Stephen Miller Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 One person who is rarely mentioned in the history of the case is Lawrence Schiller. We know he works with Norman Mailer and has been mentioned in files as a chronic FBI informer. What is the full story about this man in the history of this case? Why would Schiller tell on the FBI a lot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Kelly Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 One person who is rarely mentioned in the history of the case is Lawrence Schiller. We know he works with Norman Mailer and has been mentioned in files as a chronic FBI informer. What is the full story about this man in the history of this case? Why would Schiller tell on the FBI a lot? Without having met the man, what ever side he's on, count me on the other. BK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Richards Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 I seem to recall that in the mid 1970's, Esquire Magazine was planning a publication that allegedly named a second gunman in the JFK assassination. Schiller came out with all guns blazing trying to derail the story with information supposedly from the FBI which said this man had been interviewed and that he had an air-tight alibi. Does anyone know anything about this story? A piece on Schiller below. James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hogan Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 (edited) In his book A Citizen's Dissent, Mark Lane describes how he was approached by two representatives from Capitol Records, Richard Lewis and Lawrence Schiller. They told Lane that they were producing a documentary record that would "not take sides and permit the critics and defenders to present their views." They asked Lane if he would be willing to donate his portion of the royalties to the John F Kennedy Memorial Library. Lane wanted assurance that the Library would accept the offer. Lane goes on to recount how the record, entitled "The Controversy," was nothing more than a defense brief for the Warren Report. It was adapted into a long article called simply "The Scavengers" in the World Journal Tribune. Less than three months later, Dell published The Scavengers and Critics of the Warren Report. Lane goes into detail about the inaccuracies and deficiencies of Lewis and Schiller's work and offers his take on the whole affair. He writes: "...Schiller never disclosed the fact that he was Jack Ruby's business agent and that he had kept a substantial portion of the income derived from the sale of Ruby's final story to the press. Under the circumstances, one might have thought that the word "scavenger" might have been more sparingly employed by Schiller and Lewis." Edited August 11, 2007 by Michael Hogan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Drago Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 James, I'm flying by the seat of my pants here, but didn't Robert Sam Anson write for Esquire? So perhaps it was an excerpt from They've Killed the President that was spiked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Miller Posted August 11, 2007 Author Share Posted August 11, 2007 Anything else to add about Schiller? He sounds like a scavenger and a good old-fashioned opportunist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 Anything else to add about Schiller? He sounds like a scavenger and a good old-fashioned opportunist. Wikipedia: Lawrence Schiller was born in 1936 in Brooklyn, and grew up outside of San Diego, California. After graduating from Pepperdine College, he went to work for Life Magazine and the Saturday Evening Post as a photojournalist. He published his first book, LSD, in 1966. Since then he has published eleven books, including W. Eugene Smith's Minamata and Norman Mailer's Marilyn. He collaborated with Albert Goldman on Ladies and Gentleman, Lenny Bruce and with Norman Mailer on The Executioner's Song and Oswald's Tale. He had directed seven motion pictures and miniseries for television; The Executioner's Song and Peter the Great won five Emmys. Mr. Schiller is a consultant to NBC news and has recently written for The New Yorker and George magazine. From 1996 through 2002, Mr. Schiller published four books that became national bestsellers: American Tragedy, October 1996; Perfect Murder, Perfect Town, February, 1999; Into the Mirror, April 2002 and Cape May Court House, September, 2002, all made the New York Times Bestseller list. American Tragedy, Perfect Murder, Perfect Town and Into the Mirror were made into television mini-series for CBS. Mr. Schiller produced and directed each of the motion pictures. His previous motion pictures are: Double Jeopardy (Producer/Director); The Plot to Kill Hitler (Director); Margaret Bourke-White (Producer/Director); The Executioner's Song, 2 Emmy Awards, (Producer Director); Peter the Great, 3 Emmy Awards, (Executive Producer/Director); Murder: By Reason of Insanity (Producer); Her Life As a Man (Producer); The Patricia Neal Story, 1 Emmy Award, (Producer); Child Bride of Short Creek (Co-Producer); Marilyn, The Untold Story, 1 Emmy Award, (Producer/Co-Director); The Winds of Kitty Hawk (Producer); Hey, I'm Alive (Producer/Director); The Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald (Producer); The Man Who Skied Down Everest, (USA Director). Previous books as author or in collaboration with: Oswald's Tale, An American Mystery by Norman Mailer; I Want to Tell You by O.J. Simpson; The Executioner's Song by Norman Mailer; Ladies and Gentlemen, Lenny Bruce by Albert Goldman and Lawrence Schiller; LSD by Richard Albert, Sidney Cohen and Lawrence Schiller. Previous books produced: Marilyn by Norman Mailer; Sunshine by Norma Klein; Minamata by W. Eugene Smith; Muhammad Ali by Wilfrid Sheed; The Faith of Graffiti by Norman Mailer; Masters of Contemporary Photography book series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Wexler Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 Actually, if anyone could pry Schiller's JFK assassination investigatory materials from him, it would probably be quite revealing. For all his anti-conspiracism, his behind-the-scenes work on the Garrison case, from what little has been revealed, apparently supported aspects of Garrison's case. He apparently did not share that information with Garrison but Schiller's FBI reports seem to substantiate, among other things, that Shaw was Bertrand. Someone want to try and attempt to run him down? -Stu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 Schiller was one of the earliest to shoot "reconstruction" photos of the backyard photos. I have a copy somewhere in my files. His participation in the OJ affair is also interesting. As I recall, he gained OJ's confidence with false promises, then wrote a book against him. My opinion...he is a scavenger, looking for SENSATION FOR PROFIT, not the truth. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Miller Posted August 11, 2007 Author Share Posted August 11, 2007 Well said, Jack. Just a good old-fashioned scavenger and opportunist. What did Schiller know about the assasination and why would he want to engage in such questionable practices such as informing the FBI and lying to people and ripping them off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Drago Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 Speaking of O.J., Donald Freed's Killing Time is a must-read analysis of the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Miller Posted August 11, 2007 Author Share Posted August 11, 2007 Did Schiller turn in any of his files to the ARRB in the 1990s? I think it also would be tough trying to obtain them from him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 (edited) Speaking of O.J., Donald Freed's Killing Time is a must-read analysis of the case. Agreed. But William Dear's "OJ Is Guilty But Not of Murder" is likely closer to the truth. Having followed the case in extreme detail, I believe OJ is covering for son Jason...the only logical suspect. I once had the opportunity to talk to Alan Dershowitz about the trial and told him my theory. He replied, "Interesting. You know he is the only suspect without an alibi." Jack Edited August 11, 2007 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Jeffries Posted August 12, 2007 Share Posted August 12, 2007 They should put Schiller's photo alongside the dictionary definition of "sensationalist." From his despicable work on the "Scavengers" book, to Gary Gilmore, Jon Benet Ramsey and O.J., this parasite has managed to inject himself into most of the sensational murder cases in modern history. Imho, he's the print version of Geraldo. As was mentioned in an earlier post, it's a good rule of thumb to consider what Schiller's view is on any given issue, and then take the opposite position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Geraghty Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 I recall hearing that Schiller was supposedly the intellectual author of the Warren Report. Let me try to confirm where I heard this from. Also, his name rings a bell with something to do with Operation Paperclip. Don't mean to leave you all hanging. I'll get sources. John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now