free of the burden of any knowledge of the {moral
}implications of the abortion of a living human foetus. From his
reported remarks at Notre Dame that day, he seems not to
understand that the human foetus, is not "a thing;" it is not an
animal; it is a human being, who, at virtually any stage of life,
in, or out of womb, has a specific, creative {potential,} that of
a quality which does not exist in any other living species. Those
who are not accustomed to actually thinking creatively, might
have difficulty with that concept. Obviously, Obama did.
The problem with that Notre Dame debate is, that the
argument of neither of those contending parties, as told,
reported, by the {{New York Times}} or {{The Washington Post}},
has any affinity at all for that quality of inborn creativity,
which actually distinguishes the human individual from the
beasts. Morever, neither of them, or anyone like them, has shown
the slightest intellectual grasp of what actual human creativity
is. The evidence supplied by the habitually hollow sophistry
prescribed by the example of {{The New York Times'}} style book,
will serve, on this occasion, as illustration of my point (not to
speak of my personal experience with the product of the
{{Washington}}--ugh!{{Post}}).
No elaborate inference is required to demonstrate that
President Obama lacks an efficient quality of actual knowledge of
the potentialities inherent in the human foetus (and also
unadulterated voters). He talked, but, as we have often seen with
him of late, in respect to matters of principle, there is no
credible evidence that he had an actual conception of the
implications of what he was talking about. Often, we find, that
some Harvard lawyers these days are trained to think like that,
especially Harvard lawyers who have been close to Larry Summers;
in his speaking as a lawyer on that occasion, he enjoyed what
some might consider the exculpatory advantage of innocence of any
actual knowledge of that subject, theology, on which was
speaking. He might seek to claim innocence on the grounds of
stupidity. For the President, in this matter, the mere form of
the implied debate was everything, and the content, for him, was
nothing.
Of such compositions by that President, as the {{Times}} and
{{Post}} described that occasion's event at Notre Dame
University, we must cry out, as Lord Byron might: what shall we
say of such a poet and his press reviewers now?[1]
{{WHAT WENT WRONG WITH RELIGION?}}
-----------------------------------------------
In matters bearing on the policies of governments, let us
not speak of religious denominations. Rather, let us look at the
nature and history of the legacy of European governments since
the time of the contemporaries of the Jesus of Nazareth who was
born in the time of the reign of that Roman Emperor Augustus
Caesar who had allied himself with the priests of Mithra cult.
Jesus was murdered by crucifixion, under the specific authority
conferred upon Pontius Pilate by the latter's virtual
father-in-law, that monstrous habitué of the Isle of Capri,
Tiberius. Such were the times of the similarly murdered Apostles
Peter and Paul, and also the time of the most beloved Apostle
John.
The bearers of that Christian heritage, shared a certain
wisdom with the wise person, considered a great scholar of the
Hebrew faith from that same time, Philo of Alexandria, Philo's
attack on Aristotle, in defense of the Creator's power of
creativity, went to the core of what became the heritage of
European civilization, still today. It was men and women of that
legacy who gave birth to what has become the constitutional order
of the United States traced to the Winthrops and Mathers of
Seventeenth Century Massachusetts today.
Put to one side those sundry contemporary interpretations of
Christian doctrine which appeal more to the ignorance of the
faithful than the wisdom of the Creator. Seek more solid ground
for a judgment on a luminary figure such as our President. Look
instead, at the verifiable legacy of the Christian faith and what
it shares from its origins with the commitment of Philo of
Alexandria. Our republic defined itself as Christian; therefore,
look at the follies of the recent event at Notre Dame University
in terms of what we know of the legacy which one might presume
should be shared by those assembled, thus, at that university, or
perhaps, a much better one, more like the Harvard of Increase
Mather, today.
Then, ask and answer the question: What is the meaning of
the immortality of the soul of the mortal human individual? What,
therefore, are we killing when a child in the womb is killed by
whim? Or, similarly, later? What is the difference of the death
of the child, in the womb or later, and the death of the animal?
You will not find the answer to that in Silicon Valley!
Therefore, instead of the tiresome labor of disputing
scripture with sententious theological idiots, simply ask and
answer the question, what is the creativity of the human
individual which separates the death of the child from the death
of a beast, or, on the contrary, of a soldier in war, or of the
person who is murdered, in point of fact, by that withholding of
the medical care which might have preserved that human life which
President Obama's proposed policies now propose? Instead of
splitting hairs over the words of scripture, answer that clear
fact.
Do you know what human creativity means? I have seen no
evidence that President Obama has even a glimmer of such precious
knowledge; thus, what could he possibly know of the human soul,
or, therefore, the killing of a living child in the womb? "What
is Hecuba?" Certainly, his currently proposed health-care
policies, which are explicitly echoes of the exact-same policy of
genocide which Adolf Hitler dictated as the German law dated from
September 1, 1939, have no agreement with what civilized
societies call law.
The issue is not the death of the innocent itself; you
errant creatures shall not be let off so easily! The Satanic
quality of what President Obama's Behavioral psychologists
present as their Hitler-echoing "health-care policy," lies not in
the killing itself, but in the nature of the intention which the
uttered doctrine of Peter Orszag and that faithless "Big Wheel,"
Ezekiel Emanuel typifies. There is an essential difference in
moral principle, in death inflicted in combat, or by negligence,
or if ordinary murder, and the willful extinguishing of the soul
of the innocent person, either for reason of malice, or so-called
economic convenience. There is a wide and deep moral gulf between
the argument for the cause of death imposed by intent or by
willful negligence, which President Obama defended at Notre Dame,
and the death, even the murder of persons, for other causes.
Nor, is there an ordinary sort of punishment for such an
act.
The essential nature of the crimes which Orszag and others
have presented to President Obama as their wicked intention,
must, of course, be confessed to be the fruit of their intention;
but, the nature of the offense does not in the death itself, but
in the evil of the Hitler-like intention which Orszag and his
dupes and other accomplices represent as their intended design of
the relevant form of proposed law. The evil lies in the
legislator who permits such laws to be enacted. The essential
evil lies in its true origin, in the intention of the
perpetrator, not the act by the individual person, but the fault
of the consensual law of that society.
The fault lies, essentially with those churches and the
policies of the society which generates the general opinion which
the individual act merely expresses. The root of the problem, and
also the remedy, lies not in the individual member of society,
but, rather the fault, to the extent it exists, lies on the
shoulders of the leading molders of public opinions and law. It
lies, for example, on those who promote that impoverishment of
the people, as the current economic policies uttered by President
Barack Obama prevent certain of the typical classes of remedies
which might be available. Therein, similarly, in the economic and
related dynamics of the general policy, including the general
morality of the state, is wherein the remedy lies, a remedy
beyond the means of control by the mere individual person as
such.
It is the society, not the mere individual, who must be
considered accountable.
For the sake of his own soul, that poor fellow, that poor
heathen, President Obama must, especially, think about that.
{{"How Green Was His Valley?"}}
There are, chiefly, two aspects of the current policy of the
Obama government which tend to demand that the President promote
the increased misery of the generality of our nation and its
citizens. First, he allows the great theft by what is called
"Wall Street" and also its likeness around the world. To pay for
this immorality of current policies of the most powerful
governments generally, including Obama's own, the poor are
intended to pay by Obama's adoption of policies which will
increase their pain and misery and shorten their lives. Second,
he supports a lying and bestial cult-belief, expressed as "cap
and trade," which drives the economies which tolerate such a
swindle into greatly increased economic ruin; this ruinous policy
will kill our citizens, and those of other nations, in vast
numbers. To support that fraudulent policy, the President is, so
far, disposed to drive the greatest portion of our own and other
populations into vastly increased suffering and death-rates.
Neither the U.S. Government, nor its officials, can consider
themselves the faithful moral servants of the general welfare of
our people, a general welfare which is mandatory under our
fundamental law, if they promote, or even tolerate either those
policies or their effects. The promotion, or even the toleration
of such policies, is inherently immoral, and, under our
Constitution, impeachable. Speaker Nancy Pelosi's complicity in
the effort to bury the relevant idea of a "Pecora Commission" in
the same political graveyard as the ill-fated hoax of "The Warren
Commission," or "9-11," is typical of the principle involved.
The underlying systemic problem in the making of law which
thus confronts us here, is that, whereas, the Constitutional law
of the United States, as in both the Declaration of Independence
and Federal Constitution, was derived from the specific
principles of dynamics introduced to modern society by Gottfried
Leibniz, whereas much of the flawed law practiced by our
government and its lawmakers and courts since is based on the
entirely contrary, scientifically incompetent doctrine and method
typified by the teaching of the science-incompetent Rene
Descartes, and such depraved followers of that Descartes as Adam
Smith ({{The Theory of Moral Sentiments}}--1759) and the British
Foreign Office's Jeremy Bentham ({{An Introduction to the
Principles of Morals and Legislation}}--1781/1789).
Like Descartes' pseudo-scientific method, the British
empiricist dogma, to the present day, as also that of the typical
Wall Street ideologue, is premised on the depraved notion of the
human individual as being merely an object engaged in statistical
forms of kinematic interaction with other bumpable objects in
otherwise empty space. It is a cardinal principle of the
empiricist method derived from such precedents as the Ockhamite
dogma of Paolo Sarpi and Rene Descartes, that there is no actual,
knowable morality in society, other than bumps and grinds of the
kinematic encounters among the mere particles of empty space (and
also virtually empty heads) of Paolo Sarpi's system of government
and Venetian finance. That Sarpian heritage is the doctrine of
the empire of the British East India Company, and of British
empiricism doctrine and notions of law against which our republic
fought, since the February 1763 Peace of Paris, for independence
from the evil which that British imperial system represented as
depravity then, and its imperial murder and thievery of today.
The morality of any decent republic, and, therefore, its
law, recognizes that the connection between the individual and
the society is dynamic, not kinematic. It is the function of the
state dedicated to those principles on which our republic was
founded, in bloody opposition to British empiricist degradation,
that the state is responsible for creating those preconditions of
law through aid of which the moral objectives of the true
republic are reached in effect. It is the way in which we compose
the actualized constitution of our republic, which must create
those conditions which are necessary, but beyond the control of
the individual citizen, or even a large portion of that
population.
It is, therefore, within the bounds of the necessary,
constitutional commitment to the fostering of the scientific and
related progress of the condition of present and future
generations, and their individuals, that the practical
realization of the necessary moral conditions of life of the
individual and the larger body of society is attained and
defended.
The distinction of man from beast, on which the sacredness
of the life of the individual human foetus, or born person
depends for its protection from the actions of its adversaries,
lies in the society's devotion to the distinction of man from
beast, which lies, uniquely, in not only the existence, but the
promotion of what are those creative powers of the individual
mind of the human individual mind which are the essential, and
only distinction of man from beast among living human
individuals.
Of such matters, President Barack Obama either knows nothing
of his most essential moral responsibilities, or has chosen to
ignore those responsibilities, for one reason or another.
Therefore, in numerous ways in his recent behavior in
office, especially since his pilgrimage to worship objects in
Buckingham Palace, he has acted with indifference to the
violations of morality, and therefore constitutional principles
of our law, which are, in particular, specific to the creation
and progress of the existence of our republic. There lies the
essential practical issue; there lies the issue of proper law and
its practice,
{{In Defense of Creativity}}
When we speak of the human mind, we are referring to the
"fire" which the Olympian Zeus of Aeschylus' {{Prometheus Bound}}
had banned. "Fire," such as the presently indispensable reliance
on the use of the power of high energy-flux-density. That means
power on the level of the standard set by the nuclear-fission
power, on which the continued existence of the present level of
population of our planet now depends. No "alternative," low
energy-flux-density alternatives exist, or ever will exist. The
right of every society to its own use of the benefits of
nuclear-fission, and also higher qualities when they become
available, is as essential as the availability of a quality of
health-care which President Obama's administration is presently,
and passionately, determined to destroy.
The alternative to a pro-nuclear-power policy, would become
genocide on the scale of billions of human deaths. The use of
nuclear power, in and of itself, is not a moral issue, but the
denial of its use is comparable to the genocide, and related
effects, caused by the policies of Adolf Hitler, the willful
cause of the needless death of billions of the people of this
planet, soon. So, if President Obama's health-care policies could
cause even billions of avoidable early deaths, what of it. His
policies of "sun and wind" would tend to have the same effect.
Wind or killer pills, the fact remains, that the policies
presently pushed foremost by the Obama administration up to this
point, are policies respecting health care which are just as
mass-murderous in the near term today as Adolf Hitler's were
between September 1939 and May 1945.
Which brings us back to the event at Notre Dame.
30-30-30
Footnotes
[1]. Should such debaters bring to our mind what
Shakespeare's Doll Tearsheet, who was honest in her certain way,
said of Ancient Pistol?
"You a captain! you slave for what? For tearing a poor
whore's ruff in a bawdy house? `He's a captain!' hang him, rogue.
He lives on mouldy stewed prunes and dried cakes. `A captain!'
God's light, these rogues will make the word as odious as the
word `occupy,' which was a wondrous good word before it fell into
bad company; therefore, captains had need look to it."
End of Footnotes
-
You once again focus on irrelevant issues why not address LaRouche's lies about attendence at his speach.
You don't like Horowitz? Great I don't like him either but far more of his critics (mostly students it seems) showed up at one of his speches at UW that supporters or detractors of your guru bothered to appear at Larouche's speech at CCSU. For reasons yet to be made clear Larouche sites lied about attendence at the event.
Attendence at the event is germaine because it seems to indicate a complete disinterest, outside his small cult, to what he has to say.
You show up to debate only after Evan deletes my response. Are you the Education Forum's sacred cow? Or maybe Evan doesnt believe in calling a bottle of milk a bottle of milk?
And how do you know how many people registered and attended the LaRouche presentation? How do you "know" how many people were there? The video you're using to "prove" your contrived issue was filmed and provided by the LaRouche organization.
To be honest I dont care if they said 150-175 people were in attendance and there was less. What could they possibly accomplish by adding 50-80 people to the audience? This is the kind of poop you love to swim in. Habits from your GG Allin days?
And I answered your question on popularity ( Madonna is popular) when I pointed out that millions of adult Americans prefer cartoon watching to anything political, to anything that might require them to leave their fantasy life behind.
I simply go with who is telling the truth. The size of the audience, popularity etc. has absolutely no meaning to me. I couldnt care any less. Idiot President George Bush pulled in much larger audiences than LaRouche, so what's the point. You see where that got the nation.
Are we done with this debate? Now you know, I don't care if there were 50 people in attendance or 150 people. Furthermore I don't see the number in attendance as a reflection of any flaw on LaRouche's part. LaRouche is one of the greatest strategic thinkers alive today. His enemies know this even if you don't know it. <Offensive comment deleted>
http://larouchepub.com/lym/2006/3341campus_watch.html
http://www.larouchepub.com/pr/2006/061019h...z_genocide.html
-
Campus Watch
http://larouchepub.com/lym/2006/3341campus_watch.html
Since the end of 2002, there has been a Nazi-Gestapo operation on campuses across America, which has been run by neo-conservatives like Lynne Cheney, Dave Horowitz, Stanley Kurtz, Martin Kramer, David French, and others. They say they want to ensure that there are no "political idealists" turning campuses into a place for attacking the "War on Terror," and thereby destroying our security. The first major attempt to create legislation to ensure this was launched in early 2003, when Title VI of the 1965 Higher Education Act, which provides funding for area study centers and programs at universities in the United States, came up for renewal.
-
The major television networks have almost never allowed an intelligent discussion about the JFK assassination, let alone a debate. In the past, when the subject was broached, either a totally ineffective "critic" (think David Scheim or John Davis) argued the conspiracy side, or when a true critic was selected, it was usually Cyril Wecht or Mark Lane. Now I admire Wecht quite a bit, but if you've ever seen him on television, you know that he tends to talk fast, use too many scientific or medical terms and become emotional quickly. Because of this, he tended to come off as a bit ineffective. As for Lane, he also shows his emotions easily, becomes frustrated at the obvious bias of the host(s) and spends much of his precious air time protesting that.
Speaking of Lane, Penn Jones ran a bit in The Continuing Inquiry years ago, where it was claimed that he participated in a series of "staged" debates with David Lifton's friend Wesley Liebeler. wherein each time, they would both react identically at the same moment in an obviously scripted manner. Lane is one of my early heroes, so I'd like not to believe this, but who knows? It really wouldn't surprise me.
One thing is certain; you will never see a truly knowledgable, Vincent Salandria-type of critic allowed to debate Posner or Bugliosi on any televistion network. But then again, I don't even think they ask anyone to "debate" these clowns anymore. They just trot out a lame, bought and sold talking head like Keith Olbermann/Sean Hannity, etc., to ask softball questions of the most recent LN celebrity.
Don,
Mark Lane and his work on the JFK assassination has always been tainted by his close involvement with the likes of Bertrand Russell, Hugh Trevor Roper and "The British Who Killed Kennedy Committee". I look at that title almost like a "play on words" , an "inside joke" by Bertrand Russell.
It was Bertrand Russell's "Pugwash Conferences" that kept the policy of MADD(nuclear stand off or cold war) in place between the US and Soviets until the Soviet Union collapsed in 1989-1991 period.
And despite Russell's professed passion in solving the JFK assassination he was no fan of President Kennedy and his policies.
If you wish to get a taste of Russell's true feelings toward JFK you should contact the JFK Library in Boston and request a copy of Betrand Russell's "cables" to President Kennedy during the Cuban Missiles Crisis.
Lane and Bertrand Russell also mis lead Jim Garrison in my opinion. Garrison had nabbed one of the high level directors of Permindex in Clay Shaw. Russell, Schoenman and Lane helped shift Garrison towards the CIA in order to protect Permindex and the British.
If you want to read a very interesting book about JFK's break with the British, then you should read a book published in 1993 "Report to JFK". This is the real life account of the battle between Kennedy and the British around the Skybolt missile program that occured at the height of the cold war. British PM Macmillan in his memoirs recounted how JFK had to be "arm twisted" into giving the British the Polaris Missiles.
http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/cup_de....taf?ti_id=3261
And you if stopped and thought about it, many of the so called "conspiracy" programs, books, etc. are made in Great Britian for consumption here in the USA. Mark Lanes book Rush to Judgement is an example of this. Lane got plenty of media coverage, speaking engagement etc. for RTJ while Harold Weisberg for example could not get a single publisher to publish his book.
And for further ponderance keep in mind that Joe Kennedy Sr. married off his daughter to the nasty "Cecil" family who claimed to be the real power behind the British Monarchy for centuries.
-
Len in my view your comments about education level (not that I accept them at face value-- would have to look more closely) do not surprise me. Look at American Universites today. Chris Hedges recent article about them was dead on. They are technochratic monastaries. Most of the 9/11 dismissal is aimed at raising class anxiety at any middle class organism . It works. They are scared of beign called a conspiracy theorist, and this tendency is if anything more pronounced among Chomsky-Goodman-Cockburn left liberals.
The medieval monastaries could never produce a group as politically irrelevent as todays American Universities. You need to come back from Brazil to believe just how completely air brained and worse than Russia apolitical the university educated are here these days. Anyone from another country could never believe it.
Here's a organization "Campus Watch". They seem to be a self anointed "watch dog", always on the look out for any "thought crimes" on campus. The Middle East seems to be their specialty
http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/7358
From Who's Who at Campus Watch
Teri Blumenfeld - Research Manager, DanielPipes.org
Ms. Blumenfeld moderates the forums for DanielPipes.org and assists with research for Dr. Pipes. Ms. Blumenfeld was a founder of Meditran, an Arab-Israeli center in Jerusalem. She holds a BS from San Francisco State University and conducts research for terrorism trials. Contact: comments@danielpipes.org
I wonder if Teri Blumenfeld is any relation to the late Isadore Blumenfeld?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kid_Cann
You just never know these days.
-
http://glennbeckbooks.qarf.com/uncategoriz...the-white-house
Glenn Beck interviewed the authors on his show on Thursday, May 14, for about 10 minutes. He tried to impress the two very boring and dour "economists", who put coffee to sleep, that he admired their book, but disputed how the white house was using it to "promote the economy" with false optimism.
If this does not make sense, you do not have the right animal spirits. This is a term that Obama actually used in a recent press conference, the "animal spirits". Akerlof is especially brain dead in his appearance.
Their book contends that a depression actually depresses the animal spirits that are necessary for economic recovery, and that government must intervene to restore the "animal spirits" and promote economic recovery. This is actually a very Cartesian approach to liken human to animal psychology, which is the core of behaviorism.
In fact, the manic Wall street traders are depressed right now, since the world is ignoring them. The New Yorker has a longer article which is another one of these " connect the dots" to understand the financial collapse. AT the end of the article, the hedge fund trader that the author followed for a few years concluded that "capitalism without bankruptcy is like christianity without hell".
Then he remarked, " if long term bonds go up, we are finished
-
I disagree with your characterization. I think it's very educational for the members. Examining how people think and not what they think (opinions)is a great method for understanding truth and furthermore how the human mind locates truth.
Culture plays a great role in this process. If someone has adopted "Nazi" tendencies, if that is their outlook towards humanity, then this will definitely play a role in the way they think. The opinions they express and their method of thinking.
<offensive remarks removed>
Evan, you have to be kidding. Why do you continue to "black out" the truth?
Now you won't allow anyone to know that Len Colby is part of the Hofjuden Oppenheimer family? To characterize my comments as "offensive" is ridiculous.
-
You have perfect timing.
Do you have any idea why a portion of my earlier response was deleted?
What was my offense? I simply offered up my insight as to how you came to be a dedicated sophist. I suggested that it was long standing family tradition. In fact I think I can prove it beyond a doubt.
Maybe John can respond to the question?
-
That's certainly the understanding I came away with. Of course I've witnessed these tactics many many times before. It is always the same, attack LaRouche in an effort to contain him and his ideas.
Why do you think the Professor made special mention of the anti LaRouche pamphlets being distributed on campus?
The rest of your characterization is meaningless to me. Why identify this professor as a "groupie"? What is the significance of characterizing him this way? How does it effect the truthfulness of LaRouche's comments about 911? The Professor said many things that fly in the face of your false argument.
Deleted (offensive comment)
-
I used that clip to point out that there was a effort launched against LaRouche in order to keep people/students from attending his presentation.
-
I would suggest you watch the first five minutes, introducing LaRouche. The moderator describes the negative attacks leading up to LaRouche's appearance. This included the distribution of material which was against the stated wishes of the lecture series creator and moderator.
The moderator describes the material distributed about LaRouche as either "problematic factually at best, or clearly inaccurate".
And if you watch you'll see professors/instructors are present for the presentation.
-
What does this have to do with the truthfulness of his analysis? Millions of adult Americans watch cartoons on the Fox network (Family Guy) each week. If Americans knew what was good for them then we wouldnt be in the mess we are in right now.
-
-
KENNEDY ADMINISTRATION VIEWED MATTEI AS PRO-U.S. IN FIGHT AGAINST
BRITAIN
May 9 - In a conversation with EIR, Benito Livigni, a former
collaborator of Enrico Mattei and an expert on the history of
Mattei and ENI, pointed to the fact that Enrico Mattei, Italy's
anti-colonialist leader in the 1950s and '60s, was negotiating an
anti-British strategic partnership with the Kennedy
Administration. Of particular significance is a report, Livigni
said, written by U.S. Undersecretary of State George Ball to
President Kennedy in summer 1962, after he met Mattei in Rome.
The document, a copy of which is in Livigni's hands, says that in
case of a U.S.-British fight, Mattei and Italian State President
Gronchi (a friend of Mattei's) would be in the pro-U.S.A. camp,
whereas other leaders in Europe would align with Britain. Ball
characterizes as "Europist" the pro-British faction and as
"Atlanticist" the pro-U.S. faction.
This paper, together with the British Foreign Office
documents targetting Mattei as a threat to the British colonial
system, put the assassination of Mattei and even of JFK in the
strategic perspective of a British operation to eliminate what
the British saw as an existential threat to their Empire.
Livigni was the first researcher to dig out British Foreign
Office papers on Mattei, and published them in a book in 1995, in
which he identified Lyndon LaRouche as the executor of Mattei's
pro-development fight. Livigni's latest book, entitled {The
Predators of Oil and Finance}, contains large sections on
LaRouche and EIR articles. Bookstore orders for the book, the
publisher reports, have already exhausted stocks. Livigni is
currently working on a new project, on JFK and Mattei's "parallel
lives." [ccc]
-
I believe that assassination by BIOP is commonplace. Death by "natural causes.
Remember...the CIA ADMITTED to trying to kill Castro with BIOP germs and toxins.
Jack
I remember reading a small news report of missing virals of virus from Ft. Detrick back in the mid-70s, and then was surprised to see the whole Legionaires Disease epidemic unfold at the Bellview Stratford Hotel in Philadelphia in the summer of 1976 - Bicentennial Summer.
BK
****************************************************************
"I remember reading a small news report of missing virals of virus from Ft. Detrick back in the mid-70s, and then was surprised to see the whole Legionaires Disease epidemic unfold at the Bellview Stratford Hotel in Philadelphia in the summer of 1976 - Bicentennial Summer."
I was going to bring that up, as well. I saw nothing coincidental about that, either.
Shortly after the 9/11 debacle, KCET put a panel of medical experts together from Stanford, UCLA, USC, and Cedars-Sinai for a NOVA special to address the aspects of bio warfare and how the city of L.A. would be equipped to respond to it. The representative from UCLA seemed the most concerned, especially as to the lack of, or shortage in number of, loading dock spaces, which are converted to decontamination stations in worst case scenario disaster drills.
He also happen to mention "age specific" biologicals that could be used to target people over the age of 55. Legionnaires Disease immediately came to mind at the time. So, if these major medical centers were already anticipating bio-weaponry on that scale, and with age-specific designations, you can bet your behind that these have already been concocted and available for use, if not abuse, should they fall into the wrong hands, or gain access into black market channels of distribution.
-
http://www.boston.com/news/science/article...thogen_mystery/
WASHINGTON - The US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases in Frederick, Md., is under investigation by the Army's Criminal Investigation Command for the possible disappearance of some of its stock of deadly pathogens, an Army spokesman said.
The Frederick News-Post reported yesterday that since at least February, agents have been trying to discover what happened to pathogens that may have gone missing from 1987 to 2008. The investigation coincides with the suspension of most research at the Army lab in February as authorities attempt to find errors in an inventory of their biological materials.
Christopher Grey, public affairs chief for the Criminal Investigation Command, confirmed yesterday that the command is investigating the possibility of missing virus samples from the institute. "We have an ongoing investigation at Fort Detrick," Grey said, but he declined to say when the investigation began or when it is likely to be completed.
The investigation seems to center on missing samples of Venezuelan equine encephalitis, a mosquito-borne virus that usually causes a mild flulike illness but can also cause brain inflammation and death. It has potential for use as a biological weapon, but is far less lethal than some other agents the lab works with, such as anthrax bacteria and Ebola virus.
The News-Post cited two support staff members who said they had been questioned by investigators from Fort Meade, Md., about missing samples of the virus. Alan Schmaljohn, a longtime scientist at the lab who now works for the University of Maryland, said he had also been questioned two or three months ago as someone who once had access to the virus.
"They caught me on my cellphone on the road and I stopped and talked to them for quite a long time," Schmaljohn said.
Schmaljohn said it wasn't clear from the questions exactly what the investigators sought, though he believed they wanted to know what happened to three missing vials carrying small quantities of the virus.
"The number of vials is utterly meaningless," Schmaljohn said. "Three vials missing is no indication of any evildoing. . . . It's almost equivalent to saying you're missing 3 cents out of the national budget. . . . From the scientists' point of view it is inconsequential, but from the regulator's point of view it is an indication of sloppiness, and they are finally going to take rugged action."
A problem in accounting for Venezuelan equine encephalitis was what triggered the earlier suspension of most research at the lab. A spot check in January found 20 samples of the virus in a box of vials instead of the 16 that had been listed in the institute's database, Caree Vander Linden, the spokeswoman for the institute, said in February.
The lab has been under heavy pressure to tighten security since anthrax attacks in 2001 that killed five people and sickened 17 others. FBI investigators think the anthrax strain used in the attacks originated at the Army lab, and its prime suspect, Bruce E. Ivins, researched anthrax there. Ivins committed suicide last year.
Wonderful. One wonders how many other deadly pathogens are 'missing'. Even AIDS is sometimes suspect as having come from here by accident or on purpose. If one looks at how stockpiles of weapons are moved from military inventories to secret ops and such, why not biologicals. The idea of rogues taking the Anthrax or this new material is, IMO, less likely then a small secretly-approved operation to move it into the 'black world' for who-knows-what. There are pathogens that could kill all in a city or region or the planet in short order, in case you want to loose sleep. Ebola spread over a wide area [to name just one pathogen] would render the area a death zone that few, if any, would survive.........most would live just a week or so of horrible deathpangs. Brave New World. Reminds me of the missing nukes too. We have a rogue state posing as the State, face it. The Anthrax was part II of the 9/11 attacks and was NOT done by one disgruntled employee. He was the patsy and killed in his role.
Let's see, this rinky dink newspaper from Frederick, Maryland reports that there's a secret military investigation into the loss of vials of biological warfare viruses on one day, and the next day there's a major virus outbreak in Mexico City that requires the government to declare martial law.
Could there be a connection?
BK
*************************************************************************
My email to Peter this morning:
Hey Peter,
Could this be an indication of bio-op ethnic cleansing aimed at Mexico's drug cartels? Fort Detrick, MD working overtime, these days?
Ter
Swine flu empties Mexico City's churches, streets
AP
* Buzz Up
* Send
* Share
o Delicious
o Digg
o Facebook
o Fark
o Newsvine
o Reddit
o StumbleUpon
o Technorati
o Yahoo! Bookmarks
* Print
Mexico swine flu has 'pandemic potential' Play Video AP – Mexico swine flu has 'pandemic potential'
* Swine Flu Slideshow:Swine Flu
* Fear Over Potential Flu Pandemic Play Video Video:Fear Over Potential Flu Pandemic ABC News
* 8 NYC Prep School Students Likely Have Swine Flu Play Video Video:8 NYC Prep School Students Likely Have Swine Flu CBS 2 New York
A police officer, wearing a surgical mask, guards the entrance to the AP – A police officer, wearing a surgical mask, guards the entrance to the Metropolitan Cathedral in Mexico …
By DAVID KOOP, Associated Press Writer David Koop, Associated Press Writer – 1 hr 20 mins ago
MEXICO CITY – Churches stood empty Sunday in heavily Roman Catholic Mexico City after services were canceled, and health workers screened airports and bus stations for people sickened by a new strain of swine flu that experts fear could become a global epidemic.
President Felipe Calderon has assumed new powers to isolate people infected with the deadly swine flu strain that Mexico's health minister says has killed up to 81 people and likely sickened 1,324 since April 13.
Mexican soldiers and health workers patrolled the capital's subway system handing out surgical masks and looking for possible flu cases. People were advised to seek medical attention if they suffered from multiple symptoms — which include a fever of more than 100 degrees, body aches, coughing, a sore throat, respiratory congestion and, in some cases, vomiting and diarrhea.
Hundreds of public events from concerts to sports matches to were called off to keep people from congregating and spreading the virus in crowds. Zoos were closed and visits to juvenile correction centers were suspended.
About a dozen federal police in blue surgical masks stood in front of Mexico City's Metropolitan Cathedral, which was nearly empty after a measure canceling services to avoid large concentrations of people.
Johana Chavez, 22, said she showed up for her confirmation only to find a sign advising that all Masses, baptisms and confirmations were canceled until further notice.
"We are all Catholic so this is a big step, closing the cathedral," she said, cradling a squirming infant in her arms. "I guess I'll have to come back later."
Markets and restaurants were nearly empty. And throngs of Mexicans — some with just a fever — rushed to hospitals.
Mexico appears to have lost valuable days or weeks in detecting the new flu strain, a combination of pig, bird and human viruses that humans may have no natural immunity to. Health officials have found cases in 16 Mexican states. Two dozen new suspected cases were reported in the capital on Saturday alone.
Eleven cases of swine flu were confirmed in California, Texas and Kansas, with more suspected in New York City.
The first death was in southern Oaxaca state on April 13, but Mexico didn't send the first of 14 mucous samples to the CDC until April 18, around the same time it dispatched health teams to hospitals looking for patients with severe flu or pnuemonia-like symptoms.
Those teams noticed something strange: The flu was killing people aged 20 to 40. Flu victims are usually either infants or the elderly. The Spanish flu pandemic, which killed at least 40 million people worldwide in 1918-19, also first struck otherwise healthy young adults.
The World Health Organization on Saturday asked all countries to step up reporting and surveillance of the disease, as airports around the world were screening travelers from Mexico for flu symptoms.
On Sunday, New Zealand reported that 10 students "likely" have swine flu after a school trip to Mexico, though Health Minister Tony Ryall said none of the students was seriously ill and there was no guarantee they had swine flu. Israel's Health Ministry said there is one suspected case in that country and France is investigating four possible cases.
WHO Director-General Margaret Chan said the outbreak of the never-before-seen virus has "pandemic potential." But she said it is still too early to tell if it would become a pandemic — an epidemic that spreads in humans around the world.
WHO guidance calls for isolating the sick and blanketing everyone around them with anti-viral drugs such as Tamiflu. Too many patients have been identified in Mexico's teeming capital for such a solution now. But some pandemic flu experts say it's also too late to contain the disease to Mexico and the United States.
"Anything that would be about containing it right now would purely be a political move," said Michael Osterholm at the University of Minnesota.
Mexican authorities ordered schools closed in the capital and the states of Mexico and San Luis Potosi until May 6.
A team from the Centers for Disease Control was in Mexico to help set up detection testing for the swine flu strain, something Mexico previously lacked.
Health authorities noticed a threefold spike in flu cases in late March and early April, but thought it was a late rebound in the December-February flu season.
Testing at domestic labs did not alert doctors to the new strain. Health Secretary Jose Cordova acknowledged Mexican labs lacked the profiling data needed to detect the previously unknown strain.
Even though U.S. labs detected the swine flu in California and Texas before last weekend, Mexican authorities as recently as Wednesday were referring to it as a late-season flu.
But mid-afternoon Thursday, Mexico City Health Secretary Dr. Armando Ahued said, officials got a call "from the United States and Canada, the most important laboratories in the field, telling us this was a new virus."
Asked why there were so many deaths in Mexico, and none so far among the U.S. cases, Cordova noted that the U.S. cases involved children — who haven't been among the fatal cases in Mexico, either.
"There are immune factors that are giving children some sort of defense, that is the only explanation we have," he said.
Another factor may be that some Mexican patients may have delayed seeking medical help too long, Cordova said.
Others are forced to work and leave their homes despite health concerns.
Wearing two dirty, blue surgical masks she says she found and a heavy coat, Daniela Briseno swept garbage early Sunday morning from the streets in Mexico City.
"This chill air must be doing me harm. I should be at home but I have a family to support," the 31-year-old said.
Scientists have warned for years about the potential for a pandemic from viruses that mix genetic material from humans and animals.
A "seed stock" genetically matched to the new swine flu virus has been created by the CDC, said Dr. Richard Besser, the agency's acting director. If the government decides vaccine production is necessary, manufacturers would need that stock to get started.
___
Associated Press writers Mark Stevenson and Olga R. Rodriguez in Mexico City; Frank Jordans in Geneva; Mike Stobbe in Atlanta; Malcolm Ritter in New York; and Maria Cheng in London contributed to this report.
-
Peter,
French Intelligence did issue a 1967 report on the matter of repeated assassination attempts on the life of French President Charles De Gaulle.. In the report they identified "Permindex" as the organization responsible for the attempts on President Charles De Gaulle's life.
Permindex was headed up by British (SOE) and Divsion Five(counter espionage division within the FBI) operative "Louis Mortimer Bloomfield."
-
Don,
One irony is that "operation Mockingbird" probably was not even necessary - the "journalist community" would have gladly carried out it's objectives with much less expensive CIA influence than was unleashed. No member of the press has the slightest interest in investigating and reporting on the circumstances of quotes of GHW Bush and Karl Rove displayed here, confidently and publicly endorsing the new biography of a man; http://samuelpryor.com/Home_Page.html who Winchell. Pearson, Marquis Childs, Asst. US Attorney General O. John Rogge, and perhaps a dozen authors of books, including presidential biographer Herb S. Parmet, all described as knowingly and deliberately introducing candidate Willkie to a traitor who was openly offering millions of dollars in funding from Goring and Ribbentrop for Wendell Willkie's campaign to unseat FDR. This man Pryor later flew Davis to meet with Willkie at Pryor's Jupiter Island home and introduced him to isolationist committee chairman Verne Marshall.
Pryor befriended and chose to be buried next to Charles A. Lindbergh. This saga has the added dimension that the Nazi Abwehr agent that Pryor collaborated with and aided in the corruption of candidate Willkie, was the deliberatley hidden grandfather of Gray Davis....successfully kept hidden even as Davis's 2003 California gubernatorial opponent, Arnold Schwarzenneger, a man who in 1990 had voluntarily asked Simon Weisenthal to investigate the Nazi background of Schwarzenneger's own family, was the target of much negative news reporting related to his father and grandfather's Nazi service.
Opinion, as Peter so clearly posted....is "incentivized", shaped by ideology, agenda, and anticipated reward. The proof is, as I keep coming back to, the fact that we as country, much more so than western Europe with the exception of the UK, are skewed so far to the right, but we still think we are "centrists". Militarized, "law and order", corporatism seems like "home" to most of us. Only six percent of the world population, but confining 25 percent of the world's prisoners....no problem.
Rabidly right wing religious fanatics openly infesting the military and shaping a "biblical" foreign policy, no problem:
The man who recently headed the pentagon policy board wrote this years before his appointment:
No matter what the consequences of the dominance of our political and business culture by entrenched neo-fascism, there is no discussion as to whether a shift to the distant left side of center would be to our benefit, and the populist accomplishments of the French voters, influenced by their left leaning political ideology, is reflexively ridiculed, and never examined critically, even as 50 million in the US have no health insurance coverage and tuition costs for higher education become increasinlgy unaffordable.
When it comes to rationally reacting to implausible official BS like the "magic bullet" and the WC declaration that both Oswald and Ruby were LNs, why would you expect most to react any differently than the do when they never even notice the fact that the French voter has achieved many benefits from the way he votes, vs. the American, who seems to have achieved next to none for himself and his family?
****************************************************************
"Opinion, as Peter so clearly posted....is "incentivized", shaped by ideology, agenda, and anticipated reward. The proof is, as I keep coming back to, the fact that we as country, much more so than western Europe with the exception of the UK, are skewed so far to the right, but we still think we are "centrists". Militarized, "law and order", corporatism seems like "home" to most of us. Only six percent of the world population, but confining 25 percent of the world's prisoners....no problem.
Rabidly right wing religious fanatics openly infesting the military and shaping a "biblical" foreign policy, no problem:
The man who recently headed the pentagon policy board wrote this years before his appointment:
"Israel should insist on Arab recognition of its claim to the biblical land of Israel, the 1996 report suggested..."
No matter what the consequences of the dominance of our political and business culture by entrenched neo-fascism, there is no discussion as to whether a shift to the distant left side of center would be to our benefit, and the populist accomplishments of the French voters, influenced by their left leaning political ideology, is reflexively ridiculed, and never examined critically, even as 50 million in the US have no health insurance coverage and tuition costs for higher education become increasingly unaffordable."
On target, Tom.
Nothing like keeping the unwashed masses dumbed down, glued to their plasma screens, as well as easily accessed and gps'd through their damned cell phones, and late model, gas-guzzling SUV's. You, sure hit the nail on the head with that one. Bravo!
And, if this is considered to be an "atta boy" reply, then so be it! I could care less.
-
LONDON'S BLACK-OPS PROJECT
by Anton Chaitkin
{Time} magazine misnamed as the "Consortium of Behavioral
Scientists" what {Time} described as "a secret advisory group of
29 of the nation's leading behaviorists," directing President
Barack Obama's catastrophic policy, of pouring out trillions of
dollars to prop up the London-centered offshore finance swindle.
The group of economists is actually called the Behavioral
Economics Roundtable, based at the Russell Sage Foundation in
Washington D.C. The "behavioral economics" project has been
tightly organized and run jointly since 1986 by the Alfred P.
Sloan Foundation and the Russell Sage Foundaton.
Through these and related institutions, the project's
sponsors are the same clique of London-directed strategists who
created the Hitler and Mussolini regimes, and ran the propaganda
war against President Franklin Roosevelt.
After World War II, these British empire strategists revived
fascist economics and psychological manipulation methods to
attack and reverse Roosevelt's legacy.
The Empire's Irrational Subjects
The Israeli kook psychologist Daniel Kahneman, called the
founder of behavioral economics, was an apostle of brainwashing
expert Kurt Lewin. Kahneman has described his own Israeli army
experiments, based on the psychological warfare methods of
Lewin's bosses in London's Tavistock Institute: the study of
soldiers' vulnerable minds in "leaderless groups."
Kahneman met Alfred P. Sloan Foundation vice
president/psychologist Eric Wanner in 1982. Wanner, previously
employed by Britain's Sussex University, home of the Tavistock
Institute, took Kahneman under his wing. Wanner soon afterwards
became chief executive of the Russell Sage Foundation, and, in
1986, he instituted the Behavioral Economics Project, run jointly
by the Sloan and Sage Foundations.
Both foundations, as will be reported below, were central to
London's post-World War II fascist revival.
This began before the war was even won. In 1944, Montagu
Norman had stepped down as governor of the Bank of England, after
two decades directing the London and Wall Street promotion and
funding of the Hitler dictatorship. Norman next created the World
Federation for Mental Health, managed by leaders of the
pro-Hitler Cliveden Set under the presidency of Tavistock
Institute director John R. Rees. Heading this London initiative
within the U.S.A. was Kurt Lewin, working for Tavistock with
Rockefeller money arranged by Russell Sage Foundation operative
Raymond Fosdick.
Lewin set the tone for what is now called "behavioral
economics"--instead of a republic's government serving rational
citizens, an empire's oligarchy rules its subjects by playing on
popular ignorance and irrationality. Lewin mused in his 1941
book, {Time Perspective and Morale}:
"One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a
'strategy of terror' consists in exactly this tactic--keep the
person hazy as to where he stands and what just he may expect.
If, in addition, frequent vacillations between severe
disciplinary measures and promises of good treatment, together
with the spreading of contradictory news, make the cognitive
structure of this situation utterly unclear, then the individual
may cease to know when a particular plan would lead toward or
away from his goal. Under these conditions, even those
individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks
will be paralyzed with severe inner conflicts in regard to what
to do."
Sloan, Sage and the Project
The two foundations running the Behavioral Economics
Roundtable have extended this project and put their Behavioral
operatives into the National Bureau of Economic Research
(NBER--an anti-labor think-tank funded entirely the right-wing
Olin, Bradley, Scaife, and Smith Richardson Foundations), giving
many Roundtable Sage-Sloan paid operatives an NBER label.
Arrangments with NBER, have been supervised by Sloan
Foundation Program Director Michael S. Teitelbaum, who epitomizes
the unashamed Hitler legacy at Sloan. A former Oxford University
faculty member, Teitelbaum was a key American instigator of the
return of the Nazi race psuedo-science called eugenics. From his
Sloan base since 1983, Teitelbaum spread eugenics and
anti-immigrant filth into Congressional deliberations. He was
presient of the American Eugenics Society from 1985 to 1990, and
vice president of Sloan Foundation in the late 1990s, as
"behavioral economics" was revved up.
This effort bears rotten fruit in the person of a leading
behavioral economist Alan Kreuger, whom President Obama has
nominated to be Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Policy.
Though not yet confirmed, Krueger has already been advising
Treausury Secretary Tim Geithner during the catastophic bailouts.
Kreuger has been a director of the Russell Sage Foundation,
a Sloan Fellow, an NBER Olin Fellow, and Krueger is a longtime
staff leader at the eugenics movement's Office of Population
Research at Princeton University. American Eugenics Society
founder Frederick Osborn created that office at Princeton in
1936, the year after the eugenics movement triumphed with the
passage of Hitler's Nuremberg race laws. (The office now
advertises a workers' efficiency survey being conducted by
Treasury-designee Krueger and his fellow Princeton faculty
member, behavioral economics originator Daniel Kahneman.)
In that nightmare of the 1930s, Alfred P. Sloan was among
the small circle of leading pro-Hitler industrialists in the
United States. Sloan had been made chief executive of General
Motors in 1923 by GM's co-owners, the J.P. Morgan bank and the
DuPont chemical enterprise. In 1934, Alfred P. Sloan and
Morgan-DuPont financial executive John J. Raskob founded the
American Liberty League, and at the same time, the Sloan
Foundation. The Liberty League organized American pro-fascists to
attack President Franklin Roosevelt, while carrying on propaganda
favorable to Mussolini and Hitler.
The Sloan Foundation's assets were based on shares of
General Motors, whose Opel division produced a large proportion
of Germany's exports for the Hitler regime throughout the 1930s.
The Russell Sage Foundation, a British Empire agency planted
within the United States (with money from Wall Street speculator
Russell Sage's widow), was X-rayed in the 1976 reference work
{Carter and the Party of International Terrorism}, published by
the U.S. Labor Party:
"Since its incorporation in New York State in 1907, the
Russell Sage Foundation has served as the major Fabian
Society-Fabian Research Bureau operation in North America.
Russell Sage has been the pioneer institution in the building of
a 1984 [Orwellian]-style police infrastructure in this country:
in the nazification of the federal judicial system; and the
development of computer technology as a technical up grading of
centralized Wall Street black propaganda control over every facet
of the mass media in the field of overt criminal and terrorist
activity ... since its engineered takeover of the New York City
rackets during the late 1910s [sage] has been maintaining an
ongoing program of crime profiling....
"Under the stated purpose of scientific social work, Russell
Sage initiated a wide range of projects [aiming at] the creation
of a centrally controlled, mass-social-control apparatus. Russell
Sage conducted the earliest program in co-participation
(Mackenzie King's profiles of the Rockefeller family Colorado
mining companies) and working-class profiling [in] Pittsburgh and
San Francisco....)
"[in World War One] Russell Sage moved its offices to
Washington DC, and took over the Department of War. The
Foundation [with its London background]--in that government
capacity--organized the entire logistical and support operations
for the U.S. war effort [in the alliance with Britain]. Personnel
placed in the State Department took control over all
German-American assets for the duration of the war. Col. Ayer of
Russell Sage was one of President Wilson's chief negotiators and
advisers at Versailles; he later assumed charge of the postwar
German reparations and through this, was instrumental in creating
the Anglo-American networks epitomized by the activities of
[Hitler intelligence executive] Adm. Canaris and
[London-controlled Nazi regime-designer] Hjalmar Schacht.
"Russell Sage [later concentrated on] funding of Raymond
Fosdick [head of Rockefeller Foundation who coordinated with
publicist Ivy Lee and Morgan partner Thomas Lamont in directing
international finances and public relations for the Mussolini and
Hitler regimes] and supervision of German military buildup during
the Weimar period.
"[Just as] the original Fabian Society used visiting fellow
programs [to recruit] long-term agents of influence, the Russell
Sage maintains a network of leading operatives in every major
university in the United States.... Among the notable individuals
[created as Russell Sage projects were]:
"Charles Hamilton, sponsor of Stokely Carmichael's Black
Power project; ... Daniel Bell, [author of {The Coming of
Post-Industrial Society}]; Alvin Toffler, author of {Future
Shock}; Kenneth Boulding, the zero-growth convergence theory
planner; University of Chicago psychological warfare [strategist]
Morris Janowitz; top brainwasher Edward Shils; Columbia
University counterinsurgency warfare planner Amitai Etzioni; LEAA
founder James Vorenburg; Institute for Policy Studies terrorist
controller and labor counterinsurgency expert Paul Jacobs; and
the leading European-based linguistic brainwasher and left
countergang controller, Alvin Gouldner of {Theory and Society}."
The Obama Vortex
This London "black-ops" project, behavioral econonomics, has
embedded its operatives all over the Obama Administration.
Sage Foundation director Thaler is a linchpin of the scheme.
Thaler originally managed the Sloan-Sage sponsorship of Daniel
Kahneman to "define that field" of economics"
Thaler runs a multi-billion dollar private asset fund
(Fuller & Thaler) employing Kahneman as a director. Thaler's
private fund took over from Russell Sage the financing of the
Project inside NBER.
A University of Chicago professor, Thaler closely consults
his younger faculty colleagues Austan Goolsbee and Cass Sunstein,
two Obama advisors who were initiated into Thaler's behavioral
economics clique.
Sunstein co-authored Thaler's book, {Nudge}, on how the
regime can engineer people's choices without their knowledge.
President Obama has chosen Sunstein as U.S. Regulatory
czar--administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs. Sunstein's wife is Samantha Power, a longtime paid
George Soros agent specializing in provoking wars in Africa, who
now runs "multi-lateral affairs" (the London connection) in
Obama's National Security Council.
Goolsbee was notorious as the radical Free Trade chief
economic adviser to Obama's Presidential campaign. Like current
Obama chief economic adviser and fellow behavioral economist
Larry Summers, Goolsbee worships the late University of Chicago
economist Milton Friedman. Goolsbie eulogized Friedman ({New York
Times}, Nov. 17, 2006) for "scientific economics."
The London-Wall street sponsors of behavioral economics want
to get away with crushing austerity as policy outcome in the
present systemic collapse. From the Aug. 6, 1923 {Time{ magazine
cover lionizing Benito Mussolini, throughout the 1930s, they
claimed that {Il Duce} was brutal, but "he made the trains run on
time."
Goolsbee invoked that Mussolini legacy in the title of an
article, "Where the Buses Run on Time" (Slate, March 16, 2006),
to praise the behaviorist speed-up of bus drivers made possible
by Milton Friedman's economic program under the Pinochet
dictatorship in Chile. Goolsbee argued that Chicago should use
the methods for reducing wages and speeding up bus drivers, that
had been successful outcomes of the Chilean fascist regime.
THE ROUNDTABLE 29
{The Russell Sage Foundation identifies the "Behavioral Economics
Roundtable" members as:}
1. Henry Aaron, Brookings Institution;
2. George Akerlof, University of California, Berkeley;
3. Linda Babcock, Carnegie Mellon University;
4. Nicholas C. Barberis, Yale University;
5. Marianne Bertrand, University of Chicago;
6. Roland J. M. Benabou, Princeton University.;
7. Colin Camerer, California Institute of Technology;
8. Peter Diamond, Massachusetts Institute of Technology;
9. Jon Elster, Columbia University;
10. Ernst Fehr, University of Zurich;
11. Robert H. Frank, Cornell University;
12. Christine Jolls, Harvard University;
13. Daniel Kahneman, Princeton University;
14. David Laibson, Harvard University;
15. George Loewenstein, Carnegie Mellon University;
16. Brigitte Madrian, University of Pennsylvania;
17. Sendhil Mullainathan, Massachusetts Institute
Technology;
18. Edward D. O'Donoghue, Cornell University;
19. Terrance Odean, University of California Berkeley;
20. Drazen Prelec, Massachusetts Institute Technology;
21. Matthew Rabin, University of California Berkeley;
22. Thomas Schelling, University of Maryland;
23. Eldar Shafir, Princeton University;
24. Robert Shiller, Yale University;
25. Cass Sunstein, University of Chicago
26. Richard Thaler, University of Chicago;
27. Jean Tirole, University Sciences Soc. Toulouse;
28. Richard Zechhauser, Harvard University;
and (until his death), Amos Tversky, Stanford University.
MISBEHAVIOR IN RUSSIA
The knives are out for Larry Summers, former Harvard
president, behaviorial economist, director of the National
Economic Council for President Barack Obama. The {New York Times}
(April 6, 2009, "A Rich Education for Summers (After Harvard)")
speared him as a fanatical hedge-fund operator and
multi-millionaire.
His Harvard prote@aage@aa, the prominent behavioral
economist and mass corruptionist Andrei Shleifer, is part of what
the {Times} called the "small circle of financial professionals,
particularly hedge fund managers," that Summers has "cultivated
... to serve as an informal brain trust. He consults with them on
policy matters from his perch in the White House."
In the early 1990s, Summers was chief economist for the
World Bank, coordinating the privatization and looting of Russia
with Vice Premier Anatoly Chubais. While Summers' man Shleifer
and Harvard University were then being paid by the U.S.
government to advise Chubais and the Russians on privatization,
Shleifer's wife Nancy Zimmerman was running a hedge fund out of
the back room of Harvard's USAID-funded privatization project
office in Moscow.
Put in charge of setting up a stock market, and engineering
other post-Soviet projects, Shleifer engorged himself on the
resultant stocks and bonds, while Russia slid into misery. The
U.S. government sued Harvard, Shleifer, and Zimmerman under the
False Claims Act. Harvard and Shleifer reached an agreement with
the Justice Department in 2005: Harvard paid $26.5 million to
settle; Shleifer paid $2 million in damages, on top of his wife's
firm's $1.5 million in damages.
As Summers defended the looting of Russia and Shleifer's
role in it, Harvard paid most of Shleifer's damages and kept him
on the faculty.
The cited {Times} article names only Nancy Zimmerman, and
not Shleifer himself, as being in that Summers circle of hedge
fund managers.
The same {Times} article makes a reference that points in
the direction of the underlying behavioral economist takeover of
the Obama Administration:
"Among these [hedge fund] insiders are Kenneth D. Brody and
Frank P. Brosens, the founding partners of another hedge fund,
Taconic Capital Advisors, for whom Mr. Summers did consulting
work from 2004 to 2006. Mr. Summers reached out to Mr. Brosens in
December to discuss the Obama administration's economic
priorities. This year, he campaigned to have him run the federal
office overseeing the $700 billion bailout program. Mr. Brosens
withdrew his name from consideration last month."
The cited Kenneth D. Brody (Brosens' partner) is himself the
Treasurer of the Russell Sage Foundation, the central channel
through which the behavioral economics project has been foisted
on the American government.
{--Anton Chaitkin}
Paolo Sarpi:
THE VENETIAN ROOTS OF 'BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS'
While {Time} magazine's (April 13, 2009) expose of the
"behavioral economists" surrounding President Barack Obama has
put an important spotlight on a dangerous disease, infecting the
economic decision-making at the Oval Office, the author of the
expose only scratched the surface of the actual evil
underlying this hedonistic madness.
The bestial notion of man as an irrational creature, driven
by overwhelming impulses to seek pleasure and avoid pain, which
is at the heart of the so-called "behavioral economics" dogma,
came directly from Venice, the wellspring of all modern financier
oligarchism. The author of this schema, which ruthlessly rejects
actual human creativity, was Paolo Sarpi (1552-1623).
A Servite monk who rose to be the leading theological and
juridical authority for the Venetian doge, Sarpi waged a war
against the Catholic Church, and, despite his nominal status as a
leading theologian, argued against the existence of God. In
correspondence with Francis Bacon, mediated through the English
ambassador to Venice, Henry Wooten, Sarpi argued that man can
only know the world through his senses. Thus, Sarpi was the
author of the radical, anti-cognitive empiricist doctrine, later
codified by successive generations of English utilitarians, from
John Locke, to Bernard de Mandeville, to Adam Smith, to Jeremy
Bentham.
Sarpi took a leading role in the Venetian faction known as
the Giovanni (Youth), who argued that Venice could not retain its
financial and political power over Europe through its base in the
Venetian lagoon. Sarpi and the Giovanni not only promoted the
Protestant break with Rome, they redeployed Venetian power into
northern Europe, through the successive takeover of the
Netherlands and England, via the creation of Venetian-controlled
trading companies, including the Venice, Turkey, Levant, and,
eventually, the Dutch and British East India companies. It was
this financier-oligarchy, that took over England, and, at the
same time, promoted the radical empiricist dogma that has been
the key to oligarchical power ever since.
It is from Sarpi's descendents, particularly the radical
hedonist Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), that all of the essentials
of "behavioral economics" derive. Indeed, a 2004 paper, published
by the British Fabian Society's London School of Economics,
titled "Utility Theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman,"
makes the case explicitly.
Essentially plagiarizing Sarpi, Bentham, in his infamous {An
Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation} (1780)
wrote, "Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two
sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to
point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we
shall do.... Every effort we make to throw off our subjection,
will serve but to demonstrate and confirm it. The principle of
utility--the greatest happiness or greatest felicity
principle--recognizes this subjection, and assumes it for the
foundation.... Systems which attempt to question it deal ... in
caprice instead of reason, in darkness instead of light."
Bentham was not only the chief philosopher for the British
East India Company, during the tenure of its Secret Committee
chairman, Lord Shelburne. During Shelburne's brief tenures as
Foreign Secretary and Prime Minister, Bentham founded modern
British intelligence.
Bentham first caught the attention of the Venetian-minded
Shelburne for his diatribe against the American Declaration of
Independence. In October 1776, Bentham wrote: "This, they 'hold
to be' a 'truth self-evident.' At the same time, to secure these
rights they are satisfied that government should be instituted.
They see not ... that nothing that was ever called government
ever was or ever could be exercised but at the expense of one or
another of those rights, that ... some one or other of those
pretended unalienable rights is alienated.... In these tenets
they have outdone the extravagance of all former fanatics."
Bentham's hatred of the American Revolution and the
principles of republican government were totally consistent with
his Sarpian belief that man is a beast, pure and simple. That
Sarpi and Bentham are the intellectual architects of the perverse
doctrine of hedonistic "behavioral economics" ought to wake up
some patriotic stirrings among some in and around the Obama White
House--before it is too late.
{--Jeffrey Steinberg}
THE DANIEL KAHNEMAN, AMOS TVERSKY SWINDLE
April 8 (EIRNS)--The short version of Behaviorist Economics
is that it can be considered as the carryover of the
pseudo-science behind the Revolution in Military Affairs into the
civilian sphere. On the other hand, it also clearly reflects the
hedonistic calculus of Jeremy Benthem and Bernard Mandeville.
Its origins can be traced to two Israeli behavioral
psychologists, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tverski, both with
experience in and employed by the Israeli Defense Forces, who
began a long collaborative career by 1968.
Born in Tel Aviv in 1934, Kahneman spent his youth in
France, where his father was director of research for a chemical
company "directed by the financial mainstay of the Fascist
anti-Semitic movement in France in the 1930s," as Kahneman
recalled in his autobiography ({A History of Psychology in
Autobiography}). At the end of the war, the family embarked for
Palestine.
Kahneman received his Bachelor's degree from Hebrew
University in Jerusalem in 1954, majoring in psychology with a
minor in mathematics. A favorite professor there introduced him
to the work of Kurt Lewin, especially Lewin's "force field from
the outside." He was so taken by Lewin's theories that he still
teaches them today.
After graduating, he served in the Israeli Army for four
years, three of them in the psychology branch of the IDF. One of
the projects he worked on was selection of individuals for
officer training, using methods based on World War II British
manuals. In a test involving a leaderless group, he experienced
what he called the "first cognitive illusion I described," which
he named "the illusion of validity."
In his Nobel Prize-winning autobiography, he wrote, "puzzles
with which I struggled at the time were the seed of the paper on
the psychology of intuitive prediction which Amos Tversky and I
published later." Kahneman is known as a leader in the field of
hedonics, with a emphasis on the matter of the "framing" of
decision-making (how a question is "framed" will affect the
answer).
The two began publishing in the early 1970s, with the
seminal work, "Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and
Biases," published in {Science} magazine in 1974. At the end of
that detailed work is a note, indicating that their research "was
supported by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the
Department of Defense [DARPA] and was monitored by the Office of
Naval Research" under a contract to the Oregon Research
Institute, with additional support "provided by the Research and
Development Authority of the Hebrew University."
Behavioral Economics Is Born
Kahneman and Tversky spent time in Israel, the United
States, and Britain, each spending time at Cambridge, and, in
1978, both arrived at Stanford University, at the Center for
Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences. It was here that
they met University of Rochester-trained economist Richard
Thaler, and the "science" of Behavioral Economics was born. The
next year, 1979, saw the publication of the fundamental work of
the new science, {Prospect Theory, Analysis of Decisions Under
Risk,} by Kahnemann and Tverski. Subsequently, the two also
published works along with Thaler, and others, notably, a British
Columbia-based behavioralist Jack Knetsch.
In 1982, the grouping was "institutionalized," one might
say, by Eric Wanner, who was then the head of the Sloan
Foundation, and who proposed funding an integration of behavioral
psychology and economics. A year later, when Wanner became
president of the Russell Sage Foundation, he brought the psychos
along with him, and began to fund the project, which continues
today. The first step was to send Thaler to the University of
British Columbia, where Kahneman was teaching, to work with him
for a year. At this time, Jack Knetsch, another economist who
figures prominently in this field, would have been at UBC, as
well.
It was at Sage, that Kahneman and Tversky, along with
Knetsch produced a work in which they tried to give their
"Prospect Theory" a historical grounding, citing four works of
theoretical "heritage," one of which is the work of John von
Neumann and David Morgenstern. The result was "Fairness and the
Assumptions of Economics," published in a special issue of {The
Journal of Business}. Kahneman received half a Nobel Prize in
2002, for "having integrated insights from psychological research
into economic science, especially concerning human judgment and
decision making under uncertainty." He is today at Princeton.
Tversky died from cancer in 1996.
In 1995, Thaler, who continues as a director at the Russell
Sage Foundation, came to the University of Chicago. At Chicago,
Thaler made a quick convert and lifetime associate of Cass
Sunstein, a professor of law, who quickly picked up on the ideas
and spread them to the legal profession, causing a minor
revolution in teaching methods which continues today. Sunstein
became a close associate of Barack Obama, who was also resident
at UC at that time, and led Thaler to him at a 2004 Illinois
Senate campaign event. Thaler's response at the time: "You know,
he seems like the real deal."
Thaler, in addition to being an economics professor at the
University of Chicago, is still on the board of the Sage
Foundation, which also houses the vaunted Consortium of 29, the
Behaviorist Economics Roundtable, founded in 1992.
-
William Hundley is a new name to me, but I know a few guys who used to work for Peloquin, who may be still alive.
Bill,
Hundley was John Mitchell's defense attorney during the Watergate drama.
James
It has been reported over the years that INTERTEL played a major role in the coup against RMN.
Here is a website featuring Jack Caulfield "Staff Assistant to the President 1969-1972"
Quote:
In that same genesis description, Dean tells Nixon that Haldeman had directed him to put together, in the Fall of '71, an intelligence plan for the upcoming '72 campaign and that since he had no experience in such matters, he tasked me, then a member of his staff, with the preparation of a final draft document. "Operation Sandwedge" was a twelve page analysis/proposal of what would be required for structuring an accurate, intelligence-assessment capability, of not only the Democratic party's opposition's tactics but also to ensure that the then powerful anti-war movement did not destroy Nixon's public campaign, as had been done to Hubert Humphrey in 1968. It also anticipated facing a Democratic campaign effort that would utilize the astute services of a leading private investigative entity called Intertel, then headed by former officials of Bobby Kennedy's Justice Department. Intertel represented, in my opinion, the potential for both formidable and sophisticated intelligence opposition tactics in that upcoming election campaign.
-
This is interesting info, Bill.
Thanks for posting it.
Georgia Frontiere was quite the merry widow, getting married 2 months after her rich husband's mysterious death.
And how about the NFL's security firm "INTERTEL" a wholly owned subsidary of Meyer Lansky's Resorts International. INTERTEL was run by former Kennedy Justice Department personnel "Robert Dolan Peloquin" and "Willam Hundley".
The rest of the former Kennedy men from Justice went to work for Max Jacobs Sportsystem/ Emprise operation.
http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vau.../8282/index.htm
What a deadly web we weave.
Hey, thanks for reading it and getting something out of it.
And Chris, as for Georgia Frontiere, I tried not to mention her, as she throws a whole curve ball into the whole scene, and reminds me of an Ian Flemisque Pussy Galore.
And Terry, thanks for pointing out the INTERTEL connection to the NFL, as that's new to me, and especially interesting since Peloquin and Company served as security for Resorts International when they were the first to bring casino gambling to Atlantic City.
William Hundley is a new name to me, but I know a few guys who used to work for Peloquin, who may be still alive.
I started this file on Rosenbloom and the other NFL owners after Tim Gratz sent me an email saying that he thought it was curious that the current NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, was the son of former Sen. Charles Goodell, who was appointed to replace RFK.
It is no coincidence that current commissioner Roger Goodell also worked for Lamar Hunt, who also comes into play in the JFK story.
Coincidence or Conspiracy, you make the call Tim.
BK
INTERTEL'S other major client in the 1960's was Life Magazine. They were Life's security agency at the time Jim Garrison was trying to get access to the Z-film.
As far as Peloquin goes he is still shilling for organized crime. He got himself named to the audit board for Louis DeNaples Mount Airy Lodge and Casino.
"The new nominees are Bradford S. Smith, chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission from 1994 to 1998; Robert D. Peloquin, a U.S. Justice Department official in the 1960s who co-founded International Intelligence, a private security firm; and Barbara A. Lang, a former casino auditor in New Jersey".
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/all...0,2500693.story
Regarding the NFL. The new owner of the Miami Dolphins is the grandson to the late Max Fisher the notorious head of the Purple Gang out of Detroit.
-
"This agreement cannot be accepted," LaRouche said. "If it were, it could very well lead to riots in the United States, the the breakup of the nation and to terrorism. Therefore, this must be rejected. The U.S. must not sign any treaty agreement with these elements. No patriot will allow this to be confirmed, no matter which side of the aisle he or she is on. To sign this would be to betray the United States."
Note that the shooting deaths are occuring, with the Oakland exception, in small and rural areas, noted for their calm demeanor in good times. However, these areas were already hit hard in the last 20 years, with rural areas becoming raw material looting grounds. The current depression has ripped these small town areas into disintegrating shreds of rage.
Oakland - four cops dead in one traffic incident
Pennsylvania - 3 cops dead in domestic disturbance
Binghamton, NY - 13 dead in immigration center
NC - nursing home - multiple (8) shooting deaths
Alabama - multiple (9) shooting deaths
California - murder suicide of family (5)
While the nation disintegrates, the Obama financial plan is collapsing in squabbles between Congressional oversight rules and free market strictures. Obama will self destruct his own ego as it collides with reality.
-
Senator Edward Kennedy is scheduled to be Knighted by the Queen of England. We can only guess that Ted Kennedy is being bestowed this honor for not following in his brother, the late President John F. Kennedy's footsteps.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/worl...icle5842904.ece
FBI, the mob, and 9/11
in 11 September 2001 attacks
Posted
I cut and paste the supposed quote from your grandfather too, and you called that an "attack". Surely I must understand his sentiments in order to select that passage, correct?
I saw "no" proof" from the cited article that your grandfather was a "holocaust" victim.
Can you site proof of your accusation?