Michael Clark

255

254

253

252

251

250

249

248

247

246

245

244

243

242

241

240

239

238

237

George, If I were to do that, I would be obliged to quote you, point-by-point to demonstrate the problems with your line of reasoning and the premises of your argument. That is not a courtesy that you extend to the reader who is trying to follow you. Indeed, you tell the reader that it is all on the internet and they can find it themselves. You refuse to quote sources. You refuse to provide the statements of members To which you take exception. Why would I extend that courtesy when the lack of that courtesy, on your part,is the real source of the problem? For example, a reader who comes across this very post of mine has absolutely no idea what I am responding to. They have to go back and try to find it in order to make any sense out of it.... to put it in context. The reader may not want to do that. The reader may not be successful in doing that. In this case the post to which I am responding is three posts back,... not hard to find; but can the reader even be sure that that post is the one to which I am responding? Not really. Its a simple thing, demonstrated all over this forum everyday. Indeed the existence of the quote function speaks for itself. I don't understand why you do not do it. I tried to help. There is not much more I can do.

Ron, Nothing solid here, but it may prod somebody's memory, but I believe I read that Michael Paine was identified, through pictures, as a person who was querying students at a local university regarding their political positions. IIRC, Michael was doing this anonymously or under cover. He was gathering intelligence on students, essentially.

Keyvan, You and your posted video are claiming that the Z-film cought a reflection of a County Records Building rooftop shooter in the sprocket area of the film. That anomoly is present in a large majority of the Z-frames, including frames that were exposed while the camera was pointed AWAY from the County Records Building. In fact, you "double-downed" on that claim. It's an assertion with a built-in, automatic, hands-free self-debunking feature. That feature worked flawlessly, I must say. And, I just checked.... that anomoly is present on two of the last three frames of the z-film, when the camera is pointed west, into the trees. Frame 484

236

The video you posted makes that assertion. You own it.