Charles Blackmon

Excellent post Gil. I did not know the DPD had been so bad for so long.

1 hour ago, Mark Ulrik said:

Beyond reasonable doubt, according to Shaneyfelt.

Shaneyfelt explains how it can be done (obviously it can be done or he would not have detailed the process) but yet it is beyond reasonable doubt that it can't be done with the backyard photos? Thats B.S. 

2 hours ago, Mark Ulrik said:

 

Twisting words. He was explaining how difficult and unlikely it would have been.

 

Great. So how unlikely would it have been? 

This is an intriguing debate- wish I had time right now to follow the whole thing. Hopefully later. 

58 minutes ago, Sandy Larsen said:

 

 

For someone like Norman Mailer to make stuff up about MM's death "for a buck," that's a pretty good indication that other writers were doing the same. Nobody knew the truth about her death, so those who wrote about it were all speculating.

 

I read Mailer's "Oswald's Tale" some years ago. He really had me swayed to think Oswald was just "nutty", unpredictable enough to pull off the JFK murder on his own. I came back to my senses in time.

Any last minute book will invariably be scorned and ridiculed. "She needed more money!"

That said, I might scrape up some spare change and buy a copy.

This is a very succinct explanation of important fake autopsy evidence. I understand it much better now! 

30 minutes ago, Michael Griffith said:

Curtin seems overly suspicious to me, and I think he oversimplifies the facts when he declares that we know the CIA killed Kennedy. Curtin argues there is an extensive media conspiracy to hype Landis's disclosure in order to divert the public's attention from the "fact" that the CIA killed JFK. He suggests that Landis's disclosure is being purposely used by powerful forces that are still covering up the truth about JFK's death. I think this is an overly suspicious take on Landis's disclosure and on the media's coverage of it.

I agree that elements of the CIA were involved in the assassination, but other powerful elements also played a role. I think we need to be careful to point out that the CIA as an institution did not play a role in JFK's death, but that powerful rogue elements of the CIA were involved in the plot. To simply say "the CIA killed JFK" ignores the important roles played by certain Mafia leaders and by elements of the FBI and the military industrial complex. 

Seems like the Dallas DPD also played a major role, at least in the coverup and the implication of the Patsy.

9 hours ago, James DiEugenio said:

Well, for the first time the MSM is questioning it in public.

Which is saying something.

And that could lead to an unraveling.

So the man is lying. Is that the latest defense of the single bullet fraud?

Nurse Sharon Thuoy is the other nurse who said she observed a bullet on JFK's gurney. There is a separate thread from 2020 on hert which I bumped. Will she get pooh-poohed as well?

Right it exists as a totally unproven "theory". Which will never be "fact".

Has Landis said whether the bullet he found and dropped on the gurney resembled CE399, or not? O.V. Wright said the bullet that he was given was pointy-tipped, ruling out the Carcano.

10 hours ago, Douglas Caddy said:

Released this afternoon:

 

What the New Story of JFK's Secret Service Agent Tells Us (substack.com)

Thanks Douglas but full story is behind a paywall.

Another Parkland nurse observed a bullet on the gurney. Here is the post from a few years ago concerning Sharon Thuoy.

Going by memory here but didn't the Warren Report claim CE399 was somehow connected with the Carcano rifle, to the exclusion of all others? 

10 hours ago, Peter Fokes said:

the magic bullet was planted before the motorcade began, Watson. 

 

 

Please explain this, Holmes. Us plebians may not comprehend.

I look forward to hearing more from Mr. Landis in coming weeks about his curious actions 60 years ago and his changed statements. Maybe if anybody here reads his book they could post their thoughts.

And a nurse also said there was a bullet on Kennedy's gurney. Corroboration!

7 minutes ago, Cory Santos said:

During a press conference, I recall one dr stating a bullet was still in JC’s leg?

a bullet or a bullet fragment?

19 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:

 

• Why then did Landis remove evidence from a crime scene (limo) and relocate it to a stretcher instead of handing it off to his superior or at the very least local authorities?

Guess he screwed up. We will get a chance to hear his explanations I am sure. What about all the failures to follow rules of evidence by the Dallas police that weekend? What about Roscoe White shenanigans? When do we get explanations for that?

14 hours ago, Benjamin Cole said:

MG--

 

If Landis found what is now CE399, then was it shot from the front? 

Or was it an undercharged bullet that struck JFK in the back, and somehow fell out? 

If the bullet was lodged in the seat, that makes it sound more like it came from the front. If it was the bullet that fell out of JFKs back, that would require an explanation of how it got embedded. One possibility is the SS agent (Hill?) inadvertently pressed on it when he landed in the limo.

JFK assassination witness offers new details that undermine magic bullet theory: ‘Beginning to doubt myself’ | Fox News

28 minutes ago, Larry Hancock said:

 

It is true that the Secret Service seems to have been very casual about handling evidence and you can explain that with poor training, bad supervision, or the chaos of the moment.  

What about the stories of SS agents out drinking/partying until 5 or so in the morning? Might have had an effect on their judgment.

Vincent "Two and only two bullets" Guinn. What a joke!