Nathaniel Heidenheimer Posted July 16, 2007 Share Posted July 16, 2007 I never gave John Jr. death a second thought, until I read that article by Castro July9th, in which he describes a conversation with John Jr. about his relationship with the Kennedys. He made is seem as if John Jr. was growing more curious about the assassination. As for Flocco, I agree that he is a crackpot, but I don't think he is without a purpose. He is probably a funded tangent, connecting with truth on one point, and than fllying off into fiction, in order to poison the well. Still sometimes where there's diversionary smoke there's fire five paces to the right! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kathleen Collins Posted July 17, 2007 Author Share Posted July 17, 2007 (edited) “I still feel Tom Flocco is publishing the truth about John Kennedy Jr being murdered.” Because he’s telling what you already believe, if you want to debate the details try one of the existing threads. “I need someone to weigh in on this, whether Flocco is "tabloid" or not.” Don’t you trust your own instincts? Aren’t the stories I highlighted enough? Much as I would like Bush and Co. and Blair to have been indicted, dislike Harris and find the idea of King and Thompson working together on a porn film (though not a child snuff film) amusing , I can’t understand how can anyone take him seriously. “I took it that Flocco was a reputable journalist. I guess I was "hoaxed" into believing this.” You certainly were “And this same person also believed in Alex Jones.” What does that go to tell you? But compared to Flocco Jones is reputable. I judge sources by: 1 – Their track record 2- The reasonableness of their claims, are there any obvious discrepancies does the story violate common sense? 3- Can the story be independently collaborated? 4 – Do they have any relevant expertise? STEVE – Your recollection conforms to mine, that there are some blurry images of a man would vaguely looks like Poppa Bush by the TSBD. Len, although I sense hostility from you, I have come to the conclusion that Tom Flocco is nuts and he makes people who believe in Conspiracy in the death of John F. Kennedy look crazy. Kathy Edited July 17, 2007 by Kathleen Collins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted July 17, 2007 Share Posted July 17, 2007 I never gave John Jr. death a second thought, until I read that article by Castro July9th, in which he describes a conversation with John Jr. about his relationship with the Kennedys. He made is seem as if John Jr. was growing more curious about the assassination. I'd like to read that do you have a link? Kathy wrote: Len, although I sense hostility from you, I have come to the conclusion that Tom Flocco is nuts and he makes people who believe in Conspiracy in the death of John F. Kennedy look crazy. Sorry if I came across that way. Whether they are nuts, practical jokers, or disinfo agents I wouldn't believe anything Flocco or his associates say based on their "sources". I wouldn't feel bad for "falling for" his crap an infamous Ivy League educated "distinguised" philosophy professor, who happens to be a member of this forum, did so as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now