Steven Gaal

FROM: USNAS, NAVY #3835 ( MCAS-1) AUTH: HOOD X MR/DR ACT.NOTIF.EMER. YES HOW PATIENT ARRIVED: AMB VIA OTHER/SICK CALL OFFICER S PR LOCATION: NO LIBERTY CARD DEPENDENTS: NONE ADMISSION DIAGNOSIS: 1. Within Command-Not Work 2. Patient dropped firearm to the floor and it fired, missile struck patient in the left arm. WOUND, MISSILE,UPPER LEFT ARM,NO A OR N INVOLVEMENT (8355) FT 10-27-57 W/M, UPPER LT. ARM #8255 237 D[ischarged] NOV. 15, 1957 10-27-57 USNH NAVY 3923 J-82094 Wd. 5-A U.S. NAVAL HOSPITAL, NAV. No. 3923 FT 27 OCT 57 DIAGNOSIS: WOUND, MISSILE, UPPER LEFT ARM GUNSHOT, NO A OR N INVOLVEMENT #8255 1. Within command - work 2. Patient dropped 45 caliber automatic, pistol discharged when it struck the floor, and missile struck patient in left arm causing the injury. NARRATIVE SUMMARY: This 18 year male acidentally shot himself in the left arm with a sidearm, reportedly of 22 caliber. Examination revealed the wound of entrance in the medial portion of the left upper arm, just above the elbow. There was no evidence of neurologic circulatory, or bony injury. The wound of entrance was allowed to heal and the missile was then excised through a separate incision two inches above the wound of entry. The missile appeared to be a 22 slug. The wound healed well and the patient was discharged to duty. SURG: 10-5-57: FOREIGN BODY, REMOVAL OF, FROM EXTREMITIES, LEFT UPPER ARM #826. ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] FROM: USNAS, NAVY #3835 ( MCAS-1) AUTH: HOOD ( Message sent from #3835 = JAPAN GAAL) treated below U.S. NAVAL HOSPITAL, NAV. No. 3923 ==================================

This whole premise of Armstrong's hinges on NAS Navy 3835 being a Naval Hospital with the 3835 being the code for Japan. Since this assertion is the critical one, it's about time I asked you to pony up with a citation on that. Got one? // Parker (GAAL PREVIOUS POST had answer also EDIT of POST above SENT back Japan Oct 5th) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- found that NAS NAVY 3835 is in Japan (GAAL) }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} http://www.newspaper...wspage/3277036/ June 4, 1953 Mt. Vernon Register-News from Mt Vernon, Illinois · Page 1 ==== Pfc. Charles E. Davis of the U. S. Marine Corps, has returned to Japan after a 45-day leave in Mt. Vernon visiting his parents, Mr. and Mrs. Harold Davis of RFD 1. Charles Davis He was stationed at Treasure Island in California for a month before going back to Japan. Pfc. Davis regnlisted for six years. He has served in the Far East for 23 months. He will be serving with a Military Police Co. in Japan. His address is: Pfc. Charles E. M. B., N. A. S. Navy 3835, c/o Davis, 1159222, U. S. M. C, F. P. O., San Francisco, Calif. * * * . He will be serving with a Military Police Co. in Japan. . His address N. A. S. Navy 3835 ( = JAPAN ) ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo or Navy 3835 ATSUGI Japan 1962 Naval Cover 17008 BR NAS www.ebay.com › Stamps › United States › Covers › Postal History eBay NAVY # 3835 ATSUGI, JAPAN 1962 Naval Cover 17008 Br NAS. It was canceled "17008 Br" 3 Apr 1962. It was sent from AG Mullin to IRS in Asheville, NC. http://www.ebay.com/itm/NAVY-3835-ATSUGI-JAPAN-1962-Naval-Cover-17008-Br-NAS-/231094956196 ======================================================================================== ######################## TREATED IN JAPAN SEPT 16th officially on boat CONTRADICTION TREATED IN JAPAN SEPT 20 officially on boat CONTRADICTION TREATED IN JAPAN SEPT 22 officially on boat CONTRADICTION TREATED IN JAPAN SEPT 23 officially on boat CONTRADICTION TREATED IN JAPAN SEPT 29th officially on boat CONTRADICTION TREATED IN JAPAN SEPT 30th officially arrived in Taiwan SEPT 30th CONTRADICTION

http://harveyandlee.net/Marines/Marines.html ===================================================== A Naval Message Dated November 4, 1959, also Confirms HARVEY Oswald was Stationed in Taiwan. ===================================================== From September 14 through October 6 HARVEY Oswald was in Taiwan ===================================================== At the same time, from September 16 through October 6, LEE Oswald was in Japan. Medical records for NAS Navy 3835 (Naval Hospital) {JAPAN} show numerous medical entries for LEE Oswald recorded on Sept 16, 20, 22, 23, 29, and Oct 6.. ============== HARVEY Oswald Departed for Taiwan Aboard the USS Skagit (AKA 105) on Sept. 14, 1958. TREATED IN JAPAN SEPT 16th Note "AKA 105" Under "Record of Events" near top left above TREATED IN JAPAN SEPT 20 TREATED IN JAPAN SEPT 22 TREATED IN JAPAN SEPT 23 TREATED IN JAPAN SEPT 29th TREATED IN JAPAN SEPT 30th (HARVEY Oswald arrived in Taiwan SEPT 30th) One member of this unit was William K. Trail, who accompanied HARVEY Oswald and later served with him at MACS 9 in Santa Ana, California. HARVEY Oswald arrived in Taiwan on September 30. and was soon observed by Lt. John Donovan taking photos of troop deployments, fighter aircraft, ammunition bunkers and F-86 aircraft. Lt. Donovan would later become HARVEY Oswald's immediate superior at MACS 9 in Santa Ana, CA. The thought occurred to me that Oswald may have been taking these photos in preparation for his upcoming "defection" to the Soviet Union. This may or may not have been the reason he took the photos, but after President Kennedy's assassination many of these photos, taken in Taiwan by HARVEY Oswald, were found among his possessions by the Dallas Police. On the evening of October 4, Lt. Charles Rhodes heard four or five rifle shots coming from the direction of the position that Oswald was guarding. Rhodes ran toward Oswald and found him slumped against a tree, shaking, and crying while holding his rifle. He kept saying that he just couldn't bear to be on guard duty. Rhodes reported the incident to his commanding officer and two days later Oswald was sent on an 800 mile trip back to Japan. Marine Corps Unit Diary 158-58 lists Oswald in Ping Tung, Taiwan on October 6. [sent back to JAPAN from ABOVE OCT 5th] Unit Diary shows HARVEY Oswald was TREATED IN JAPAN OCT 6th in Ping Tung, Taiwan, on Oct. 6, 1958 ######################################### Medical records for NAS Navy 3835 (Naval Hospital) = number means JAPAN (GAAL)

http://harveyandlee.net/Marines/Marines.html I want to stress the importance of LEE Oswald's repeated visits to the Atsugi Station Hospital from September 16 through October 6. These visits are significant because during this time HARVEY Oswald was no longer selling shoes in Ft. Worth. HARVEY was beginning the process of assuming the identity of LEE Oswald, which began aboard the USS Skagit en route to Taiwan. Marine Corps Unit Diary 151-58 (744) shows that (HARVEY) Oswald departed with this unit en route to Taiwan on September 14. One member of this unit was William K. Trail, who accompanied HARVEY Oswald and later served with him at MACS 9 in Santa Ana, California. HARVEY Oswald arrived in Taiwan on September 30 and was soon observed by Lt. John Donovan taking photos of troop deployments, fighter aircraft, ammunition bunkers and F-86 aircraft. Lt. Donovan would later become HARVEY Oswald's immediate superior at MACS 9 in Santa Ana, CA. The thought occurred to me that Oswald may have been taking these photos in preparation for his upcoming "defection" to the Soviet Union. This may or may not have been the reason he took the photos, but after President Kennedy's assassination many of these photos, taken in Taiwan by HARVEY Oswald, were found among his possessions by the Dallas Police. On the evening of October 4, Lt. Charles Rhodes heard four or five rifle shots coming from the direction of the position that Oswald was guarding. Rhodes ran toward Oswald and found him slumped against a tree, shaking, and crying while holding his rifle. He kept saying that he just couldn't bear to be on guard duty. Rhodes reported the incident to his commanding officer and two days later Oswald was sent on an 800 mile trip back to Japan. Marine Corps Unit Diary 158-58 lists Oswald in Ping Tung, Taiwan on October 6. HARVEY Oswald Departed for Taiwan Aboard the USS Skagit (AKA 105) on Sept. 14, 1958. Note "AKA 105" Under "Record of Events" near top left above Unit Diary shows HARVEY Oswald was in Ping Tung, Taiwan, on Oct. 6, 1958 With HARVEY Oswald aboard, the USS Skagit departed Yokosuka, Japan bound for Taiwan on Sept. 14, 1958 Following his "defection" to the Soviet Union, HARVEY Oswald discussed his assignment in Taiwan with reporter Priscilla Johnson, who wrote news articles about Oswald and his "defection." A naval message of November 4, 1959 reported that Oswald served with Marine Air Control Squadrons in Taiwan. In 1964 The Warren Commission received a memorandum from the Assistant General Counsel for the Department of Defense that stated Oswald had been stationed in Ping Tung, Taiwan. Naval Intel Memo A Naval Message Dated November 4, 1959, also Confirms HARVEY Oswald was Stationed in Taiwan. From September 14 through October 6 HARVEY Oswald was in Taiwan. At the same time, from September 16 through October 6, LEE Oswald was in Japan. Medical records for NAS Navy 3835 (Naval Hospital) show numerous medical entries for LEE Oswald recorded on Sept 16, 20, 22, 23, 29, and Oct 6.. HARVEY Oswald's assignment in Taiwan, while LEE Oswald made numerous visits to the Naval Hospital, is a very important "smoking gun." While HARVEY Oswald was in Taiwan, LEE Oswald was being treated for a Venereal Disease in Atsugi, Japan, more than One Thousand Four Hundred Miles Away. Following his return to Japan on October 6, 1958 HARVEY Oswald was temporarily assigned to a Marine Squadron at Iwakuni, a Marine air base 400 miles southwest of Tokyo. Owen Dejanovich, who first met HARVEY Oswald at radar school in Biloxi spent time with him at Iwakuni. Dejanovich thought that Oswald had grown bitter toward the Marines and recalled seeing him occasionally talking to a Eurasian girl. The following day, October 7, 1958, LEE Oswald was admitted to the Naval hospital in Atsugi and on October 10 he had a colon examination for rectal bleeding. LEE was discharged from the hospital on October 13, but returned on October 16th and 27th to have vaccinations that were required before returning to the US. In other words, while HARVEY was at Iwakuni, LEE was at the Naval hospital in Atsugi. After HARVEY Oswald departed Iwakuni he returned to the United States and was assigned to the Marine Corps Air Facility--MACS 9--near the city of Santa Ana, California (HARVEY was always assigned to Sana Ana, CA; LEE was always assigned to El Toro, CA). HARVEY worked in a radar bubble with Sergeant Nelson Delgado, 5 enlisted men, and 3 officers. Sergeant Erwin Lewis remembered that Oswald transferred to MACS 9 in either October or November, 1958. Lewis said, "It was a matter of common knowledge that Oswald could read, write, and speak Russian. Marine Corps medical records confirm that HARVEY Oswald was at the Marine Corps Air Facility in Santa Ana, CA on October 29. But on October 29 LEE Oswald was still in Japan. Four days later, on November 2, LEE Oswald boarded the USS Barrett in Yokoska, Japan for a 13-day voyage to San Francisco. Marine corps medical records that show HARVEY Oswald was in California on October 29, 1958, while military records that show that LEE Oswald was in Japan and departed on November 2, 1958--an obvious "smoking gun." ========== Medical records for NAS Navy 3835 (Naval Hospital) ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] I found that NAS NAVY 3835 is in Japan (GAAL) }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} http://www.newspapers.com/newspage/3277036/ June 4, 1953 Mt. Vernon Register-News from Mt Vernon, Illinois · Page 1 ==== Pfc. Charles E. Davis of the U. S. Marine Corps, has returned to Japan after a 45-day leave in Mt. Vernon visiting his parents, Mr. and Mrs. Harold Davis of RFD 1. Charles Davis He was stationed at Treasure Island in California for a month before going back to Japan. Pfc. Davis regnlisted for six years. He has served in the Far East for 23 months. He will be serving with a Military Police Co. in Japan. His address is: Pfc. Charles E. M. B., N. A. S. Navy 3835, c/o Davis, 1159222, U. S. M. C, F. P. O., San Francisco, Calif. * * *

EXPRESS YOURSELF WITH THE VOTE ???? = #######################o0o0o0o0o0############################# Millions of voters are missing: It’s another #GovtDigiShambles http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/03/23/voters_are_missing_its_another_govtdigishambles/ ]]]] This is the first General Election to use “Individual Voter Registration” (IVR), which requires each voter to register to vote individually. The change was made in the 2013 Electoral Registration and Administration Act. Previously, the “head of the household” was responsible for ensuring voters were registered to vote. In October, the Electoral Commission reported that 5.5m voters were missing from the Electoral Register. But this shouldn’t be a surprise to the Cabinet Office, who knew of the problems two years ago.

PARKER START QUOTE He had departed on September 14 and returned on October 5. Please show me the "numerous visits in between" to the medical clinic at Atsugi that you claim he had. Nothing indicating it in the evidence you provided. Once again... you simply don't seem to able to understand the records. // PARKER END QUOTE ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ STARTED ON SEPT 14th and RETURNED ON OCT 5 SO CANT BE at Atsugi on medical clinic on SEPT 29th or EAST Atsugi Medical clinic Sept 16th and 30th.

A Cruel and Shocking Twist (FACTS) numerous pictures of the military installations in Taiwan. Lee H. Oswald was there. Medical Records Clash Oswald's Mother site = Lee Oswald’s medical records are another odd episode in his life. As mentioned in Part 1, Oswald is listed as being treated for contracting gonorrhea. As the notation states, “In the line of duty and, not of his own fault.” A rare entry to say the least. This was an offence that gets a soldier booted out of the service. Here, for some unknown reason he is given a pass. It has been speculated that Oswald was on a mission for the ONI when he contracted the disease and that is the reason for getting off the hook. But not of his “own fault”? Even stranger is that he is given a course of penicillin for tonsillitis. Yet his childhood medical records state he had his tonsils removed at the age of six. Evidence of an imposter? Or perhaps a simple filing error? Of note in his medical records is the three-inch mastoid scar from the operation he had at the age of five. The mastoids are a series of bones in the skull that an ear infection can spread to. An incision behind the ear down the neck is required. Amazingly, at Oswald’s autopsy, pathologist Dr. Earl Rose did not document the mastoid scar on the neck nor the gunshot wound on the upper left arm. Likewise, mortician Paul Groody while preparing Oswald’s body did not find those scars either. He was in fact called twice by the Secret Service in regards to this issue. Certainly an indication they were unsure of whom they had. As Groody said on the Coast-to-Coast AM radio program to host George Noory, at the last moment, the FBI showed up for one final set of fingerprints. Another indication that the FBI, along with the Secret Service, was unsure of which body they had as they already had multiple sets of prints of Oswald from the Marine files, his arrest in New Orleans in the summer of 1963, and his arrest for the murder of policeman Tippet and President Kennedy. Whatever the results were from 4 sets of fingerprints is unknown. But somebody was nervous about something to take prints off a dead man. However, the medical record inconsistencies don’t get an easier to parse. On September 16, 1958 Oswald’s unit leaves Atsugi for work in Ping Tung, Taiwan aboard the USS Skagit. A Marine Corps unit record is called a diary. The event is recorded in the unit diary and Oswald is on that ship—he is mentioned by name. Meanwhile his medical records state during this period he was receiving medical treatment at the base hospital in Atsugi from the time the Skagit leaves throughout much of September of 1958. He was ailing from urethritis to hemorrhoids. It’s hard to comprehend that there are two Oswald’s in the same unit at the same time and place. The chief counsel for the HSCS Robert Blakey had a dilemma to resolve with this odd issue as well. He contacted Secretary of Defense Harold Brown who wrote back that Oswald didn’t leave with his unit on 9/16 but instead stayed in Atsugi as part of a MAG II rear echelon unit. A pity that his unit diary never mentions a word of this. Maybe that is true and was left out of the unit diary for reasons of security. He could also have been flown back to the hospital for treatment of the reoccurring urethritis; it would have created a lot of flying back and forth. His records state that he was treated five times in September and twice in October. Robert Blakey easily resolved the issue. He lied. As he wrote in the final report: “Accordingly, based upon a direct examination of Oswald’s unit diaries, as well as his own-military records, it does not appear that he spent any time in Taiwan.” One last thing—in his personal effects discovered by the Dallas Police were numerous pictures of the military installations in Taiwan. Lee H. Oswald was there. A Cruel and Shocking Twist (FACTS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARKER START QUOTE He had departed on September 14 and returned on October 5. Please show me the "numerous visits in between" to the medical clinic at Atsugi that you claim he had. Nothing indicating it in the evidence you provided. Once again... you simply don't seem to able to understand the records. // PARKER END QUOTE /oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo/ A Cruel and Shocking Twist (FACTS) WHO DOESN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT ?????? A Cruel and Shocking Twist (FACTS) GAAL

Are Leading Economists Corrupt, or Just Mind-Blowingly Ignorant? Apr 23, 2015 Eric Zuesse Conservative economists favor Republican candidates because it’s the way for them to rise in power themselves, but what about ‘progressive’ economists: are they psychopaths, too; or do they instead blindly favor ‘Democratic’ candidates because of a sincerely oblivious belief that the mere ‘Democratic’ Party-label indicates that the given politician is actually progressive? Apparently, the answer is the latter, if one is to judge from assertions by the most-famous ‘progressive’ economists. Even so-called ‘progressive’ economists say that corrupt ‘Democratic’ candidates who have clear records of lying should be judged on the basis of what they say they will do, not on what their conservative record shows they’ve actually done and the interests they have actually been serving and paid by. For example, Joseph Stiglitz is trumpeted by economists and by the newsmedia as being a ‘progressive’ economist, and he was recently asked in a Huffington Post interview, regarding Hillary Clinton, “Some people are skeptical as to whether she is really genuine, … whether or not this is a woman who is too cozy with Wall Street?” and he answered, “Well, she’s clearly much better than the Republican candidates,” and he cited as supposed evidence for that, not just what she is saying to him, but what she is saying to Democratic Party voters in a Democratic Party primary campaign to attract liberal voters and so to win the Democratic Party’s Presidential nomination. He compares to that, such things as the Republican candidate Marco Rubio’s (who, of course, doesn’t consult with such ‘progressive’ economists) campaign statements, which are aimed to appeal to conservative voters and so to win the Republican nomination — as if the task for either candidate (Clinton or Rubio) at present is actually to win, instead, the general-election campaign and so to appeal to the entire electorate, both conservative and liberal. Is Stiglitz really that stupid? Of course not. He knows the difference between a primary campaign and a general-election campaign. He simply ignored Hillary Clinton’s already established and lengthy record, which is that of a conservative in ‘Democratic’ rhetorical garb, just like Barack Obama (the continuer of George W. Bush’s Wall Street bailouts and most of his other substantive policies), or, for that matter, her own husband, Bill Clinton, who had ended the great Democratic President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s progressive legacy of the Glass-Steagall Act, which placed a firewall between, on the one hand, government taxpayer-insured bank-deposits and checking and savings accounts, versus, on the other hand, Wall Street’s risky gambles and bets to win high profits with proportionally higher risks — and, so, FDR basically blocked any continuation of Wall Street’s then-existing ability to gamble with Regular Joes’ money and so to leave the gambling losses to Regular Joes, while still reaping the outsized gambling profits, which then go to Wall Street’s banksters, alone. The ‘Democratic’ President Bill Clinton in 1999 helped Republicans ram through Congress the Gramm-Leach-Bliley, all-Republican, bill (which is one of the most corrupt laws in U.S. history), to terminate the Glass-Steagall Act in order retroactively to legalize Citibank’s takeover of Travelers Insurance; and his Treasury Secretary (Robert Rubin) was then hired by Citigroup to help to lead this very same Wall Street firm that had lobbied the hardest for this Republican law to legalize that merger, which violated FDR’s progressivism and violated the American public. If this action by Clinton wasn’t corrupt, then nothing is, except perhaps Wall Street’s continuing lavish spending on the Clinton Foundation and on Hillary Clinton’s political career, first as Wall Street’s junior U.S. Senator, and then as an aspiring U.S. President. A good summary of the reality about Hillary Clinton was Ben White and Maggie Haberman’s Politico article, on 28 April 2014, “Wall Street Republicans’ dark secret: Hillary Clinton 2016,” which noted that, “The darkest secret in the big money world of the Republican coastal elite is that the most palatable alternative to a nominee such as Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas or Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky would be Clinton.” It’s not that the fundamentalist Cruz or the populist Paul would fail to treat Wall Street fairly; it’s instead that Hillary Clinton would be even more subservient to that big-money than either Cruz or Paul would be — that she’s more corrupt. And she is. Here is the list of top career donors to Hillary Clinton: That’s Wall Street and the firms which serve it. The ‘feminist’ EMILY’s List is also included, of women who still vote for Hillary for the same reason that Blacks still vote for Obama (despite their being pounded the worst by his economic policies), which has to do with gender or racial identifications instead of any progressive (or even practical) ideology at all, but Hillary is almost entirely Wall Street’s property — bought and paid for, and committed to delivering to them what they have paid for (advantages to big international firms at the expense of small firms and at the expense of consumers and of workers and of the environment), which is the types of services that such ‘Democrats’ as she, and her husband, and Barack Obama, have privately promised to them, and delivered to them. (Actually, Obama is the very worst: During his Presidency, the top 1% income share has soared, and he has been President in the years following an economic crash, which is precisely the period in the economic cycle when the norm has instead been for economic inequality to decrease, not increase. In order for a President Hillary Clinton to outperform his lousy record on inequality, she’d need to reject his policies and turn radically against Wall Street, which has financed her own rise. What you’ve just now read is all documented right there, at that link; any intelligent voter will want to examine it.) America has become a corrupt country in a corrupt world, nothing unusual in this regard. The first step to America’s becoming less corrupt would be for its voters to recognize that they have been and are fooled by the decades-long big-money indoctrination into “the free market” (actually crony capitalism), and that their top priority should thus be to vote against it — to vote against (i.e., in the exact opposite direction from) the advertisements and ‘news’ media that pump what the super-rich want to be pumped into politics and into government, and so pump the popular votes that enable it all to be legal and ‘democratic,’ no mere oligarchy that mocks America’s anti-aristocratic Founders. Stiglitz wants to be part of the game that Hillary Clinton, as Obama’s Secretary of State, was playing: working for Wall Street while pretending to be their enemy. He wants to be on Hillary’s team, perhaps even inside the White House. (Like President Obama himself told the banksters in secret, at the start of his Presidency, on 27 March 2009: “My Administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks. … I’m not out there to go after you. I’m protecting you.” And, he fulfilled on that promise. But he doesn’t fulfill on the big ones to the contrary, that he makes in public, and to the public.) If President Obama were sincere about his opposition to increasing economic inequality, he wouldn’t deceive people by saying that, as The New York Times summed up his propaganda in a headline on 3 February 2014, “In Talk of Economy, Obama Turns to ‘Opportunity’ Over ‘Inequality’.” He would instead acknowledge that equality of opportunity cannot increase while inequality of incomes is increasing, because opportunity depends very largely upon income: the bigger a person’s income is, the more economic opportunities that person tends to have. Instead of acknowledging this basic crucial economic fact, Obama, and the Clintons, and economists, hide it. The lying permeates not only all of the Republican Party, but also the very top, the national, level of the Democratic Party. Democratic voters were especially deceived by Obama, and by Hillary, and by John Edwards, in the 2008 Democratic Presidential primaries, to think that their plan (it was all basically the same plan) for health insurance would produce “universal health care,” but all three knew that it couldn’t possibly deliver any such result. The percentage of Americans who had insurance then was 85.4% insured; 14.6% uninsured. Currently, it’s 87.1% insured, 12.9% uninsured. Their plan thus increased the insured rate by 87.1%/85.4%, or merely 2% above what it had been when they all started promising “universal coverage,” something which already exists in all other developed countries (100% of the population having health insurance). That’s how corrupt our country is. And they all promised also a public option, something which would enable anyone to opt out of the for-profit corporate model of provisioning healthcare services. But, Obama never really intended to deliver on that promise, either. Leading economists are not mind-blowingly ignorant. Perhaps the main reason why the turnout of Democrats at the polls is so poor is that the Democratic Party has sold out so much to Republican Party values, so that the Democratic Party’s voters are giving up hope and giving up on the Party itself as representing them and their interests. The reality now in the United States, has become that there is, now, a choice only between two conservative parties, with the only differences between them being ethnic and gender preferences in order to keep up the fraud that there exists a real political choice and not just a one-party, actually fascist, government, decorated, around the edges, with differences about how deeply into conservatism this nation ought to go. And, so: what can be expected of the Democratic Party’s economists, except the hope that their next career-move will be upward, instead of downward?

Surveillance Video: Tsarnaev In Holding Cell In July 2013 This surveillance video was introduced as evidence by Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's defense team. It shows him in a holding cell in July 2013. Webmaster's Commentary: So where is this near-lethal throat wound we were told was the reason he could not be interviewed by the media?

WikiLeaks Docs: Sony Chiefs Met With Cameron Ahead of Scottish Referendum (link) British Prime Minister David Cameron met with representatives from Sony Pictures just ten weeks before the Scottish independence referendum to discuss the release of a TV show based on Scotland's repression under British rule, documents released by WikiLeaks have revealed. The release of the 'Outlander' TV series, which depicts among other things, 18th century life in Scotland under British rule, was delayed in the UK, heightening suggestions it was done amid concerns over any nationalistic sentiment it may have generated in the lead up to the independence referendum.

Ruth Paine ?? really ?? I'll take Jack Lawrence. Ruth IMHO has as much credibility as Marina .......zero. ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] Friday, March 10, 2006 OSWALD IN MONTREAL: WAS OSWALD SENT TO CANADA TO INFILTRATE THE COMMITTEE FOR NONVIOLENT ACTION (CNVA) ? Even if most researchers of the JFK assassination may dismiss entirely the possibility that Lee Harvey Oswald made a trip to Montreal in the Summer of 1963, some researchers invested lot of efforts to find out the truth about this rumor. For one, researcher Gary Shaw who initiated many FOIA requests on the JFK assasination, went at length to obtain more files about the reported sighting of Oswald in Montreal. Shaw even went as far as filing court procedures against the FBI to obtain an album of photographs of the Quebec-Washington-Guantanamo walk for peace, listed in Warren Commission exhibits listing. The photographs were annexed to a heavily redacted FBI memorandum dealing with allegations that Lee Harvey Oswald was in Montreal during the Summer of 1963. Not small hearsay rumours, the allegations were in fact an official report from a US Customs senior representative to the effect that a Canadian Custom and Excise investigator (Jean-Paul Tremblay) saw Lee Harvey Oswald distributing Fair Play for Cuba Committee leaflets in Montreal. The report even stated that the investigator was able to identified two individuals that were distributing leaflets with Oswald from photographs taken during the Quebec-Washington-Guantanamo Walk for peace. After many court orders, appeals and reversals, in 1984 the FBI succeed to keep the photo album away from Gary Shaw and the public eye. But 8 years later, in 1992, the JFK Records Act forced the FBI to open its files, and the album, with lot of other documents on Oswald’ Montreal sighting, were made available at the National Archives. I was able to consult and photocopy them during a short visit in 1996. To my knowledge, nobody ever published them. In the present series of posts, I will put online the ten photographs that were in this album and new un-redacted memos that even specify the name of one man that was distributing FPCC leaflets with Oswald. Photograph #1 and #2 of this album are reproduced below. They are the most interesting of them all because, according to Jean-Paul Tremblay, characters #1 and #2 (the two at the left) were with Oswald in Montreal. In a memo that I will also reproduce in the next post, character #1 is identified as Fred Moore, an important figure of the USA non-violent movement of the sixties. Was Oswald sent in Montreal to infiltrate this movement? That’s what we will discuss in the next posts. OSWALD IN MONTREAL: THE FBI REPORT THAT WAS HIDDEN FROM THE WARREN COMMISSION Here is the full FBI report that contained all the details of the Jean-Paul Tremblay sighting of Lee Harvey Oswald in Montreal. This report have been hidden from the Warren Com, probably because its revealed that the Tremblay's account was given enough credential to justify further investigation from both the RCMP and the FBI. For the present post, I'm just reproducing the pictures of this report. I will give more information on its content in the next posts. (Unfortunately, I'm a little too busy with some personal matters to spend all the time I should on this Blog.) But a word of caution: I made contact with people that were in the Quebec-Washington Guantanamo Walk for peace, and they disagree with the FBI on the identification of character #1 as being Fred Moore. Sunday, April 23, 2006 OSWALD IN MONTREAL: A CONCLUSION Is there any reality behind Jean-Paul Tremblay’s report? Why was the FBI report on Oswald’s apparition in Montreal suppressed for so many years? At first view, when we know how much effort the Warren Commission and the FBI have investED to study Oswald every moves, we would think that the answer to Tremblay’s report would be: “We know as a fact that Oswald wasn’t in Montreal at this date, we had reports placing him in New Orleans.” But, even if the FBI tried to discredit Tremblay’s report with affirmation that Oswald, in June 1963, was working in N.O., at William Reily Coffee Co., the problem that still persist is that: 1) the FBI made, voluntarily or not, a poor job at determining the time of the Oswald in Montreal sighting; and 2) the FBI information about Oswald’s activity at the most probable time for his Montreal presence is quite weak. If we pay attention to those 2 points, we may find that there is indeed a possibility that Oswald’s known whereabouts doesn’t rule out the possibility that he might have traveled to Montreal in spring 1963. Let see a few excerpts from the FBI report: “(…) Jean Paul Tremblay, Investigator, Customs and Excise, Montreal said on November 27, 1963, that he, Tremblay, had received one of the above—mentioned pamphlets from a man St. Jacques Street in Montreal. He said he believed this incident occurred in August, 1963, and he, Tremblay, is positive this individual was LEE OSWALD. According to Mr. Chasse, Tremblay said OSWALD at the time was accompanied by a short, homely, heavy woman who took unusually long steps when walking and by two men about the same age and weight as OWALD.” “Photographs of persons participating in the Quebec-Washington-Guantanamo Walk for Peace in Montreal on June 7 and 8, 1963, were shown to Mr. Tremblay and he positively identified two of them as having been engaged in the distribution of leaflets on the day in question. One of the persons he positively identified was the woman referred to by Chasse in his letter to the Secret Service. The other person identified by Tremblay was believed by the agency making the above inquiry to be a Mr. Fred Moore of San Antonio, Texas.” In the second excerpt there is a clever deception (or a embarrassing mistake) that you can detect only if you look at the photographs and if you have more background information on the QWG walk. The photos were not taken in Montreal, but in some countryside at an unspecified location. They may show persons that have participated at some events in Montreal, but the pictures were not taken during those events. The reality is that the pictures in the countryside were taken on June 7 and 8 but the QWG leaved town days earlier, around May 26. So inferring that Oswald was seen at the date the picture where shot is grossly deceptive. So, even if Tremblay guessed he saw Oswald in August 1963, and even if the FBI placed this sighting in June, according to the chronology of the Québec-Washington-Guantanamo Peace Walk the only time when Tremblay could have seen Oswald leafleting with Fred Moore or Erika Enzer (the lady that Tremblay identified on picture) would be prior to the walk, thus before May 26, 1963. The interesting thing is that this is one of the rare periods where Oswald whereabouts are poorly accounted for. In May, Oswald had left Dallas for New Orleans and had supposedly start to work for William B. Reily Coffee Co on May 15. But there is not a lot of witnesses and reports to corroborate Oswald was in New Orleans all of the time in May. John Newman, in Oswald and the CIA made a good case of showing that it is unclear exactly when the FBI knew of Oswald presence in N.O. at that time and that at least in one instance they were wrong on the date of his employment with Reily. Newman wrote on page 288 of his book: “Then something strange happened : the FBI lost track of Oswald for two months, from April 24, through June 26. These dates cover Oswald’s move to New Orleans and his first month of FPCC activity there.” Newman also noted that there is at least one instance in which a FBI report about Oswald employment with Reily was giving a false date. At page 348, Newman wrote: ”On September 10, 1963, Special Agent Hosty sent a report to the Bureau and to New Orleans. (…) Hosty then said Oswald had been working at the William Reily Coffe Company on August 5. He apparently did not know that Oswald had been fired from his job at Reily Coffee on July 19.” In addition of this foggy period in Oswald's chronology, another curious fact tends to give credibility to the possibility that Oswald took a trip to Montreal at this time. On May 29, just after his hypothetical return from Montreal, Oswald used the name “Osborne” when ordering FPCC handbill in New Orleans. The curious things are that: 1) Osborne was the name of Oswald’s companion on his us trip to Mexico, and 2) that Osborne was from Montreal. That opens many questions: Did Oswald knew Osborne during his spring trip to Montreal? Did Osborne travel to Montreal with Oswald just as he did when Oswald got to Mexico to visit the Cuban embassy? Was Osborne, in Montreal, an handler of Oswald in his FPCC penetration activities? In conclusion, given Jean-Paul Tremblay’s credibility as a witness (he was a professional investigator); given Aurelien Chassé and Lawrence Fleshman’s endorsement of Tremblay’s account (they were U.S. treasury high officials); given the fact that both RCMP and FBI have not dismissed Tremblay’s account and had made investigative works on its basis; given the hole in Oswald’s whereabouts and his use of the Osborne name that seems to corroborate his contact with this Montrealer; I am on the opinion that Oswald was indeed the man seen by Tremblay in Montreal. Obviously, such a trip wasn’t initiate on his own and had intelligence purposes. posted by youshouldknow @ 1:48 AM

Monsanto and Others Caught Paying Internet ‘Trolls’ to Attack Activists (link) Have you ever seen a post, comment, or reply that absolutely reeked of behind-the-scenes compensation by corporations like Monsanto? In the growing age of internet activism, and the expansion of social media as a tool to spread the word on real issues, paid internet trolling is becoming a new career path.

Tesco to report one of largest annual losses in UK corporate history Newstalk 14:04 ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] Rule Britannia (With lyric annotations) ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Our Lives: Poverty then and now in the UK Fran Bennett 17 April 2015 ==== A report launched today, Our Lives: Challenging attitudes to poverty in 2015, captures the humanity of the experience of poverty and calls for change as radical as the social reform in the 1940s. It was just over a year ago when Bob Holman - the inspiring activist from Easterhouse on the edge of Glasgow, now retired but still active - issued a challenge in The Guardian newspaper. He called on eight named women to put a spotlight on the lives of people living in poverty in the UK now. (I was the add-on - woman no. 9 - who got roped in as well.) And the report we wrote together, Our Lives: Challenging attitudes to poverty in 2015, launched today in Newcastle, does just that (#ourlives2015). Our Lives deliberately harks back in its title to the report Bob Holman wanted us to emulate. Our Towns: A close-up was published in 1943 and written by another group of eight women - members of the Hygiene Committee of the Women’s Group on Public Welfare. They were trying to respond to the many complaints made about working class evacuees sent from the East End of London and elsewhere to safer, often richer, places. Bob Holman was himself one of those evacuated children and remembers the experience well. The host families complained that these children often had nits or fleas; they wet the bed; they didn’t have the proper clothes; and they didn’t behave properly, either. Our Towns was an attempt, by eight women all actively involved in health visiting, teaching or voluntary work, to explain the context of these children’s lives, where they came from, and in particular the structural roots of the poverty they lived. And they spelt out clearly how much the children’s parents cared about them. Our Towns was of its time, and a report written today is clearly not going to be the same. But Bob Holman saw it as one of the turning points in the Second World War - alongside the better-known Beveridge report - that helped lead to social reform, and in particular to the creation of the post-War welfare state. Bob argued that there was more solidarity with those living in poverty and more understanding of their lives as a result of Our Towns. He said there was an urgent need to carry out a similar exercise now - especially in the context of the coalition government’s cuts to this post-War welfare state - and named the women who should undertake this task. They and others (including me) accepted his challenge - and Our Lives: Challenging attitudes to poverty in 2015 is the result. It builds up a picture based on individual stories of what living in poverty is like in the UK today and calls for change as radical as in the 1940s. This is not an academic report, or a document brimming with statistics. Others have written those. As Julia Unwin, of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, says in her Foreword, the report “… gives a clear, unflinching account of the state of our nation, and does so in ways that illuminate, and humanise, the dry accounts of trend data. Taken together, [the stories] give a picture of life that is harsh, and difficult, perpetuating inequality, and reducing potential. And they do so in ways that underline the humanity of the experience of poverty.” The authors of Our Lives have all admired Bob Holman for years for his unflinching commitment to working alongside people in poverty - living in Easterhouse himself for many years. We cannot aspire to be like him. And we do not pretend that we are living in poverty ourselves. In that sense, this report is not ‘the voice of the poor’. But what we have in common is a long history of living and working closely with families and communities grappling with poverty. One of us is a community development and social policy worker (Tricia Zipfel); one is a former director of a family rights organisation (Jo Tunnard); one is a children’s writer (Josephine Feeney); one is the manager of a food bank (Audrey Flannagan); one works at a Citizens’ Advice Bureau (Loretta Gaffney); one is a social worker (Karen Postle); one works for the voluntary sector (Sally Young); and one is the General Secretary of the TUC (Frances O’Grady). I am an academic and social policy researcher, and would also see myself as an activist, as would many others I’m sure. Between us, we know many people who are struggling to make ends meet - and doing so against the odds, and often in the face of hostile attitudes, or just incomprehension. So we invited them to tell us their stories. Some of these are about people’s struggles to survive, and about being battered by the benefits system. Some of the stories demonstrate the complexity of people’s lives, and others how families can be fragmented by domestic abuse, or even by the care system. Mental health and disability issues, as well as homelessness and insecure employment, also feature. There are examples of public services treating people in poverty badly. But there are also instances of private companies doing the same. And, as Julia Unwin says in her Foreword, the stories ‘tell of people faced with the most difficult and disturbing circumstances continuing to care and support those they love’. There are tales of extraordinary resilience and resourcefulness - or just of the powers of daily endurance that living in poverty often entails. Of course some people make mistakes, and some make bad choices. But there are usually reasons. And the stories show that society tends to be much less forgiving when this involves people on low incomes. So what do we want from the report? We want it to encourage people to oppose cuts that fall heavily and unfairly on those on the lowest incomes. We hope it will counter a public narrative that devalues the welfare state as we know it, and that sees ‘dependency’ instead of survival against the odds. But this is not just a(nother) report about the coalition government’s austerity programme, either. We also want Our Lives to be a wake-up call, as Our Towns was over seventy years ago. We want it to challenge the common assumption that people in poverty are ‘scroungers and skivers’. We want it to highlight the courage and determination that are needed to cope with life on a low income day after day. And we hope it will also contribute to a wider discussion about the kind of society we want to be. About the author Fran Bennett is a senior research and teaching fellow and a member of the Oxford Institute of Social Policy, University of Oxford, with interests in poverty, gender and social security issues. She also works on a self-employed basis for NGOs and others on social policy issues. She is an active member of the Women's Budget Group, which analyses government budgets, spending and policies from a gender perspective. ================== Related Articles Gender and poverty in the UK: Inside the household and across the life course Fran Bennett Whose recovery?: Gendered austerity in the UK Dawn Foster The punitive regulation of poverty in the neoliberal age Loïc Wacquant

Baker Hughes increases layoffs to 10,500 (LINK)

FBI Corruption May Have Led to Execution of 14 Innocent People (link) FBI corruption has led to other innocent deaths. And a U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its "Cointelpro" campaign – the FBI used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists. ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] Woman Successfully Defends Herself from Armed Attacker Only to Be Shot When Police Arrive (link) South Huntsville, AL– A woman was shot by police Sunday evening after her estranged husband, against whom who she had filed multiple protection orders, broke into her home and threatened her with a weapon. Lisa Skinner, was at the house she shares with her mother on Sunday as Bradley Skinner, broke the glass on a back door and entered the home carrying a pistol and a large knife. ========================================================================== US Marshal goes berserk smashing woman’s phone for recording him on public sidewalk (LINK)

Is Inkol related to sheldon? Are either related to "Harvey"? Just what is it the hell you are blathering about? Why should anyone care what this person thinks? // PARKER }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} Your rude talk is noted. Who cared ?? THE GREAT JFK RESEARCHER DR JERRY ROSE. How do you say it down under ?? Oh yes put another insult on the Barbie. AS to source re Auto Dealership its Jack Lawrence for most info. (GAAL) ========================================================================================= The Third Decade, Volume 6, Issue 4 pg 1 Found in: The Third Decade PATSIES by Sheldon Inkol THREE CARTRIDGE CASES CHAIN OF POSSESSION by Michael Wiseberg The Third Decade, Volume 7, Issue 5 pg 1 Found in: The Third Decade Vol 7 #5 July 1991 THE THIRD DECADE JOHN FNKENNEDY SASSINA THE 1963 1973 1983 1993 ISSN 088-5230 CONTENTS JACK LAWRENCE ASSASSIN OR FALL GUY 1 by Sheldon Inkol RANDOM THOUGHTS ON THE THIRD DECADE The Third Decade, Volume 9, Issue 5 pg 1 Found in: The Third Decade wa THE THIRD DECADE O A NUFN KENNEDY RESEARCH ON THE 1963 1973 1983 1993 1 8 13 35 36 Vol 9 W5 July 1993 -.t ISSN 088-5230 CONTENTS THE INDIANA RIFLE by Sheldon Inkol THE BRAIN DOESN'T WORK THAT 　 The Third Decade, Volume 7, Issue 3 pg 1 Found in: The Third Decade multiple hits in this document The Third Decade, Volume 8, Issue 6 pg 1 Found in: The Third Decade multiple hits in this document The Third Decade, Volume 9, Issue 5 pg 12 Found in: The Third Decade multiple hits in this document The Third Decade, Volume 9, Issue 6 pg 45 Found in: The Third Decade multiple hits in this document The Third Decade, Volume 9, Issue 4 pg 49 Found in: The Third Decade President's autopsy a critique of the findings of the "Clark Panel"---critical discussions of the material in Riley's original article---Sheldon Inkol's study of the "Indiana Rifle (Harry The Third Decade, Volume 6, Issue 4 pg 5 Found in: The Third Decade Tx. J Gary Shaw 1976) pp 102 103 CD 7.687 691 CD 7.707 23H469 CD 4.720 OTHER PATSIES by Sheldon Inkol* November 22 1963 6:00 p.m Dallas Texas District Attorney Henry Wade states "Preliminary 　 The Third Decade, Volume 7, Issue 6 pg 24 Found in: The Third Decade impersonation 716 Sep 91 pp 2,3 Inkol Sheldon on comic books and assassination 711 Nov 90 pp 1-7 713 Mar 91 p 25 on Jack Lawrence 715 Jul 91 pp 1-17 on man behind the wall 712 Jan 91 pp 27-29 on The Third Decade, Volume 7, Issue 1 pg 1 Found in: The Third Decade multiple hits in this document The Third Decade, Volume 7, Issue 5 pg 1 Found in: The Third Decade multiple hits in this document The Third Decade, Volume 8, Issue 4 pg 29 Found in: The Third Decade Lawrence by Sheldon Inkol Garrison On The Trail Of The Assassins p 22 Marrs Crossfire p 319 Marrs Crossfire pp 402-14 For Ruby's criminal associations see David Scheim Contract On America (New York The Fourth Decade, Volume 1, Issue 2 pg 1 Found in: The Fourth Decade 11/22/63 by Sheldon Inkol DEEP POLITICS A REVIEW 31 by Jerry D Rose WAS JACK WHITE WRONG TO TELL THE HSCA THAT THESE GUNS ARE NOT ALL THE SAME 34 by Jack White A JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON THE JOHN F The Fourth Decade, Volume 2, Issue 3 pg 1 Found in: The Fourth Decade Sheldon Inkol UPDATES NEW DEVELOPMENTS ON PREVIOUS ARTICLES .19 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR .19 PROOF AND MORE PROOF 30 by Milicent Cranor WHO'S KILLING THE TRUTH 34 by Harrison E Livingstone A JOURNAL OF 　 The Fourth Decade, Volume 8, Issue 1 pg 19 Found in: The Fourth Decade evidence suggesting frontal shot from intersection of stockade fence and rail road bridge) pp 31-32 Letters to the editor Whitmey on Giesbrecht Inkol on B.Oliver Nissenson on LHO language proficiency The Fourth Decade, Volume 4, Issue 6 pg 24 Found in: The Fourth Decade multiple hits in this document 　 The Fourth Decade, Volume 1, Issue 4 pg 7 Found in: The Fourth Decade multiple hits in this document The Fourth Decade, Volume 2, Issue 4 pg 32 Found in: The Fourth Decade Inkol in his letter that appears in the 3/95 issue Specifically the comments regarding Martin Shackelford's "Black Dog Man RIP. Mr Inkol seems to question the statements and observations of Ms The Fourth Decade, Volume 4, Issue 5 pg 31 Found in: The Fourth Decade -Sheldon Inkol 54 Raglan Ave. Apt 14 Toronto Ontario Canada M6C 2L1 ea The Fourth Decade, Volume 4, Issue 4 pg 17 Found in: The Fourth Decade multiple hits in this document The Fourth Decade, Volume 6, Issue 2 pg 27 Found in: The Fourth Decade really is just a coincidence Sheldon Inkol 147 Borden Street Toronto Ontario Canada M5S 2N2 To the Editor In the November 1998 issue is a letter by Mike Sylwester concerning my article on Oswald's The Fourth Decade, Volume 2, Issue 3 pg 16 Found in: The Fourth Decade to a local political rally held near the hotel that night and Power was also suspected of being involved in an attempt on the life of Sheldon Inkol 54 Raglan Ave. #14 Toronto Ontario Canada M6C 2 　 The Fourth Decade, Volume 3, Issue 1 pg 24 Found in: The Fourth Decade Giesbrecht research (who had initially contacted Sheldon Inkol in Toronto after seeing a profile of him on a CBC.TV report about "JFK and the growing skepticism towards the Warren Commission's The Fourth Decade, Volume 3, Issue 4 pg 9 Found in: The Fourth Decade Tennessee in May of 1963 A Canadian researcher Sheldon Inkol informed me of a tabloid newspaper carrying a story about an assassina tion attempt against JFK during his Nashville trip I was able to obtain The Fourth Decade, Volume 4, Issue 3 pg 16 Found in: The Fourth Decade for one example and the Odio incident for another -Sheldon Inkol 54 Raglan Ave. Apt 14 Toronto Ontario Canada M6C 2L The Fourth Decade, Volume 5, Issue 2 pg 26 Found in: The Fourth Decade "conspiracy. And I find this sad Sheldon Inkol 54 Raglan Ave. Apt 14 Toronto Ontario Canada M6C 2L1 aa The Fourth Decade, Volume 5, Issue 5 pg 38 Found in: The Fourth Decade second photo or not Sheldon Inkol 54 Raglan Ave. Apt 14 Toronto Ontario Canada M6C 2L1 To the editor I originally looked forward to reading John J Johnson's article "Man-in the-Doorway An Un The Fourth Decade, Volume 6, Issue 1 pg 26 Found in: The Fourth Decade Mercury space capsules It could have been anything Sheldon Inkol's research on the Mercury dealership near Dealey Plaza notwithstanding The relevant portion of the FBI report as reproduced in NASA Nazis

(FBI) but didn't bother going there // Parker ============= It was Louis Oswalt who Bogard took for a test drive //Parker ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] Was it him ?? Couldn't prove it by FBI. ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] Sheldon then went into some detail on the topics he touched on briefly in his opening. Albert Bogard was a Downtown Lincoln Mercury salesman who accompanied Lee Oswald on the test drive. Oswald terrified Bogard by taking him on a wild ride at speeds up to 85 miles an hour. The Warren Commission placed the incident on November 9, 1963 and dismissed it because Oswald's whereabouts are known for that day and because supposedly Oswald did not know how to drive. Sheldon pointed out that Bogard had no reason to lie, his story did not change much over the years and he had corroboration from 4 co-workers. Bogard also passed a lie detector test administrated by the FBI. Sheldon thinks that someone who identified himself as Lee Oswald did test drive a car with Bogard. Another salesman placed the incident on November 2, 1963. This would allow the real Lee Harvey Oswald to be involved. Sheldon explained that the real Lee Harvey Oswald for him was the one killed by Jack Ruby. Oswald worked only a few minutes away from the car dealership. Bogard showed Oswald every car in the showroom and the lot, went on the test drive that covered about 13 miles. Less than three weeks later the assassination occurs. Inkol thinks that if Bogard was fooled by an impostor that impostor had to be nearly identical with Oswald and there can be no innocent explanation for an impostor. However, Inkol thinks it was the real Oswald who test drove the car. If this is true then Oswald was expecting to acquire some money within a couple of weeks. Apparently there was some kind of conspiracy of silence at the dealership not to tell the authorities. Jack Lawrence took it upon himself to alert the authorities about an Oswald who visited the dealership and was promptly fired shortly after making the call. FBI agents questioned Bogard the day after the assassination. Word of this Oswald test driving incident reached NBC reporters from California, Gene Barnes and Ted Mann (sic?) who heard that Bogard went to Shreveport on Saturday, November 23, 1963 and flew there to interview him. How did the FBI react to NBC's initiative? According to the Los Angeles Herald Examiner written October 1964. It is written by Walter Winchell. "Isn't it true Mr. Chief Justice that a filmed interview with Mr. Bogard and other salesmen, one of whom was actually fired for tipping the Feds, has not been made public because some law men allegedly requested the network not to use it?" Unbelievably, Inkol does not give the Chief Justice's response, or if there wasn't one he didn't explain that. He just went on. On December 9, 1963 Bogard provided a written statement to FBI agents and they warned him that this statement may be used against him in a court of law. http://spot.acorn.net/JFKplace/09/fp.back_issues/12th_Issue/fredonia2.html

General News 4/19/2015 at 12:37:25 Chelsea Manning and the Deepwater Horizon KillingsBy Greg Palast (about the author) ======================================= http://www.opednews.com/articles/Chelsea-Manning-and-the-De-by-Greg-Palast-Chelsea-Formerly-Bradley-Manning_Chelsea-Manning_Chelsea-Manning_Environment-150419-645.html

Louis Oswalt ...the FBI couldn't find him .......be great for the case if they did.......just couldn't find him......GAAL ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/FBI%20Records%20Files/105-82555/105-82555%20Section%20018/105-18b.pdf

Report: 'Nearly Every' FBI Forensics Expert Gave Flawed Testimony In 'Almost All Trials' Over A... (link) = ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] = Judge Lets Cop Off Easy In Brutality Conviction, Now He's Killed His Girlfriend & Himself... (LINK)

Layoffs begin at U.S. Steel http://govtslaves.info/layoffs-begin-at-u-s-steel/

Argentina: 30,000 Doctors and Health Professionals Demand Ban on Glyphosate (link) Following on from the conclusion of the International Agency for Research on Cancer that glyphosate is a probable carcinogen, Argentina’s union of doctors and health professionals, FESPROSA, has issued a statement throwing the support of its 30,000 members behind the decision...

"How The Media Controls Britain" Submitted by Tyler Durden on 09/28/2014 13:35 -0400 inSh We have yet to read Owen Jones' "The Establishment... And how they get away with it", although Russell Brand's take of the author has certainly piqued our interest: ''Owen Jones may have the face of a baby and the voice of George Formby but he is our generation's Orwell and we must cherish him." We do know, however, that the young author and Guardian columnist is one of those who are not afraid to think critically while accepting there is far more than meets the eye, and certainly than the controlled media would like revealed. To wit, from the book's official blurb: The following infographic from the book, showing "how the media controls Britain" reveals the schism between popular British sentiment about key social issues courtesy of media influences and reality, indicating that the "establishment" is more than happy to sow discord within the working/middle classes using its traditional "objective" distribution channels, while it remains aloof, collecting the rent its record capital provides. Behind our democracy lurks a powerful but unaccountable network of people who wield massive power and reap huge profits in the process. In exposing this shadowy and complex system that dominates our lives, Owen Jones sets out on a journey into the heart of our Establishment, from the lobbies of Westminster to the newsrooms, boardrooms and trading rooms of Fleet Street and the City. Exposing the revolving doors that link these worlds, and the vested interests that bind them together, Jones shows how, in claiming to work on our behalf, the people at the top are doing precisely the opposite. In fact, they represent the biggest threat to our democracy today - and it is time they were challenged. And while the middle class around the world fights for scraps, and has seen its real wages over the past three decades largely unchanged, the "establishment", wrapped in a comfortable cocoon spun by the captured media, benefits:

The Magazine source for this article is McCall's, but a 1968 Saturday Evening Post article is much more detailed, revealing that Averell Harriman was directly involved in circumstances which lead to Jackie's trip to Cambodia. The point of this is that it is not certain that Jackie knew who was behind her husband's murder, but would she have went on a diplomatic mission to Cambodia arranged by the person responsible for his death? Harriman as JFK Conspirator might fly on the Forum, but not in the real world. // Howard }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} see video >>>>>>>>>> http://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewer/Archives/JFKPPP-35.aspx Douglas Harriman Kennedy (born March 24, 1967) is the tenth child of Robert F. Kennedy and Ethel Kennedy, named in honor of W. Averell Harriman.After President Kennedy's assasination, Harriman and his first wife, Marie, moved out of this house to allow their friend Jackie Kennedy to move in with her children. Jackie stayed a month before buying the house across the street. see https://www.flickr.com/photos/bootbearwdc/215469874/ Golly the POTUS had not decided yet to get rid of Diem and others (HARRIMAN) went ahead ..........like the POTUS was already dead ...HUH ? HOW POWERFUL IS THE STRAUS FAMILY !!! ?? !! ?? (GAAL) JACKIE was close to the Harriman's before the assassination,but in the real world elites have two faces. BELOW (GAAL) like the POTUS was already dead like the POTUS was already dead like the POTUS was already dead like the POTUS was already dead .>>>>> HARRIMAN like the POTUS was already dead like the POTUS was already dead like the POTUS was already dead like the POTUS was already dead }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} >>>>>>>>>>>>> in the real world elites have two faces Bush Family - Nazi Dealings - WWII to 1951 by John Buchanan and Stacey Michael from The New Hampshire Gazette Vol. 248, No. 3, November 7, 2003 }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} After the seizures in late 1942 of five U.S. enterprises he managed on behalf of Nazi industrialist Fritz Thyssen, Prescott Bush, the grandfather of President George W. Bush, failed to divest himself of more than a dozen enemy national relationships that continued until as late as 1951, newly-discovered U.S. government documents reveal. Furthermore, the records show that Bush and his colleagues routinely attempted to conceal their activities from government investigators. Bush's partners in the secret web of Thyssen-controlled ventures included former New York Governor W. Averell Harriman and his younger brother, E. Roland Harriman. Their quarter-century of Nazi financial transactions, from 1924-1951, were conducted by the New York private banking firm, Brown Brothers Harriman. The White House did not return phone calls seeking comment. Although the additional seizures under the Trading with the Enemy Act did not take place until after the war, documents from The National Archives and Library of Congress confirm that Bush and his partners continued their Nazi dealings unabated. These activities included a financial relationship with the German city of Hanover and several industrial concerns. They went undetected by investigators until after World War Two. At the same time Bush and the Harrimans were profiting from their Nazi partnerships, W. Averell Harriman was serving as President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's personal emissary to the United Kingdom during the toughest years of the war. On October 28, 1942, the same day two key Bush-Harriman-run businesses were being seized by the U.S. government, Harriman was meeting in London with Field Marshall Smuts to discuss the war effort. Denial and Deceit While Harriman was concealing his Nazi relationships from his government colleagues, Cornelius Livense, the top executive of the interlocking German concerns held under the corporate umbrella of Union Banking Corporation (UBC), repeatedly tried to mislead investigators, and was sometimes supported in his subterfuge by Brown Brothers Harriman. All of the assets of UBC and its related businesses belonged to Thyssen-controlled enterprises, including his Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart in Rotterdam, the documents state. Nevertheless, Livense, president of UBC, claimed to have no knowledge of such a relationship. Strangely enough, (Livense) claims he does not know the actual ownership of the company, states a government report. H.D Pennington, manager of Brown Brothers Harriman and a director of UBC for many years, also lied to investigators about the secret and well-concealed relationship with Thyssen's Dutch bank, according to the documents. Investigators later reported that the company was wholly owned by Thyssen's Dutch bank. Despite such ongoing subterfuge, U.S. investigators were able to show that a careful examination of UBC's general ledger, cash books and journals from 1919 until the present date clearly establish that the principal and practically only source of funds has been Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart. In yet another attempt to mislead investigators, Livense said that $240,000 in banknotes in a safe deposit box at Underwriters Trust Co. in New York had been given to him by another UBC-Thyssen associate, H.J. Kouwenhoven, managing director of Thyssen's Dutch bank and a director of the August Thyssen Bank in Berlin. August Thyssen was Fritz's father. The government report shows that Livense first neglected to report the $240,000, then claimed that it had been given to him as a gift by Kouwenhoven. However, by the time Livense filed a financial disclosure with U.S. officials, he changed his story again and reported the sum as a debt rather than a cash holding. In yet another attempt to deceive the governments of both the U.S. and Canada, Livense and his partners misreported the facts about the sale of a Canadian Nazi front enterprise, La Cooperative Catholique des Consommateurs de Combustible, which imported German coal into Canada via the web of Thyssen-controlled U.S. businesses. The Canadian authorities, however, were not taken in by this maneuver; a U.S. government report states. The coal company was later seized by Canadian authorities. After the war, a total of 18 additional Brown Brothers Harriman and UBC-related client assets were seized under The Trading with the Enemy Act, including several that showed the continuation of a relationship with the Thyssen family after the initial 1942 seizures. The records also show that Bush and the Harrimans conducted business after the war with related concerns doing business in or moving assets into Switzerland, Panama, Argentina and Brazil - all critical outposts for the flight of Nazi capital after Germany's surrender in 1945. Fritz Thyssen died in Argentina in 1951. One of the final seizures, in October 1950, concerned the U.S. assets of a Nazi baroness named Theresia Maria Ida Beneditka Huberta Stanislava Martina von Schwarzenberg, who also used two shorter aliases. Brown Brothers Harriman, where Prescott Bush and the Harrimans were partners, attempted to convince government investigators that the baroness had been a victim of Nazi persecution and therefore should be allowed to maintain her assets. It appears, rather, that the subject was a member of the Nazi party, government investigators concluded. At the same time the last Brown Brothers Harriman client assets were seized, Prescott Bush announced his Senate campaign that led to his election in 1952.. ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) >>>>> Underhill had no history of mental illness except that provided by CIA . Underhill had discrediting information on the CIA and CIA then gave out discrediting information on Underhill. >>>>> Underhills papers never saw the light of day with the CIA between publisher and said papers. >>>>> Underhill predicted CIA surge drug trade. I think Underhill's story more correct than not. (GAAL) 　 http://www.deepblacklies.co.uk/cia_drug_trafficking.htm 　 If the Contra drug scandal had been the only time the CIA had been deeply entangled in narcotics trafficking, the Agency might have escaped with censure, but it wasn't. Even before the CIA was founded in 1947, its predecessor, the Office of Strategic Service (OSS) already had grimy hands. This arose from a private agreement between Allen Dulles, later to become Director of the CIA, and a group of Nazi SS thugs seeking to escape war crimes trials at the end of WW11. SS General Karl Wolff held a series of secret meetings with Dulles, who was then Swiss "Station Chief" for the OSS. The two men thrashed out an agreement - against the direct, written orders of President Roosevelt. This gave the SS group freedom from prosecution in return for agreeing to secretly work for American intelligence against the Russians in the cold war. Since it was impossible for the OSS to fund this secret network, Dulles agreed the Nazi's would finance themselves from their vast stocks of Morphine, plundered gold and a mass of counterfeit British bank-notes. These were smuggled to Austria in the last days of the war and hidden. They were later sold on the black market and the proceeds used to finance the black SS-OSS network. The subterfuge was so successful that it would later become an irresistible method of underwriting "off-the-books" CIA black operations. By the time the Vietnam War was in full swing, the CIA and its Vietnamese underlings were busily peddling huge amounts of Heroin from the Golden Triangle region of Southeast Asia. Historically, the French controlled the Opium trade in this part of the world. After WW11 it was agreed that members of the underworld would manage Opium smuggling on behalf of 2eme Bureau of French Military Intelligence. This was the top secret project known as Operation X, sanctioned at the highest levels. Raw opium was cultivated by the Hmong hill tribes and then trucked to Saigon. Here it was turned over to the Binh Xuyen bandits for distribution throughout the City. At this point, members of the Corsican underworld took their share of the drugs, shipping them to Marseilles and then to America. This smuggling route later became known as the "French Connection." Captain Savani of 2eme supervised the entire arrangement. With the embarrassing defeat of the French at Dien Bien Phu in 1954, the French began to withdraw her forces from Indochina. This resulted in top CIA operative, Major General Edward Lansdale being sent to Saigon. A year earlier, during a fact finding mission to the region, Lansdale had learned of the existence of Operation X. There now ensued a power struggle between the remnants of 2eme, along with their Corsican gangsters and Lansdale's American team under the watchful eye of CIA director, Allen Dulles. Open battles were fought in the streets and Lansdale, more than once came close to death. However, the die had been cast. The French were "out" and the Americans were "in," and the Opium trade began to rapidly grow. Years after the Vietnam War was over, the CIA remained the principal beneficiary of Heroin shipments from the Golden Triangle. This fact emerged during the latter part the 1980's by Colonel Bo Gritz. Possessing a truly remarkable daredevil record, Gritz is a legend in the Special Forces community. Sylvester Stallone modelled himself on Gritz in the gutsy Hollywood smash hit "First Blood."

Why You Can’t Trust the American Council on Science and Health PrintEmailShareTweet Posted on April 17, 2015by Gary Ruskin Why You Can’t Trust the American Council on Science and Health The American Council on Science and Health is a front group for the tobacco, agrichemical, fossil fuel, pharmaceutical and other industries. PersonnelACSH’s “Medical/Executive Director” is Dr. Gilbert Ross.[2] In 1993, according to United Press International, Dr. Ross was “convicted of racketeering, mail fraud and conspiracy,” and was “sentenced to 47 months in jail, $40,000 in forfeiture and restitution of $612,855” in a scheme to defraud the Medicaid system.[3] ACSH’s Dr. Ross was found to be a “highly untrustworthy individual” by a judge who sustained the exclusion of Dr. Ross from Medicaid for ten years.[4] FundingACSH has often billed itself as an “independent” group, and has been referred to as “independent” in the press. However, according to internal ACSH financial documents obtained by Mother Jones: “ACSH planned to receive a total of $338,200 from tobacco companies between July 2012 and June 2013. Reynolds American and Phillip Morris International were each listed as expected to give $100,000 in 2013, which would make them the two largest individual donations listed in the ACSH documents.”[5] “ACSH donors in the second half of 2012 included Chevron ($18,500), Coca-Cola ($50,000), the Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation ($15,000), Dr. Pepper/Snapple ($5,000), Bayer Cropscience ($30,000), Procter and Gamble ($6,000), agribusiness giant Syngenta ($22,500), 3M ($30,000), McDonald’s ($30,000), and tobacco conglomerate Altria ($25,000). Among the corporations and foundations that ACSH has pursued for financial support since July 2012 are Pepsi, Monsanto, British American Tobacco, DowAgro, ExxonMobil Foundation, Philip Morris International, Reynolds American, the Koch family-controlled Claude R. Lambe Foundation, the Dow-linked Gerstacker Foundation, the Bradley Foundation, and the Searle Freedom Trust.”[6] ACSH has received $155,000 in contributions from Koch foundations from 2005-2011, according to Greenpeace.[7] Indefensible and incorrect statements on science ACSH has: Claimed that “There is no evidence that exposure to secondhand smoke involves heart attacks or cardiac arrest.”[8] Argued that “there is no scientific consensus concerning global warming. The climate change predictions are based on computer models that have not been validated and are far from perfect.”[9] Argued that fracking “doesn’t pollute water or air.”[10]Claimed that “The scientific evidence is clear. There has never been a case of ill health linked to the regulated, approved use of pesticides in this country.”[11] Declared that “There is no evidence that BPA [bisphenol A] in consumer products of any type, including cash register receipts, are harmful to health.”[12] Argued that the exposure to mercury, a potent neurotoxin, “in conventional seafood causes no harm in humans.”[13] Footnotes [2] “Meet the ACSH Team,” American Council on Science and Health website. [3] “Seven Sentenced for Medicaid Fraud.” United Press International, December 6, 1993. See also correspondence from Tyrone T. Butler, Director, Bureau of Adjudication, State of New York Department of Health to Claudia Morales Bloch, Gilbert Ross and Vivian Shevitz, “RE: In the Matter of Gilbert Ross, M.D.” March 1, 1995. Bill Hogan, “Paging Dr. Ross.” Mother Jones, November 2005. Martin Donohoe MD FACP, “Corporate Front Groups and the Abuse of Science: The American Council on Science and Health (ACSH).” Spinwatch, June 25, 2010. [4] Department of Health and Human Services, Departmental Appeals Board, Civil Remedies Division, In the Cases of Gilbert Ross, M.D. and Deborah Williams M.D., Petitioners, v. The Inspector General. June 16, 1997. Docket Nos. C-94-368 and C-94-369. Decision No. CR478. [5] Andy Kroll and Jeremy Schulman, “Leaked Documents Reveal the Secret Finances of a Pro-Industry Science Group.” Mother Jones, October 28, 2013. “American Council on Science and Health Financial Report, FY 2013 Financial Update.” Mother Jones, October 28, 2013. [6] Andy Kroll and Jeremy Schulman, “Leaked Documents Reveal the Secret Finances of a Pro-Industry Science Group.” Mother Jones, October 28, 2013. “American Council on Science and Health Financial Report, FY 2013 Financial Update.” Mother Jones, October 28, 2013. [7] “Koch Industries Climate Denial Front Group: American Council on Science and Health (ACSH).” Greenpeace. See also Rebekah Wilce, “Kochs and Corps Have Bankrolled American Council on Science and Health.” PR Watch, July 23, 2014. [8] Richard Craver, “The Effects of the Smoking Ban.” Winston-Salem Journal, December 12, 2012. [9] Elizabeth Whelan, “’Global Warming’ Not Health Threat.” PRI (Population Research Institute) Review, January 1, 1998. [10] Elizabeth Whelan, “Fracking Doesn’t Pose Health Risks.” The Daily Caller, April 29, 2013. [11] “TASSC: The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition,” p. 9. Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, University of California, San Francisco. November 21, 2001. Bates No. 2048294227-2048294237. [12] “The Top 10 Unfounded Health Scares of 2012.” American Council on Science and Health, February 22, 2013. [13] “The Biggest Unfounded Health Scares of 2010.” American Council on Science and Health, December 30, 2010.