Jump to content
The Education Forum

Calvin Ye

Members
  • Posts

    314
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Calvin Ye

  1. 3 hours ago, Denny Zartman said:

    What misinformation do you think it contains and what makes you believe it is misinformation?

    I think I have it, the document entitled "Armadeus: The Bigger Picture"? I read it today and am working through it again for an upcoming post. Do you know the name of the author and when it was written?

    It was written by Bill Tyree. I believe that it was written in 2000?

  2. 1 hour ago, John Butler said:

    Andrej,

    This is one of the many incidents in the story of Harvey and Lee that identifies a Harvey and Lee.  Lee Harvey Oswald (the original) was in the Marines in the Japan for a part of the year 1957, and for all of 1958.  He was at the Naval Base at Atsugi, Japan.  In the early part of 1957, Lee Harvey Oswald (the original) was in California and then later he was at training bases in Florida and Tennessee until the end of August 1957.  Then he was assigned overseas duty to Atsugi, Japan. 

    Lee Harvey Oswald (Harvey) was also trained at these radar and aircraft bases.  Then he drops out of the US Marine Corps record.  By August 1958 Harvey appears at Antioch College.  By October, 1957 he is back in New Orleans living at the Senator Hotel and working at Pfisterers Dental Lab.  He doesn't re-enter US Marine Corps records until September, 1958.  Nowhere does it say this, but Harvey Oswald was AWOL from the Marine Corps.  Maybe he was off with the US Army taking the two training courses he said he did with the army. 

    There is a note in David Joseph's timeline that says that on Septermber 14, 1958 he was escorted under guard to a naval ship in Yokusuka, Japan.  This was with a group of marines that were totally unfamiliar with Lee Harvey Oswald (the original).  Eventually this ship went to Taiwan.  Harvey was not in Taiwan long, perhaps as few days as a week.  Then he was back in Japan at another Naval Base, Iwakuni which is 400 miles from Atsugi, Japan.  he was not there long either.  He returns to the US at about the same time as Lee Harvey Oswald (the original).

    This doesn't make sense to me.  This indicates Ruth Paine was really not in the loop on Oswald in New Orleans and Oswald at Atsugi, Japan.  This says that Oswald (Harvey) was set in front of her to find in late 1956 and Lee Oswald was not because he was in California working in aircraft maintenance and repair.  This is according to the Sgt. Rannsberger info.  Maybe this is just need to know info for various agents.

    ruth-paine-1957-1958.jpg

        

      

    Bill Tyree's affidavit contained misinformation..

  3. On 11/28/2020 at 12:30 AM, Karl Kinaski said:

    Prouty also claimed that he personaly knew the three IC-individuals which where responsible for the Powers hoax: The staged U-2 Crash on May 1st 1960 for the purpose to crash the Paris-summit and Ike's "Crusade for peace." He claimed he knew their names. But he never gave them.

    KK

    Alan  Weberman's research suggest that James Jesus  Angleton was responsible for the staged U-2 Crash because he opposed detente

  4. On 6/7/2021 at 10:00 PM, Denny Zartman said:

    Bumping this because of the mention in the Paine Files thread.

    I don't know what to think about this one. I certainly suspect the Paines, so details about their role certainly makes for interesting reading. And after "The Men Who Stare At Goats" and hearing recent stories of remote energy attacks, some of the mind-control experiments and technology sounds disturbingly plausible.

    Denny, do you want me to message the affidavit?

  5. On 4/5/2021 at 10:07 AM, Douglas Caddy said:

    Larry O’Brien, John Roselli and Robert Maheu

     

    Ervin committee staff wanted to call John Roselli as a witness to look into the idea that the Nixon White House was interested in Larry O'Brien because of a link to Robert Maheu.

     

    My thanks to Jerry Shinley for providing these

     

    showDoc.html (maryferrell.org)

     

    showDoc.html (maryferrell.org)

     

    showDoc.html (maryferrell.org)

     

    showDoc.html (maryferrell.org)

    Larry O' Brien was ally of the Kennedy family

  6. 1 hour ago, Steve Thomas said:

    Chuck,

    Because of his outspoken opposition to DeGaulle, in the Nov - Dec, 1960 timeframe, Souetre was presented with a choice: either accept a transfer from Algeria back to France, or face arrest. He took the transfer, but in January, 1961 deserted from the Air Force and established a "Maquis" or French/Algerian Underground in Oran, Algeria.

    (Souetre deserted in January, 1961. Went to the farm of Robert Martel.)

    I'll give you this link, but I think it's broken now:

    http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.piedsnoirs-aujourdhui.com/histoir73.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DOAS%2Bprison%2Bde%2BBarberousse%26start%3D10%26client%3Dsafari%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Den%26biw%3D1600%26bih%3D736

     

    "February 15, 1961 in Oran, near Mostaganem, about 80 km north-east of Oran, a first maquis "French Algeria" is established by two senior officers: its founder is Count Andrew Bush Montpeyroux, reserve captain in the (severely wounded honor of the 2nd World War 2 Military Cross, Military Medal, Legion, ex Corps Francs and those of the Resistance) head of SAS in 1957.

    The leader of the commando is the captain of the Air Force Jean-René Souêtre former Groupement des Commandos Skydivers Air (5 citations 2 to order the army, Cross of Military Valour, Legion of Honor), which has a band of twenty soldiers and civilians (René Villard and network France Resurrection) …

     

    ...the maquis is surrounded February 23, 1961 by gendarmes that capture 9 thereof, the count and the captain, some of his men fled with 400 weapons and are based in other maquis training."

     

    Over the evening hours of February21 - February 22, 1961 Souetre, Bruce de Montpeyroux, three sergeants and five civilians were arrested at Bouguirat in Mostaganem.

    On December 17, 1961 all the members of the Maquis were put on trial.

     

    Here is a link to the newspaper article I referenced, but that link is now broken too:

    http://adimad.info/galerie/MAQUISBOURGUIRAT/Maquis_Sou_tre_2

    image.png.d9d32b8433035e8f3d38c14fe443a773.png

    Of the names I cross-referenced, I only found one who had both been at the trial in December, 1961 and who was also listed as one of the escapees from the prison camp in February, 1962. That was Albert LeFevre.

    image.png.98a794baef3558f586b594ebcd0d1e06.png

    The CIA produced a document that had the names of some of the members of that Maquis in Algeria:

    HSCA Segregated CIA Collection

    XIST CE NE OF "ALGERIE FRANCAISE" MAQUIS IN ALGERIA CONFIRMED BY ARREST

    https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=110453&relPageId=3

     

    Steve Thomas

    https://nationlistgreen.blogspot.com/2019/08/cia-refuses-to-release-files-on-jean.html

  7. 2 hours ago, Paul Brancato said:

    You will notice that other members here don’t seem very interested. The general feeling is that the French Connection was disproved long ago. I don’t agree, and after looking closely at that theory I came to the conclusion that false leads were deliberately planted, such as Christian David and his story. What no one ever mentions is that Lemnitzer took over as NATO chief in 1962, and from there he surely was in the Gladio loop. I’d like to see that angle looked at more closely. 

    https://nationlistgreen.blogspot.com/2019/08/cia-refuses-to-release-files-on-jean.html

  8. 2 hours ago, Denny Zartman said:

    I have no real reason to go against the idea that Dulles, Helms, Angleton, and Harvey were major players in the planning and execution.

    I also don't doubt E. Howard Hunt played a role mid level and maybe also ground level. But he also can't be trusted to have disclosed his role truthfully, so you basically have to take everything he says with great skepticism.

    So I should ignore the CIA officials' own memoirs?

  9. 24 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:

    I don't put much faith in anything Hunt said.  Between Watergate and Mark Lane basically convicting him of lying about Dallas.  The possibility of Harvey and Angleton collaborating is intriguing and bears further investigation if possible.    

    Richard Helms claims in his memoir that he had excellent relationship with Lyndon Johnson. 

  10. 1 minute ago, Richard Booth said:

    Control over the investigation. Produce a report that says Oswald did it. Interview witnesses. Gather and control all of the evidence. Get the evidence out of Dallas' hands and into the FBI's hands in DC where the evidence can be meddled with if necessary (And this happened -- all evidence went to DC and when it was shipped back to Dallas, MORE pieces of evidence came back to Dallas then went to D.C.!).  Get all of Oswald's pay records and school records. 

    His job was to control the investigation and the evidence. As LBJ said on the phone about the Warren Commission "all you're gonna do is evaluate a Hoover report" -- that is, rubber stamp an FBI report.

    Oh okay. I get it

  11. 6 minutes ago, Richard Booth said:

    I always bear in mind that J. Edgar Hoover would absolutely love to see JFK dead. He hated his guts. Hoover would have certainly made things very easy for the people who did it, especially if those people were powerful peers. Even moreso if those powerful peers had compromising material on Hoover.

    It is certain that Hoover was an accessory after the fact. He may have been brought on-board by the planners -- in a compartmentalized fashion -- giving him only the information he would need to accomplish his task as leader of the FBI. It seems almost necessary for someone to have brought Hoover on-board in order to get him on the same page as everyone else. But I do not see him as a planner. He was just a tool: "make sure your report nails Oswald. Make sure your agents seize all of Oswald's pay stubs and school records. There were three shots. He was a Marxist. There was no conspiracy." That sort of thing.

    I just can't see Hoover being at the top. I believe Angleton was at the top and surrounded by some of his peers including his former boss Allen Dulles, who continued to receive briefings and meetings at his home after he was fired.

    I now wonder, what is the role of Hoover's involvement in the  assassination?

  12. 6 minutes ago, Richard Booth said:

    I believe that Corson's assessments of Harvey's character were accurate. Reading that entire page, the deception I see is by saying that Harvey was Hoover's mole. In this way, it becomes easy to attribute Harvey's involvement in horrible things to J. Edgar Hoover.

    I believe that William Harvey's involvement in horrible things more likely relate to his work with Angleton and Staff D and other figures at CIA, and that Hoover did absolutely hate Harvey based on the official memos he wrote trying to get Bill Harvey fired from the CIA. 

    Corson deceived Victor Marchetti for James Angleton, he was involved in an operation there targeting a journalist. I suspect that his work with Trento is more of the same.

    Trenton Parker stated in an interview with Rodney Stich that he heard Dulles,  Hoover and others conspiring to assassinate Kennedy on tape. I originally thought that Harvey and Hoover work together to kill the president therefore explaining Hoover's voice on tape but thanks to you I now know that Harvey and Hoover working together was not true

  13. 2 minutes ago, Richard Booth said:

    Interesting that it was William R. Corson who said that.

    William R. Corson was an United States Marine Corps counterintelligence figure who worked for the CIA. Sort of like how Edward Lansdale was technically in the Air Force but he was really CIA.

    Anyway, you need to understand who William R. Corson really is to know if you want to trust his word on all this. Take this for example: It was William R. Corson who worked with James Angleton to spread the limited hangout story that the CIA had a document implicating E. Howard Hunt in the assassination. This was a bogus document created by Angleton designed as disinformation. James DiEugenio explains Angleton's limited hang-out in Destiny Betrayed pgs 362-366 but doesn't mention William Corson's involvement. Corson served as a sort of "cut-out" between James Angleton and Victor Marchetti. He did Angleton bidding by telling Marchetti he'd seen the document.

    I don't trust William R. Corson, because he was working directly for key figures in the assassination. So, if he's telling people that Harvey was working for Hoover I suspect that was to misdirect people from who Harvey was really working with: the baddest of the bad in the agency. Angleton. Staff D. Helms. The mafia figures. All the people that connect the CIA to the deal. 

    Was Corson deceiving Trento like he deceived Marchetti?

     

    If Corson is deceiving Trento, that is too bad. I thought that Harvey was really working with Hoover to set up Oswald as patsy and kill the president.

  14. 1 minute ago, Richard Booth said:

    Thank you for the link!  I don't doubt what you say (That this Colson fellow said it) -- I just think he may have some other motives for having said that, possibly it was a suspicion of his, many possible other things because it flies in the face of what we know about Harvey. I'll take a look at the context. Thanks Calvin.

    You need to create an account at the website I posted for you to access the ebook.

×
×
  • Create New...