Craig Lamson Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 Twyman and Ryan can be totally dismissed Thats a bold statement Of course Craig makes it without having read "Bloody Treason" besides the .00001% of the book that I just posted And its that small percentage that embodies my comments. I don't really care about the rest. Now deano, you still gonna pimp these guys as it deals with 302-303? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted December 27, 2009 Author Share Posted December 27, 2009 Twyman and Ryan can be totally dismissed Thats a bold statement Of course Craig makes it without having read "Bloody Treason" besides the .00001% of the book that I just posted And its that small percentage that embodies my comments. I don't really care about the rest. Now deano, you still gonna pimp these guys as it deals with 302-303? You should care about the rest of the book Oh thats right, you dont care who killed JFK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 (edited) Twyman and Ryan can be totally dismissed Thats a bold statement Of course Craig makes it without having read "Bloody Treason" besides the .00001% of the book that I just posted And its that small percentage that embodies my comments. I don't really care about the rest. Now deano, you still gonna pimp these guys as it deals with 302-303? You should care about the rest of the book Oh thats right, you dont care who killed JFK You are right. I don't care who killed JFK. Now deano, you still gonna pimp these guys as it deals with 302-303? Edited December 27, 2009 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted December 27, 2009 Author Share Posted December 27, 2009 Twyman and Ryan can be totally dismissed Thats a bold statement Of course Craig makes it without having read "Bloody Treason" besides the .00001% of the book that I just posted And its that small percentage that embodies my comments. I don't really care about the rest. Now deano, you still gonna pimp these guys as it deals with 302-303? You should care about the rest of the book Oh thats right, you dont care who killed JFK You are right. I don't care who killed JFK. Now deano, you still gonna pimp these guys as it deals with 302-303? I will always back Noel Twyman no matter what, and I back Twymans work when it involves Ryan as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 I will always back Noel Twyman no matter what, and I back Twymans work when it involves Ryan as well Wow...deano believes! lordy lordy, deano believes! Or do you have solid empirical data to back up your slavish devotion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted December 27, 2009 Author Share Posted December 27, 2009 I will always back Noel Twyman no matter what, and I back Twymans work when it involves Ryan as well Wow...deano believes! lordy lordy, deano believes! Or do you have solid empirical data to back up your slavish devotion? Of course I have solid empirical data All you have to do is buy "Bloody Treason" Twyman does a masterful job of backing up his theories Sorry Craig but while I dont mind scanning pages to post to show you and Len wrong I am not going to scan 900+ pages, and even if I did it is against the law to post Start saving now Craig, you can get a good copy in the $100.00 range Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 I will always back Noel Twyman no matter what, and I back Twymans work when it involves Ryan as well Wow...deano believes! lordy lordy, deano believes! Or do you have solid empirical data to back up your slavish devotion? Of course I have solid empirical data All you have to do is buy "Bloody Treason" Twyman does a masterful job of backing up his theories Sorry Craig but while I dont mind scanning pages to post to show you and Len wrong I am not going to scan 900+ pages, and even if I did it is against the law to post Start saving now Craig, you can get a good copy in the $100.00 range Dean...we all know that Lamson cannot read, so why would he waste his stipend on a book? Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted December 27, 2009 Author Share Posted December 27, 2009 I will always back Noel Twyman no matter what, and I back Twymans work when it involves Ryan as well Wow...deano believes! lordy lordy, deano believes! Or do you have solid empirical data to back up your slavish devotion? Of course I have solid empirical data All you have to do is buy "Bloody Treason" Twyman does a masterful job of backing up his theories Sorry Craig but while I dont mind scanning pages to post to show you and Len wrong I am not going to scan 900+ pages, and even if I did it is against the law to post Start saving now Craig, you can get a good copy in the $100.00 range Dean...we all know that Lamson cannot read, so why would he waste his stipend on a book? Jack I know Jack Im really trying to help Craig but it looks as if im wasting my time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 I will always back Noel Twyman no matter what, and I back Twymans work when it involves Ryan as well Wow...deano believes! lordy lordy, deano believes! Or do you have solid empirical data to back up your slavish devotion? Of course I have solid empirical data All you have to do is buy "Bloody Treason" Twyman does a masterful job of backing up his theories Sorry Craig but while I dont mind scanning pages to post to show you and Len wrong I am not going to scan 900+ pages, and even if I did it is against the law to post Start saving now Craig, you can get a good copy in the $100.00 range What, you can't put the arguments into your own words? You can't defend them by showing how you checked them for accuracy? You need someone else to do it for you? And silly me I thought deano understood the stuff he scanned proved Twyman wrong? Man was I mistaken. Deano does not even understand what empirical evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 I will always back Noel Twyman no matter what, and I back Twymans work when it involves Ryan as well Wow...deano believes! lordy lordy, deano believes! Or do you have solid empirical data to back up your slavish devotion? Of course I have solid empirical data All you have to do is buy "Bloody Treason" Twyman does a masterful job of backing up his theories Sorry Craig but while I dont mind scanning pages to post to show you and Len wrong I am not going to scan 900+ pages, and even if I did it is against the law to post Start saving now Craig, you can get a good copy in the $100.00 range Dean...we all know that Lamson cannot read, so why would he waste his stipend on a book? Jack Whats the matter Jack, dog eat whats left of your brain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted December 28, 2009 Author Share Posted December 28, 2009 I will always back Noel Twyman no matter what, and I back Twymans work when it involves Ryan as well Wow...deano believes! lordy lordy, deano believes! Or do you have solid empirical data to back up your slavish devotion? Of course I have solid empirical data All you have to do is buy "Bloody Treason" Twyman does a masterful job of backing up his theories Sorry Craig but while I dont mind scanning pages to post to show you and Len wrong I am not going to scan 900+ pages, and even if I did it is against the law to post Start saving now Craig, you can get a good copy in the $100.00 range What, you can't put the arguments into your own words? You can't defend them by showing how you checked them for accuracy? You need someone else to do it for you? And silly me I thought deano understood the stuff he scanned proved Twyman wrong? Man was I mistaken. Deano does not even understand what empirical evidence. How did it prove Twyman wrong? Because you said so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 (edited) I will always back Noel Twyman no matter what, and I back Twymans work when it involves Ryan as well Wow...deano believes! lordy lordy, deano believes! Or do you have solid empirical data to back up your slavish devotion? Of course I have solid empirical data All you have to do is buy "Bloody Treason" Twyman does a masterful job of backing up his theories Sorry Craig but while I dont mind scanning pages to post to show you and Len wrong I am not going to scan 900+ pages, and even if I did it is against the law to post Start saving now Craig, you can get a good copy in the $100.00 range What, you can't put the arguments into your own words? You can't defend them by showing how you checked them for accuracy? You need someone else to do it for you? And silly me I thought deano understood the stuff he scanned proved Twyman wrong? Man was I mistaken. Deano does not even understand what empirical evidence. How did it prove Twyman wrong? Because you said so? Twyman proved himself wrong and you posted it for all to see. He said the limo was in sharp focus and not blurred in 302-303. and the background blur was gone in 303 Nothing could be further from the truth. How did this escape you? Lost in awe and wonder and unable to think for yourself? Edited December 28, 2009 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now