Jack White Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 A few researchers, like me, deal mostly in IMAGES. Some researchers never post images. All members here are allotted THE SAME AMOUNT OF IMAGE SPACE. Though equal, this is highly inequitable. I can no longer post my research to the forum because of this unreasonable limit, which should be altered. It is the forum's loss, not mine, that members will have no further access to my research. Members who will miss future pictorial research from me should ask that this problem be fixed. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Crane Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 (edited) I will be the first person to step up and ask for this problem to be fixed. Edited January 9, 2010 by Michael Crane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evan Burton Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Jack, Just ask John via a PM. I am sure he'd increase you limit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Of course like the rest of us (other than John) Jack doesn't spend a penny to participate here yet he arrogantly demands to be given more space and proclaims that "It is the forum's loss, not mine" if he can no longer post his rubbish here. Storage space = bandwidth = money, perhaps he'd be willing to make a contribution. The other option of course is to use free 3rd party hosting sites. In addition to not using up the forum's bandwidth (thus not costing John anything) it allows unlimited uploading of images which unlike forum attachments are visible to visitors and member's who aren't logged in.This has been explained to Jack, along with the extremely simple process, repeatedly. But Jack would rather play the victim/primadonna. Stop whining Jack and use Photo Bucket, Image Shack or any of various other free hosting sites. If any one (including Jack) wants the process explained to them I'll do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Of course like the rest of us (other than John) Jack doesn't spend a penny to participate here yet he arrogantly demands to be given more space and proclaims that "It is the forum's loss, not mine" if he can no longer post his rubbish here. Storage space = bandwidth = money, perhaps he'd be willing to make a contribution.The other option of course is to use free 3rd party hosting sites. In addition to not using up the forum's bandwidth (thus not costing John anything) it allows unlimited uploading of images which unlike forum attachments are visible to visitors and member's who aren't logged in.This has been explained to Jack, along with the extremely simple process, repeatedly. But Jack would rather play the victim/primadonna. Stop whining Jack and use Photo Bucket, Image Shack or any of various other free hosting sites. If any one (including Jack) wants the process explained to them I'll do so. I always use a 3rd party hosting site Even Myspace works! Just upload the image, click on it to get the image to its bigger size, right click and select properties, then highlight the address, copy it, then use the picture icon and paste the address I have never and will never use the forum to upload an image Jack can have all of my image space Dean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted January 9, 2010 Author Share Posted January 9, 2010 (edited) Of course like the rest of us (other than John) Jack doesn't spend a penny to participate here yet he arrogantly demands to be given more space and proclaims that "It is the forum's loss, not mine" if he can no longer post his rubbish here. Storage space = bandwidth = money, perhaps he'd be willing to make a contribution.The other option of course is to use free 3rd party hosting sites. In addition to not using up the forum's bandwidth (thus not costing John anything) it allows unlimited uploading of images which unlike forum attachments are visible to visitors and member's who aren't logged in.This has been explained to Jack, along with the extremely simple process, repeatedly. But Jack would rather play the victim/primadonna. Stop whining Jack and use Photo Bucket, Image Shack or any of various other free hosting sites. If any one (including Jack) wants the process explained to them I'll do so. I always use a 3rd party hosting site Even Myspace works! Just upload the image, click on it to get the image to its bigger size, right click and select properties, then highlight the address, copy it, then use the picture icon and paste the address I have never and will never use the forum to upload an image Jack can have all of my image space Dean Thanks, Dean...but I have no time to get involved in "third party" sites. It is all I can do to do all the things I do...including managing a history site with 60+ members, and corresponding with them in 20 to 30 emails a day, plus producing 3 or 4 pages daily. My members include teachers, authors, historians, photographers and lots of history buffs. Take a look, and you will see what takes MOST of my time. http://www.fortwortharchitecture.com/oldftw/oldftw.htm I am interested in all kinds of history, not just JFK. Jack Edited January 9, 2010 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Hagerman Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Of course like the rest of us (other than John) Jack doesn't spend a penny to participate here yet he arrogantly demands to be given more space and proclaims that "It is the forum's loss, not mine" if he can no longer post his rubbish here. Storage space = bandwidth = money, perhaps he'd be willing to make a contribution.The other option of course is to use free 3rd party hosting sites. In addition to not using up the forum's bandwidth (thus not costing John anything) it allows unlimited uploading of images which unlike forum attachments are visible to visitors and member's who aren't logged in.This has been explained to Jack, along with the extremely simple process, repeatedly. But Jack would rather play the victim/primadonna. Stop whining Jack and use Photo Bucket, Image Shack or any of various other free hosting sites. If any one (including Jack) wants the process explained to them I'll do so. I always use a 3rd party hosting site Even Myspace works! Just upload the image, click on it to get the image to its bigger size, right click and select properties, then highlight the address, copy it, then use the picture icon and paste the address I have never and will never use the forum to upload an image Jack can have all of my image space Dean Thanks, Dean...but I have no time to get involved in "third party" sites. It is all I can do to do all the things I do...including managing a history site with 60+ members, and corresponding with them in 20 to 30 emails a day, plus producing 3 or 4 pages daily. My members include teachers, authors, historians, photographers and lots of history buffs. Take a look, and you will see what takes MOST of my time. http://www.fortwortharchitecture.com/oldftw/oldftw.htm I am interested in all kinds of history, not just JFK. Jack Very nice Jack I am very proud of my home city of Redding CA like you are of Ft Worth, I own many books and videos on Reddings history and 2 books of vintage pictures of my city, so the website that you run I can appreciate very much Like I said if its possible you can have all of my image uploading space if John can do that Dean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now